/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>18328601
no one cares about CZ's next scam coin

Biggest ponzi i've ever seen. As far as i understand the price can't get above ICO price (or not "rationally" at least) because the team offer 90% price guarantee to ICO price buyers for 12 months meaning that it'll prevent volatility at above ICO price meaning no good ROI, When stakers pull out SOL from the circulating supply the team automatically release tokens and market sell them until they get to the fixed 8M supply.

Horrible token metric, all the money grabs in the last year at something similar.

>>18328958
Tldr, Do not touch this thing beside short term trading opportunities for at least the next 12 months (or at all really). I suspect price decrease will be even more blatant than algorand/celr/perlin.

11059370

referal

>>18328601
desu https://solana.com/airdrop?grsf=db99e0

>>18328601
>non-us only

https://solana.com/airdrop?grsf=5gizzp

Referral ID: 17191506

B: 59,490
D: Proof of History
A: 0.4
E: All of the Above

>>18329057
>algorand
algorand auction was too high, it was a 33 billion marketcap (and no price warranty)
solana marketcap is 110 million (most of them with 90% price warranty)
the auction price is already lower than presale...

>>18329275
>posts an amerisoy

https://solana.com/airdrop?grsf=m3rad7

$20 for non US

https://solana.com/airdrop?grsf=2o4gph

>>18329308
Most of the supply sold at 0.04$, Also you claim those as if projects can't go below VC level which can't be more wrong than this.

It also doesn't matter consider what i already claimed. You won't see ROI from this project for the next year or so, again unless you're targeting short term trade.

>>18329937
>Most of the supply sold at 0.04$
15.86% which was from the initial angel investors when the team was made of 3 people (you can imagine the risk of throwing 3.17MM to 3 random guys), so i'm ok with that, it's pretty fair, without them the project was not starting at all, that's how investment works
>Also you claim those as if projects can't go below VC level which can't be more wrong than this.
i'm not saying it cannot go lower but valuation is starting 30 times lower than algorand and project is actually good (fastest blockchain out there), not an erc20 shittoken or some scamfork

>>18329990
Current valuation doesn't matter you still don't get it, This token metric (at least for the next 12 months) is a major obstacle, Investing in this project makes no sense.

Irrelevant but i would argue that algorand is the better project, Solana didn't prove anything yet, It's still on beta mainnet. Also i've some problems with solana's proposals, regardless if they achieve them or not.

I am a LINKlet, please support me, so I can buy more LINK.

https://solana.com/airdrop?grsf=u30p95

>>18328601
i'm just a pajeet no body likes me:
https://solana.com/airdrop?grsf=ns5i4g

>>18330291
>Solana didn't prove anything yet
it's 50 times faster than Algorand...
so far Solana is the only one that can scale better than Stellar Lumens
Algorand is a nice project but doesn't solve any other problem, just like Tezos or Cardano, ETH2 will just take over all the "this is the new ETH" projects
The only other project it is worth considering is Cosmos (number one for interoperability)
Looking just for short term ROI it is useless IMHO, I'm not a daily trader
I pick gems (I did massive gains with Stellar Lumens in the past, I bagholded for really long) and I go for it

>>18328601
True and real anons. I beckon you. Stay far away from this one. I literally know some of the team. Buy PNK.