/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>17537745
Put it in the same mailbox you mail santa clause your christmas list to

>>17537745
You communicate your concern to another involved human being via email.

>>17537745
You are the guy fudding the other thread, kek you piece of shit I'll reply here again so anons won't be dissuaded by your reddit-tier bullshit

Yes but an exit scam isn't possible. What, just one dev with his stack can dump the market? That won't happen. For an exit scam to happen all devs need to dump their stack. The token distribution is much more fair. There is a large stack for the devs for incentive to continue working on it BUT THEY ARE DIVIDED EVENLY. One dev can't dump it all before they get reported to SEC (plus that won't happen because it isn't illegal).

Also, I'm sure they all know each other. So if they see one dev exit scamming in case of panic, they can just leak his info here on /biz/ as a threat so no one exit scams. If Sergey did this token distribution maybe Chainlink would have had more success but unfortunately he owns it all.

Look at the OP pic from here >>17533074 # # They are all hard at work doing development for the project. I seriously doubt that if there was sudden unease because of the SEC FUD, let's say for example "andrei32" can just dump it to zero. At most the price will go down 10% after this "andrei32" sold all his stack, and then development will continue. What about Sergey? If he panics over jailtime it's over for Chainlink, straight to zero.

This is why it is important to distribute the tokens evenly. Even if this "andrei32" decides that he is a massive pussy and doesn't want to risk jailtime simply because of random redditor FUD on /biz/, he can just go ahead and sell his whole stack but it won't bring it down to zero. NuLink has decent market volume anyway. Other devs can still continue the project and reap the benefits

I'll just report you and let the jannies deal with you. I will reply this every time I see you, fucking newfag piece of shit coper.

>>17537745
>NOOOOOOOO YOU CANT JUST GET RICH FROM BUYING NULINK

>>17537745
get a life
saged

>>17537745
Do it. They have tons of time to go after some pajeet garbage with less than $200 daily volume.

>>17537745

nuchain.link is the one you want to report. You are allowed to fork open source projects. nuchainlink made their ERC-20 after NLINK using the ticker (NULINK) to try and trick people into thinking it was the same fork of chain link as the one that blessed anon had airdropped for free. As if it wasn’t bad enough that they were deceptive in naming and charging much more they then set up a fake staking website where you send your NLINK and give you returns in their imitation coin.

>>17537745
How do I report my fist to your face?

>>17537745
Report this dick faggot. Never selling my airdrop stack.

>>17537764
KEK

Want to help shutdown NuLink scammers? Here's what you can do.

Report their account (https://twitter.com/smartcontractP)) to Twitter as it is used for scamming purposes:
help.twitter.com/en/rules-and-policies/twitter-report-violation

Contact GitHub and ask to remove NuLink (https://github.com/smartercontractkits/nulink)) as it is used for scamming purposes.
support.github.com/contact

Report nulink.org to Google and Microsoft as it is used for scamming purposes.
safebrowsing.google.com/safebrowsing/report_badware/?hl=en
microsoft.com/en-us/wdsi/support/report-unsafe-site

Contact Uniswap and ask them to remove NLINK token as it is used for scamming purposes:
contact@uniswap.io