/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>17460623
Thanks for the sell signal

>>17460623
Replace LINK with PNK and I agree yes we will make it

>>17460623
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1xbLO5bB0Tk

>>17460623
Timo trying to pump it means he wants to exit

>posting timo unironically
Cringe

>>17460632
2 in the pnk 1 in the link

>>17460650
24hr volume is 527million, Pajeet. Timbo is irrelevant.

>>17460623
If this is true, and I think it is, then this year will be the hardest trial of any linklet's life. I only have 30k LINK which would put me at half a mil, not quite enough to /makeit/.
If LINK follows the same general trajectory as ETH then it will slowly bleed for a whole fucking year after that before actually mooning. It will be next to impossible to prevent ourselves from selling.
Get your iron hands ready my fellow linklets.

>>17460623
as much as i like to hop on this dopamine train. Link right now is what Eth was at $14. Link is going to $80 but on a longer time frame than what timo said. We gotta cool it with our expectations... keep them grounded. dont tempt kek with your hubris

>>17460623
nigger if you're gonna meme line at least do it properly

people who put two charts together and go see they're the same are a special kind of delusional

>>17460623
Everything Timo says is false

>>17460681
>Pajeet
Good one, Manoosh.

Jesus god what a strong fud

>>17460623
$16 link in 4-6 weeks
please be true
i need this

>>17460750
OMG, do we shit on the same street?

>>17460694
You can't hold for six months?

>>17460623
oh goody instead of 20-50 spam threads a day you queers will be making 50-200 spam threads a day now.

>>17460786
Probably. What's your favourite curry? Mine is Chasni.

>>17460777

777 has spoken.

>>17460694
So just sell what you need to live for a year and keep the rest in cold storage. Start living your life.

>>17460807
That's hot. Korma, definitely Korma.

Does it just seem to anyone else that both LINK and XTZ are going to rise slowly but steadily instead of just going straight to the moon?

>>17460679
Kek

JESUS CHRIST FUCK TIMO HE GETS HIS DICK SUCKED ALL OVER TWITTER AND DISCORD CAN WE NOT BLOW THIS PUDGY GERMAN SWINGLINKER FAGGOT HERE FAGGOT ASS OP IS PROBABLY TIMO

>>17460623
>AND altseason started
There is no altseason for LINK. Random shitcloin PNDs can't be created on the Chainlink network. Therefore LINK's value can't be pumped by bullshit, only real-world use from traditional adoption. So it:s going to be a long time to see ETH level returns. I just trying to level expectations.

>>17460777

>>17460777
checked

>>17460777
Me too fren, me too.

>>17460777
Fucking checked. Going to make it lads. This is our time and literally no one is doing anything revolutionary. Confirmation bias aside, we're all in this together.

>>17460861
>Random shitcloin PNDs can't be created
Random shitcloin PNDs can reignite hype potential with a LINK partnership
have you not been watching?

>>17460936
Lol you either don't know what you're holding or a troll

SERGI PUNP MEIN BAGS

>>17460623
is that fucking timo

that fucking scam artist

linkies are desperate I see

>>17460694

Dude I feel this so much and I’m only a 13k linklet - 30k isn’t a linklet stack and you know it. But yeah, the 10-20$ range is going to be fucking excruciating. I’ve never sold a link and been bought throughout 2017-2018. But this is going to test my iron hands like never before. Honestly I’m going to short obvious peaks rather than try to swing my stack.

>>17461512

Fuck ari is handsome

>>17461566
>I’m going to short obvious peaks
RIP we hardly knew ye

>>17460694
>>17461566
ngmi

>>17460828
No it’ll have to moon. We’ve discussed this for years. Singularity isn’t a joke - once we are used by SWIFT in prod so much link will be locked away staked all the while each token will absorb the underlying derivatives value

Not a larp
If CL is the real deal, it will very likely go 5-10,000 real quick.

>>17460933
Cheque cheque

>>17460623
Please can we go back to $2? I need more time
I only have 5k

>>17461785
What were you doing 2 years ago?

I've been all in for two years and don't even care if it moons anymore. My life has changed so much in this time that my former dreams don't even make sense. I can't imagine anything worthwhile coming of a pump to 1k; I'd just be an old despondent richfag with no art, no vision, and no family. There's nothing I could do with the money that would slake my loneliness. I'm so tired bros, when is it going to end?

>>17460623
>>17460694
>>17460875
>>17460898
>>17460933
>>17460936
>>17461512
>>17461541
>>17461661
>>17461774
>>17461785
>>17461792
reminder that LINK is NOTHING like ETH.

1. ETH had a testnet with thousands of users and finished mainnet 1 year after ICO, and only raised 16mil. Chainlink had a testnet and mainnet with ZERO users after 2 years and 32mil. It has gained ZERO adoption (the partnerships aren't using it). The level of developer adoption and excitement for ETH vs LINK is absolutely incomparable, LINK has none.

2. The Ethereum tech was actually innovative. It was the first successful attempt at a smart contract platform. It was decentralized and working one year after ICO. Chainlink only has centralized oracles (Sergey is lying about decentralization) which are not new or innovative. Their "innovative" solution to sybil resistant consensus is KYC.

3. The Ethereum foundation only had 1% of the Ethereum supply after ICO. The Chainlink team has 65%. Also when Ethereum was $1, it had a market cap of less than $100,000,000. It was actually a low market cap gem. Chainlink's real marketcap (if you count the 650,000,000 tokens in Sergey's wallet, ready to sell) is currently $2,000,000,000, which makes it an incredibly overpriced top 10 coin, not a low market cap gem like Ethereum was at the time.

4. Chainlink has already had mainstream exposure. It's made the front page of crypto subreddits countless times, was covered in forbes and every news outlet imaginable. Yet, even after all this attention, it has failed to get any developer adoption. It is fair to say that every single dev in the space knows about Chainlink, and decides not to use it. There are many projects running oracles in production, none of them choose to use Chainlink.

>>17461837

>>17461837
Nigger

>comparing LINK to ETH

>>17461825
I would be you but I found a based waifu bought a house and am about to create a comfy ass life
All in link 50k stinks

>>17461837
>3. The Ethereum foundation only had 1% of the Ethereum supply after ICO. The Chainlink team has 65%.
this
i think this is the biggest red flag of chainlink

>>17461792
I nearly put $10k in this shit coin

There's a forum post of me saying that I was sure that LINK would moon eventually because the memes were giving me similar vibes to ETH back in the day

In the end I only put $200 into it, I can't even remember why.

If there is ever another coin that /biz/ really gets behind in the way they did with BTC ETH and LINK, that has solid fundamentals, I'm going to put everything into it.

I doubt it will happen again though, /biz/ (& 4chan in general) seems different these days.

>>17461879
Trust Sergey dude

>>17461907
>that has solid fundamentals,
link has terrible fundamentals (KYC, centralized), and zero adoption 3 years in.

>>17461907
>I doubt it will happen again though, /biz/ (& 4chan in general) seems different these days.
this. link is the last ship off this hell of an earth.

>>17461878
Good for you, it sounds like you're where I could have been If things had gone different. Hold on tight anon, the alternative is bleak.

>>17461837
link makes eth obsolete

>>17461979
based, agree

>>17461978
you'll make it too fren i think you just need some time to relax

>>17461907
Biz will find another Chainlink but only after Chainlink becomes as valuable as bitcoin. It’ll take a new market and use case token/investment/company.

Biz is where autist intjs will gather forever to group think and escape. We may ascend and move on, but young autists will be fueled by our previous success and follow in our footsteps

>>17460623

>>17461918
>crypto
>trust
yeah yeah sure

EVEN AT 16 IM STILL NOT RICH

>>17460623
>>17460694
>>17461837
I'm eyeing LINK/BTC; The weekly chart has a setup for a nice parabola to continue up. It looks like LINK is going up in USD, BTC is going down in the near future. This has a good chance to accelerate the trend. I'm looking at selling most of my stack between 100k - 200k sats, assuming BTC stays under 10k USD. Then I'm going to ride pretty much only BTC up next bullrun, because I think BTC is by far the safest bet of any crypto to moon. And I'll have a lot of BTC if I get to flip LINK for it.

>>17460777
Checked. Praised be.

>>17461999
Triple Niner predicts Severe Defeat for Japanese Yen

>>17462060
> selling his Chainlink for bitcoin
anon, i....

>>17461929
Lol that’s literally not true though you obvious tranny

>>17462078
I have more faith in BTC mooning in another bull cycle than of chainlink succeeding. I still think link will do well, it's just less likely. If I can do what I outlined, I literally make it. I think many people here would as well. If chainlink hits 150k sats, consider whether you think chainlink or 1.5 BTC per 1000 LINK you hold is more LIKELY to moon (both can still moon) and how many USD you'd end up with in the next bubble.

>>17462060
Yeah sounds like a gay plan my dude
I’m only holding 1 BTC for swing trading purposes the rest is all link baby
I also have 1 LP share because why the fuck not
Fuckin chilling over here my guy

>>17462125
I would absolutely not take that deal I cringe at the very thought

>>17462152
everyone here is a massive faggot (myself included) so that makes sense. I'm currently at about 50% link, 25% BTC, 8% LP
>>17462181
10k link is great, but you don't think 15 BTC would get you enough to make it? That chainlink might end up worth $10mm, but the BTC being worth $2mm is FAR MORE likely.
Either way, the LINK/BTC chart looks like it's going to go parabolic. Do with that info what you will.

>>17462082
it's literally a fact. 0 adoption 3 years in and not sybil resistant i.e. centralized.

not a single one of their "partnership" has pulled through and actually used their oracles in production

learn to code brainlet.

I would have bought some link except PUNJABI TOOK MY MONEY AWAY FROM ME
Brown hand reached inside my wallet AND REMOVED MY CURRENCY FROM MEEEEEEE
GAPE FART MASALA
PUNE JAB STOLE MY LIFE FROM MEEEEE

>>17460677
>>17460777
>>17460800
>>17460811
>>17460911
>>17460933
>>17461566
>>17461633
>>17461855
>>17461999
>>17462066
>>17462244
I have witnessed the many consecutive digits, and have verily arranged my ducks

>>17460777
Checked.

I sold most of my stack at 4.3 but thid thread is giving me huge fomo, what do frens?

>>17462788
It’s a fakeout pump don’t fall for it
It’s never hitting 4.5 again

I’ve sold everything at 4.6 will re enter at 3

>>17462788

>>17462788
fight the fomo. it doesn't mean not buying back in but don't let that emotion control you.

>>17462060
You're glowing.

>>17462963
Glow niggers gonna glow
Trying to get us to empty these link hands

>>17462818
post proof faggot

>>17460623
All the people bagholding will massive sell when the price comes even closer to the buy order. Forget about it

1000 eoy

10,000 US MOTHER FUCKING DOLLARS EACH LINK 2024 NO DOUBT

Just bought another 1 NYC’s worth shit is about to pop off big time my dudes

>>17461997
Beautiful

30 you mean.

I've got $5000 waiting to go, buy yet or wait for another few days?

>>17460632
this pnk bullshit is getting so old, just move on please

>>17460694
I've been worrying about this too
T. 26k linklet. Down from 33k because jelly hands

>>17461566
>I’m going to short obvious peaks
Oh boy

>>17460677
>>17460777
>>17460800
>>17460811
>>17460911
>>17461566
>>17461633
>>17461855
>>17461999
>>17462066
>>17462244
>>17462788
>>17462977
>>17463288
>>17463633
>>17463744
Ducks in a row frens. Last week I swear I saw a deadline for 28 Feb on the pivotal but when I checked again it was removed.

>>17462788
Did you have a swing target percentage?

>>17460694
I am already over half a mill with a bigger stack.
Still did not sell..
It makes no sense to sell when Link outperforms every other investment I know.

>>17464114
Same

>>17464114
Where is this from!?

>>17461907
Where have you been? It’s Kleros

>>17460777
yes

>>17461997
this is beautiful, almost made me shed a tear

>>17462977
Dubs of truth. NEVER SELL. Do not trust anyone trying to pry your linkies from your hands.

>>17461837
tl;dr

>>17464928
This.

>>17460679
Here's your (You)

>>17460694
It makes no sense to sell Link
Swingers will try to justify but over the long term they always lose

>>17464667
Easily over a year old now. Turbo-autists' came up with a semi-convincing argument that that the balding guy nearest the camera is/was the head of some massive finance outfit that I can't recall the name of. Can an anon help out?

>>17466076
LINK is at a much much much higher valuation today than ETH was at U$4. Also ETH was at a further point in it's tech development at U$4

>>17467601
great pic.
sergey visiting the underworld.

>>17461837
Kill yourself my dude

>>17460810
Remember this?

>>17462125
cringe
imagine shorting this

>>17460623
that short faggot has made really bad calls lmfao

>>17468337
What does it mean?
Is it a parabolic trendline?

>>17460911
what you really need is to stop being a tripfag. straight up my nigga.

>>17467706
German, CEO of Allianz SE

>>17460632
Unironically... I did

>>17468621
Suck my ugly cock!!!

I haven’t been on biz in like 2 years. I could had invested 5 grand back when it was .25 cents. Now I have learned it’s $4 yesterday. What the actual fuck. I remember all the shilling for it back when it first came out and there was so much anti shilling too. Seems to be the same today. Is it too late invest? Should I wait until it dips to around $3?

>>17470741
You’re still good because it a coin that reddit hates, mainstream media has not picked up on it and the team could have cashed out years ago but didn’t. Project is still very active.

>>17470741
Get fucked nolinker

>>17470741
Let me cut through the fud for you my guy
BUY NOW
We’re about to break all time high in sats and then we will enter price discovery
That will pump us to at least $6

>>17470741
Anything under 100$ is an excellent buy.

>>17470741
>dip
you missed the dip

>>17470807
What a disappointing ass..

It's literally stalling out, we're going to fucking zero boys

no investment thesis detected

i wish everyone here and twitter stopped trying to shill it. we were supposed to price reddit and normie scum out.

>>17460777

>>17460623
when?

>>17462256
I get so fucking hard when I see pathetic noLINKer virgins seething

Link to this discord Timo posted this on?
thanks frens

>>17460623
Timo&Joos never lost a single trade.

>>17460623
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAAHAHAHAHAHHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAH FUCK YOU TIMO

>>17460623
That discord is insufferable. Literally here’s only 4 people that are worth a shit and everyone else is an actual retard.

>>17460623
peak euphoria. time to sell

>>17470819
Because the market fear just magically went away in 24 hours. Impressive
I don't dare selling, but I'm still thinking there's a dip coming

>>17462060
Highest IQ post in the thread and people are blinded. Basically if you do this and bitcoin goes to 100k you’ll have 10 million fucking dollars. Now for some fuck off chance you pull this off and over the next decade bitcoin is 1 million you’ll have 100 million fucking dollars. Everyone in this thread is fucking retarded if you can’t see this is an absolutely OG move.

>>17468337
He’s not shorting. I’m selling at 100k sats+ as well and retiring. Fuck your shit.

>>17470741
This shit will reach $50 fairly easy. Idk if a 20x is good enough for you.

>>17470741
>dips to $3
Bitcoin fucking shit the bed and this thing fucking went on a tear. Just get in you’ve waiting long enough already and you see what’s happened.

>>17472066
Your dumb chainlink is a different product than BTC. Anyone can have a distributed ledger. It Chainlink that the most important piece of the cog.

I'm actually more qualified to talk about this than most anons. I'm employed with a cyber-techno machinations company, I do a lot of security analyst programming type work. Open source, decentralized, APIs, partnerships, you name it. We'd be one of the first companies in line for something like Chainlink, if the decentralized smart contract space had more value over traditional data exchanges. There's a catch though, an underlying flaw more deeply embedded in the bedrock of LINK than the very code itself. The flaw is with the concept, and it's this: Companies won't actually go through the hassle of trusting their data API's through crypto.

Now I can already hear your keyboards going frantic, but hear me out. /biz/ hates banks, and traditional data providers. But actual companies, businesses, and investors do not. There's an old saying you might have heard of: "If it ain't broke, don't fix it!". The idea that any of our bosses would give us the go ahead if we approached them to put our companies valuable data in a smart contract on a cryptocurrency called Chainlink, that they've never heard of, we'd be laughed out at best and fired on the spot at worst. We already have API data buyers and providers we trust.

'But Chainlink is trustless!' I hear you cry, but is that really a good thing? Just listen to the sound of it. Businesses don't want to spend millions of dollars on something that is trustLESS, they want something trustFUL. 'But the reputation system!', doesn't that defeat the whole point of your coin? If companies only trust nodes with high reputation, what's the difference between trusting banks and data providers that already have reputation, but in real life not on a computer screen.

The fact is, LINK is going to share the same fate as ETH will. A lot of 'real world application' hype, with a lot of 'crypto world application' reality. Only, this billion supply coin isn't going to come close to the $1k that Etherum hit.

>>17472239
Okay smart guy thanks
Glad to see you’re smarter than York E Rhodes

>>17472239
I think it depends how staking will work and valuations for the node. We might calculate it the way we do annnuities with present value of future cashflows.

>>17460777

checked and keked

godspeed marines!

>>17472173
That’s what that dude meant. Kek this place has the reading comp of a 4 year old

>>17464114
>outperforms every other investment I know.
This is what I thought about crypto Jan 2018...

>>17460623
We're at where ETH was at $40. Just do LINK x 10 to compare to ETH. Going $50 LINK max in best case scenario. Any ETH over $500 was pure manipulation.

>>17460777
Thanks kek

link to discord?

>>17460777
Praise kek

PLEASEEE FRENS

LINK TO UNOFFICIAL DISCORD FOR CHAINLINK

PLEASE

THANKS

>>17460623
How do you exchange it for real money though.

>>17470667
this is some good-ass post-post ironic meme appropriation

>>17470911
thank you for using my apu fren but this one is for posts that one is for threads

>>17472899
My goodness, what’s with all the digitals?

>>17472264
>>17472293
newfags responding to pasta holy fuck im gonna make it

>>17461997
Gay post.

>>17460777
checked
>This
>Is
>The
>Year
TITY gettin LITTY

Check em

https://youtu.be/Cs8jfZuC1Jk

>>17473565
Haha! Had the same in mind

>>17470741
No, it's going to crash back to .25 cents, just be patient and you'll have your original entry price.

>>17473060
Intersted also

>>17460623
It dosen't really matter. Covid-19 will destroy society

>>17474271
Shut up pussi.