/biz/ - Business & Finance

xrp the standard, all doubters will get fucked eventually. are we late? undoubtedly. does it matter? not one bit. xrp will flip this bitch on its head and all you faggots will get left behind.

the delusions never stop, they only get bigger

Currently sitting on a 20k XRP stack. Is it a good idea to invest in XLM as a hedge?

grabbed me a ton in this dip. god it feels awesome

>>17670805
>imagine thinking XRP wouldnt completely replace Chainlink's "take the average of five sources" oracles in an ideal world

just sell your XRP, bandwaggoners are cancer

>>17670687
where can I get myself a big tiddy libanese gf frens?

>>17670839
I'm skeptical about Codius' potential. It's been killed and reborn twice now, right? Who's to say it wouldn't integrate with Chainlink, as in smart contracts are executed on Codius, using LINK for data inputs.

>>17670805
nah man. lumen is xrp's little retarded brother who gets bullied constantly by big bro Chad and will never stand a chance. little brother syndrome at its finest.
Chad XRP has all the connections to high profile institutions and banks, lumen is just a try hard catching up and leeching off big bros power

> Ripple doesn't use its own token to achieve all this

>>17670604
>another day, another delusional XRP thread

>>17670805
What did past two weeks felt like for XRP hodler?

>>17670904
You think there's no reason to worry about their ties to IBM? I thought they were a pretty big player in fintech
>>17670928
>Lying on the internet
Why?

>>17671019
I've been buying in between 21-28 cents the past few months, so it hasn't felt bad at all. I'm down a little, but I'd probably be down more if that money was in stocks. Wondering if it's going to go to .10-.15 or if now is the time to buy more.

>>17671053
>intrigued by IBM

buy VIDT; they’ve started plastering their solar panels all over NL (60k burn each)

>>17671209
> not on ethereum
not buying

>>17670604
every time i see some complain about payments, i think of the retarded boomers in infomercials
what is it exactly about paying for things thats so hard for you, that you need (((ripples))) help

>>17670901
because chainlink is a piece of shit with no use? do you even get how Link's oracles work? There is no decentralization, its just taking the average of 5 sources

>>17671815
crippled faggot wants to talk decentralization when RippleNet is no different than a hyperledger project kek

>>17671815
Can you show me proof of this? I'd like to think there's more than 5 sources. I currently don't hold any LINK, just XRP, but I bought 2k Link at 30 cents and sold for 40 between late 2017-early 2018. I think they're both poised to takeover crypto. Link as the data coin, XRP as the money coin.

>>17671907
XRP is more decentralized than bitcoin. The best incentive is no incentive.

>>17670805
Holding XRP and XLM is a hedge against becoming rich

>>17671991
PoA will never be more decentralized than PoW
>no incentive best incentive
actually believes this just because Schwartz said so

>>17671972
probably not five, but its something really basic. just read >>17567537

>>17670901
isnt that essentially what is happing between R3, XRP and LINK?

>>17672128
>60% of hash power owned by China
>Consolidated into 3-4 mining groups
Yea, nice decentralization you got there.

>>17672331
no. there is no stated document anywhere that says codius uses link in anyway. Link does not solve anything. If it did, Vitalik would already be all over it. The only crypto projects that use LINK do it because they know their projects are memes and have no real use anyway

>>17670604
Meanwhile CL and SCs can do swift transfers (millions of banks, not tens like this kike coin) and offer seemless fiat exchange/forex trustlessly without the need for a third party processor or needing to buy jew coins.

Hmmm.

>>17672653
LINK is literally a glorified data feed- and its not even real time. There is no actual transfer of money. SWIFT is trying to prevent real world progress by trying to have their payment system outdue real time settlements

>8+ years, 0 adoption
>99 billion supply kike scam coin
>Monthly dumps on its bagholders
>Solves nothing
>Only way for it to be successful is if it replaces the entire kike banking paradigm

This is why Chainlink was picked to usher in the 4IR, it does everything XRP can't at no cost to the kikes. Kys OP you salty subhuman shitskin, you're priced out faggot lmao

>>17672715
Hahahahahah COPE

>>17672952
>no adoption
https://utility-scan.com/#/dashboard

>LINK has no costs
thats the thing, LINK is slower and has even higher transaction costs than XRP. Banks wouldnt even have buy large amounts of XRP to commence in ODL, but with LINK, banks willl have buy large amounts from fat fuck sergey for the system to even work. And if one Bank has more LINK than another, then that bank has more power in dictating the prices since they can vote out other banks. LINK is a horrible idea

>>17672972
>cCcc- COPE!!!
seethe

>>17672247
kek you fell for the json parser fud

>>17673109
Lmao took your shitskin ass long enough to respond with the 20 faggot threads you made.

Cope harder faggot, 8 years and no adoption lmao link has more users and clients and money on the network than xrp by more than 10x lmao kys faggot cope harder

>>17673109
also, under the chainlink network, literal neets who got into LINK early would have the power to veto real world data feeds from established sources.

you think no bank will see no problem with this?

>>17673153
>hurr, this fud is old, therfore its false
its never been proven wrong once. People knew about this for years, but LINK just writes it off, just because

why are linkies even in this thread thats clearly XRP? If linkies hate XRP so much, why do they keep bumping xrp threads?

>>17673183
>t. me as source

>>17673211
no one cared about link in this thread until your autistic response to an image >>17670805

>>17673356
>he actually keeps track of ID's
discord would be more up your alley

>>17673211
Shitskin cope lmao imagine buying a worthless 99 billion supply kike scam coin that's dumps on its bagholders every month lmao 8 years and only 7 million dollars on the network while Chainlink has over 100 million lmao holy shit just kill yourself you disgusting non white soulless piece of trash

>>17673484
>buzzwords buzzwords buzzwords
thats nice, please reply back when you have actual facts

>>17672952
>>17673183
>No adoption
Awful FUD, again.

>>17673553
He says this as he keep making threads and commenting all over /biz/ the same shitskin drivel lmao cope harder faggot your butthurt to hell and mad youre priced out of link

>>17673647
What I said is true
Cope harder faggot cripple will never even reach $1 again

>>17673484
>7 million dollars on the network while Chainlink has over 100 million
wait, you mean XRP is only 20 cents with just 7 million dollars on the network.
Meanwhile, LINK has 100 million, but has a mere 1 billion market cap?

And this isnt supposed to be bad?

that means that if XRP had a 100 million dollars on its network, it would be more than 10x its price. But it would take 900 million more worth of value being used on the chainlink network for LINK to 10x its price.

>>17673658
>I HATE XRP
>keeps bumping the thread

also
>100 million on network
>t. no source

awww, is this why the LINK holder is mad? looks like someone is a bit steamed XRP is outperforming them on the market