/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>18161880
status-quo supporting centrist drivel

>>18161887
/thread
if they were actually meaningful, it wouldnt be published

Is there alternatives to this?

>>18161880
No

>>18161900
seconded

BS mainstream media who do hatchet jobs and puff pieces for the highest bidder on top of all.

>>18161880
ahahahahahahaahahahahahahaahahahahahahaahahahahahahaahahahahahahaahahahahahahaahahahahahahaahahahahahahaahahahahahahaahahahahahahaahahahahahahaahahahahahahaahahahahahahaahahahahahahaahahahahahahaahahahahahahaahahahahahaha

>>18161887
it's leftist drivel masquerading as centrist
my mother reads it and she is a leftist

>>18161912
3rd gender is not an alternative

You will eat the bugs.

So what stuff would you guys recommend?

>>18161968
"The Wealth of Nations"
anything but modern centrist Keynesian dogma

>>18162005
>>18161887
This

The economist literally just touts Keynesian bullshit with no other points of view

>>18161968
/pol/

>>18162005
Any other newspapers, magazines or websites?

lol no it tries to come off as a kind of gold standard, unbiased economic periodical but it is total neoliberal trash. Every headline and premise for a column departs from postmodern drivel

>>18161912

That’s either a man OR a woman

>>18162041
the Manga Guide to Economics

>>18162049
It’s a woman.

>>18162041
idk. i would try to look for classical writings or unbiased modern writers

>>18162046
And who will be in charge of redistributing lollies

>>18162049
looks like a man

>>18161880
No, they've taken a horrendous turn to leftist identity politics.

>>18162075
I’ve got some old dusty book laying around somewhere but it maybe outdated.

Found it, it’s from 1970 though

The Sun with fancy words. wouldn't even wipe my ass with it/10

>>18161880
It’s worth a skim to be up to date on what (they) want you to know. If you want to learn economics just read textbooks

It is absolute shite. As others have said it's just neoliberal dross with zero investigative essays or interesting long-reads. Bloomberg, Financial Times and Reuters all have more interviews, interesting tech stuff and more balanced articles on topics.

>>18162057
This is unironically decent for a manga

>>18161968
WSJ if you want mainstream FT if you care about international (lol)

>>18161880
if you want to become a pinko, leftist commie who knows literally nothing about how the economy works or how business works then yes it's a good start for you literally /thread

>>18161880
I stopped reading it a few years ago when I realized every story in one issue was propaganda. It's meant to persuade, not inform.

The best place to get information is probably whitepapers or directly from the source. Or from direct reporters like Reuters or AP (although they can be biased as well)

>>18162508
Jews swindle shekels from goy animals. That’s how the economy works

more like the jewconomist haha amirite
so how do we defeat them and go full communism guis? now is the time

>>18161880
You are a domesticated worker bee.

Remember to bee yourself and BEEHIVE YOURSELF!!!!

>>18162082
>leftist
identity politics is a neoliberal thing, take note how all of them call for more female ceos and shit like that. if they were leftist they would be against ceos as a whole

>>18161880
Rothschild owned and de facto Rothschild run. If you like to be mentally assraped and Jewed every single day, the Economist is from you. If you can stand drivel like lack of Obama caricatures in the Economist is purely due to Obama being too beautiful and thus too hard to caricature and that Africa's economic disaster is solely due to lack of education and colonialism, not lazy nigger genes and mentality, etc, then Economist is for you.

>>18161880

It's basically a neo-liberal globalist mouthpieces written by some fucking 23-year olds.