/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>19022938
no proof, no credibility.

>>19022938
just sign bro

>Specializes in C++, Bitcoin was written in C++

>Degree in Distributed Computing

>b-money/hashcash Mailing Lists line up

Not even watching. Want cryptographic proofs.

>>19023085
You're not gonna get it. Back might do it on his death bed, but he has no reason to do it now. He has too many responsibilities with Blockstream and Bitcoin investors that would be ruined with the signature.

Satoshi has contacted all major candidates of being Satoshi EXCEPT Adam Back. He pretends that Satoshi has corresponded with him and that he's shredded the emails to protect Satoshi's identity, but has demonstrated that he never really cared about protecting Satoshi's supposed "identity" by pointing to Paul Le Roux in order to direct attention away from himself.

Thanks for this OP
Filled in a lot of gaps for me

THIS VIDEO IS GETTING REMOVED ON R/BITCOIN FOR UNCOVERING THEIR CENSORSHIP REGIME

>>19022938
>No convo in emails between him and Satoshi found
>His website was very similar, i.e no design, to the initial Bitcoin website
>Initially Adam was the only one excited about this technology while other cryptographers didn't bat an eye

Yoinked this is the biggest sell signal I have ever seen

>>19022952
Cringe
Watch the video

He wanted money from Bitcoin without people knowing when Satoshi would sell coins.

Hence: Blockstream. $100 million in investments. My theory is that Adam showed his investors the signature and his investors signed a non disclosure agreement. That's the only way Adam could've gotten so much capital, because he hasn't wrote a single line of code for Blockstream.

It was the best of both worlds, the perfect crime. People who didn't know who Satoshi was would buy Bitcoin, driving it's price up, and people who did know who Satoshi was would invest in Blockstream. Either way, Adam comes out as the winner.

>>19025032
And this will do nothing to Bitcoin, because as long as Adam doesn't publicly show the signature, he still has plausible deniability. You have to respect it.

>>19022938
Yeah, after watching the video there's no doubt in my mind.

Sounds interadesting, about to watch

I wondered how it could be him when I've never even heard his name before in, but then that would make sense if he was hiding his identity

>>19025249
sir gay is Barely Sociable.
He's covering his tracks.
Look at part 2 where he talks about satoshi selling his bitcoins - he left an easter egg admitting to it.

>>19022938
KYS SCAMMER

Fuck off

>>19022995
this

>>19025906
What does Satoshi have to gain from signing publicly? Wouldn't he gain more from signing privately for investors?

>>19022938
The name Satoshi Nakamoto came from Dorian Nakamoto. What are the chances that Hal Finney, a well experienced cypherpunk, lived in the same town as the only person named Satoshi Nakamoto? Hal also was the first besides Satoshi to use the software and received the first transaction.

It's not out of the question that it was a team and that Adam Back could be one of the main contributors to the creation and debugging. Adam fits the bill as the coder and the author of the whitepaper when you compare his previous whitepaper entries.

Adam, Wei Dai, Hal, and Szabo along with Ian Grigg had their hand in the Satoshi huddle. It could be Adam Back was funded $100 Million and the coins mined by Satoshi were a part of a giveaway to those that invested. If you see who funded Blockstream, those are groups that were given bags of Bitcoin under the table by Adam.

>>19022938

Holy shit, just watched this, fantastic video.

I am 100% convinced Adam Back is Satoshi, without a fucking doubt.

>>19026239
And he seems like an annoying faggot too

>>19026239
>>19026269
cringe samefag

I don't care which balding nerd invented what
I want money

>>19022938
#anyonebutcraig #notmysatoshi

>>19025838
this

Satoshi's last email in May 2011 said "I’ve moved on to other things and probably won’t be around in the future"

Hal's last post before he died. March 19 2013 was essentially him saying goodbye.

"I got a surprise in 2009, when I was suddenly diagnosed with a fatal disease"

"but fatigue and voice problems forced me to retire in early 2011"

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=155054.msg1643833#msg1643833

>>19022938

This video was extremely shocking to me. It gets everything right about the censorship on /r/Bitcoin, the history of Mike Hearn and Gavin Andresen trying to do the right thing by increasing the block-size, their getting shoved out by the Blockstream, the capturing of Bitcoin by the banks, the creation of Bitcoin Cash. However, the narrative until now was that Bitcoin Cash was fulfilling Satoshi's original vision. Can it really be the case that Satoshi was the villain all along? Where does that leave BCH?

One thing that casts doubt on the video for me is that Adam Back doesn't seem to be grammatically intelligent enough to be Satoshi. As I write he's posting in the /btc/ subreddit making spiteful comments like this one:

https://www.reddit.com/r/btc/comments/gf3w7f/when_even_i_as_a_fan_of_bitcoincom_am_annoyed_by/fprdthw/?context=3

"this whole sub-reddit is a shill controlled/moderated forum. a long list of bitcoin.con products on the side-panel, all moderators u/memorydealers employees.

all directly against reddit policy fwiw. but whatever Roger is a fraudster engaging in mis-selling, so that what passes for normal around here.

ps what happened to Roger's other compay memorydealers.com it redirects to a tweet ranting about being investigated for fraud or something."

Terrible grammar; no capitalization; childish abbreviations like "fwiw," vulgarisms like "or something." It isn't the way Satoshi wrote, nor is this the attitude he ever had. One person is making claims on the /r/btc thread that the other e-mail, which the Youtube video cites, was hacked as well; but I don't know how to verify this.

>>19027037

This is what I also find confusing about the Adam Back identification. Satoshi clearly had a strong affection for Mike Hearn, because he had a lengthy correspondence with him into 2011, and Hearn was the last person he spoke to. He also liked Gavin Andresen: his last e-mail literally says, "I’ve moved on to other things. It’s in good hands with Gavin and everyone." So why would Adam Back turn on Andresen and Hearn and treat them so horribly if he really is Satoshi?

Again, we all know what the original white paper envisions Bitcoin to be, which is a decentralized peer-to-peer cash system. We know that Satoshi didn't like mainstream banks. We also know that Satoshi indicated that he supported increasing the block size. So why would he turn on his long-cherished principles, and support this "digital gold" idea, and these evil second-layer solutions which track and centralize everything you do?

>it turns out to be reddit controlled printed fake money with a cult community that's in it for the money
>completely centralized and private
it should be collapsing in price right now but nothing is happening

Damn, not gonna lie.

Video was astonishingly convincing.

>>19022938
Just finished watching the entire video. The video is incredibly well researched and convincing af.

>>19027136
Greed? Most projects start off with honest intentions, but people change when money and power come with success

I'm sure there's lots of companies or websites or apps that you used to love, because they were clean and pure, until over time they become corrupted by money and advertisers or new owners

We've built Satoshi up in or minds so much, at the end of the day he's just a guy who had a great idea and over time his values changed

the end of the documentary sucks though. hal finney himself said there should be a layer 2 because bitcoin cant scale

So Satoshi ruined bitcoin. Made it unscalable and nonTC. Just admit it's Craig and get on your knees.

>>19027523

Hal Finney never said that 1 mb blocks should be kept, or that we all ought to run our own nodes at home. He never advocated second-layer solutions at the expense of neutering the basic infrastructure. That's the point at issue. BCH can be enhanced, eventually, with second-layer technology, while still providing fast, anonymous, and inexpensive transactions for the entire world. BTC, with scale, will never be anything but a centralized tracking system.

"Bitcoin can already scale much larger than [Visa] with existing hardware for a fraction of the cost.It never really hits a scale ceiling."

- Satoshi Nakamoto

"The bandwidth might not be as prohibitive as you think. A typical transaction would be about 400 bytes (ECC is nicely compact). Each transaction has to be broadcast twice, so lets say 1KB per transaction. Visa processed 37 billion transactions in FY2008, or an average of 100 million transactions per day. That many transactions would take 100GB of bandwidth, or the size of 12 DVD or 2 HD quality movies, or about $18 worth of bandwidth at current prices.

If the network were to get that big, it would take several years, and by then, sending 2 HD movies over the Internet would probably not seem like a big deal."

- Satoshi Nakamoto

True or not, this video is manipulative bullshit. Jump yourself to 3:49 and listen to the interview https://youtu.be/XfcvX0P1b5g?t=2210

This guy talks about how *some* people are free thinkers but most are mind controlled NPCs. Goes on to say that Satoshi's identity should not be revealed because it would create an identity for NPCs to look up to and the MSM would try pull their J*wish tricks. The narrator preys on the short attention span of his audience and says "hurr hurr looks like this guy doesn't like people thinking for themselves". Either he's retarded or trying to manipulate you.

>>19028274
36:49 BTW. Typo.

The fact that Adam Back is addressing this piece by piece is surprising and says a lot about his level of concern. He's getting full defensive mode on Twitter.

https://twitter.com/SociableBarely/status/1259984192454029314

Why is it not huge news already? I've literally never seen most of the evidence he showed on the video.
And r/bitcoin is banning anyone who posts it there, lmao

>>19029090
Its getting big on r/btc and twitter is heating up. If this hits mainstream news, its gonna be one helluva drama lmao

>>19027523

Hal Finney was just spitballing when he said that. noone was actually taking bitcoin seriously then.

>>19022938

more like Adam Hack, inventor of Bitcoin Tab™

>>19022938
great video.

>>19028492
legally he can claim he is not satoshi nakomoto, and that the identity exists as a separate entity.
I would think there is no precedence for this, but also there is no jurisdiction so I don't think he can be charged for anything. From there he can privately do whatever he wants with the coins.

Intelligent to claim no relationship even if it's apparent in the future you controlled the id. Similar to acting as an executive of an LLC.

>>19026006
>your face when coretards are using the exact same arguments that CSW has been making, for why Adam back is actually Satoshi and not CSW

LOL full circle retardation

>>19027216
Up until the last part where it turns out: Tadaaa!! Satoshi is actually the bad guy!

Satoshi is blockstream and he supports censorship and social media manipulation that would make intelligence agencies blush, he went back on his vision to scale bitcoin and what Satoshi really wanted all along was to keep the blocksize at 1 mb so he could create garbage centralized solution on top to increase profits for blockstream!

It was the master plan!

Very crafty, that Satoshi guy.

>>19027300
>>19027216
>>19026338
>>19026239

go back.

>>19027037
dude, just stop
hal AUDITED bitcoin
he did not come up with it
his greatest contrib was going against what satoshi wanted and implemented the 1MB that saved bitcoin from mike hearn and the other numbskulls

hal isn't satoshi but in some ways he is more important than him

>>19026006
>>19030895
that's called false flag

>>19022938
its not me guys. keep buying Bitcoin!
oh and if you say its me on reddit, 360 day ban. dunno what that is about. >reddit, right?
oh and I just live on this small island where many infamous historical kangz lived. nothing suspicious. I moved to Malta, an EU tax haven - in 2009. pure coincidence, dumb goy. now keep using Bitcoin. Do not use BitcoinXL or any other coins! Keep the limits low and the fees high! Printing money for me! fucking idiots!

>>19022938
What's his endgame? why did satoshi end up being a corrupt greedy fuck?

>>19027044
>Blockstream is Verified on twitter

>>19028492
The fact that he's basically doing full on damage control just makes him look super guilty. If he just addressed the video casually like "hey, great video! can't really comment on the validity of the claims but an interesting watch!" it would be a lot less suspicious. Coupled with r*ddit mods deleting shit and banning people, it all looks really damning.

>>19031857
He's not Satoshi. He's a CIA operative who forced out the people Satoshi entrusted with the Bitcoin project: Gavin Andresen and Mike Hearn. The video even covers that.

Since then, BTC has been in the hands of Blockstream a CIA front, tasked with restraining ans sabotaging Bitcoin from EVER scaling.

Satoshi Nakamoto was always a big blocker and wanted aggressive scaling on-chain. Therefore, anyone in the core camp can not be Satoshi, including the glownigger who literally did a coup on Bitcoin, Adam Back.

>>19031779
harsh narrative twist for the cashies but maybe it's salvageable

https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/
honestly, it is baffling to me, how this all happened. Some dudes made a digital coin. private secret conversations and development occurred. suddenly big players were "invested" in it and then the coin begin to sharply rise in value, going from fucking 1 cent a coin to like $100+ then $1000+ then $10000+ a coin over years.
Then you get the normalfags, fueled by greed, with not a single brain cell working in their heads, to go and trade all their real money for this magical coin that will x10000000 and make them rich doing nothing but holding onto it.
They follow your coin like a cult. Like a bunch of fucking cultists. They all have wallets full of your garbage coins.
They handed you billions and billions of dollars for writing some C++ code and calling it a currency.
This was all planned, not only by the developers, but forces very high, without names, big money. It was all planned from the beginning to profit in the billions together, in a small elite few, while the sheep held the useless data coins you created, hoping to get a small pittance of wealth from a fucking con.
Historians in 100+ years will study this. The greatest con in human history. Actually, maybe the whole banking system and its inception was worse. Its still here.

>>19030988
Noooooooo!!!!! You can't support a p2p currency you should have terabyte size blocks so governments can shut it down.

>>19032000
this is better than
>>19032004

>check the actual reddit accounts from the highest voted / awarded posters on r/bitcoin
>account created 2020
endless keks

>>19032018
BTC is not supposed to be a P2P currency, did you forget your talking points today?

It's just a store of value!!!! Digital gold!! If you want a currency fucking use FIAT!!!! If you want to use Bitcoin as a currency, you are evil and dumb and old and a cultist and ...

Can we get a mod in here to delete this thread please? Discussion regarding this video needs to be properly controlled.

>>19029090
news won't cover the truth. the news media is literally modern day propaganda. why do you think they all report the same shit in unison? their masters tell them what to dribble to the public masses.
go google what happens to journalists who try report the truth.

>>19022938
Fuck me. I cannot believe this shit. At least the ethereum furrie developers are not as shady as this. Fuck, how long before this fucker cashes out his billions worth of btc?

>>19027136
because of money

What happened when they last "discovered" who Satoshi was? Journalists got onto it, there was a media storm of articles even normies read about it. Why happened to the price? Did it dump? History will repeat

>>19032000
thats depressing

>>19032000
>He's not Satoshi. He's a CIA
Pills... take them

Time to dump my bitcoin for physical metals.

Peter Schiff was fucking RIGHT

>>19032677
Blockstream arrived for damage control.

Pic related is definitely Satoshi! Sounds exactly like his vision for Bitcoin kek

>>19032821
You know btc is not the only cryprocurrency out there right?

>>19032837
If bitcoin fails that's 70% of the crypto market dead.

I am getting out before this ponzi collapses, I am putting it all into physical silver. That way my value is in something real, and isn't manipulated by some cult.

>>19022938
>Nakamoto would promote Segwit, Lightning, small blocks and be bankrolled by bankers

We've reached peak retard.

>>19032931
He would for hard fiat and connections. Remember the undeniable truth of crypto, everyone's goal is to eventually cash out into fiat with profits, yourself included.

>>19032963
Speak for yourself, you disgusting degenerate.

>>19032976
lel ok, you plan on holding onto that crypto forever, right? Don't be a virtue signaler

Natoshi Sakamoto is Dan Aykroyd.

>>19032963
The Satoshi Vision everybody! We can all go home now, we figured out the true purpose of Bitcoin was always to funnel money into the hands of Blockstream employees!

>>19022938
Good clues, zero proofs. Cute.

>>19022938

Adam doesn't have character needed to be Satoshi
Also whoever thinks Blockstream wouldn't raise a lousy $100m is an idiot. CMC sold to binance for $400m recently. Do you know how little $100m is when we're talking about top 10 entities in the space?

>>19033010
>holding the world's new money system
Yes I plan on doing that forever.

>>19022938
meh.
The email could easily have been faked/hacked
There's no smoking gun, just a whole lot of circumstantial stuff. Much like with others such as Szabo (who also described something very similar to Bitcoin before it was released)

This guy is Satoshi. Currently works on Tezos

>>19032837

Peter Schiff cannot see any intrinsic value in cryptocurrency. I do, which is why Bircoin Cash, for example, excites me. But nobody knows, at this time, which cryptocurrency will definitely succeed. That's why Peter Schiff is more right than anybody else about the subject, and why the allocation of a sensible person has to be 1% crypto, 99% precious metals.

>>19032837

Peter Schiff cannot see any intrinsic value in cryptocurrency. I do, which is why Bitcoin Cash, for example, excites me, which aims to make every human being his own private bank. But nobody knows, at this time, which cryptocurrency will definitely succeed. That's why Peter Schiff is more right than anybody else about the subject, and why the allocation of a sensible person has to be 1% crypto, 99% precious metals.

Additionally, he spends most of his time keeping people out of Bitcoin BTC, which is the one currency which definitely won't succeed. And, even if it did, there would be terrible consequences for humanity.

>>19024124
>>19029090
>>19031779

The censorship on /r/Bitcoin does not necessarily prove that Adam Back is Satoshi. /r/Bitcoin would have a vested interest in censoring the video because of the information in the first half of the video, about Mike Hearn, Gavin Andresen, censorship on /r/Bitcoin, community support for scaling the block-size, the undercutting of the community by Blockstream, the creation of /r/btc and Bitcoin Cash.

>>19033687
OMG REDDIT BITCOIN THATS MY FAVOURITE BITCOIN WEBSITE OMG YAYAYAYAYAYAAAAAAAAAY

>>19024124
Who the fuck cares about rBitcoin in 2020? Fucking redditfags.

>>19024828
cringe
If you see a proof in this video you don't know what a proof is

>>19026338
The lesson is jews got your money, and jews don't share money. Get out while you can. #WhiteSamsonOption

>>19022938
Good research, plausible theory, but wow that was a lot of butthurt.
> reeeee bigger blocksizes, I have to buy coffee with cryptocurrencies!!

>>19026338
Basado

>>19030988
The only plan ever was to get rich. Freedumbs and all that bullshit were marketing for the goyim. He's a kike. #WhiteSamsonOption

>>19032016
Look at Adam Back's kike face and know hate. #WhiteSamsonOption

it's the day of the 3rd halving and if you STILL don't understand the scaling debate then you're a fucking retard

Full damage control mode. OH NONONO HAHAHAHAHA

>>19034074
Lurk more retard. He's not jewish.

>>19022938
Damn, this really blackpilled me on blockstream desu

btc is illegitimate

>>19034292
most of the info was always out there but severely suppressed and fudded, this vid really puts a comprehensive case together for blockstream's efforts to parasitize bitcoin. this is more important than the identity of satoshi but it gets way more attention if it has satoshi in the title. excellent video and i hope it gets more traction. fuck blockstream kikes and fuck craig wright.

>>19034215
Of course he is.

If you were convinced by that video you are a full blown clown with the indoeendence of a sheep.

>>19034794
i think it was more about exposing blockstream's subversion of the movement, the satoshi title is just clickbait to get more views and exposure.

>>19034862
this lol.
The creator is based af.
After years of censorship and propaganda, one man destroyed all that kikestream aimed to achieve. The satoshi part is 15% of the entire video just so he can justify the video title.

>>19022938
This is pretty compelling info. Thanks OP.

Just going to leave some links here for people who want to learn more about the part of the video which deals with censorship and the block-size debate.

https://blog.plan99.net/the-resolution-of-the-bitcoin-experiment-dabb30201f7

https://medium.com/@johnblocke/a-brief-and-incomplete-history-of-censorship-in-r-bitcoin-c85a290fe43

https://medium.com/@johnblocke/r-bitcoin-censorship-revisited-58d5b1bdcd64

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UYHFrf5ci_g

https://medium.com/scalar-capital/the-bitcoin-cash-story-e55b277491f9

https://medium.com/@jonaldfyookball/12-reasons-bitcoin-cash-is-the-real-bitcoin-8d5547988374

https://www.reddit.com/r/btc/comments/89z483/ama_ask_mike_anything/

https://txstreet.com/beta

Imagine being so self-obsessed that you create and edit your own wikipedia.

>>19022938
> double space

Not on twitter for sure.

Please give examples where you see AB using double spaces.

>>19035024
it's literally in the video you braindead ape

ETH is the future, fuck BTC centralized boomer coin

>>19033047
You are right, Satoshi obviously envisioned a future where you could pseudonymously buy a coffee using a system where a sizable portion of the planet's computer power would be involved in ensuring the coffee payment would not be double spent.

>>19022938
So Craig was right when he said that "Satoshi is dead, long live Satoshi"

Buy BSV

>>19035251
post a pic of your hand curry boy

>>19035258

>>19035265
if that's real, you are either insane or a fool.

>>19035292

>>19035297
absolute mad lad, good luck to you lol you're gonna need it

>>19034862
Adam Back is the CEO of Blocksteam. And Satoshi Nakamoto came out and inexplicably railed against fixing the scaling problem which benefited Blockstream. And Blockstream censors r/bitcoin.

>>19035502
i was just looking at r/bitcoin and r/btc out of curiosity, and the former seems to be completely devoid of content or discussion, just shit memes like pic related.
the latter seems to have a fair bit of butthurt about the censorship on bitcoin but also some useful threads and generally a more interesting community. just another example about how heavy moderation can turn a forum into an intellectual wasteland

Women indeed are whores. All of them.

Back is Top6 reference in bitcoin whitepaper.
Nobody noticed, nobody checked, even satoshi identity fanatics went dorian way.
Doesn’t add up

>>19035138
The title of the Bitcoin white paper is literally "A P2P electronic cash system".

Bitcoin is supposed to be digital cash. A currency. Used for payments. To buy stuff. Including coffee.

That's the whole point of Bitcoin. Blockstream took that vision and smashed it against the wall, because they are obvious glowniggers working for the existing financial system and they can not allow competition.

>>19035820
Everything Adam back stands for is the total opposite of what Satoshi wanted.

So obviously not Satoshi.

>>19035920
based reformation poster

>>19035920
>>19035920

The more I think about it, the less I believe that Adam Back is Satoshi, because the childish attitude and grammatically deficient writing style of the former do not align with the maturity and literary intelligence of the latter. But even if they are the same person, the original Bitcoin has its foundation in Wei Dai's b-money system. So the true ideals of Bitcoin certainly still have a founder in Wei Dai. Adam Back would then be a man who at first made Wei Dai's principles into a working system, but later corrupted them.

"I'm getting ready to release a paper that expands on your ideas into a complete working system." -- Satoshi Nakamoto, e-mail to Wei Dai in 2008

>>19027208
This has been known by virtually everyone since 2017

>>19028274
i noticed this and it grated me too
i like to think narrator just misinterpreted it (ie. is a retard) but yeah im not sure

>>19036109
If you even entertained the idea that Adam is Satoshi, you are retarded. The email in the video supposedly from Satoshi poo pooing XT is fake. It was used to bolster the narrative of Blockstream.

Evaluate things logically:
Satoshi wanted digital cash - Adam wants e-gold
Satoshi wanted scaling on chain - Adam wants tabs and lightning
Satoshi want big server farms - Adam wants raspberry pis
Satoshi wanted micropayment capability- Adam celebrates high fees
Satoshi wanted instant payments - Adam disabled it
Satoshi wanted a protocol set in stone - Adam fucked the protocol beyond recognition
Satoshi wanted Gavin to carry the torch of Bitcoin forward - Adam back kicked him out

Want me to go on?

Adam is a CIA snake who took control of the protocol through manipulation and deceit, and subverted everything Satoshi wanted to prevent it from ever reaching it's potential.

>>19036405
Now let's try this with another personality

Satoshi wanted digital cash - so does Craig Wright
Satoshi wanted scaling on chain - so does Craig Wright
Satoshi wanted big server farms - so does Craig Wright
Satoshi wanted micropayment capability - so does Craig Wright
Satoshi wanted instant payments - so does Craig Wright
Satoshi wanted a protocol set in stone - so does Craig Wright
Satoshi wanted Gavin to carry the torch of Bitcoin forward - Gavin testified that Craig Wright was definitely the person behind Satoshi

Did it click yet? 1+1 = 2

Logic is a wonderful thing

>>19033326
Go on...

>>19036470
satoshi wanted anonymous cash dumbass

>>19036681
That's why he built the most traceable system of money ever invented, literally a public ledger where every transaction you ever do is recorded forever for all the world to see LOL

You are pretty stupid.

>>19036723
yeah and while satoshi was around you could buy and sell it anonymously, i.e. without KYC

Imagine still being butthurt about blocksize and blockstream in 2020...

>>19036831
i'm more butthurt about scaling fud, and blockstream kikes are to blame

>>19036681
anarchist projection

>>19022938
Theory is not bad, but the writing pattern argument when referring to cypherpunk/hacker dudes is ridiculous. Always being aware of that is n00b shit of the lowest level.

>>19022938
>double spaces
>If I wanted to disguise my typing style 101

>>19037165
guess where this is from

>>19037523
Do you still not understand the difference between
privacy and anonymity?

Privacy is the walls on your house. Nobody can really see exactly who's inside and what you are doing, it's not unobtainable information that you live there, your name is registered to your address as a legal entity. You can easily be located and held accountable with the proper legal authority like a warrant.

Anonymity is when nobody knows where you are, nobody can trace you, nobody can find you. You are a ghost in the system. Zero accountability.

Satoshi designed a traceable pseudonymous system: that is privacy.

It was not supposed to be an anonymous system.

>>19037653
cope
i know you could transact anonymously with bitcoin in 2012 and i know that was the point early on. all that shit you typed doesn't change the irrefutable FACT that satoshi made an anonymous coin and craig is a fat fuck

>>19037687
https://craigwright.net/blog/bitcoin-blockchain-tech/bitcoin-is-anything-but-anonymous/
sorry sweety here's satoshis revision

>>19037857
>craigwright.net
yeah nah
dude's a clown and will never be relevant

>>19036681
Then he would have invented Monero, dumbass.

>>19037687
Emotional child, let the adults talk for a few moments

>>19038152
>>19038159
i clonk your giant oversized retarded heads together with a hollow coconut sound

>>19024783
Initially Adam was one of the only ones excited, and he didn't make an "Adam Back" account on Bitcointalk until 2013. Seems too much of a coincidence

>>19038189
You must be 18 to post here.

>>19038345
i'm 79 years old you lil zoomie shit

>>19037889
Now THAT is a cope.

>>19038433
i never cope. craig's a joke and you should rope ya dope
https://github.com/vbuterin/cult-of-craig

>>19038613
Do you think linking to some random disinfo blurbs collected in a blog by a pedophile manchild, who launched the biggest scamming platform (possibly) ever created, somehow helps your argument?

>>19038355
And still a faggot.

>>19038797
yes.

>>19038797
Pumpkin man is truly the best aussie shitposter

>>19038804
grow up lame-o

>>19034215
>That super jewish looking villain who created and profited from a massive Ponzi scheme claiming to liberate the goyim from the kikes is not a kike, goy.
#WhiteSamsonOption

>>19038824
Then you are an imbecile :)

good video.

>>19038955
BSV tranny identified

>>19022938
Surely this will be the end of BitCoin and Craig Wright!

>>19039108
Reduced to posting self-portraits in pure frustration now I see

kek

>>19039710
fuk you for making me go back and look up evidence of this fat pice of shit being a fraud
https://archive.fo/kjuLi even his mother says he's full of shit. now go dilate

>>19027136
because
https://www.mail-archive.com/bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net/msg08276.html

From btc is anonymous money to craig wright is a fraud. Quite pathetic.

>>19039710
>source: trust me guys
the absolute state of bsvtards