/biz/ - Business & Finance

one is convenient and one isn't.

Why didn't you ask these questions before buying it?

>>17683244
I've derived the private key from my mnemonic words before, this makes it so you never "know" your private key even though it can be derived. So you run less risk by not ever pasting it and you manually confirm transactions. That's about it.

>>17683265
because I'm an impulse shopper
because they're cheap
because it's probably better to have than not?
Don't know

>>17683275
It generates the tx offline too which is cool
Does this have CKB support?
If so I'll get it

>>17683244
the problem is that a paper wallet is very dangerous to access. if your computer had a keylogger, then inputting your pkey every time you need to access your funds would certainly cause you to lose all your funds. you literally cant get hacked using a trezor/ledger; the only way you can lose your coins is if you are robbed at gunpoint

the ledger x has wifi implementation, so it looks like less secure than the nano s to me

>>17683715
thought it was just bluetooth

>>17683244
>Wouldn't a paper wallet be just as secure?
no, it would be more secure
paper wallet, airgapped laptop, offline tx signing
Also you should generate your own wallet using dice, not some shady website/software

>>17683244
You should use it for a wallets that you frequently use
large amounts you hodl would be better on a paper wallet or metal wallet acctually

>Ledger meme x
>cripto assesories for sessoned cripto enthusiasts
PAPER
WALLETS
DISEASED
DIRTBAGS
( + airgapped laptop)

>>17683244
this dumb piece of shit technology has all my coins locked in it. The ledgerlive program connects to my nano s just fine, but the second i attempt to move my coins the nano s magically goes unidentified. use a paperwallet

>>17683886
stuff of nightmares, holy shit

>>17683840
crypto is so incredibly convenient

>>17684006
>crypto let you have your own money
>you control yourself and not let a single entity decide what you can do and who you can transact with
>can't be stolen as easily as gold by hieves and governments
>not convenient
???

>>17683607
>what is an offline signed transaction

>>17684299
dont care didnt ask plus your gay

>>17683829
yes I meant bluetooth

>>17684006
nigga you can have millions of dollars in your brain, it ain't gonna get more convenient than that

>>17683244
I have both S and X.
On Ledger S I keep my linkies, it is in a safe place.
On Ledger X I keep shitcoins I trade, I have it in my pocket/pc bag everyday.

They're the way to go, it keeps your heart rate low when you see "MAINTENANCE, ALL TRADES ARE PAUSED"

Seriously, everyone keeps saying "not your keys not your coins" since literally a decade, and not to trust online wallets/exchanges with large amts of crypto. But now you think you're smart because you're trusting some company making USB sticks with all your crypto?

>>17684733
imagine not doing your secured chips yourself to send and receive your crypto

>>17684733
this

>>17684733
>TREZOR
>OPEN SOURCE

I have all my coins on Coinbase except for pnkies in metamask. Is this really that bad of a thing to do?

>>17685192
>metamask

>>17685227
What’s wrong with it?

I like the price locking feature. My BTC still locked
at 13k

>>17685172
>you have not vetted their supply chain
>you have not personally read all of the code
>you don't know that the code they have on github is the same as what's on the device
>even experts might not notice a subtle vuln in the rng or whatever
I don't understand why you would make your attack surface so much larger and more complicated to assess, when it could be very simple.