/biz/ - Business & Finance

>April 1
what did they mean by this?

Aren't Visa and Mastercard also a jewish clique?
Why would they throw their own under the bus?

>how is this related to chainlink anon?

>>18300110
>deluded linklets believe april fool's joke article is real
Never change

>>18300141
Implying bankers aren't autistic and remember to make April Fools jokes

>>18300088
Where is the Swift announcement?

>>18300088
This is /biz/, don’t waste your time posting anything technical that can’t be absorbed by room temp IQs in 30 seconds

>>18300088
those white pussies need to be ARYAN'D

>>18301128

>>18300088
>>18301155
Literally built for BWC

>>18300088
This was already posted but nice try

>>18301369
I basically live on this website and I have not seen this.
Not really sure if blockchain or more specifically chainlink plays a role in this though.

>>18301396
These types of payment systems are the kind that would eventually happen on the blockchain aren’t they?

It obviously went under the radar

>>18300088
wow upvote for Wicker man

>>18301396
>I basically live in Mumbai and have not seen this.
What a surprise.

Nice fud you fucking pajeet. Not selling.

>>18300088
This was posted a few days ago.
By 2025 Chainlink will be used in nearly every transaction that takes place on the earth.
$1k was fud. $10k is more like it.
>>18301128
Exactly. I lurk but no longer redpill the masses. Its like teaching 10th grade math to 1st graders. A waste of time for everyone.

>>18303012
> coffee standard

>>18302674
This isn't a FUD?

>>18303012
kek no, all partnerships have been proven fake already

>Swift
Chainlink won some competition 3 years ago, literally not a single news since -> PROVEN FAKE
>Google
1 blog post 10 months ago, never used on mainnet, nothing else since -> PROVEN FAKE
>Oracle
10 months ago, gravelcoin, fernando demoted -> PROVEN FAKE
>E&Y
recent news, will be proven fake soon
>Microsoft
recent news, will be proven fake soon

Delusional idiots think Swift is using a shit token

>>18301369
it was during a night anon

>>18303680
>it’s like teaching 10th grade math to 1st graders.

I rest my case.

>>18303012
Holy shit you are special. No one needs this shit for anything hence the lack of adoption. This board is full of hopium

>>18303049
Well I didn't read it so I don't know about

>>18300088
we didn't miss it, there have been at least 3 threads, use the archives
>>18300110
it's not april fools
https://www.swift.com/standards/iso-20022-programme/timeline?tl=en#topic-tabs-menu

>>18303861

Your destiny awaits

OP, This is unironically fake news. Try to the march 12th announcement the article makes reference to. IT DOESN'T EXIST.

>>18303936
Imagine being stuck at $2 years after the ico. Losers

>>18301128
we used to be able to... fuck nu/biz/

>>18303949
>>18301091
>>18303903

>>18303861
He thinks the space is reduced to tokenization and SoV/privacy functions. The absolute state lol

>>18303987
Based.

>>18303936
>>18303987
>>18304239
>b-based

>>18300088
SWIFT really will save us all

>>18304423
SWIFT is jooish. ...why use Link and cut them in when they can just make their own?

Also Ripple has already BTFOd SWIFT.

>>18303012
I saw this several days ago but haven't seen a coherent response to the 2025 timeline. Is it for all transactions or just the beginning of use?

>>18304646
i think that sergey's focus on defi rather than enterprise might be partially motivated by the intertia of large enterprise, he wants to get things going faster and he's trying to set a fire under their feet by potentially sucking value from cefi to defi

>>18304784
Exactly this. Sergey gave us hopium in swift, banks and institutional lenders ... and instead we got SNX, kova and a Celer porno

>>18303680
>>Oracle
>10 months ago, gravelcoin, fernando demoted -> PROVEN FAKE

it’s on 2020 Q3 Roadmap idiot
https://static.rainfocus.com/oracle/owlonglobal2020/sess/1573096232255001Jv5j/PF/LHT1056-LON%20-%20What%27s%20New%20in%20Oracle%20Blockchain%20Platform_1581179085443001RUQO.pdf

>>18303742
it’s not about the token, it’s about the linking capability, and smart contracts with security.


it already has become impossible to say no to LINK for providers.. and all of these partners leveraging it...you can see health, law, other company related software starting to build integrations for it.

many other coins and people said they’d never use it and they ended up bending the knee.

they’re all going to integrate with it and the software platforms these partners own and will build in the future will all leverage chainlink technology.
at first I was worried that LINK would just be used for the middleware with no real need to have them pump the price of LINK up because they’re just using ChainLink to transfer ETH/BTC etc..
but noooo.


because the nodes pay & fine in LINK.it requires LINK to operate..
which means more LINK is created each time a job runs, which means even if people don’t purchase the LINK directly, it is going to feed itself and exponentially grow when the workload is increased.

>>18304784
where does all the anti-link sentiment originate from? Is it competitors, butthurt anons that don’t know they can still get in on it?

Trolls?


or Bank/Financial institutions scared Crypto is going to eat their lunch so they want to restrict Crypto to tokenization only.


my bet is the last one.

>>18304981
Accumulation

>>18304496
Imagine not knowing that LINK is banking with a defi service owned by an Israeli entrepreneur with a lending department full of IDF and Israeli MOD members.

>>18304981
>>18305026
I'd say some of it is genuine newfags who see the same jason parser fud from 2017 and think they're "in the know" and want to fit in by being an obligate contrarian nigger. Then you have people like uncleoldfag who fud to gatekeep. Then you have the actual glowniggers who run organized fud campaigns so they can consolidate it on their end

>>18305081
i fud because it's entertaining to bait sincere linkies who should just shut the fuck up and accumulate

>>18305096
It's important to keep in kind that WE ARE ALL IN THIS TOGETHER. Help and support your fellow linkies and we are all going to make it

Can someone tell me what I’m missing here? I’m going through the article and the only thing I’m seeing here is iso standard. I’m not seeing anything related to link.

ib4 hurr durr iso standard is link. It’s not link it’s just a standard ,a spec that they want to be met

>>18304981
You’re a fucking idiot or clever

>>18305136
Read between the lines friend, you’ll see the rocket ship

>>18305096
fuck you

>>18305169
I’m reading what’s writing. I’m not even seeing swift gpi

>>18305136
What happened is Chainlink used the ISO standard from Swift, and then pretended to have a partnership with them (lied). Linkers are too stupid to understand that Swift has nothing to do with Chainlink. Chainlink just used their standard (open standard that anyone can use for free without permission) and then claimed to have a partnership.

Sergey would actually be in jail for this if crypto was regulated like stocks.

Fuck you.

>>18304981
Many are upset they spent months, maybe even years browsing the board seeing “but Chainlink” at $0.2, only for them to not listen or to chase other shitcoins. It’s only natural to show hatred or disdain towards those you are jealous of. Had they listened to us, even after all this market mayhem they would be up 10x. Personally, I understand the emotions they exemplify, it must be incredibly painful knowing what would have been. What’s even more painful is likely the realization that Linkies were ultimately right, that this is just the tip of the iceberg before SC mass adoption ushers in the 4IR. Imagine the pain that will be felt a year from now. Me personally? I can’t wait to read the heated threads

>>18305201
But do they not understand that link is still at an obscene discount and the real moonshot hasn't even begun? Dude. I bought at $1.50 and I'm not even mad. I'm actually very grateful that the stars aligned in my life for me to be able to buy a bag at this low of a price

>>18305192
swfit gpi will of course operate under ISO 20022, swift gpi is touted as being able to interface with any payments system or trading platform, including DLTs, since chainlink is becoming a standard of interoperability it's natural to think they fit in here, also gpi link is LITERALLY an oracle, chainlink developed "smart oracles" for swift, it's true there is no direct confirmation but that's the nature of speculation, and this is some solid fucking speculation

I am only a 3,000 LINKlet

>>18305034
>thinking I care how I get my 1000x

>>18305298
GPI link is of course Chainlink, the big question is whether or not anybody will use it, because there's not really a reason yet to give two fucks about DLT.

>>18305248
They likely fell for the same FUD I almost fell for. People touting “you missed out already bro” when it made its run from $0.15 to $0.5. I was super bummed, and believed them for awhile, felt like I had truly missed the boat. Ultimately it’s either one of two things. 1. Someone who truly doesn’t understand what LINK is and the implications it will have if successful or 2. People who do understand point 1 but don’t want people on the left side of the spectrum to get in on their investment.

>>18305096
I can see some people doing this because they’re worried that the news of LINK will get out and they don’t have the available funds to build a 10K stack yet and don’t want the ship to sail without them.

>>18305359
The fundamental question is, when the tech is fully fleshed and developed, can DLT effectively reduce trust while simultaneously saving enterprises/corporations capital on the back end. My bet is yes. Gartner and Ernst Young would agree with me

>>18305131
I think >>18305373 was his real reason of FUDding

I COULD HAVE BOUGHT 25,000 LINK BACK IN THE DAY. BUT I WAS SCARED BECAUSE I LOST MONEY IN SCAMS.
THOUHT LINK IS JUST ANOTHER ONE.
TOLD MYSELF TO STAY AWAY FROM CRYPTO. FINALLY REALIZED I AM A GIGANTIC FUCKING RETARD AND BOUGHT EVERYTHING AT $3
NOW I ONLY HAVE 3,000 LINK
Some people were never meant to make it :(

>>18305474
buy more now while it's under $3 to lower your dca

>>18305502
If you would have bought at $0.2 like we told you to you wouldn’t have to worry about buying more at these prices. What shitcoin did you fall for instead anon?

>>18305298
Did you read the article instead of farming what anons are posting in here?

>>18305610
i started buying at 21 cents, my dca is 50c flat, hard for me to buy more because of that clean number

>>18305378
How hard are you trying to sound like you know what you’re talking about?

>>18305686
I already made my bet. Top 700 wallet here. Godspeed and good luck

>>18305313
How does 3 dildodickillion sound?

>>18305674
I wasn’t as lucky as you, started at $0.33 but fortunately have a DCA of $0.51

>>18304863
All of the mentioned have to go through Link if they want to use Blockchain tech.

Don't believe SWIFT when they say they'll use their own inhouse oracles. When they need to do business with banks outside of their network, they sure as hell won't be TRUSTING their oracles.

>>18305700
Look here guys. We got a big swinging dick here

>>18305738
Settle down, faggot.

>>18304423
SWIFT is a part of the USD infrastructure. USD is being debased to shit. There will be a massive short squeeze, the dollar will rise killing all other fiat then the dollar will be abandoned as the global standard. SWIFT, being the primary channel for international wires denominated in USD, will no longer be needed.

>>18305726
They will trust the network

>>18300117
>philosophy major
> previous crypto Nxt was an edit scam
> 3 years no users
> 700k dump
> porn star managing money
>strives
> muh partnerships

i strive to become a millionaire too via opening up my own ambitious coffee brand taking in starbucks by partnering with amazon to deliver my product.

I will use windows 98

As you can see i am partnered with microsoft and will utilize apple ipads for orders

the state of links and brainlets that memes this PnD coin. They still believe this will get them to lambo land Zlmao

>>18305668
i did read it

>>18305746
And why would I do such a thing?...... faggot

>>18301166
story?

is he alive?

is this the state of chain linkers after sergey cooms

>>18303012
see you at the yacht party fren i just bought ten k more linnie’s

>>18303012
>By 2025 Chainlink will be used in nearly every transaction that takes place on the earth.
>$1k was fud. $10k is more like it.
Because you read iso20022? That means chainlink to you

>>18305700
where can this be checked what level Neet I am?

>>18305881
ethplorer

>>18305881
It’s a blockchain bro look at the explorer

>>18305920
>>18305910
thanks, I’m brand new trying not to drown when this moons

>>18305951
6/10 made me respond

>>18305951
>I’m brand new
you're getting meme'd on, hard

>>18305972
>you're getting meme'd on, hard
No doubt. But he's still smart enough to buy link, smarter than you

>>18305951
No worries and good luck. My two cents would be focus on the Holy Trinity, BTC ETH and LINK. Everything else is just noise at this point.

>>18306295
ngmi

>>18306378
What should we buy, BSV? Fucking ngmi.

>>18306295
Yeah the holy trinity of ETH, XMR and BSV maybe. Brainlet.

>>18305686
Kek’d
Contour(Voltron) and Marco Polo appear to have enough clients to make it work. Think contour is going live this month.

>>18306426
BSV...you automatically discredited yourself there lol

>>18306378
Keep chasing shitcoins anon. I’m up 10x in a bear market with LINK. Whatever helps you cope with missing out I guess.

>>18306295
that’s exactly what i’m doing

>>18305136

>>18306572
Smart man. Good luck to you and always DYOR

>>18306562
Faggot btc and eth are shit coins.

>>18306627
This looks like a sales pamphlet. Just cause it mentions a standard means nothing. That’s the same shit as saying mill spec

>>18305096
Based

>>18304896
Mate that is common FUD copy pasta from shills. I've seen that exact message about 40 times

>>18305474
Well if it gets to $200 you'll have $600,000... would you consider that a failure??

>>18305034

Bullish as hell

Isaelis get stuff done if they dont loot the company first

>>18303966
I can't find an altcoin that's performed better than LINK during the last few years. Everything else is near pre-07 levels and LINK is doing great

>>18308489
I openly Kekd when I read Nuke Goldsteins name. Definatley Bullish

>>18308267
no, it's literally proven fact. Chainlink has faked 100% of their partnerships and to this day, they have 0 users.

Proof:

>Swift
Chainlink won some competition 3 years ago, literally not a single news since -> PROVEN FAKE
>Google
1 blog post 10 months ago, never used on mainnet, nothing else since -> PROVEN FAKE
>Oracle
10 months ago, gravelcoin, fernando demoted -> PROVEN FAKE
>E&Y
recent news, will be proven fake soon
>Microsoft
recent news, will be proven fake soon

In fact, redditors predicted this 10 months ago, why didn't you listen? Are you lower IQ than redditors?

>>18303680
Damn delete this info now!