/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>18651790
PLEASE
For the love of god we’ve waited so long I’m an insane alcoholic now I just want to make it already
Why are we still here
Just to suffer

>>18651790
In essensce the Singularity is corporations created a technology that creates cost savings and a new profit stream for everyone involved.

AI and IOT, oracles, and blockchain will manage the system core.

-LINK is seriously overunity because its design creates an endless positive feedback loop as they will use the passive income to buy more LINK and so on and so forth.

81K by 2026 is probably real

>>18651790
>Welcome to the Singularity

>>18651827

You better start changing your ways now. I hope you never sell its going to reach unbelieveable levels value in a time frame that will feel impossible.

>>18651886
How long though
I have about one more year in me before I lose it completely

>>18651942
Idk your basis point but $100 is possible imo within 12-18 months. Probably closer to 18 months however LINK will go on a run first, retrace a lot and then BTC will go on its run 3-6 months into 2021 bringing up the rest of the market/alts.

>>18651790
>Biggest crypto exchange chooses direct Chainlink competitor and releases competing product TODAY
>Linkers: This is bullish!

>>18651790
>institutions/corporations
>coinbase
lmffffffffffao

>>18651993
How can you people say things like this, it’s never correct, granted you can say link will go up but you yourself have no idea what the value and what timespan that entails. You are lying

>>18652012
You are dumb Coinbase is Compound. As I said each company will have their own oracles providing data feeds so they profit from Chainlink's Oracle network, its brilliant all around.

>>18652036
Its called speculation. Based on past performance, currents events unfolding like today's news, and the future timeline I'm aware of a 33x is a conservative estimate honestly. Its my best educated guess breaking triple digits is possible once things are actually up and running.

>>18651993
Are you serious about that $100 prediction
How confident are you because of it actually hit $100 that would be the greatest thing ever Id be a multi millionaire

>>18652031
Idk why you are laughing Oracle software company, Microsoft, Salesforce, Swift and countless others will be doing the same soon enough. I won't have to even think about money by 2022. I barely do now I just live swining LINK and never selling my main stack.

>>18651827
If you become filthy rich, TO be honest it sounds like you'll just be a filthy rich alcoholic

>>18652099
I believe you, but i want to know your reasoning behind this.
Also checkedd.

>>18652070
I dont get it

t.brainlet

So what do I invest in?

>>18652126
That’s fine with me I just want to move somewhere comfy I have a smokin hot cute feet goth waifu already just need a Michael Corleone stile compound in Lake Tahoe

>>18652101
Absolutely, but definitely 18 months probably, and I'd have some sell orders at $35, $50, $70, $84 etc Its impossible to call the tops in parabolic trends. Always have a stack to swing and one you never touch. You can't just wait until $100 to sell, it might not hit that completely this cycle then goes back to $20 then on to $1000 etc. You HAVE to take some profit unless you really don't mind working and don't need the extra money then don't sell until 2025-2028 and have intergenerational wealth

>>18652148
i also plan on moving to south lake tahoe. snowboarding will be glorious!

>>18652162
What about the $1000 eoy prediction?

>>18651790
powerful

>>18652168

That was a meme and likely someone just made a script bot to capture those digits its not hard. I think it will hit $1000 one day, basically guaranteed, but I can't give an accurate timelink based on what is known now.

>>18652148
>smokin hot cute feet goth waifu
Six words I thought I'd never read in that order kek. Good for you anon, I'll be smiling when you make it.

>>18652189
>>18652189
timeline* lmao my hand just auto spells link

>>18652036
Lol can’t believe you’re falling for his fud.

>>18652162
My sell plan is as follows
Sell 40,000 link at $100 for 4 million
Keep my remaining 10,000 link staked
If it hits $1000 gg I’ll sell for 10 million
That’ll probably be enough desu

>>18651790
>coinbase makes chainlink obsolete in a move that was predicted for years
>This is probably some of the most bullish news
???
there's literally zero reason to use a link node to get a coinbase price rather than coinbase directly.
Once more exchanges add this capability, it's over.

>>18652189
So you don't believe LINK will be a trillion dollar network?

>>18652129
>>18652134

If you don't get it you really need to read the Chainlink white paper to understand what an oracle does in combination with IOT, blockchains, and potentially AI. Corporations of infinite amounts of data for clients, customers, inventories, specs and so on so forth. They can attach that information the blockchains from various cloud services and then sell it essentially by creating their own oracles to do jobs in the Chainlink network. Again read previous posts its incredible, it both creates costs savings and new monetization streams. Anyone who doesn't participate will be at such a disadvantage they won't be able to compete.

Hello, big corps. You can either get data straight from the source or add another middleman and potential point of failure into the mix.

I wonder what they will choose.

>>18652248
Its going to easily hit 5 digit total like BTC, I just have no idea the timeline as of right now. There isn't enough concrete information.

>>18652258
Is this good specifically for chainlink or bad

>>18652242
You don't understand what Chainlink is, which is a decentralized oracle network. It adds all oracles to its services to create a decentralized enviroment. Coinbase will be included and the first business to monetize an API through it. Once more exchanges do this LINK will rocket in value. Its literally the opposite.

>>18652297
This is literally what it was intended for. Lol

>>18652036
>>18652101
>18652101
Its going to $1000, minimum, my dudes.

>>18652297
Its the singularity. Chainlink creates a feed positive feedback loop for all companies that make oracles that get included in the network to essentially sell their data, automate jobs, and profit from the passive stream.

>>18652276
Yep, there's no space for middlemen at all. Chainlink and other oracle networks/companies too.
All data is going to be signed directly by the source. The penalty for incorrect data is going to be enforced by courts - the signed data is going to be an undeniable proof.

In this scenario, chainlink is going to be worse than useless - it's going to make the security much worse, by adding an additional layer of middlemen that can fail.
>>18652303
except everybody can get signed coinbase data without link, so why use link even if it's added as an option?

>>18652276
The one that adds more security and less points of failure through decentralized nature. You don't get it. Its not a middleman its a necessary component for corporations to monetize their data feeds in an automated way.

Im 10 and what is this

>>18652358

The opposite is true the decentralized nature allows for more security. An aggregation of price feeds is safer if one fails.

>>18652395

>>18652012
this, stinkies are so tiresome

>>18652421
If coinbase fails, there's no data from coinbase and nothing can be done about it.
Adding link changes nothing about it, but it adds the possibility of link nodes failing and costs more.
Thus, there's no advantage.
>An aggregation of price feeds is safer if one fails.
signed data allows anyone to put up a data point on-chain. It's enough to offer a payment in eth for this. That's maximum possible decentralization.

>>18652136
SLV & GLD

>>18652162
good lord, this level of delusion..

>>18652442
>>18652462
I have 300$ to invest. How do I start making sound money so I can grow it and not die during the whatever the fuck crisis, buy gold in weight?

>>18652235
>meme zoomer tattoos
cringe and disgutingwhorepilled

>>18652488
just buy eth and hold until eth2

>>18652488
don't do anything until you have at least 1000$

>>18651869
LMFAO Bitcoin won't be at 81 K in 2026 let alone LINK with a total supply of 1 Billion
>INB4 muh supply argument
yes I know that LINK tokens will be locked up as collateral as a part of the mechanics but i can guarantee you that its not going to be anywhere near the magnitude (i.e. 99% locked up) to facilitate a token value of 1K let alone 81K LMAO
Im not even fudding tbqhwu im just being realistic

>>18652439

It doesn't cost more LINK will be providing Coinbase a net positive and profit from running the oracle through their network.

There will be many oracles doing jobs, which pay in LINK, getting price feed data from Coinbase, Coinbase itself is deciding to do one as well in order to profit through the Chainlink decentralized network. A centralized source is a vector of failure. The Chainlink network uses many layers of security, decentralization arguably the most important, to ensure saftey and accuracy of delivered data. Its not just one oracle, its many and a centralized oracle can never succeed alone. Its why all the of the rest have bent the knee and joined.

>>18651790
is this why $LINK will go down to $2? FUCK!

>>18652524
>It doesn't cost more LINK
I can call the coinbase api for free and provide it to a DeFi dapp
or
I can pay link nodes in link to provide the data from coinbase
therefore, link is more expensive
>A centralized source is a vector of failure
The source is always centralized, do you think link can magically get coinbase prices if coinbase is offline?
>Its why all the of the rest have bent the knee
is anyone other than synthetix (who uses it only for fiat/fiat pairs) actually using chainlink? not just blog posts.

why would you get paid to give crypto price feeds?

>>18652506
The collateral has to be proportional to value of contracts being trade via smart contracts. Trillions/billions dollars worth of value. It creates a feed back loop as the network is saturated that will eventually lock up 99% given enough time. Corporations will be encouraged to buy, lock, and DRIP profits (dividend re investment program) as it creates cost savings through automation, increased token value through staking(lowering supply) and passive income buying more to continously stake which increases value and lowers supply more. Its literally a perfect system all in one.

>>18652099
I’m not really from this board but I am a Schizo obsessed with the number 42, plz give me a QRD

>>18652591
Check the archives

>>18652439
Listen you fucking TURD I am so sick of seeing your fud spam everywhere

If you want to know the price of Ethereum for a smart contract that has millions in collateral you don't rely on just the coinbase price but you want a combination of multiple price feeds to increase accuracy and minimize the potential of tampering with prices

>what is manipulation
>what is flash crash

>>18652567

Once smart contracts come out people will have automated derivatives contracts which need price feeds to operate. The oracles will get paid for that data need which automates those contracts and takes out the human element. That is just one example among hundreds maybe thousands that haven't even thought of yet.

>>18652563

Its a cost of business but not really since they will profit more from running the oracle than they will paying for the data inputs needed to automate trades and other financial products.

>>18652235
>>18652499
10/10 feet though desu

>>18652588
there won't be any on-chain collateral needed, there's going to be a contractual obligation. The way the entire Western world works for centuries.
>>18652599
>but you want a combination of multiple price feeds
you write that like it's news, yes more exchanges are needed. I already wrote that here >>18652242
>Once more exchanges add this capability, it's over.
>>18652645
>they will profit more from running the oracle than they will paying for the data inputs needed to automate trades and other financial products.
who's 'they' here? Coinbase? Why would coinbase for inputs? Or the user, but then why is the user supposed to run a link oracle? This sentence is really confusing.

>>18652235
Never sell that 10K just stake and wait until 2030, it will be worth probably 50-100 Million.

>>18652665
>>Once more exchanges add this capability, it's over.

I sincerely think that you don't understand what Chainlink is. Do you understand what is the difference between just combining multiple price feeds or using Chainlink?

>>18652726
>Do you understand what is the difference between just combining multiple price feeds or using Chainlink?
Yes, if I use link I have to pay more and risk additional failures.

>>18652665
The very way contracts settle are changing, the old ways are over. Trust will be deterministic, not probabilistic, that is the entire point of Chainlink. "They" is any institution that needs data feeds for their smart contract based financial products like derivatives in the future. Coinbase is just the start. Eventually Wall St funds will create price feed oracles and profit LINK from jobs as well. The same funds will then use that data to create automated trading tools. Its seriously amazing when you consider the possibilities

>>18652726

Its intentional misunderstanding. Again Chainlink is a central sources, it can use any oracle data feed in existence and pays that oracle in LINK for doing jobs. Its 100% necessary and no oracle can operate outside of the network in a central manner without running into several different points of failure.

>>18652750
>Trust will be deterministic, not probabilistic, that is the entire point of Chainlink
Chainlink relies on trust into Sergey Nazarov, who has the power to add and remove nodes. It's a joke.
>Eventually Wall St funds will create price feed oracles and profit LINK from jobs as well
Again, there's literally zero reason for anyone to buy the same data from link nodes rather than directly from the source.

>>18652743
Alright so you're just arguing in bad faith

>>18652781
your fud would be better if you just stopped replying instead of showing how little you know

>>18652781
pay for each individual data source for your smart contract or utilize chainlink network and threshold signatures as a one stop shop for a call? the latter is less complicated and less expensive.

>>18652781
I just listed several reasons why. Coinbase will have a node to profit from their own oracle price feed.

You are being intentionally obtuse and misleading. Probabilistic/Deterministic has nothing to do with Sergey, its about the resolution of legal binding (smart) contracts. The reputation of nodes has to be known in beginning to prevent 51% attacks. When too few sources of data exist its easier to manipulate the feeds in the beginning. Once a certain threshold is met, neet nodes/anonymous nodes will be free to operate and be judged solely on the output of their data. A lot of different facets have to come together all the same time for the initial launch to work flawlessly

>>18652861
also your contract is protected by a collateral so less risk

>>18652865
kek learn to code.

Coinbase couldve become a Chainlink node (ie use the Chainlink standard). Instead they decided to use Open Oracle, a directly competing oracle standard, which is superior to Chainlink in every way.

Anything else is cope.

>>18652890
Chainlink has no collateral/reputation after 3 years and $50mil in dev. They never will. It's a scam that non-programmer brainlets like yourself fall for.

Coinbase made more progress in the oracle space in 1 day than they did in 3 years.

>>18652861
The cost of aggregating data on-chain is minuscule and sacrificing security for a tiny amount of gas is not worth it.
Once exchanges start to use BLS signatures (which are going to be the standard signature on eth2) signature aggregation is going to be possible directly.
>>18652865
>I just listed several reasons why
you didn't list any.
>Coinbase will have a node to profit from their own oracle price feed.
They already offer the api for free.

>>18652913

Chainlink itself only runs a few oracle nodes, they don't actually need to even, the Chainlink network absorb other oracles into the collection of oracles to create a more decentralized secure and profitable system for everyone.

This dicussion has nothing to do with coding? I'm familiar with Python a bit.

>>18652938

I literally listed the reason. The corporations/business will run their own oracle data feeds and nodes within the Chainlink network to create cost savings and new profits streams simulataneously.

Anyone new here that wants to understand how LINK works should read this whole thread.

why does link have a token

if you stake tokens that makes your data more trusty?

>>18653263
So everyone providing data outputs in the network can create a profit? LINK is needed to pay the nodes that do data output jobs and collateral on nodes to ensure accurate data is being provided.

>>18652913
"Learn to code" must be one of the dumbest FUD one-liners ever in relation to Chainlink. The concept of a decentralized oracle network and it's intended purpose is several layers of abstraction away from simple programming. Of course there is code involved, but that's the (relatively) easy part.

This FUD is on par with the JSON parser fud imo, except that was actually funny.

>>18652591
>42

>>18653263
It does make the data more trusty indirectly. The nodes lose LINK staked on the node if they give incorrect data outputs. They are then incentivized to provide accurate data to not only profit on the output but also not lose the value staked on their node. To summarize they are making trust a commodity, and created a system where being trustworthy is more profitable than being a malicious actor.

>>18653311

Correct, it has little to do with the discussion at hand. Anyone can write code to create a node giving various data outputs of their choosing.

Only one decentralized oracle network (Chainlink) exists, and over the last few years they have shown its a needed component in order to solve the oracle problem(inherent/apparent vectors of failure) and complete "The God Protocol". A centralized oracle out putting data in a stand alone manner will always fail and be subject to various attack vectors.

-Multiple sources of the same data feed( decentralization), aggregation of said feeds, threshold sigs, mixicles(anonymity), Z-proofs etc I'm probably missing other areas that is off the top of my head.

>>18653417
Also SGX and off chain computation as well

>>18652099
33x, i see what u did there
Also, checked

You are delusional morons. This means the data will be aggregated and published on chain FOR FREE.

Fucking no one is going to pay to jump through hoops for the same data you insufferable ponzi faggots.

>>18653478
>>18653478

Ironically a coincidence but you are correct its synchronicity and just as things should be. Accidental masonry haha. 33 vertebrae in the spine as well all along the charkra points and energy centers.

I'm amazed at the person I'm becoming since I started researching Chainlink within in weeks of it launching. Every facet of my life has changed.

Pic related

>>18653313
>sergay 6 letters
>nasarov 7 letters
>6*7=42

>>18653517

See

>>18653289
>>18653032
>>18652865
>>18652772
>>18652750
>>18652750
>>18652625
>>18652588
>>18652524

Every corporation that will need to secure data outputs for various smart contracts won't necessarily be paying because their oracle jobs will cover the expense and then some. Its a net gain. They have to be part of the Chainlink network to do so. Also paying a node to acquire the data in an automated manner is cheaper than the human element used currently.

>>18653578
What do you expect Oracle to roll out next month? And what's in store for us in the next few months. What's your take on Arbitrum?

>>18653559
Basically this. Most of the negative replies aren't from ignorance of the system but malicious intent. I want all my brothers here to profit here. If you can hold long enough even 1000 will have you set for life eventually. Just under a $4000 investment and maybe 8 years and your family will be set as well.

Its imperative INTJ's, GATE, followers of Christ and the Source/Prime consciousness succeed and serve the masses in their area of expertise with the wealth gained from this project. The playing field must be evened. We need to raise the vibrations of those around us.

Higher Power/God/Christ
Your own personal physical and spiritual needs
Family
Friends
Neighbors
Community
State
Nation

The pyramid must be inverted. Its the duty of the intelligent, strong, and capable to lift, care, and provide for the weak and vulnerable. There are many who believe its their natural right to rule over them.

And here's how it's good for Chainlink...
(And that's a beautiful thing!)
(Right!)

>>18652358
Go back to plebbit you faggot. The whole point of chainlink is so a Smartcontract can use coinbase’s api feed, Gemini’s api feed, kraken’s api feed, etc... and aggregate them making the smart contract’s data input secure. And chainlink can do this with almost any type of data.

>>18653684

You ducking simpleton. Coinbase is publishing directly to chain which means smart contracts can just pull the data directly for free and with no token to worry about or new protocol to involve.

Chain link is dead.

>>18653629

Arbitrum and Chainlink together solved the scalability problem. Ethereum and other blockchain platforms will be just be settlement layers basically. I'm only invested in LINK and soon to be Link Pool, I'm still working out a buy price and amount to purchase, but I need to pull the trigger soon.

Oracle will integrate Chainlink into their cloud software just as Google did in their Big Query tools. Eventually all of them will create their own oracles, like Coinbase did today, to provide data feeds included in the network and launch nodes to perform jobs. Staking will be official soon, probably by August imo, but May is looking to be a great month. I suspect a lot of it is already done and its just public relations deciding on dates.

>>18653719

Coinbase can't create cost savings and new profit streams in that manner through the Chainlink network they will though. Smart contracts must have collateral to be secure as well, which LINK provides. That is still one centralized piece of data output. Coinbase will create a node and monetize their own API price feeds.

>>18653719
If you’re not trolling, I feel sorry for you being so dumb. Being that dumb must be so tiresome.

>>18653797
they will get paid for the call of their data.

>>18653764
>Arbitrum and Chainlink together solved the scalability problem. Ethereum and other blockchain platforms will be just be settlement layers basically.
It's going to really painful for you when link goes to zero while eth goes above $10k.
Sell at least 1/3 of that link and buy eth.
>as Google did in their Big Query tools
google did literally nothing except release a blogpost on how chainlink utilizes their api.
>>18653797
>Smart contracts must have collateral to be secure as well, which LINK provides
the only collateral worth anything on ethereum is eth or stablecoins. As pointless as link is, it's made even worse by the token.

>>18652439
Wow you are a dumbass

>>18653835
Retards have been trolling since 2017. The only people who fud link are paid actors and genuinely bitter people which I don't feel sorry for. When link reaches triple digits it's going to take 5 years before this board settled down and the next money maker is genuinely shilled

>>18653856
>$10k eth

I stopped reading there.

>>18653842
Its not secure as a central source taken straight from their API thus the oracle problem, which the Chainlink network solves.

>>18653914
What's the deal with SWIFT? Are they waiting for the open banking regs to come out? What's your take on that? Feels like that shit has been top secret since SIBOS and the ICO

>>18652358
CENTRAL POINT OF FAILURE

>>18653677

>>18653990
I believe this pic is unironically real but says more about hyperinflation than anything else. BTC wil be $50MM

>>18654043
Wrong

Epic bread.

Posting for history purposes.

The World will look a lot different in two years. Rapid change. By the time social distancing practices are relaxed many people will see the world drastically in a different way.

>>18652099
Checked.

$377

>>18653930

PSD2 compliance and the ISO20022 standard is in the works, but the complaince legislation that required banks to convert got pushed to 2022 if I remember correctly. By that date it will be law for banks to follow.

I don't know if you have seen central banks in Europe and Australia off the top of my head are teaming with Accenture(R3 Corda etc which use Chainlink) to create an on blockchain digital currency of their respective country. Imo all of that will come first, with them creating the token, oracle feeds, and nodes, then SWIFT will begin to use all of that information for their smart contracts by 2022 when the standards are required by law.


SWIFT will likely be one of the last institutions we are aware of now to enter unfortunately but lots of gains will be made prior. Once SWIFT enters the sky is the limit and we will see the real singularity in effect. Seriously the value their SWIFT is trillions/billions daily, it will be unreal the value needed staked on nodes to be proper collateral for their smart contracts to securely resolve.

>>18654146
Haha yes the DMT/Mushroom trip prophecies. Did they say a date again? I don't remember. I suppose that is possible in 12 months but Idk that would make me too much money so I'm skeptical. Given the right set of events the system could mature that quickly in a year, but it would be beyond idea cirumstances imo Lol

>>18654207

>>18652248
Do you think xrp was worth $140 billion for literally nothing?
140,000,000,000 / 350,000,000 = $400 per link

>>18653990

A man can dream. The token mechanics could ironically achieve this by 2026, but I'd assume its likely a photo shop although Idk how to tell. Idk maybe 42 did send himself information through time via quantum computing since time isn't linear and everything is happening all at once.

>>18654232

>>18652148
Discord tranny spotted

>>18652358
So I just get coinbase's data / prices and that's enough? For everything? Just some crypto prices and we pack up, big data is done for the day?

>>18654275
Just like quantum computing accessing the prime consciousness we all stem from would also transcend time or be existing all at once so it would probably be doable to see potential outcomes as well. Nothing is 100% written though imo

>>18654275
Get your ducks in a row.

>>18654241
It was only worth this much because they seemed to be the most corporate of crypto projects, and promissed banks as clients, but fucked the people over by not making anyone adopt their fucking token. To think I actually thought back in the day that it was a good investment. I'm still ashamed biz, forgive me.

>>18651790
I sold the 40x and bought back, and sold THAT 2x, TWICE. KEK!

I have 180K LInkieZ and I STILL cashed out $250K from you retards.

Maybe we'll 2x by EOY, but I think we bleed, hard.

Any newfags buying above $3 are about to get ICX'd!

Buy UND before main net or stay forever bagholdin.

>>18654085

It will feel the same to most people probably but the very nature of how people form contractual agreements will be completely transformed in the internal layers that are unseen. An entirely new system is being laid out and implemented.

>>18654348
>I sold the 40x and bought back, and sold THAT 2x, TWICE. KEK!
>I have 180K LInkieZ and I STILL cashed out $250K from you retards.

I doubt it but if you did great, I swing trade for profits in the interim as well and never touch certain percentage of my holdings.

The rest of your post is wrong though there is no better time to dollar cost average than now. It will probably dip after the halving as well but its hard to tell. The market has everytime in the past. The upside to LINK is infinite and some people simply don't have the time, understanding, or patience to trade short term, much safer for some to just buy and hold, which is a fine strategy.

Link looks like it will dip below 3 after the halving, buy in then

>>18654440

I don't think it will go that low, but its somewhat possible, unlikely I'd say though.

>>18654407
>>18654440
When's the halving? Also how large are the stacks you trade on any individual sell/buy order usually?

Not sure if I should buy my linkies 10 at a time or 100 to build a nice 1k stack.

>>18653764
They won't just create data feeds, but data filtering systems, off-chain computation... oracles are much bigger than data feeds

>>18654490
This. Most of these newfags weren't around for the Towncrier acquisition nor do they realise how massive this is for link. See pic.

>>18654490
Yes the possibilities are endless definitely. Again its a combination of AI, IoT, oracles, and distributed ledgers forming digital neural network always communicating with itself and removing inefficiences/refining the system/itself. The future will truly be glorious

>>18654487
I do futures on 10x usually but use significant amounts of open margin to ensure I don't have a liquidation point. I only make a couple trades a month I'd say. I'm very careful. 5 digit sums at risk. Just continue to buy whatever you can afford. You should get a job wherever you can right now. If you don't have 5000 then take out a loan or get there do anything to hit that before July if possible.

Rate my buy last night

>>18654626
r8 8/8 its gr8

>>18654258
Anything is possible

>>18654297
Link is never going to support more than publicly available api, because anything else has just one data source which has no need for a middleman.
It's almost three years since the ico and there's still no sports data oracle in chainlink, and that's semi-public data. There's never going to be one. It would commoditize precious data.
>>18654584
town crier is completely worthless, and on-chain randomness is a solved problem in eth2.

>>18654623
My only problem is that I have to report all crypto stuff to the firm I work at, and they have to approve it. I'm not too clear on the details but I'm getting that sorted out. I have like 7k I'm willing to throw in for LINK in a few weeks.

>>18652210
It’s not FUD, it’s common chainlink shilling

>>18654626
thats a holy buy my friend

>>18653417
>Only one decentralized oracle network (Chainlink) exists
I'm heavy in chainlink, but is tellor not a decentralized (shit, but decentralized) oracle network?

>>18654487

https://www.bitcoinblockhalf.com/

Right now I'd buy 100 at at time. You need to hit 1000 yesterday if you can after that you can be more conservative up to 5,000. If you can hit that with current prices you should be set if you are willing to hold 3-5 years. Maybe sooner Idk what your monthly costs are. I could live comfortable on 500,000, but I'm going for more like 5 Million perhaps 50 Million. I have a set amount I will never sell, it will be passed down to my children, and the keys will die with me probably. They will have trusts obtaining the dividends. I'll use smart contracts to ensure my future generations won't lose the intergenerational wealth I've created for them. Perhaps I'll leave clues so that only one who understands the potential, lives the proper life of service to others, and correct moral acuity in general will understand.

>>18654085
Like how we used to.

>>18653856
>chainlink utilizes their api

>>18652439

Signing data is great but it can't protect a contract holder from bad actors or collateralize the contract. Coinbase could be hacked, or coinbase could provide whatever data it wants to--- smart contracts are not legally binding and one day Coinbase might wake up and decide it's in its own interest to trigger the conditions of a smart contract. Or maybe coinbase is compelled by authorities to alter a contract. The point of chainlink is that the use of LINK and the aggregation of data from multiple inputs fends off bad actors and also collateralizes the contents of smart contracts.

The whole premise of blockchain is eliminating trusted central actors and using cryptography and game theory to allow a community to secure a service in a decentralized manner. If you can accept that, then having centralized data feeds defeats the entire use case of ethereum smart contracts, and you may as well have a smart contract that is not validated/executed on the blockchain at all.

>>18654678

No Tellor is different. Its decentralized price feeds from one oracle. Its more limited in scope as well. It could always be added to the Chainlink network for more value for everyone though but alone is subject to some vectors of attack. It system is a bit safer though than the average centralized oracle data feed as they try to solve some of the issues of the "oracle problem". You need independent nodes all doing the same job for max security.

Unibright and Kleros seem to be important parts to the entire system running well outside of data inputs and outputs although I'm not shilling them. I haven't done the proper research to invest and honestly LINK is just a better bet at this point. Its the main facet of the 4th Industrial Revolution

>>18652563

You act like a smart contract would be using chainlink only to call on coinbase prices. In the case of price data, which is exactly what an api call to coinbase would be for, Chainlink would not be sampling only one exchange. Getting an average price from many different exchanges would 100% be how Chainlink would be used. In this case Chainlink derives much of its security from sampling many different exchanges for price data.

>>18654752
Excellent points. I'm seeing discussion and breakdown of mechanic specifics I haven't seen since almost mid 2018. Its nice, most OG's just made their bets by then and everyone stopped discussing because it became a waiting game.

>>18654207
>SWIFT will likely be one of the last institutions we are aware of now to enter unfortunately but lots of gains will be made prior. Once SWIFT enters the sky is the limit and we will see the real singularity in effect. Seriously the value their SWIFT is trillions/billions daily, it will be unreal the value needed staked on nodes to be proper collateral for their smart contracts to securely resolve.
that will never happen. Chainlink lied about Swift. They have no relationship whatsover except that one competition they won 4 years ago. Not a single news since except some lies from Sergey himself. It's been 4 years, how many more years are you gonna wait for this fake partnership to materialize? 20 years?

>>18654490
>>18654584
kek that was years ago... and they haven't even started on it/started using it.

This is a fairy tale non programmer brainlets like yourself fall for. In 5-10 years they still won't have started on it... because it's bullshit to fool non-programmers

>>18654626
Praise be!

>>18652665

If you seriously think they will opt for legal contracts, why are you interested in blockchain for smart contracts at all? The whole premise of blockchain is to eliminate trusted central authorities and enable communities of users to execute and verify a service. You can run smart contracts in code not on the blockchain, you know.

>>18654679
I have 1500 but I literally cannot afford more than a dozen at a time now (I have a family). I don't know what to do. My trumpbux is coming by check (so weeks or months).. I have bad credit.. What would you do?

>>18654626
fuck. u have more than me and i bought in 2018

>>18654846

There is lots of evidence SWIFT is involved. Sergy has mentioned it at Fluidity by name. There are legal ramifications for using their logos without proper authority. Its plastered all over SmartContract.com, which is the parent company that redirects you to Chain.link, if you want to create smart contracts for institutional use.

I'm familiar with Python. Random Number Generators are one of the easiest things to code and will ensure complete security for off chain computation. Every company will be able to create a monetization stream doing that very thing. Think about how 2FA works to sign into your crypto accounts.

The banking sector moves incredibly slow, it will be the last industry to fully move in. Again the legal standards for banks must be adhered too by 2022, which is likely when SWIFT will officially enter. Central banks are creating their own digital currencies and using Chainlink for their oracles through Accenture, R3, and Corda.

2 years isn't that long to wait for them and many other industries will launch way before that. You are just being ridiculous and purposely negative.

>>18654943
We’re all in it together, fren. Sending some positive energy your way!

>>18654911

Its bad taste to ask friends or family and generally not wise but I suppose it could be an option given your individual case. Everyone I know is poor though so it never made sense. I also never want to have other people's money and suggest you find another way but I figured I'd mention it.

You can always sell things you own, borrow against assets you already own. Maybe sell your car and buy something more affordable or cheaper. I don't have an immediate family so its easier for me. You of course need to make sure they are taken care of first so the car thing could be a bad idea, and unwise. You can always lower your current costs. I prepare all of my food from scratch, nothing premade at all, never eat out, don't drink or smoke. I have zero subscriptions to any like Netflix its all online anyway. You could not pay student loans for almost a year before they try to garnish your wages, pay the absolute bare minimum if anything some months. If I can think of anything I'll mention it, get creative I believe in you.

>>18651883
swap you an image?

>>18655021
Thanks anon. It really means a lot. I'll do my best as I've been trying to and luckily my wife has always believed in link too so we're in alignment on this.

>>18652506
Hyperinflation of USD incoming keep accepting Gibs and then 81k will probably equate to 1k in today's money.
Go back in time and look at what 10c could get you.

>>18652591
Oh god. You may have found your nirvana if you find a 42 thread

>>18652303
this is accurate
coinbase oracle service itself is a single source of truth, so there will need to be a network of that
aka chainlink

>>18651993

100$ seems possible within 18 months but that’s a best-case scenario imo

>>18651827
Read the bible and stop worshipping idols heathen. There is a war going on you dingbat.

stop Drinking. Focus.

>>18653764
>I'm still working out a buy price and amount to purchase, but I need to pull the trigger soon
Me too what’s your take

>>18655232

I suspect the next bullrun will be total market capitalization of all crypto will approximately 4 to 4.5 Trillion at its peak. That is around a 25x from current value. BTC will probably make up 40% of that imo. That doesn't give a clear picture of LINK's pricing I guess but 50 to 100 billion isn't outrageous

>>18655232
So in your best case scenario link will be worth half of what xrp was worth at its peak lmao

>>18655232
>824 billion
>previous ATH.
No retard, there are for starters more coins in circulation. And it was 320 billion. And why the fuck would a useless erc token get so much money

>>18655334
>50 to 100 billion isn't outrageous
Only 50 to 100 billion? I thought it's the only project that matters most in crypto. Where the fuck will the other 2 Trillion go if BTC takes up half?

>>18655419
Honestly,
>the only project that matters
It's a fucking dead erc token for 3 years. Literally nothing more then coronacoin.Literally the same. Useless shit. It's crazy that it's in the top 20 even.

>>18654752
A nice high IQ thought out post. Good job.

>>18655289

Well shit at current prices 1LP share is only around $6700 USD which isn't terrible. Last time I looked it was much higher. Now I'm thinking I will buy .25 to .4 tommorrow and then DCA to a full share by end of June, buying each week for the next two months. That still feels too long from now though, but better than nothing. I'm starting to think getting into LP early will be a serious game changer.

>>18654846
Swift wants to stay alive, They know it's going digital. Swift need link more than Link need swift.
If all banking was going the way of Xrp what would the likes of swift think?
Xrp suing people from pulling out means something is going down.
Keep FUD up boys, I need to accumulate more.

>>18655419
ETH will probably get a lot of it, 1 trillion likely and the rest of the top 20 will split the rest basically. LINK will probably be top 5 by that point. That is a conservative estimate on LINK, but if it goes to 300 billion this cycle I'd be surprised a bit. Eventually I think LINK could over take ETH but closer towards the end of the decade, 2028-2030. We will be at a 10 Trillion or more MCAP by then. It definitely has more potential but the LINK network needs serious saturation.

LINK $0 EOY

>>18655443

Its one of the most important pieces in the coming 4th Industrial Revolution. Decentralized Oracles networks, Distributed Ledger Technology, Artificial Intelligence, and the Internet of Things, and digital currencies will all combine to create a seamless automated society in the near future. Chainlink is more like a commodity. Data will power everything and overtake oil as the new lifeblood of the future. Its all quite exciting.

>>18655049

I literally forgot about AAVE. You can borrow against your own holdings and pay some interest. If the price goes to low you will get liqudated though. I would suggest only 20-25% of your 1500 stack. You want your liquidation price under 1.50 perhaps lower. I've been looking into it as well but haven't pulled the trigger as I already do futures and don't want my main stack at any risk but I might consider doing 10% because it can be virtually risk free if managed properly. A lot of people are doing it right now and going balls to the wall, but its definitely one of your best options. You can just pay it off normally like a regular loan from working as well each pay period or with profits of the borrowed LINK potentially.

>>18655466
Why do you think 1 LP is a better investment than putting $6700 into LINK now? You believe that 1LP will perform better than 1700 LINK? I'm on the fence about LP. I think I'm better off just buying more LINK.

>>18655466
Since this is THE thread I don’t mind asking for your way of explaining it

>>18651790
so neetnodes wont be a thing huh?

>>18655722
>>18655725

I suspect early staking gains will be significant in order to incentivize to people to use the services available. Link Pool works directly with the Chainlink team, which is huge. LP also lets you stake but still retain complete ownership of your holdings with the private keys unlike the staking services we will likely see from exchanges I.E. Coinbase, Gemini, and Binance. This is one of the most important aspects honestly. I think those who hold a share get somekind of staking priority as well in the early stages but I need to double check that completely. The passive income from LP unrelated to staking LINK, which pays out LINK already, is the main reason I want it and should have bought months ago.

How much LINK do you own. If at least 10,000, 1 LP share in tandem with that amount should be more beneficial than just buying 1700 more LINK from my research. I'm in for the long haul and plan on holding for years more like decades. A 90/10 (preferred) to 85/15 split LINK/LP will give the most long term gains, while all in LINK would probably give better short term gains.

>>18655784
No they will, but the system needs more saturation before they are viable otherwise the system is more vulnerable to 51% attacks

bump

>>18651790
Fuck off LINK is going to damp just sold it all.

>>18656026

No? Its the most promising project in the top 20. You should read the thread.

>>18655821
Great success! Fence posts are no longer in my anus. Thanks man.

>>18651790
How can coinbase introduce staking for LINK in their wallet without being a node operator to use your LINKs as collateral?

There's so many brainlets here about to miss a big opportunity.

>>18651790
This is sounding very centralized. Isn't the whole point of DeFi the De part, otherwise why bother at all? Tellor is the only project trying to solve this currently

based op

>>18655419
>only 50 to 100 billion?
The fucking hide on crypto faggots

>>18652012
>>18652422
>>18652913
>he thinks Compound is a competitor to Chainlink

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

>>18656095

Tellor is trying but fails to solve the "oracle problem". Its also limited to price feeds, while the Chainlink network will encompass all data feeds.

See

>>18654801

Each data feed is inherently centralized. Its the collection of oracles combined in the Chainlink oracle network that creates the decentralization aspect.

>>18656107

It could be higher, but 100 billion in this cycle is a safe estimate.

Sooo what do I buy? Link? Etherium? Bitcoin? All of em?

>>18651993
No. We will see $1 LINK before we see $100. This winter will be an absolute bloodbath once the massive covid wave hits. Stop being a retard

>>18652235
Fucking retard. Never sell the final 10K and get rich as fuck

>>18656192
Only one of the ones you mentioned hasn't mooned 1000s of times yet, and has been gradually conquering crypto over the past two years.

>>18656195

That is completely speculation. Its possible we could have a second wave, but then the best course of action is to continue to accumulate and just dollar cost average. Time in the market>timing the market. I said $100 would be the top of the next cycle and 18 months away at best. Plent of time

>>18656107
Shut the fuck up retard

>>18656037
And you dont think it will have a marketcap greater than 100 billion? What the fuck lol

>>18651790
Happy Ramadan!

>>18656568
Suck goats in Hell, jawa filth!

>>18651790
The team is already losing money subsidizing the network and now coinbase releases an oracle for their most used pairs
Yeah this aint bullish, are they going to be paying coinbase to use their api now too?
Are they a miney faucet?

guh

>>18656653
>and now coinbase releases an oracle
All it does is allow Chainlink users to verify that the source is indeed Coinbase.
See pic.

>are they going to be paying coinbase to use their api now too?
lmao, that was always the case you absolute retard

>>18656568
Happy Ramadan chief!!

>>18655784
They will

>>18655821
Thanks

>>18656043
Can you literally explain what you mean? Lol more specifically, how does understanding LP take chainlinks out of your butt?

>>18656015

>>18652235
I guess it would be dumb to sell for 4.05billion. Much better to sell for chump change. While we're at it I'll give you a nickel if you let me fuck your wife and any future daughters in the ass any time I want as often as I want. Sounds just low enough that you'd be willing to take it.

>>18655821
I don’t believe you have to have linkpool shares to stake on linkpool, from my understanding it gives you priority when staking commences.

>>18651790
Epic bread. What kind of sc will you create so the wisest and fruitful of your offspring come into possession of link. LP is a long term play to keep generating wealth for staking purposes, it’s a pay-to-play and cut in front of the line. Need to figure out afford 1LP

Thank you frens. LMFGod.

a. Would you like me to capsized this whole thing by getting my dad's friend to buy whatever stock you're suggesting?
b. Taking down the pedophile elite seems to had negative effects as the Pentagon kitty pork takedown and Harvey Weinstein take down proceeded our current state of emergency.
c. I mean at this point between rap culture and rape culture and pizza gate remnants one wonders what the story is with little girls and government.
We're little girls EVER innocent. Do you remember what little girls acted like when you were little?
d. Maybe stop being jealous that you don't have the courage to run for office and pleasure yourself in vitality. Maybe stop selling roastees as potential life partners when they famously cannot accomplish consciousness or empathic sentience.

>>18655821
Finally someone that gets it.

>>18653990
Lets talk about this photo. Is it possible to set the computer clock to a future date? Is it possible to fake a performance graph? Is it possible to time travel? I saw this posted a few weeks ago in a really good chain link thread. How long has this photo been around and whats the true story behind it. If there is time travel where are the travelers? I've seen the black and white photos of guys wearing sunglasses among 1880's miners but those could just as easily be Photo shopped as this pic. Are people really using this pic latch on to as hope?

>>18656195
The meme virus is fake and gay. Do your research. Don't let propaganda meant to scare you into selling, scare you into selling.

>>18654258
>what is Inspect Element

>>18656559

Obviously it will at some point, that was my conservative estimate for the next 18 months, $100 dollar top, it could be much higher if events unfold flawlessly.

>>18656653

First Coinbase releases an oracle data feed, then they will create a node to start profitting through the Chainlink network once staking is announced. Its insanely bullish.

>>18658013
You are correct, but the LP share will probably retain value better and be subject to wild price swings like LINK, but won't go up in value nearly as much. Again its just long term vs. short term value.

>>18659500

I haven't worked out the details completely, but I doubt I'll ever pass on the private keys to entire basket of LINK/LP being staked that is generating their wealth. Everything will be 100% automated by then and the staking gains will be somewhat reinvested back in LINK/LP and some diversified into other tangible assets, some put into a trust as liquid currency to spend. No one but myself will ever have access to the entire thing. One man can secure his blood line for the rest of eternity basically. I will set smart contract executions based on various contingencies I'm aware of now. They need to have family if they want part of the trust/dividend pay outs. They will never be able to spend themselves into poverty after a few generations, but have a massive leg advantage in life. If would be cool to have secrets for the worthy, perhaps a descendent of mine 100 years from now, to obtain a large percentage of the pile, maybe even all of it, if they exhibit character traits of a Soul of Gold. Idk how to arrange that completely yet. Someone who doesn't want the money but basically wants to save the world. Insane like me.

All I think about now is accruing massive wealth to start a business in high quality food production to raise the masses' vibrations and create high paying jobs. Impact as many as possible and expand, but Idc about profit more or less

Service to others

>>18662197

u a cool crazy nigga linkbro

Anyone else find it strange how much oracle chatter there is in this thread yet basically none of PNK? People are really still unaware of what PNK is?

>>18662498

Instead of making second-rate memes you fucking pinkies should make some useful explanations/infographics of what is does.

>>18662197

>securing your bloodline with smart contracts and leaving clues for the worthy

That’s unfathomably fucking based

>>18662498
I mentioned it. Its just not as important as LINK, but will probably see some excellent gains in the next cycle. I'm just not holding any because I see little reason to hold anything other than LINK/LP unless you want BTC or ETH, maybe Tezos.

>>18662629
Thanks, I can only hope they follow my ideals. Overcome fear and spread love. Love, Justice, Freedom, and Truth.

gemini chad here, never bought link because I've always been comfortable just holding bitcoin and I don't like moving my funds to shady chink sites to buy altcoins. but reading through this thread convinced me. I'll place cascading limit orders growing in size starting at $3.59 when trading goes live

>>18662988


Good luck man, I'm glad you the information useful. Coinbase is relatively safe from my understanding, although its always best to buy and then send at least some to a ledger or trezor. Trading goes live today right? I hope you can hit 10,000 and maybe consider LP as well but one step at a time.

>>18662197
Based af fren
>All I think about now is accruing massive wealth to start a business in high quality food production to raise the masses' vibrations and create high paying jobs. Impact as many as possible and expand, but Idc about profit more or less

Have you heard of chef Jose Andres, he founded the world food bank. He’s currently trying to work with Congress to pass legislation on providing fresh food to the poor. From my understanding his non profit works on two ends- getting imperfect farm foods to the poor- and setting up food banks to countries that could face famine. Essentially taking away profits from big pharma by feeding people healthy and properly

>>18662197
BASTE.

>>18662197
>They need to have family if they want part of the trust/dividend pay outs.
Don't do this bro. It's honestly really sad when your loved ones don't have family. Often it's not because they are degenerate, but because it just didn't work out for them. Don't make it harder on them

>>18652036
30x from here you fucking retard. Bitcoin is $7000 LOL

>>18663657

My expertise is in running and managing fast causual dining restaurants. I will check him out that sounds interesting as well but the business concept I'm suggesting needs to turn a profit for the workers.

A business where I can ideally empower others to achieve freedom. It's in the food industry where I'd do traditional American style cuisine but only the best quality ingredients. Food is the basis of all life and anyone literally anyone can work that kind of job. I'm not concerned with profit so much as long as I can continue to operate and reinvest to expand Bezos style to impact as many people as possible. I only eat wholefoods, grass fed butters dairy and the cleanest cuts of meat, healthy fats, lots of green vegetables, spring water, coffee, honey, dark chocolate eggs, herbs, onion, garlic, fresh cold pressed juicing of vegetables as well etc you get the idea (if interested I'll gladly give a full list) since I was 19. My starchy carb intake is low, mostly potato and occasionally rice. I haven't had my immune system compromised in almost 4 years. I eat maybe at best 10gs of refined carbs and sugars, and most days it's zero.

Eventually I will use indoor grow farms nearby each location to ease supply chain costs and ensure the food is of the best quality. The savings are astounding growing produce and then using it directly in a restaurant.

>>18655665
Thanks for this suggestion, I am doing this with 1/3rd my stack currently :)
Btw this is one of the best threads on biz for a long time. Love you anon

>>18663776

Hmm I will take that into account and perhaps refine it, but its often because people choose not for selfish reasons and not because they couldn't. Children are the light of the future and its imperative good people have them and put them above all else.

>>18663838
You're probably right. I guess I was just thinking anecdotally about my own family members who are old and alone. I think you definitely have the right idea about using smart contracts to encode the correct values in your family's foundation for generations to come. This is an application I had never even considered, but quite frankly it's brilliant

>>18663821

Thanks man, I hope everyone is learning something. The endless streams of terrible thoughtless FUD was becoming so tiresome. They generally stopped and started ignoring the thread so it didn't bump anymore.

We are all in this together!

Everyone that finds their way here is indeed special and has more potential than they could ever realize.

=)

>>18663801
Economic sovereignty by way of Food sovereignty.

I can definitely see a circle economy. Starting from the source, regenerative agriculture practices that yield more produce while sequestering carbon and reducing greenhouse emissions. Getting that food directly to the consumer either by restaurant or direct. By restaurant, there’s a model by Food pioneer in the space, Alice Waters, she has a restaurant called Chez Panisse. The employees get paid very well, only has one restaurant and hasn’t not scaled, but it encompasses this circle economy. May be worth checking out. Also there are some startups that are trying to create incentives for owners and restaurant goers to donate to regenerative agriculture practices. But nothing yet. There’s a big push in the academia side of things right now, so I’d imagine we are in the early forefront of that movement.

One of the big obstacles, imo, is that there’s a scarcity of land, which makes the output expensive, which then makes this an expensive products to eat. So I really love the idea of local indoor grow farms. I’d imagine, say city dwellers can pay into a system where they contribute either by physical work or financially to grow their own products in someone’s backyard. This would help people achieve such food sovereignty. There will have to be a shift from relying on big messy food supply systems, to relying on a more local level. Man. I feel like learning hydroponics and indoor growing

>>18651790
>All corporations will have oracles of their own for each data feeds

even if this is true there is no money in this shit. Coinbase's oracle is free for a reason. Why does the LINK token even need to come into play? Just another adoption barrier. Use your fucking brain

>>18660823
Best friend’s sister died from it. Will be nice to see the deniers get btfo this winter when it really takes off. Remember they are trying to take away your right to earn a living anon. Do not quarantine. Go outside and make sure to interact with lots of normies

>>18664184
You are being purposely obtuse it appears. The LINK token will allow Coinbase to properly monetize their new data feed. You should read the thread to understand the specifics. A centralized feed can't stand alone. Everything you just mentioned has been covered multiple times here.

>>18664110

Yes, corporations and the powers that be are attempting to completely monopolize the food supply. If you control food, you can control the people. In addition most people eat synthetic processed goods that barely resemble real food. Its a large reason for poor health outcomes, chronic ailments, low energy, and even mental problems like anxiety/depression.

Thanks so much for the added information. It will be useful to research these people, their experiences, and methods to refine my own plans.

Please add more if you have other information on proper execution.

>>18664250
Imagine paying someone to tell you the price. Jesus Christ you guys are insanely deluded if you think there's riches to be made off of fucking price feeds
>A centralized feed can't stand alone
so what? just use a bunch of different free feeds then

>>18662197
>One man can secure his blood line for the rest of eternity basically
>if they exhibit character traits of a Soul of Gold
This is a bit much, even by my standards

>>18662764
>>18663838
Are you a Christian?

>>18664348

All data has value and the ability to be monetized. Price feed data is quite valuable as smart contract derivative tools that execute automatically will need that data in order properly resolve.

The data can't be securely input without Chainlink's oracle network. Again you still can't just do a bunch of free feeds separately as they fall victim to various attack vetors, thus the "oracle problem". Anyone who adds their oracle data feed to Chainlink's network adds a net positive for everyone involved.

They are able to monetize those data streams now which will outweight any costs associated with aggregating data inputs. Its also automated and cheaper than using a human element to do it.

Again everything you are saying has been covered many times here already. Go through the thread.

>>18654819
>>18654801
>>18654752
>>18653764

>>18653578

Those cover everything especially the last one lists 8 more posts that nail exactly everything you are arguing against.

>>18664464

One man secure his blood line for eternity though. They simply won't be able to access the main supply creating their wealth and accidently destroy it, which means it will operate endlessly while giving them dividends for all time. I'll make sure some of the dividends are diversified into tangible things like land/property

Not really in an organized sense. I follow the teachings of Christ and suspect he is the actual embodiment of God, who came here to absolve our karmic debt because it was getting to a point where no one could ascend anymore due to the state of the planet at the time. Evil was everywhere and hold was immense. I meditate a lot, frequently lucid dream, have had insights or feelings that came from outside the 5 senses more or less.

I'm positive we all stem from a single prime consciousness/creator that transcends all time and space.

>>18664184
Nothing is free, if you aren't paying for a product you are the product.

>>18664328
My wife studies this, so I’ve learned a lot from her. We are both learning and meeting interesting folk. If you’d like shoot me a burner and I’ll keep you posted on interesting things or reads in that space as I find out. Changing the food system for the better Is as or more important than anything really. linkygreenanon@protonmail

>>18664464

Also Plato mentioned the term "Soul of Gold" and related it to the ideal the leader of men, a Philosopher-King essentially who empowers/serves as opposed to controls. There are other stages if I remember correctly silver, iron etc

There are some insanely based, patrician anons in this thread that give me hope about the future

Be blessed.

>>18664690
>>18664830
I love it, it’s just audacious on a level beyond what one normally sees or hears lmao

>>18665087

It does sound a bit pretentious on the surface I suppose, the proper intentions are there. Lol

>>18664816

Hmm I might take you up that and make a random email soon when I get some time. Ironically I'm starving and going to make some food soon. Lol I'm going to save your burner and if perhaps you will get a message from me, I'll state who I was/our discussion in the message.

>>18664900

Yes, ideally many here will rise up and change the world when they are ready.

>>18664236
now tell us what she really died from or better yet quit being a lying faggot

>>18652235
Holy shit you have a 50k stack and you will never make it. That's impressive stupidity.

>>18651790
Sorry dude LINK is done for. Sell now while you can still get something for it

>>18665970

>>18665801
it’s all over the news retard. Albany GA

>>18665970

Lol really? I mean really why even bother replying obviously. There are over 150 replies specifically on the breakdown of the token mechanics and why Chainlink oracle network is a necessary component to solving the "oracle problem". Honestly, just stop its so sad.

I've been accumulating/researching since November of 2017 and dollar cost averaging in to into late 2018. My basis point is sexy as hell. Now I just swing futures in the short term and will be averaging into Link Pool as my next venture. Sorry but I won't ever be selling my willy wonka ticket.

>>18666317
Based anon. I have just started accumulating at the crash, you have inspired me to accumulate and hold for a long time. I believe you'll be securing your bloodline, I'm hoping it's a based lineage.

Bump

>>18666635

You will make it as well. So many things came together for me in my lifetime, especially over the past 5 years that gave me the will and patience ensure my bloodline and future generations in general a chance at prosperity.

I was legit built for this shit.

>>18651790

>>18655289
.

>>18666763
C-can you email my burner too plz sir cdg2@live ?

>>18651790
Astro is a fucking faggot lol

He complains about his neighbors in the Ghetto like someone fucking cares

>>18651827
>For the love of god we’ve waited so long I’m an insane alcoholic now I just want to make it already
Pothead reporting in

>>18667014

About what specifically? The conversation on food production?

>>18667082
Everything

If multiple exchanges are sending signed data to open oracle, couldn't those be aggregated without chainlink?

>>18667194
>couldn't those be aggregated without chainlink?
Not how it works.
Pic here is an explanation from the horse's mouth: >>18656807

>>18667194

It wouldn't be secure nor monetized in the most profitable manner. All oracles and their feeds must join the network.

>>18667131
Sure if I make one I'll save yours as well.

boasting in epin bread

>>18667312
It’s my permanent burner

>>18667286
>It wouldn't be secure
Why not

>>18667494

If you legitimately don't understand why then you don't understand the purpose of the Chainlink network or the "oracle problem". You should read the white paper and research that phrase to get a better understanding.

I've also covered it in this thread multiple times, read through it.

>>18667591
Based and notgettingpissedoffatretardspilled

>>18666317
>Sorry but I won't ever be selling my willy wonka ticket
Custom meme for you king (I’ve been meaning to make this since I saw the film a few days ago kek)

>>18667312
Before you forget

>>18667610

Yes well if its ignorance that is understandable and can be helped, we should all be helping each other here.

If its intentional and just spreading FUD, they want an emotional response and to divert the focus away from the underlying tech, which is sound and impeccable at this point.

>>18667863

LOL thanks! I'll cherish it forever this is great

>>18652462
This
If you unironically believe analysis and price predictions from complete strangers on a basket weaving forum you deserve to lose everything

>>18668130
What does "believing" a price prediction even mean? Like believing that they made that prediction? It's a prediction retard

>>18668079
Proportions are better here probably ya, my knee bent

>>18668130

I gave an insightful breakdown of my speculation based on past events, current happenings, and the future timeline potential. I also gave sell points all the way to where I think the top could be. I would also suggest you are right in the sense that you should never do what someone else says develop your own plan based on your holdings and assets you need/want to be comfortable.

If anything my assessment allows for people to actually solidify profits on the way to my estimated top for the coming bull cycle. Of course I think you should always have an amount you will never sell, at least 1000 but probably more if you can afford it.

>>18668238
>>18668238
>>18668079

It is better, but he only amplified your original design. Both were equally necessary to complete the most satisfactory end result.

>>18668436
https://youtu.be/5drb3-znyBs

>>18668407
You're just throwing numbers out. None of your predictions are based on any math.

>>18668548
That is wrong. I based it mostly on total market cap breakdown. Its in here probably halfway through the thread.

>>18668613
Cycles are getting longer, why do you think 18 months will be peak for this cycle?

>>18668548
>>18668548

>>18655232
>>18655334
>>18655539
>>18656238
>>18662197

Read these

>>18668686
Right, but for instance
How did you arrive at the number 4-4.5 trillion market cap peak?

>>18668674

I don't think the peak will be 18 months but I had said I think LINK could hit $100 in 18 months maybe less. LINK will go a nice run into the double digits by EOY potentially, retrace a bunch and then BTC will go on its run half way in 2021, eventually pulling up the rest of the market. Peak will be some ways into 2022, but then the banks must adhere to standardized regulations pulling LINK up again, and by then we are getting real close to the next halving. BTC's interest rate will be effectively less than USD in 17 days, and we are in the middle of an economic crisis. It seems bullish, but usually the halving event is bearish on the short term right after.

>>18652235
clip art tatoos... oh ya lol

>>18668724

The exponential curve of previous halvings monitoring the tops and bottoms of each MCAP after the parabolic rises and dumps after. Each time the gains/multiples have been less drastic. Also the book the 4th Industrial Revolution by Klaus Schwab talking about turning points in the future. Most experts hypothesize 10% of global GDP to be on the blockchain by about 2025, which is around 8 Trillion in value, a little more. I think the top of this cycle will be around half that and then probably dip back to 1 Trillion, maybe 750 billion.

>>18651869
Anyone who believes the 81k link screenshot is actually a dumbass with no critical thinking skills. I’ve explained it before, but I’m amazed by the number of nulinkers that believe that photo.
>why is it fake?
look at the related cryptocurrencies. If you can’t figure it out you either have confirmation bias, or are an idiot, and in either case you’re hopeless

>>18668888

The fact you think people think its 100% real is probably more humorous.

That being said by 2026 we could easily see something like 20-25 Trillion on the blockhain perhaps upwards of 30 Trillion.

Given LINK's token mechanics upwards of 90% could easily be removed from circulation allowed only 100 Million to be traded.

That would only require LINK has 8 Trillion MCAP or around 25-30% of the total at that time. BTC, ETH, and LINK are the backbone of automated smart contract technology, will easily make up the top 3, and majority of the MCAP by 2022.

>>18668888
quads

BUMP

>>18669300
Shoot me an email king

>>18669008
>>18668888
Blockchain market cap doesn't matter. Link will surpass BTC market cap by several magnitudes.

>>18651869
>81K by 2026 is probably real

>>18669498
Uhh what’s the argument there? I don’t know if that’s reasonable

>>18669498

It might, but I literally just laid out a MCAP scenario that is perfectly plausible allowing LINK to hit 80K by 2026 through circulation reduction and potential value running on/throught the blockchain. I disagree market cap absolutely matters especially once LINK starts producing dividend value its an incredibly important metric to consider.

>>18669526
Yes I was looking for this. Lol Thanks.

>>18669534
Because it's not a crypto project, it's a project meant to bring blockchain to the IT corporations, the governments and the banks.

You should look at S&P marketcap, instead of looking at bitcoin.

For example when the BSN integrates chainlink and is fully implemented in china you will have payments from 1.5 billion people running through the LINK nodes.
Even the fucking ID2020 implants are supposed to use chainlink.

Basically if the world keeps going in the direction it's going, in 10 years you will be looking at the tyrannical prison planet where you every move is surveiled, passed through chainlink and stored on the blockchain.

>>18669708

Yes I saw that Blythe Masters is on the board. I'm not looking at BTC, I'm looking at the entire MCAP of crypto. Chainlink is different as its more of a commodity that powers the entire system you outlined.

I will have to look into BSN, I haven't seen articles on it, everything good here gets slid.

https://thefintechtimes.com/berlin-group-publishes-version-1-0-of-the-nextgenpsd2-framework/

>>18669823
>I will have to look into BSN, I haven't seen articles on it, everything good here gets slid.
Chinese government blockchain network powered by the Chinese cellphone companies.
They are integrating chainlink. It's bigger than Libra.

>>18668871
>Pearl Harbor is my favorite porn star.
Yeah, that explains a lot.

>>18669708
>>>Even the fucking ID2020 implants are supposed to use chainlink.

>>18669951
What does that even mean?

>>18669823
I read this entire thread, I'm in. Where can we learn more?

>>18670218

The archives. Unfortunately, I don't save many links to previous threads. I have an excellent memory and just no most of the big players involved and a relatively solid picture of the Chainlink network mechanics, LINK token mechanics, and how it interacts with other various technology in the big picture frame. AI, IoT, Distributed legder technology, automation, smart contracts, RFID/smart ID marking for health and tracking, 5G, surveilance/digital mapping as the other anon mentioned, and digital fiat currencies. I'm sure there is more but that is off the top of my head.

I've been here reading things for a long time adding each layer or puzzle piece into the equation.

>>18670164
Your father was your model for God.

If you're male and you're Christian and living in America, your father is your model for God. And if you never know your father, if your father bails out or dies or is never at home, what do you believe about God?

What you end up doing is you spend your life searching for a father and God.

What you have to consider is the possibility that God doesn't like you. Could be, God hates us. This is not the worst thing that can happen.

>>18652502
So stupid.

>>18670218

MediLedger/Pharma
Pg 31

https://www.docdroid.net/pIudrF8/mediledger-dscsa-pilot-project-final-report.pdf#page=4

Google

https://www.forbes.com/sites/hanktucker/2019/06/13/google-integrates-cryptocurrency-project-with-new-blockchain-oracle/#1b3628a061dd

Oracle
Pg 13
https://static.rainfocus.com/oracle/owlonglobal2020/sess/1573096232255001Jv5j/PF/LHT1056-LON%20-%20What%27s%20New%20in%20Oracle%20Blockchain%20Platform_1581179085443001RUQO.pdf

Finance/Securities
https://provenance.io/
BaaS(Smart Contract/application construction)
https://provide.services/

Smart ID on DLT
ID2020.org
Microsoft/Earnest and Young/Baseline Protocol
https://www.coindesk.com/microsoft-ey-and-consensys-present-new-way-for-big-biz-to-use-public-ethereum
https://www.meetup.com/Chainlink-Brussels-Connected-Smart-Contracts/events/269261608/

ISDA Guidelines
https://www.forbes.com/sites/jasonbrett/2019/12/19/congress-considers-federal-crypto-regulators-in-new-cryptocurrency-act-of-2020/#7dd45b165fcdes
https://www.isda.org/2019/10/16/isda-smart-contracts/
Maersk Supply Chain
https://investor.maersk.com/board-directors
Swift confirmation(video)
https://www.finextra.com/blogposting/18607/swifts-major-announcement-slips-under-the-radar
https://twitter.com/TheLinkMarine1/status/1174434578943107073
Crypto-Currency Act of 2020(Decentralized Oracles)
https://www.forbes.com/sites/jasonbrett/2019/12/19/congress-considers-federal-crypto-regulators-in-new-cryptocurrency-act-of-2020/#7dd45b165fcd
Central Bank Digital Currencies(CBDC) R3
https://www.forbes.com/sites/michaeldelcastillo/2020/03/25/trillion-dollar-stimulus-jumpstarts-project-to-issue-central-bank-currency-on-ethereum/#7e687a9447bc
https://www.ecb.europa.eu/paym/intro/publications/pdf/ecb.mipinfocus191217.en.pdf

FED NOW(Instant settlement) Ctrl+ISO20022 standard
https://www.federalreserve.gov/newsevents/pressreleases/files/other20190805a1.pdf

Here is a start

>>18670218

Chainlink + Openlaw: https://twitter.com/openlawofficial/status/1177300013946417154?s=21

Chainlink + Google: https://cloud.google.com/blog/products/data-analytics/building-hybrid-blockchain-cloud-applications-with-ethereum-and-google-cloud

Chainlink + Intel: https://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/new-confidential-computing-solutions-emerge-on-the-hyperledger-avalon-trusted-compute

Chainlink + Oracle(Software company): https://blogs.oracle.com/startup/every-startup-in-the-blockchain-with-oracle-cloud-and-chainlink

Chainlink + Amazon (Skip to 1:01:30): https://pages.kaleido.io/webinar-ondemand-kaleido-on-aws-thankyou?submissionGuid=68a3dd47-631c-4ad9-acf0-d54c52e1dc7c

>>18670342
Nice slide I'd prefer to talk about Chainlink and the implications, tech, integrations etc.

>>18670367
Thank you anon. I feel like, you helping me is helping you and any other anon involved in this.

>>18670318

Supply chain tracking too. Everything you purchase will be tracked on the blockchain with an ID as well. They will have control over what you can purchase as paper money will be phased out. Self driving cars only mapped for areas they want you to go, and everyone pushed towards urban living etc

>>18670444

https://thefintechtimes.com/berlin-group-publishes-version-1-0-of-the-nextgenpsd2-framework/

https://www.coindesk.com/inside-chinas-plan-to-power-global-blockchain-adoption

>>18651993
People said two years time for about 4 years.

>>18670889

New thread bump limit reached here

>>18670860

I'm up more than 20x. None of those projections were out, I'm sorry its not 3953257838923 yet

>>18667863
This is old. There’s a better version out there. I’ll dig it out. Also OG posting in epic bread for my collection. DRSM

>>18671331
Ignore this comment

>>18668079
Someone beat me to it