/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>18911718
wtf this isnt cryptogurrensy, EPIC

>>18911718
You dumb bastard.
None of those articles are confirming any of the tech.
I mean, the literal URLs use words like >"may get"
>"rumors"
Tread lightly friend.

All Microsoft has to do is show that their new Xbox can be used as a general computing platform and can be paired with a stripped down consumer grade hololens.

The hololens 2 is a standalone device and costs $3500.
Why so expensive?
The computing power, cooling, power, etc is all self contained. You pay a premium for the miniaturization.

A hololens addon to Xbox would be powered via the Xbox and use it for computing. Really just a fancy display.

This gives capabilities like HUD displays when playing FPS games.

if they pull out a headset during tomorrows XBox event.

You WILL CUM if you have stocks.

Spam that Scammer!

office@avatarbitbyte.ch

>>18911718
I'm assuming /biz/ is full of shit on this, so I bought 30 shares. Currently $0.02/share above breakeven

How will AR be used for gaming?

Imagine the use the TV screen for a majority of the action but on your hololens is the HUD.
To reload your weapon, you actually look down and use your hands and gesture controller to reload your gun.

Halo next gen
Minecraft AR
Age of Empires 4
Etc

Desktop/productivity applications.

Instead of buying 2-3 monitors that consume desk space.
A single hololens could be plugged directly into computer and used as a 360 degree monitor/window space while still being able to see whats around you (not a full VR headset).


This is how Microsoft plans on keeping Operating System marketshare.

The software required to virtualize the computing experience into an AR headset.

Something Mac and Chromebooks dont support and would be YEARS behind.

Once again....3.5k hololens 2 is self contained.
However, power its energy usage and computing power by external source (computer) and the cost goes down dramatically.

Package it with the XBox....and Microsoft makes billions.

>>18912327
I feel like this is counter-fire from reddit.


Change my mind

>>18912438
No. Just a techfag who has been following AR and VR since oculus rift dev kit.

Used to nigger rig VR goldeneye on N64 using 2 TVs and splitscreen multiplayer just to see what maps looked like with "depth".

Microsoft is positioned to take AR mainstream.
Hololens was a test.

Hololens 2 (Microsoft/Microvision) will be primary AR platform.
PSVR2 (Sony) will dominate the VR space.

>>18912438
ur poor. go back.

Kept 250 shares that i got at 1.05 just to see what happens tomorrow. This shit is too amusing

/biz/ when will you learn?
It's obviously just smoke, lidar isn't anything new, "revolutionary laser beam scanning" is used in dust robots ffs, I thought you were smarter than this...
It might pump again, but don't expect any serious product from a company so eager to sell snake oil. There is a reason desk projectors aren't a thing: they offer nothing more than what a tablet can provide... they only have drawbacks.

>>18912655
b 2005-2012
pol 2008-2020
biz 2019-2020

(you)
>>/lgbt/

>>18912655
b 2005-2012
pol 2008-2020
biz 2019-2020

>(you)
>>>/lgbt/

>>18912937
Its not what they built.

Its the patents they hold.

China is Intellectual property hell and nothing that comes out of there will ever make it mainstream here.

Being a specialist in this business for >20 years and holding +500 cockblocking patents makes them valuable.

Valuable enough that a buyout is basically buying a blackbox of AR, projection, and display tech.
Something a company trying to speed up development would do (i.e Microsoft)

>>18912547
Very convincing thesis


but

Can you beat this guys argument because its also convincing.

>>18913143
>>18912937

just bought 250 shares. hope this happens. thanks anon

>>18913088
Projection will never get mainstream, even high end projectors (100'000+$ aren't better than oled TVs if not for size) their display tech is boring right now, microled is the hot stuff. Also their website is a steaming pile of garbage filled with meaningless words to lure investors...

>>18911718
Just stop. Just fucking stop, anons. It’s over. This shit stock was supposed to go up 300% today based on all the hype from yesterday. Whales stop hunting, SSR, microsoft patents, etc and it still dumped today. Stop being fucking delusional. Im now full bear on MVIS to recover from my losses.

If microsoft isnt mentioned after the conference call, this shit will drop to $0.20 or lower. Screencap this.

>>18913222
Trips of truth


I capitulate on MVIS at 1.50$

>>18913222
checked and can confirm.
stop luring anons into buying this trash, it's literally gambling at this point.

>>18913143
>>18913163


Like I said.

The +500 patents they hold are their strengths.
They are basically a research lab that create new processes and tech.

Any company stepping into VR and AR market has to navigate around their literal minefield of patents.

These patents take on average 4 years to grant.
So companies trying to get into VR/AR and miniturized display has to get through them first.

Buyout would instantly give any buying company a treasurchest of patents and technology to cockblock their competitors.

They cant just put what they make on their website. Its far beyond normies.

I work a software/tech company myself. The websites and marketing is often dumbed down to the point of hilarity.

Companies that need their tech know where to look because they are looking at patents.
Their website isnt marketed towards normies.

https://patents.justia.com/assignee/microvision-inc

>>18913326
so a shittier kinect?
why would microsoft pay someone else for something they already have perfected?

>>18913326
>>18913443
https://developer.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/kinect/
https://www.terabee.com/shop/3d-tof-cameras/terabee-3dcam/
https://www.trustedreviews.com/news/what-is-a-tof-camera-3690164
They have NOTHING NEW to offer.

A fucking brainlet here. Do we buy or not??

>>18913692
if you want to gamble yes
if you expect the stock to have any value bc of their products no

>>18911718
deeem