/biz/ - Business & Finance

we do. that's why we sold.

>>17485334
redpill me

Vidt is actually a pretty good project, except holders got completely demolished because of that Binance vote. The coin it lost to dumped even worse. What a complete mess. The only one to prosper seems like it was Binance.

>>17485326
how about you share what you know faggot instead of posting this low level shit?

>>17485638
actually, the vidt team cashed out a fair sum on the hype. you're an idiot if you still think this is a legit project after they sold millions of 'locked' tokens on kucoin and cashed out their personal stash too.

>>17485677
really? proof

>>17485858
which part? I was posting proof while it was happening, not really interested in digging up the transactions again today. The first wallet that received vidt in the initial distribution is obviously the founders wallet. it held the largest individual amount, and it sold most of what it held while everyone was hyping up a binance listing. the team also sent millions of tokens from the validation pool wallet to kucoin to sell.
they talked about both of these things in the TG plenty, it's not conspiracy.
they claim that asked the 'whale' to sell so that they could borrow money for the binance listing, and that's why they sold 'locked' tokens too. can you believe that shit? this rag tag crew with no overhead is supposedly broke after two years, having raised 3.4M in an ICO... not even a little bit believable. they cashed out the ICO money and now they are liquidating personal and company tokens.

>>17485677
Current price is on life support.
Massive Red candle incoming

>>17485677
Vitalik sold large amounts of ETH at $12. I am not delusional enough to believe this project will ever be anything like Ethereum, but selling their personal stack doesnt make this a scam.

>>17486267
they straight up told the TG that they won the binance listing ahead of time, as if the whole vote were just a show, then unloaded tokens into the pump saying they needed it for binance. it is a scam. they lied to create fomo so that they could dump on you. how's the 'major hardware player' partnership working out for you? more scam hype to fuel the pump.
this is a project so retarded and simple that you can literally find blockchain tutorials to walk you through building your own document validation app over a weekend. they don't have not a viable business model and there's absolutely no reason to be bullish on this shit.

>>17485858
https://etherscan.io/token/0x445f51299ef3307dbd75036dd896565f5b4bf7a5?a=0x4c05b0476eacfba4c10360bcd86d0d13eb50ad4b

follow this

>>17486267
The whole global economy is in freefall and in the worst case scenario production lines are 2-3 weeks at the most away from a total shutdown. I'm bearish on VIDT

It's ok. We now have VIDTmv
Discord = D6WTXV

>>17486267

This is your brain on reddit

>>17486573
they sent tokens to kucoin, now what?

>>17487502
https://etherscan.io/token/0x445f51299ef3307dbd75036dd896565f5b4bf7a5?a=0xef85a0e22ce16ba8b99197297032f92f8f297388

>>17485660
>>17485353
>>17486525
>they straight up told the TG that they won the binance listing ahead of time, as if the whole vote were just a show, then unloaded tokens into the pump saying they needed it for binance. it is a scam.
This. You were warned. Well, not while it was pumping since I bought the coin the day of the Binance rumor announcement and went along with it. But you were warned.

Daily reminder V-ID's service is not needed. They also host sensitive documents on their servers from an office next to Subway sandwiches.

>>17488608
everyone knows by now that this is a scam

>>17488686
I bet if the price was going upwards not everyone would think it's a scam. The signs were always out there.

>>17485989
>which part? I was posting proof while it was happening, not really interested in digging up the transactions again today. The first wallet that received vidt in the initial distribution is obviously the founders wallet. it held the largest individual amount, and it sold most of what it held while everyone was hyping up a binance listing. the team also sent millions of tokens from the validation pool wallet to kucoin to sell.
>they talked about both of these things in the TG plenty, it's not conspiracy.
>they claim that asked the 'whale' to sell so that they could borrow money for the binance listing, and that's why they sold 'locked' tokens too. can you believe that shit? this rag tag crew with no overhead is supposedly broke after two years, having raised 3.4M in an ICO... not even a little bit believable. they cashed out the ICO money and now they are liquidating personal and company tokens.
Since you got no replies, you're getting one. Read bagholders, read.

they dont host the documents on their servers you idiot

>>17485326
Dumped this trash months ago

>>17490106
>If you are reading this from a printed copy, scan the QR code with your phone to see the validate file
>and compare the content visually to confirm its authenticity.

well thats because the company has the documents.its stored on the blockchain. at least try a little harder with the fud. but thanks for showing me that you are an idiot.

>>17490319
the document is not stored on the blockchain, the document hash is. you can't reverse a cryptographic hash...so if they do actually display the document, it's being stored somewhere.

>>17490319
>storing sensitive documents on a public blockchain that can be viewed by anyone who gains access to the QR code is a good idea
Or alternatively clients keep the documents files on their own servers, then the QR code takes you there and have to login to your company's account, in which case V-ID is not needed in any capacity. Which is it, VIDTard?

I thought the whole point of vid was to hash a document and push that in a transaction to the blockchain. then, to verify your documents authenticity, you hash it and compare that with the hash that was previously pushed to see if it matches.

>>17490656
That's exactly what it was, but the delusional bagholders that still haven't sold are now changing the narrative as they realized that even V-ID admits they cannot prevent fraud of physical printed documents.

it's too easy making fun of this company. come on biz... can you stop shilling this now?