/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>18966192
god even the FUD is bullish

Fake and gay

>>18966192
What’s the consensus 2020 about

How do these partnerships work? Take Kava for example. Did Sergey pay Kava to integrate LINK into their system or did Kava willingly contact chainlink for Oracle assistance?
Does it cost money for these cryptos to run on the chainlink network or is it relaticely costless?

Are there any crypto projects that begged chainlink to promote their coin via a tweet?
Are there any crypto projects Sergey had to pay big money to get them to integrate?

>>18966192
We moon within a week, target 120k SATs

>>18966215
No FUD my man, I wouldn't shit where I eat but I see a lot of posts about people expecting everything to start 2019, 2020 and it's just way too early

>>18966231
Can't speak on every project, but certain companies want consulting on what works and what doesn't, there may be an incentive payout that they get for data feeds and secure nodes but a lot of what you're seeing on twitter is fluff. As in, it's just an announcement. Ironically without the use of a "Contract"

>>18966236
Absolutely not gonna happen

>>18966192
Why does Chainlink need a random number generation mechanism? It's something they've built and are unrolling soon. I'd like to understand what it's internal use case is. Also, if you are able to answer this, I will have some faith that this isn't just a larp.

Should I sell all my ETH and buy up Link or just stay in Eth

Tellor will drink your milkshake stinkie linkies. Get in before it’s too late

>>18966290
thanks. Very scummy of link, but at the same time, these projects do no ask to take the tweets down, probably because of good publicity.

After todays meeting, i thnk Sergey is statting to become scared shitless of competition. Sergey called Open Oracle and BAND "garbage". If these projects were insignificant as the shills say, i dont think sergey would acknowledge them at all or make any prep work

thoughts?

>>18966192
how long do I have to turn my Mcchecks into a 10k suicide stack

>>18966192
have you actually provided any kind of proof youre an insider yet? can you name on of the few partners that will be announced next week? only claim ive seen was itll drop in value which it didnt and then you claimed you meant sats after BTC pumped for its halving. and incorrectly claiming market trading volume on link would decline which it hasnt. you seem to be grossly incompetent for an insider

>>18966192
yeah again, post proof, and why is link pumping when you've said the bots are getting turned off in the past 4 threads? or are you abandoning that bullshit now too?

fuck off douche. you're a larper.

>>18966192
Do you know how's the integration with Bloomberg and NYSE data? How deep will it go?

>>18966346
no he hasn't. i've asked him to post anyting with a timestamp the past 4 threads. a mug, letterhead, a pen. anything with smart contracts/chainlink. he has yet to do so.

>>18966192
thanks uncle

>>18966326
Such a dumb question. Stack and stake both when the time comes.

>>18966336
I doubt it, they need to establish more from what we can see

>>18966344
Plenty of time, especially after next week

>>18966300
Short answer is decentralization, randomness and prevents poison pill attacks and reputation gaming. I will expand on this later, I am signing off for the night.

I expected tougher questions!

>>18966487
Why don’t you answer my question?
>>18966217

>>18966366
Fuck you my work is nothing like this pleb tier trash.

>>18966487
You weren't right about link dumping why should anyone believe this?

>>18966487
Explain how randomization has anything to do with the poison-pill attack. (I'm guessing you're referring to the poison pill attack mentioned in the zcash paper). And why is chainlink concerned with this at all? Poison pill attacks are related to Layer 1.

>>18966487
i have question here >>18966339

Why did Sergey openly attack Open Oracle and BAND today? Is he scared?

>>18966578
He didn't name them by name, did he?

>>18966607
link shills say he very heavily implied it. It would be like a liberal saying
>that racist fat orange bastard in the office
without saying Drumpf. We know who that person is referring to

>>18966192
>woot
I haven't heard this shit since like year 2000's ac. You aren't an insider tho, just a fucking larp guarenteed.

>>18966545
I thought you were just getting lazy

>>18966300
Secure RNG is a massive massive thing all on its own. For example eth 2.0 needs a secure random source for staking to work

Chainlink needs to speed up their progress since Tellor and Band are slowly catching up and eating their market share

>>18966718
Oh I totally see why it's important for blockchain, in general. Like for randomized leader election, for example. But it's really unclear why Chainlink needs it. Unless they're simply creating it as a service for other applications.

>>18966744
Internally? Something to do with staking probably. Externally they can offer it to anyone who needs a strong randomness guarantee just like any other oracle data

How many fucking Linkies am I supposed to have again? God Im so high right now.

>>18966487
You answered nothing anon

>>18966862
Could you link any info re: necessity of RNG for stalking mechanisms? The connection isn't immediately clear to me. Also, it's nice having an exchange with someone who sounds literate in computer science. I was thinking of setting up a whitepaper general or something, to perhaps reverse this place from the shithole it's become ..

>>18966955
For eth2.0
>there is a large pool of stakers, each represented by up to 32 ETH (32 ETH is required to activate a staker and this can fall as low at 16 ETH until deactivation). This pool does not directly vote on blocks, instead it is arranged into various voting committees, whose members are randomly selected from the wider pool.
https://blog.bitmex.com/ethereum-2-0/

I'm not sure how fleshed-out chainlink's staking mechanism is

i sold at 3.89