EARN IT ACT--FUCK LAW MAKERS TRYING TO PASS INTERNET LEGISLATION

File: 424 KB, 1092x1052, adameve.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

EARN IT ACT--FUCK LAW MAKERS TRYING TO PASS INTERNET LEGISLATION Anonymous Mon Mar 16 00:04:12 2020 No.17833956 [Reply] [Original]

https://www.freepress.net/news/press-releases/earn-it-act-very-bad-bill-gets-its-day-congress

I've heard its to curb abuse by people who are "pedophiles" and use the web for their sick purposes.

We need to research this ASAP, other cities and states have also been passing various gun control legislation as well.

Corona is real but they certainly aren't letting a good crisis go to waste are they?

Is this good for us against the pedos? Or are they trying to shut us the fuck down under the guise of stopping child predators?

>>	Anonymous Mon Mar 16 00:06:02 2020 No.17833991 >>17833956 This will shut down sites like google, Facebook, leftist media, youtube from arbitrary removing and censoring content they don't like.

>>	Anonymous Mon Mar 16 00:07:20 2020 No.17834017 >>17833991 But if it's being legislated by democrats watch out.

>>	Anonymous Mon Mar 16 00:10:37 2020 No.17834090 >>17834017 My thoughts exactly but it seems "bi-partisan" but we know that almost doesn't exist. Too many neo-cons and liberals that don't care about freedom and not enough patriots

>>	Anonymous Mon Mar 16 00:14:51 2020 No.17834178 >>17833991 how do you figure that? their section 230 protection is only forfeited if they don't comply with the government that they propagandize for on a daily basis. seems unlikely.

>>	Anonymous Mon Mar 16 00:23:50 2020 No.17834339 >>17833956 It's always in the name of stopping pedophilia. Protip: it has nothing to do with curbing child abuse, it's just to tighten government grip on the internet.

Anonymous Mon Mar 16 00:26:24 2020 No.17834379

>>17834178
Honestly Facebook, google and the rest already stretch the shit out of those 230 protections with their editorializing. I'm all for forcing them to some standards for them to keep their protections, but not in this way and under the banner of "think of the children" again.

Anonymous Mon Mar 16 00:31:30 2020 No.17834468

>>17834379
Specifically, because all the damn bill does is say "we'll come up with arbitrary standards that all sites must follow to keep their 230 protections". This does nothing to fight child abuse. Child abuse is already illegal and the affected sites already crack down on it.

>>	Anonymous Mon Mar 16 01:31:27 2020 No.17835453 >>17834339 This AG Barr has been anti-encryption for years

Advanced search
Text to find
Subject [?]Search by post subject. Leave empty for any.
Username [?]Search for user name. Leave empty for any user name.
Tripcode [?]Search for tripcode. Leave empty for any.
Email [?]Search by email. Leave empty for any.
Filename [?]Search by image filename. Leave empty for any.
From Date [?]Enter what date to start searching from. Format is YYYY-MM-DD
To Date [?]Enter what date to start searching until. Format is YYYY-MM-DD
Image hash
Search in	All Posts OPs Only
Deleted posts	Show all posts Show only deleted posts Only show non-deleted posts
Internal posts	Show all posts Show only internal posts Show only archived posts
Order	New posts first Old posts first
Capcode	All Posts Only by Users Only by Mods Only by Admins Only by Developers
Results	Posts Threads
Action	[ Simple ]

/biz/ - Business & Finance