/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>18689943
$3 incoming then to $2! Deluded overvaluation. Normies eat shit and die.

>>18689943
Chainlink's supply is just as centralized, and the token is just as not needed, so probably

>>18689959
stay poor

>>18689943
Next floor for $3 Dollar Lounge! Going down!

Whole market is PUMPING. Link is DUMPING

>>18689943
Oh no, I'm only 3,700% up now. what will i ever do?

COPE.

that said, buy some UND if you want LINKIE style gains in 2021.

>>18690016
Cripples said the exact same thing when they went from $3.70 to $3.50 to $3.20 you know....

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8IMCQnegoY0

>>18690032
>>18689943
>>18690009
>>18690002
>>18689976
>>18689959

>>18690055
XRP's chart looked the same in jan 2018.....

>>18690070

>>18690016
>>18690055
>>18689998
why all the seethe? Could it be because Coinbase refused to work with Chainlink and chose to adopt an oracle network standard (Open Oracle) from a direct competitor (that makes Chainlink obsolete)?

>>18690081
XRP was the highest gainer in 2017.... like LINKs the highesy gainer in 2019....

>>18689943
kek
ie say 'ello to endless dumping back to 0

>>18690094
>>18690112

>>18690158
like father like son, both went up the highest and fell the hardest

>>18690201

>>18690274
cripples said the same thing at $3.80....

>>18690300
Why do you put "..." after every sentence Pajeet? Fuck off cunt

>>18689943
Im about to short 1k link at 20x. Binance here i come.

>>18690340
why do linkies pretend they are different from XRP?

XRP was the highest gainer in 2017 and part of 2018. LINK was the highest gainer in 2019 and part of 2020
XRP was supposed to take over the world because it had the connections with the the highest banks, LINK was supposed to take over the world with SWIFT
Normies got into XRP at its peak. Normies got into LINK at its peak

literally whats the difference?

>>18690393
xrp hit top two

>>18690406
lmao

>>18690081
Its called trading retard. Only boomers hodl.

>>18689943
Lol i just made $500 bucks shorting link.

>>18689943
OH NONONONO LINKY BROS WE GOT TOO COCKY AGAIN

>>18690393
link gains are far more significant than xrp. i wish i didnt fall for the meme and bough chainlink during the crash and not xrp. i converted halfway through and make some moniez

>>18689976
>token not needed

>>18690094
>Coinbase refused to work with Chainlink
>direct competitor

Too bad both Coinbase and that "direct competitor" came out shilling Link by name.

>>18690393
XRP mooned when everything was mooning.
Link pumped when everything was dumping.

>>18690951
>far more significant
lmao, how? are you just going to ignore XRP was the highest gainer just like link was at one point? >>18690393
in fact, XRP went up 36,000% in a year. Not even link had as high percentage
>oh, but links different!
>>18690957
Open Oracle does all that link does without a token. rip

>>18690988
XRP mooned harder than everyone else like link
>link mooned when everyone else
LMAOOOOOO.
remember when BSV went up 300% this year out of nowhere when no one else did?
How about tezos this year?
>bbbut link went up in 2019
QNT went up higher than LINK in the summer peak of 2019

>>18690974
>mentioning the name of a compatible product is shilling
Microsoft name drops Apple when they say microsoft office works on it. Does this mean. Microsoft is shilling for Apple?

>>18690993
>"it just looks good to have google on your amateur-ass looking architectural diagram
uhhhhh, that diagram was made by Google not Chainlink lel.

>Open Oracle does all that link does without a token.
Better tell Coinbase and Open Oracle then, because they're shilling Chainlink by name: >>18690974

>>18691016
>XRP mooned harder
... during a general golden bullrun.

>BSV
>QNT
They went up during a short amount of time, Link has been going up against the market for two years straight.

>mentioning the name of a compatible product is shilling
Absolutely.

>Does this mean. Microsoft is shilling for Apple?
Yes.
Because MS Office working on Apple is good for both MS and Apple.

>>18689943
hurry up and buy Sergey's bags /biz/
do you think lambos grow on trees

>>18690974
>competitor says his data format is better
bearish asf

>>18691065
>competitor says his data format is better
lmao, circle where they say this brainlet.

>>18691039
>diagram was made by google staff members that held link bags
unironically the same in terms of shaddiness

how many times do i have to tell you retarda name dropping isnt shilling. Microsoft literally programmed Microsoft Office to work in Apple Os along with Windows.
Does this mean Microsoft is shilling for Apples?

Open Oracle works with chainlink. It doesnt need chainlink at all. Youve been told this hundreds of times

>during a general bullrun
are acrually implying Link didnt moon during a bullrun? Link went to $5 in february, and in ja uary BSV went up 300% and Tezos went up 300% in februsry too.
How is link possibly unique at all?

>Microsoft shills for Apple
LMAOOOOOOOO
well, this is the absolute state of the linkies. I guess if Apple falls, Microsoft falls with it too then in your logic

>>18691016
>>mentioning the name of a compatible product is shilling
Yes.
Companies pay a lot if money just to have their product mentioned in movies and interviews.

Nooooo please sirs my village in Jaipur is running out of money, please stop selling the chain link I beg you sirs bless u sirs

>chainlink went up during a bear market. no other coin went up with it. Chainlink is mot like XRP who moooned the hardest during a bullrun. Chainlink mooned during a bear market :^)

>>18691088
if apples fails, does microsoft fail?
does a windows computer need apple computer to run?

>no other coin went up in sats out of nowhere this year like chainlink. Chainlink is COMPLETELY different!

>>18691085
>unironically the same in terms of shaddiness
Yeah, Google drawing up a diagram with Chainlink in it is inherently shady because reasons.

>name dropping isnt shilling
It literally is.

>Open Oracle works with chainlink. It doesnt need chainlink at all.
Of course they don't "need" it, they can make their own oracle or use a competitor.
But they literally mention Chainlink - and ONLY Chainlink - because they're the best there is.

>How is link possibly unique at all?
Because it's the only one to pump consistently during the bear market these past two years.

> I guess if Apple falls, Microsoft falls with it too then in your logic
Shilling for someone doesn't mean your books are merged you dip, fucking lol.

>>18691114
>apples fails, does microsoft fail?
wat

>>18691107
>>18691131
Neither of these pumped consistently for two years straight.

>>18691132
>a diagram that doesnt make use of links primary function as seen here >>18690993
>AND by a google developer who held linl bags
yeah, nothing shady at all
>of course they dont need it
You literally lost the argument then. Lmao, people can use Open Oracle without chainlink as discussed before

If Open Oracle doesnt need Chainlink to function, then its not shilling. its compatibility. Microsoft could not give a fuck if Apple fails or not, but they let them use Microsoft Office so the Apple holders dont have a meltdown. Open Oracle doesnt give a fuck if chainlink fails or not ______

>chainlink never fell
In summer 2019, chainlink was $3 + and fell to $1.70 by december 2019
Tezos is no different. Tezos reached in ath in summer 2019 just like link, fell by december and the reached a new ath in 2020

What is this
>link moons in a bear market
please show many specific way link has broke free from the general market that lasted more than a week

>>18691169
Link collapsed from $3 im summer 2019 to $1.70 by december 2019

What is this consistent pump for 2 years straight you are talking about?

>>18689959
>>18689976
>>18690002
>>18690009
>>18690032
>>18690070
>>18690094
>>18690201
>>18690112
>>18690116
>>18690300
>>18690343
>>18690393
>>18690478
>>18690675
>>18690928
YOU dont get it

>>18691191
>a diagram that doesnt make use of links primary function
It literally does do that.
Hint: "write response on chain"

>You literally lost the argument then.
How?
People don't "need" cars or internet, but that is what they want and use.

>>chainlink never fell
Never said it didn't fall.

>please show many specific way link has broke free from the general market that lasted more than a week
The trendline since summer of 2018.

>>18691196
>Link collapsed from $3 im summer 2019 to $1.70 by december 2019
Yet it didn't break the uptrend.

>>18691222
kek, no it doesnt. Chainlink doesnt even have staking yet. Chainlink is not a finish product. Actually read the image here >>18690993
Open Oracle would be using the internet with a router. Chainlink would a software firewall added to your router. Open Oracle does not need chainlink in anyway, and does all of chainlinks functions.

Actually READ the image here >>18691085
>>18691191
Open Oracle can do all those things without Link. What is this vital essence chainlink provides?

>never said it didnt fall
then you lost. Link goes down in a bear market (which you denied) and moons during a bullrun (see Tezos and BSV)

Here is chainlink sats in all of 2018. It did not break out at all. Not one bit. Then in 2019 (the same year Tezos, Bsv both mooned) the sats start rising

who are you fooling?

Chain link btfo

>>18691266
>>18691269
You dont get it.

>>18691280
No average person cares about chain link, you're just giving money to Sergey, there's no market or demand for it

>>18691266
>kek, no it doesnt.
It LITERALLY does.
It shows Link being used to write external data on chain. Literally.

>Open Oracle does not need chainlink in anyway
>Open Oracle can do all those things without Link.
Yet they shill Chainlink by name because they're complementary.

>then you lost.
No.
Link's trendline is an unbroken uptrend for two years straight.

>>18691288
You still don't get it.

>>18691288
fudders:
>haha link is a normie coin now, sell sell sell

also fudders:
>haha nobody cares about link, sell sell sell

>>18691290
Again. Read the images here
>>18691085
>>18691191
Open Oracle can do all that without chainlink at all.
The tweets just say Open Oracle can work with chainlink, not that its needed.

All the things Open Oracle provides are the features businesses only care about. Running chainlink ADDS cost. Here are the costs of using a token here
>>/biz/thread/S17394751#p17396624
Open Oracle can do all that without a token.

What is this business advantage chainlink provides without Open Oracle?

>trendline unbroken
Your claims is that link moons during a bear market. Meanwhile, Link went completely sideways in sats during a bear market as seen here >>18691266
are you actually saying this isnt sideways movement? Lmaooo
Link goes up during the 2019 bullrun, many other coins did too (see QNT) collapsed in december 2019 just like every other coin and mooned in 2020 like every other coin

Link does NOT moon during a bear market. It just mooned the hardest in a bull market, just like XRP did here >>18690201
hence, why LINK is the next XRP

>>18691327
>Open Oracle can do all that without chainlink at all.
>Open Oracle can do all that without a token.
Yet Coinbase and OpenOracle literally shill Chainlink by name.

Either they're wrong, or you're an idiot.

> Link went completely sideways in sats
lmao, pic related

>Link just mooned the hardest in a bull market
Link did almost nothing during the bull market.

>>18691299
Both are true. Normie e thots and low iq black people are shilling it but nobody cares because they want real assets and liquidity, we are in a medical and economic crisis, they don't want some intangible internet token, they want food, shelter protection gold and silver, farm land etc.

>>18691362
>Both are true.
I'm sure they are in your mind.

>>18691356
Namedropping isnt shilling. Its compatibility. You seem to be ignoring all the things Open Oracle can already do without link as seen here >>18691191
>>18691085

Way to cut me off
Completely sideways in sats IN 2018. here is the 2018 chart>>18691266
2018 was a bear market. Link did not moon in a bear market like you claim. Link mooned in 2019 like many other coins (see QNT)

Link went to $5 in february 2020, Tezos reaches its ATH in february 2020 too. And in january, BSV went up 300% when no other coin did

What makes Link special??

>>18691399
>Namedropping isnt shilling.
It literally is.

> You seem to be ignoring all the things Open Oracle can already do without link
Coinbase and Open Oracle also seem to be ignoring that.

>Completely sideways in sats IN 2018
Look at the trendline for the past two years, like I said.

>What makes Link special??
The two-year trendline.

>>18691419
no its not. Microsoft namedrops apple when they say office can work in apple

Does that mean Windows needs Apple to function?
>seem to be ignoring that
how? all the things open oracle can do are seen here
>>18691085
>>18691191
these are the only features businesses care about.

Open Oracle and Coinbase literally said chainlink can work with them. Its not needed. Tell me what specific vital things chainlink does that are needed with open oracle

>Muh trendline
here is the 2018 trendline>>18691266
look how chainlink is sideways in 2018. Link did not moon during a bear market. Ot went sideways. Then link moons in 2019; a bull market. And 2020 also a bull market. i explain it here >>18691399

>>18691446
>Microsoft namedrops apple when they say office can work in apple
And this benefits both.

>how?
Because they're both going out of their way to mention Link by name, and how their project complements Chainlink.

>here is the 2018 trendline
Here is the 2018, 2019, 2020 trendline: >>18691356

>>18691474
>benefits both
lmao ok. More like Apple would be completely fucked if they couldnt migrate office onto their OS. Windows does not need apple to be successful. Open Oracle does not need chainlink to be successful
>muh tweets, muh tweets
all those tweets say is that open oracle can work with chainlink. thats it. All the features Open Oracle can do on its own is here >>18691191
>>18691085

chainlink does nothing for open oracle, except what the anon literally says "sign twice" which is pointless.
AND, chainlink adds costs with a token
>>/biz/thread/S17394751#p17396624

so there is absolutely no point in using chainlink with open oracle. Can chainlink be used with open oracle? sure. the tweets say it can. Does open oracle need chainlink? no

>muh trendline
my good sir. The 2018 trendline is literally here >>18691266
link did nothing in 2018, But it did moon in 2019 like a lot of other coins (see QNT). Link collapsed on 2019 december to 1.70 (like other coins) and link reavhed its ath in 2020. Tezos and BSV did too

Link is not special. It just mooned the hardest in a bullrun, just like XRP >>18690393

>>18691266
sure xrp shill, no linkers go first on the day of the snag

>>18691526
>Open Oracle does not need chainlink to be successful
>chainlink does nothing for open oracle
>there is absolutely no point in using chainlink with open oracle

Then why did they go out of their way to shill Chainlink by name?

>The 2018 trendline is literally here
And the 2018, 2019, 2020 trendline is here: >>18691356

>>18691362
>liquidity
>gold and silver
Drooling noob

Bro 42 got a quantic message from the future

>>18691623

>>18691576
^chart
/thread

>>18689943
Chainlink is doing things on a fundamental level:
https://eprint.iacr.org/2020/269.pdf
You’re too much of a smoothbrain to see it.

>>18690201
So you telling me you’re a no linker?

>>18691672
OP ran away from his own thread

>>18691016
>>18691039
We still have fudders when link as made it this far.. BULLISH

They missed out and/or wants more. What’s these fudders goals. To ruin lives. I’ve been around since 2017. And for my no linkers, you’re in a for the ride of your lives.

>>18691822
>What’s these fudders goals.
1) soothing their unfathomable butthurt from betting on the wrong horse in 2017/2018
2) some deluded scheme to "keep the normies out"

>>18691039
>... during a general golden bullrun.
XRP was leading the bullrun, only reason it crashed was CMC pulled the Korean Exchange data.

>>18691356
why is it so hard for you morons to read?
they aren't shilling they are saying Chainlink can use open oracle.
its basically saying we have a superior product and we will not be using chainlink.

>>18692745
>only reason it crashed was CMC pulled the Korean Exchange data.
Imagine being THIS deluded.

>>18692759
>they aren't shilling
They literally are.

>>18692759
it's just another data source, a high quality cryptographically verified signed data source in fact, and will certainly be used as just another part of chainlink's network. it'll also be used as a centralised data source though.

>>18692811
>and will certainly be used as just another part of chainlink's network.
Yes.

>it'll also be used as a centralised data source though.
That's not how it's intended to be used according to Coinbase.

Coinbase themselves literally say they are "simply adding a signed price API as a way to add another input for DeFi price oracles" (meaning Chainlink oracles).
The goal behind this project is to allow end users to verify on chain that the contract oracle (i.e. the Chainlink oracle) did indeed use the source(s) specified.
If sources do not sign their data, there is no way to do this (at least on chain).

>>18689998
This isn't the witty comeback that you think it is

>>18691526
>>18691474
>33 million posts by these IDs
Why are you trying so fucking hard to fud link?

>>18693085
You quoted me, but I'm not fudding.

I'm right where I belong, discussing a project I support.