/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>17357266
ok letting this slide

Oh and also Pantera is backing them but whether that's a good thing or not I'll let you decide, retard Krug's track record is iffy but he's also in some real good stuff

I swear to kek if an ic3 team announcing google, microsoft and libra connections all in the same day doesn't get any serious You's but Kleros pajeets keep bumping on the front page, biz is fucking doomed

You're fucking hopeless, I guess the smart ones left last year

>>17357451
Why you about to blow a gasket? You really think this is huge huh?

Have a bump fren

>>17357451
I appreciate you anon and miss the pre-main net autism surrounding LINK that used to fill this board. /biz has always just been a bunch of mindless retards shilling shit coins to each other but lately it’s been really bad.

>>17357266
Nice find

Bumping but I’m retarded. I understand the IC3 connections and the google query but what is OP even trying to say? That libra is going to integrate chainlink?

What should be the punishment for spoonfeeders? These idiots are single handedly rustling my jimmies big time

>>17357451
Appreciate the post man as it’s a nice find but we are all so tired of crumbs. Ive been nibbing on crumbs since 2017, I want my fucking loaf

>>17357266
Today was a good day when OP wasn't a faggot

>>17357726
Was anything knew even discovered? I’m not trying be an asshole OP. Appreciate the effort you put into this post but didn’t everyone already know all this?

>>17357731
HAHAHAHAHAHAH LMFAO

>>17357622
Just frustrated with how shit this board has become. 2018 autists would have been all over this without me needing to spoonfeed. They've been quietly building for three years, no one has heard of them and suddenly they're Google go-to integrated DLT for an industry giant and hanging out at Facebook HQ to discuss shit under NDAs. If this doesn't at least make you curious...

>>17357694
As far as I know this is the first project that mentions being in talks with Libra and Libra seeking to collaborate with crypto projects (probably to shed their negative corporate image), we know Sergey has been talking but only because of crumbs and leaks. Combined with the ic3 ties and the other crumb in the archived link, this pretty much guarantees Libra will integrate LINK eventually IMO.

>>17357266
Thanks OP but I'm already all in.

Very nice. Libra will fail, however

>>17357568
don't be mad OP I liked your thread

>>17357266
Isn't privacy a big problem with Chainlink's oracles. As any number of unknown node operators will need to have access to the data feed in order to verify if a contract should execute?

We already know link will be the backbone of the crypto space. The old breadcrumbs were exciting because they revealed this. Now we’re just waiting. There being yet another project that’ll use link is expected.

>>17358076
https://blog.chain.link/town-crier-and-chainlink/

>>17358088
It's not just about LINK but also Cypherium's potential once public

Token will launch at the same time as mainnet, probably in a couple of months, probably binance first.

Curious regarding the issue that PoW seems a bit outdated technology wise. What is the answer to that?

Otherwise seems like a great project.

>>17358427
Yeah that raised a red flag for me too but what do I know, if they're good enough for google and ic3 they're good enough for me. Apparently they saw the bear market bloodbath coming and delayed their token launch to coincidence with the next cycle, wise move but then it seems outdated.

>>17358495
Furthermore the team seems subpar to say the least. While I dig the IC3 and Google thing I am not sure in regards to the team.
Do you know a bit more about that?

I am really curious in the project.

Just read Cypherium whitepaper Op, thanks for bringing this to my attention.
Where to buy? From what I gather they are already in their 2nd round presale?

>>17358427
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=_vk9TqXcRTs

>>17358554
Wait for exchange or send them an email to participate in presale round 2 (minimum buy in 100,000 cph at $0.15)

>>17358712
Nvm. Token is already way overpriced, that puts them at 1.5B marketcap.

>>17358768
Total circulating supply at mainnet launch: 1.0 Billion tokens, valuation of $150 million.

>>17358768
>>17358884
That's from their "Initial Mainnet Offering" medium post
https://medium.com/@cypherium/initial-mainnet-offering-explained-38eeda7eadf2

>>17357266
Thank you anon, it's stuff like this that keeps me from completely abandoning /biz/

thanks OP. got my eye on this one

Honestly after the Arbitrum/Chainlink news I pretty much think the platform "race" is over. The rate of development of off-chain scaling solutions has outpaced on-chain solutions by a hyperbolic factor.
ETH2.0 will be able to cope not because it has a million TPS, but because it doesn't need it any more.

>>17357451
We're all all-in, man. The pajeets are here baiting newfags, but the couple hundred regulars on this board are 99% all-in link already.

Bump for a non-shit thread, appreciate it OP

>>17357266
God 2020 keeps getting better and better. Thanks OP.

>>17357821
I've never wanted Facebook to SUCCEED at a project so much in my life.

link to the moon

>>17357266
discover the mistake -_-

bump

>>17359663
They're wearing yellowface and brownface. This won't go over well.

>>17359663
It's really funny how /pol makes you a better entrepreneur and investor than the 99,9%.

Uhh... guys...
>>17296274

>>17359887
bump.

>>17359887
You think the schizoposter was referring to cypherium?

>>17359989
>https://medium.com/@cypherium/initial-mainnet-offering-explained-38eeda7eadf2
Maybe. Do you?

He seemed like he wanted to be cool and leak something, but everyone ignored him. Not the usual sense from trolls.

23926RNSS7

Ok absolute fucking brainlet here, thanks for the backbreakjng work OP. How the hell do i invest in this?

>>17357266
>>17357266
No one cares because link is already $4 and while you wait for your 1000k eoy meme tons of people will be getting rich in that 10yr wait

>>17357647

We are still better than the heights of stupidity of the last bubble

>>17360038
>23926RNSS7
wat

>>17359051

Absolute truth

get off our board javier

>>17357266
I've had some good cryptos in my time. Uh I... I love a good oracle, decentralized oracle, and events- real world events, and smart contracts on a blockchain. Uh, that is hot stuff, you can get that at- at a number of different DEX's.

I road BCH up like a dirty pajeet from 188 to 450, then jumped all into Link

>>17357266
>>17357821

nice thread op, but the thing is this is kind irrelevant now, those who know, know

this stuff is gonna to be integrated everywhere in 7 years, it will change the world. the sad part is knowing all this and having to wait for everyone else to catch up

either spend your time building a company around this new market that will emerge, or cope until you are able to quite your job

>>17360301
>either spend your time building a company around this new market that will emerge, or cope until you are able to quite your job

Give me a few quick examples off the top of your head? Please? Trying to wrap my mind around the future.

Thanks

>>17360386
Spin up a node, build external adapters

>>17360386

i'll give you one for free

smart contracts to automate independent energy grid generators payments, both for usage as well for down grid time

i worked with wind generators a while, and this part is an example of operational cost that adds no value to the company, yet is expensive, you often see more employees in the financial office than in the engineering

if you can come up to a company with a full build plan on how they can do it, you could easily charge 15% of the savings for 4 years or more

>>17357821
Listen man, leave this place. It is an intellectual hell hole, anybody with a modicum of intelligence is either ignored (because their thoughts go over the heads of the idiots here), or are shouted down by idiots and shills. Seriously, take your ideas elsewhere. Reddit is slightly better, but still not great. The quality of conversation has dropped drastically since the 2017 bubble, and it is not going to recover. This is the price you pay when you go mainstream.

Do I sell my FTM ? if Libra is the stablecoin and this first thing do a lot of TPS

>>17360759
Where else is there? Internet is so centralized and normie saturated lately.

>>17361266
There are private invite only communities for discussion on these topics, they are the only place left to have intellectual discussion on cryptocurrency. Anything public is full of shills and idiots.

>>17361266
Idk where else I can go. 2+2 /biz isn’t great. And the only other place is r/WSB which is options/stocks. Any mention of bitcoin/crypto gets immediately deleted.

>>17361334
Those places” like telegram and discord. Lol ok.

>>17361334
>>17361344
WSB is inundated with gamblers and idiots as well.

What if I have a smart contract for a shipment coming from China, say insurance on the delivery of some goods. Do I have to trust China and their data or can I verify it in other ways. I know more nodes equals more security and more sources of data provide greater redundancy but China is infamous for manipulation of facts and public opinion. There is no serious distinction between private enterprise and public. It all pretty much leads back to the ccp. So my data could be tampered with or the Chinese could ship "international" standard of raw material to me but when it arrives it was actually a chinese interpretation of an international standard. So how can I protect myself if this happens?
Tldr are oracles just about efficiency and is globalization kill?

>>17361357
Yeah, some worthwhile communities exist on telegram and discord, I’m also aware of a invite only forum. Not sure why you’d write them off just because they are hosted on telegram or discord, those platforms are effective ways to share ideas in a group setting.

>>17361381
Any platform where people have "online identities", like usernames, breaks down because of egos. People become "popular" and then their weak ideas are upheld due to social reasons rather than their own merit. It's why biz despite its flaws is still the only actual food source of discussion.

>>17361381
Because those platforms have serious security issues

>>17360759
>reddit is slightly better.

Look up St. Simon of Trent on reddit and then post a thread about it here on 4chan i dare you.

>>17361425
Any online forum is a security risk, just do some standard opsec as you would anywhere else.

>>17361413
This is only true in uncensored communities with voting features, anonymity and lack of moderation has it’s issues as well.

>>17361451
I’m saying within the scope of cryptocurrency discussion. Reddit is a shithole for other topics of discussion, no doubt.

>>17361480
Right but there's levels of risk here. You might as well talk on faceberg if you're relying on discord.

Imagine buying this shit over hbar. Neither can I

>>17361557
These are just communities for cryptocurrency discussion, there is no reason you would be disclosing private information and you should always be using a VPN while on the internet regardless. Very little risk using discord for these purposes.

>>17359663
big yikes

>>17361600
>Open yourself up to algorithmic data mining and just hope you never slip up in however many dozens to hundreds of hours you might end up clocking with a particular community

You're dumb. If you're gonna be joining private discussion groups at least choose a platform that's not a literal honeypot and preferably one that can easily be encrypted.

>>17357451
i appreciate you, everything you posted is gold, but im already all in

Bump