[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance

View post   
File: 40 KB, 745x481, download.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18539455 No.18539455 [Reply] [Original]

I would like to impose one little rule

if Craig loses his case to this fucking cuck, all you BSV guys can't EVER post his face on this board again
there is no coming back from losing to this fucking faggot mcormack

if he loses to mcormack, you can only post Calvin Ayre, even Jimmy's face... but you can no longer post Craig's

>> No.18539479

>>18539455
Both parties claim that creg has 1.1m btc, just think about it.

>> No.18539480
File: 101 KB, 785x731, 1559141075588.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18539480

>>18539455
>if Craig loses his case to this fucking cuck, all you BSV guys can't EVER post his face on this board again

>> No.18539540
File: 19 KB, 703x911, 1586623325190.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18539540

>>18539479
>Both parties claim that creg has 1.1m btc, just think about it.
That doesn't mean shit, it just means they aren't litigating that. Why? Because it's in Ira's interest to presuppose Creg has the 1M btc. Why would Ira spend all this money to prove Creg was lying and thus also prove he has no claim on Creg's fortune?

>> No.18539578
File: 41 KB, 512x564, frog giggle.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18539578

>>18539455
This is a weird one where I hate both parties involved. In fact I probably dislike Peter even more than CSW. For the greater lols though, it'd be much more hilarious if CSW loses that case.

He's like 0 and 10 in suing people and he's always LARPing about the rule of law. He's not even successful at being a fraud.

>> No.18539580
File: 253 KB, 280x390, tismprism.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18539580

>>18539540
>That doesn't mean shit
>Why would Ira spend all this mon-
Oops

>> No.18539641

>>18539479
that's not what I'm talking about
I'm talking about the case 'Craig Wright vs Peter Mcormack'

>>18539480
there is nothing lower than losing a court case to this fag, admit it

>> No.18539647

>>18539479
Wrong. That is the Kleiman case. Not the case with McCormack

>> No.18539669

>>18539479
that is another case.

>>18539455
ok, I promise I wont put up his face again if he loses to McCormack. Whats your wager?

>> No.18539704

Reminder faketoshi already paid adam beck's legal fees. Welcome to law!
The absolute state of bsvdrones...
Let me say that again.
The ABSOLUTE state.