/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>17306236
and if it captures 0% it will go back down to $1 where it belongs

>>17306255
*flush*

you holding link making me fearful for the future of link and this community

Not to mention its use in everyday enterprise blockchain. As more companies adopt blockchain, they'll need chainlink. There's no way around it.

I'm expecting $100 this year purely on speculation. $1k is very feasible as long as they dont majorly fuck anything up

>>17306255
seething no linker

>>17306266
Sell me your linkies then

>>17306267
What's stopping Sergey from creating a new token once the tech is finished?

>>17306287
If he did that he would lose all credibility in this space and nobody would trust whatever he decided to create next. Keep in mind that there are entities will millions of dollars worth of this shit going to bat for him. If he up and left them with the check, nobody would give him a dime later.

>>17306236
what leads people like you to think stuff like that will ever happen

>>17306236
>Lets say Link is used to back the entire derivatives market
How would this even work?
Link ""backs""" the derivatives market?
The fuck does that even mean?

First off, it's 1b tokens.

There are just going to be alternative oracle networks/nodes that use BTC or other coins for staking purposes. What we will most likely see is a first-mover advantage like ethereum has, so chainlink will probably capture 25-50% of the crypto-oriented derivatives collateral, which will be a tiny percent of the actual derivatives market. So if it succeeds, the upper bound on the price will likely be somewhere around 20-50.

>>17306399
staked LINK overcollateralizing some nonzero percentage of the notional value of the global derivatives market, oracle fails => security of contract execution jeopardized => LINK stake gets slashed; the exact parameters of how needs to be staked and how slashing will work will be decided by the market

>>17306403
we shall see

>>17306236
Why would the derivatives market increase their costs in favor of an automatic system that could be abused by certain actors? Their legacy systems are way faster, cheaper and they can actually take legal action if someone exploits them.

>>17306403
Chainlink being used as collateral for financial transactions accounting for 10% of the European Union's GDP would already put it at €1800
It sounds absurd to me as well

>extremely volatile. 9000% gains in one year
>would be used to “back” anything

Pick none.

>>17306424

So, LINK (the token) acts exactly like money such that it is collateral, while LINK (the oracle) attempts to do what modern systems are already capable of doing in securing buy/sell contracts.

Why?

>>17306703
smart contracts inherently reduce friction in settlement by garunteeing to execute as programmed

however the idea that link will 'absorb' some portion of this market cap is absurd. The mistakenly think that USER SC will be rewarded by the node providing bad data, but the reality is that the stake will be just high enough to prevent an attack...

>>17306236
Link has no customers

>>17306772
Except Citi bank.lol since 2014.
>you wouldnt get it

>>17306266

Iceberg hopium has always been part of the link meme arsenal

>>17306703
https://gendal.me/2014/01/05/a-simple-explanation-of-how-shares-move-around-the-securities-settlement-system/
that describes the life cycle of a security from point of sale to final settlement, observe the bloat, 90% of that can happen on a blockchain with a smart contract, such smart contracts need market data, such market data enters blockchains in a trust-minimized fashion via decentralized oracles (chainlink), nodes will be paid in the LINK token, the LINK token will also be staked by nodes as a guarantee they will provide a quality service, if they don't provide a quality service then their stake will be slashed and awarded to contract owners, what "quality service" means, how much LINK must be staked, and how much LINK will be slashed, and under what conditions it will be slashed are all parameters to be determined by the free market, for example: if a node is offline during the time period that it is legally obligated to serve data to a smart contract, it's stake will be slashed 20%

>>17306788
Nonw of that shit is live yet anyways

>>17306255
Should've bought LINK

>>17306820
so cope?
>It will be

>>17306236
why would the price of the token go up just because the chainlink blockchain will be used?

>>17306764
>smart contracts inherently reduce friction in settlement by garunteeing to execute as programmed
As opposed to the already functioning multi-quadrillion market systems that are in use 24/7 365?
Even if the above is true (ignoring the fact that none of this had been demonstrated), there needs to be profit/incentive to switch systems.
Further, who is programming these smart contracts? Smart contracts INHERENTLY reduce ""friction""? Sounds a lot like you're describing these things as if everything is best-case scenario, perfect world - what about bad contracts? What about the underlying mechanics of staking? What about the things that we don't know about? What about other things?

And finally, to reiterate, why the actual fuck would anyone spend time and money switching systems if there is no demonstration of a good/great/profitable reason to do so?

>>17306912
Why do you care if its used? OH WAIT, you care because if it was used, youd buy. So would everyone else. Your coping. The price will rise. Your literally your own answer.

>>17306236
>estimate

>>17306961
Because you must invest to earn potential profit
> see CitiBank

>>17306800
Thank you

>>17306403
even the fud is bullish

>>17307020
Thank god this guy gave us his arbitrary bounds.
Some one claimed BTC ceiling at $1800 in 2017

>>17306867
Not a customer untol they go live kek

>>17306236
>pay your entire value to use a tool
Why would they do that? You're saying they're worth X amount so that means if they use a tool then that tool absorbs its entire worth.

>>17306800
Just read the linked article:
There isn't much bloat at all.
Data aggregation takes work and isn't automatic and/or necessarily reliable.
Following this, staking parameters seem to be up I the air and also tied DIRECTLY TO THE CURRENT PRICE OF LINK (LOL) - what happens when a million smart contracts for derivatives need to last several days/weeks/months/years and the price of LINK changes?
Also, node payment parameters are also undetermined and would require absolute fluidity and ability to change with every single tick, along with staking/slashing parameters which have already been set within the previously described smart contracts..

There is just so much here that seems like we're taking about a perfect world where everything is taken care of almost perfectly and nothing big or bad or massively unexpected ever happens and also somehow perfectly efficient and superbly effective software has already been created and it's called LINK and it's basically already finished..?

Hmm.
Gonna have to call bullshit, as if the above case were true, every single business and individual person would already be using this more effective and efficient software system which saves them money and time from the get go.

Is this really what we see happening?

>>17307106
Nobody help this autist
>stay poor lol

>>17306287
>what if the ceo exit scammed
Then he’d be blacklisted by every potential partner of his, really anon?

>>17307106
we fundamentally disagree on too many points, there's no point in me trying to change your mind

>>17307106
You're smart anon, don't let anyone tell you otherwise

>>17307120
>we gon' b rich lololol
epic marketing for your """product""" there faggot

Unless the proposed use-case scenario for LINK is actually DEMONSTRATED in the near future, I feel this project will slowly crumble under the destructive weight of its ambitions.

I will invest as soon as I see a working node with staking/slashing, smart contract use for effective and efficient data aggregation and contract initiation and finalisation.

I'll be waiting a while I suspect.

>>17307163
Nice reddit spacing

>>17306236
Don't ever put that glorified JSON parser LINK and derivatives together in a sentence again

XRP is the only coin that can potentially distrub the derivatives market and it's already making great progress at that.

To summarise:

>Unless the proposed use-case scenario for LINK is actually DEMONSTRATED in the near future, I feel this project will slowly crumble under the destructive weight of its ambitions.

>I will invest as soon as I see a working node with staking/slashing, smart contract use for effective and efficient data aggregation and contract initiation and finalisation.

>I'll be waiting a while I suspect.

>>17307163
Literally none of these fucking retards buying now can even answer the basics of what you're asking.

Do you understand the principles behind smart contracts? if yes. surely you can see why an options contract that can guarantee the outcome is preferable to those that don't. But you're probably right.... centralized solutions make more sense for most people, at least for the foreseeable future, Any use beyond DEFI is a pipe dream at this point. You're dealing with cultists that just say 'meme magic' for anything they can't understand or expalin

Use case value is different than speculative value. Thomas told us in stack the price can be a cup of coffee and 1000k eoy but apparently only sergey knows how this works. I guess he will talk about this tomorrow?

You are going to literally kill yourself if you dont buy link. I know what you're thinking, "haha yeah right, ok.." No. You're going to kill yourself if you don't own a suicide stack of this shit. It used to be 10k, 1k, 100, The suicide stack is decreasing. Time is running out. You wont be able to live with the thought. The thought wont leave you. Why didn't I buy this? Why didn't I just put some money in? I had extra money at the time. Why didn't I just buy in? It's not too late. Actually, no, it is too late. If you're sub 10k link right now and youve been on this board for more than a year i dont even know what to say to you. I honestly pray for you anons in this situation, because i really dont know how youre going to live with yourselves in the coming years.

>>17306236
Why exactly would you sell chainlink for usd??

RN link as a token is just being discussed whereas before the mechanism and oracle network was the focus.

>>17307294
USD is backed by special jet fuel that melts steel beams

>>17307294
to shower strippers with dollar bills

>>17307314
lold irl

>>17306236
Jesus these newfags

>>17306236
Thanks for the kek

>>17307163
>so intelligent and yet he doesen’t understand speculative potential
ETH hit 1500 with no adoption based purely off of speculation and token ICOs.

>I'll just keep shouting delusional estimations into this annonymous tibetian chat room echo chamber. Yea.. That will surely turn me into a billionaire whale

>>17307386
>>17307412
HelIo reddit!

>>17307433
Hello Ravinder Ghmanash

>>17307259
10/10
This appears to be the sad truth for all those invested in LINK.

>>17307409
>but speculation bubbles happen so therefore LINK is a legitimate solution to an existing issue and is definitely going to be used by anyone at all and therefore will increase in price
This is your thought process.

>>17307259
>centralized solutions make more sense for most people
Look at what VEN has done in the last year regarding centralization changes and voting. Larg corps want some centralization to come to the table.

>>17307480
How based can one person be

>>17306267
>$1k is very feasible as long as they dont majorly fuck anything up
In thousand years maybe
Who the fuck is willing to pay so much money for that shit?
It is literally fucking Impossible

>>17307491
If they want centralized control then they can build in house. Hell why even use block chain if you want centralization. Just use a normal database.

Drunk anon is it you?

>>17307790
why didnt bzx think of that
kek

Hey retard, the derivatives market will grow because of Chainlink. $1b eoy

>>17306236
I've read that hopium for XRP, looks like these normies found a new HQ

>>17307106
Is it summer already?

>>17308065
This is not a valid/sound response to the quoted post.

>>17306348
Oh nothing.
Nothing at all, just move along there's nothing to see here.

>>17306703
You can't use "money" to collateralize smart contracts.
Smart contracts live entirely on the blockchain, and fiat money does not (in fact, fiat is one of the iconic examples of "external data").

At best you could use a stablecoin, but that means adding another massive layer of complexity (just look up how DAI works) which is entirely unnecessary for the core functionality of oracles.

>while LINK (the oracle) attempts to do what modern systems are already capable of doing in securing buy/sell contracts
But not buy/sell SMART contracts.

>>17308102
You’re a double nigger. Buying Chainlink is investing money into a risky, disruptive technology that could fail for any number of reasons. If you buy after it’s proven it won’t fail, you’re gonna miss out on bigger gains. This is shitcoin gambling, faggot. Go the fuck back to stocks or reddit or wherever the fuck you came from

>>17306961
Maybe you should look up "smart contracts" and look at what the big players (Swift, Capgemini, Gartner, ISDA, ...) are saying about them.

Smart contracts are vastly more automated, cost-efficient, secure, ... than conventional contracts.

>>17307106
>current financial system
>"nothing big or bad or massively unexpected ever happens"

This is bait.

>>17307163
>Unless the proposed use-case scenario for LINK is actually DEMONSTRATED in the near future, I feel this project will slowly crumble under the destructive weight of its ambitions.
lmao
This sentence boils down to "if it doesn't succeed, it will not be successful".

You are one smart cookie, anon.

>>17307106
upvoted!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

>>17308253
have an upboat yourself, sir x^D

>>17306912
>>hurr durr Chainlink blockchain

read up on what Chainlink is faggot and stop asking stupid questions

Price of a cup of coffee.

>>17306236

It's useless to talk about "muh derivative markets" because nobody is going to use your ShitStink on naything. 3 years and there are still 0 users of this shit.

>>17308170
What exactly (functionally) will a smart contract be able to do that traditional contracts and financial systems inherently cannot?

>>17308201
Try reading the entire post instead of taking two specifically oppositional components and then framing them like they were intended to be complimentary, you fucking retarded cunt.

>>17308216
A successful demonstration of the claimed use-case is not the same as industry-wode adoption and ultimate success, you dense nigger.

Just imagine a situation where somebody was actually using ShitStink. Some big player decides to dump the price making the collateral absolutely worthless. There is nothing, absolutely nothing, that prevents this from happening. Your Stinkcoin is worthless vaporware.

>>17306961
>why the actual fuck would anyone spend time and money switching systems if there is no demonstration of a good/great/profitable reason to do so?

Smart contracts automate 60-90% (industry dependant) of human labor/cost. Derivatives is on the upper bounds, and at a very high per person salary.

SCs also cut the transaction times from 7-14 business days down to seconds, and cut the significant carrying costs/financing costs to float those outstanding contracts for the week(s) it takes to process through the 10+ people making 6 figures each on each side of the trade.

Contracts vary wildly, so there's no one answer...but even basic swaps cost 5k and up in fees alone, and have to go through a centralized clearinghouse. More complex contracts are 25k+, not factoring lawyers and human costs...both types costs a few hundred to a few thousand in financing (10mm+ for a week or more).

SCs can reduce costs from 5k, 25k, 50+k after labor down to 10 cents to deploy and whatever their selection chainlink node operators charge for data. Basically a node could charge these guys 500 bucks for a couple minutes of "work" (2-3 price feed deliveries and a few million in collateral) and banks/trading firms would be lining up asking whos dick they have to suck for that cheap of a price.

>>17308411
>What exactly (functionally) will a smart contract be able to do that traditional contracts and financial systems inherently cannot?
Why are you asking me instead of Jeeves?

>Try reading the entire post
I did.
You said what you said.

>A successful demonstration of the claimed use-case is not the same as industry-wode adoption and ultimate success
The Chainlink use case is oracles, which have been "successfully demonstrated" to hell and back.

>>17308450

LINK + ETH "claims" to be able to do what you've described, but is the software functioning in this state? Are there standardized contracts for these uses? Has there been any demonstration of these capabilities?

I feel that the answer to all of the above is NO, simply due to the fact that if the answers were YES, then, as you said, banks and trading firms would be lining up asking whos dick they have to suck for that cheap of a price.

>>17308450
>why the actual fuck would anyone spend time and money switching systems if there is no DEMONSTRATION of a good/great/profitable reason to do so?

>>17306236
>chainlink running on eth will handle derivatives requiring millions of transactions per second
HAHAHAHAHAHA
cmon linkies, get real, fucking lmao

>>17308411
Openlaw already demoed working smart contracts using OLE(tm) to ISDA a couple months ago. They're just waiting on legislation to be finalized/pass in the countries of business to start implementation and acknowledgement. The UK already has rulings/precedents, and a few US states have legislation (google us smart contract bill, CT, TN, IL on first page).

I really hope you're just some bored "troll" trying to bait us into feeding noobs...but in the offchance you're actually a really retarded boomer/nigger you're welcome.

>>17308472

Simple API call function != UNIVERSAL SMART CONTRACT ORACLE

Also, for clarification, here is the paragraph you misread:

>There is just so much here (within the claims made by LINK) that seems like, if these claims are to be taken as true, we're talking about a hypothetical perfect world where everything is taken care of almost perfectly and nothing big or bad or massively unexpected ever happens;

>and also, somehow perfectly efficient and superbly effective software has already been created for all and every smart contract use and it's called LINK.

I don't see this actually being demonstrated in any way, and again, simple API calls are not a demonstration of the above.

>>17308512
Yeah, it fucking is and does. Look up the aggregator contracts, nigger, (I won’t because fuck you) and as for BUT IS IT LIVE AND READY YET AND WAITING FOR ME WITH A COOL HANDY WELCOME PAMPHLET? welcome to crypto, you’re early. Have a seat. Your buddies at the country club haven’t caught on just yet because they haven’t quite figured out how to send the 0.01 bit coins they bought in November ‘17 off coinbase yet.

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-02-18/crypto-giant-binance-launches-cloud-service-in-revenue-shift

This seems at least semi likely to involve LINK doesn't it? CZ seems to be quite a fan of link

>>17306432
>Their legacy systems are way faster, cheaper and they can actually take legal action if someone exploits them.

They are slower, expensive, and the fact that legal action can be taken to stop contracts is one of the very reasons smart contracts powered by decentrelized oracles are usefull

>>17308578
>Simple API call function != UNIVERSAL SMART CONTRACT ORACLE
You have no idea what oracles are.

>There is just so much here (within the claims made by LINK) that seems like, if these claims are to be taken as true, we're talking about a hypothetical perfect world
Chainlink is about oracles, which is a tool for making smart contracts a reality.
None of these things involve "claims" originating from Chainlink.

>somehow perfectly efficient and superbly effective software has already been created for all and every smart contract use and it's called LINK.
Chainlink has the absolute best oracle fundamentals ever seen, yes.
And it's not just "Chainlink" saying this, about half of the crypto world agrees. Including ETH, which calls Chainlink its "resident oracle authority".

>>17308577
>Openlaw already demoed working smart contracts using OLE(tm) to ISDA a couple months ago.
Can you provide a link?
Was LINK used as the oracle?

>>17308592
>LINK is basically finished and working as intended
Why isn't ANYONE lining up to suck cock for these kinds of savings?

>>17308512
>>17308522
See
>>17308577
There are already semi-public demonstrations, all the ceo's of every bank and trading firm have already attended (plus all isda members). Was only 1k per ticket. Everything is in the multi month long testing and certification processes, and will hopefully be updated and given a solid timeframe tomorrow at the fireside chat.

Again, this is for quadrillion dollar business...these things move at glacially slow pace to be finalized through boomer style implementation.

Everyone involved from every side is all saying "soon" but some faggot from reddit knows better

>>17308643
Well staking isn’t out yet (arguably the most important/fragile part) and they’re nursing the network along. I had a huge screencap a while back of some anon describing how building up pure word-of-mouth trust is how they’re securing the network against Sybil attacks at least in the early stages. Can’t remember the details

>Why isn't ANYONE lining up to suck cock for these kinds of savings?
Hello fren, look around you, what board is this again? Now drop your pants

>>17308637
Can you point to a smart contract that is DEMONSTRATING the use of LINK as an oracle? I see that LINK nodes have been setup to execute simple API calls, but if the resource specified in the smart contract which is being used for this action (API host) goes down, is there any fail-safe or fall-back built in? Notification process?

>>17308643
>IF LINK IS SO GREAT HOW COME IT'S NOT $200 YET

>>17308637

>Muh oracles

Sorry, but there is no DEMONSTRABLE use for your ShitStink. Nobody is using it.

>>17308708
Should be:
>If LINK is so great how come no one is using LINK?
Idiot, get some reading comprehension.

>not a single person in this thread knows how derivatives market works
the underlying value is far less than the notional value. Don't forget, there's only $300T worth of 'stuff' in the world.
Look what a simple google search results in https://www.investopedia.com/ask/answers/052715/how-big-derivatives-market.asp

>>17308707
>Can you point to a smart contract that is DEMONSTRATING the use of LINK as an oracle?
Of course.

>>17306403
>the upper bound on the price will likely be somewhere around 20-50
Based on..? Your opinions?

>>17308724
>how come no one is using LINK?
People are using Link right now, lmao.

>>17308753
No, based on the fact that "chainlink will probably capture 25-50% of the crypto-oriented derivatives collateral".
Because we all know that 1% of "crypto-oriented derivatives collateral" equals 1 USD.

Clearly the guy put a lot of thought into this.

>>17308760
>People are using LINK right now
I absolutely dare you to post evidence for this claim.

>>17308732
>n-notional value doesn't count
k anon

>>17308752
>I can definitely point to a smart contract which is using LINK as an oracle, not as a simply API call function.
And yet you haven't.

>>17308779
Look it up.

>>17308789
>yet you haven't
And I won't.
Look it up.

>>17308411
>What exactly (functionally) will a smart contract be able to do that traditional contracts and financial systems inherently cannot?
Do you even google

>>17308789
>>17308779
What is this argument even meant to convey?
Even if nobody was using Chainlink yet (quod non); half of crypto (incl. ETH) and firms like Google Cloud and Oracle are taking active and public steps to integrate it.

You are literally complaining about being "too early".

>>17308781
>chainlink will have to be worth 1.2 quadrillion because that's what the other number is

>>17308811
Checked, but that's not what I said.

>>17308817
isn't it though

>>17308828
Yes, it isn't it.

>>17308669

There are no ACTUAL demonstrations. Just the same old representations by a fat russian scammer.

>>17308802
>Even if nobody was using Chainlink yet (quod non); half of crypto (incl. ETH) and firms like Google Cloud and Oracle are taking active and public steps to integrate it.

So nobody is still using your ShitStink. Nobody uses it and nobody will never use it. It's a shitcoin that nobody uses.

>>17308847

Correcting that to nobody and ever.

>>17308847
Oracle just said they're integrating Chainlink four days ago.

You do know Oracle, right anon? Second-biggest software company in the world?

>>17308867

And nobody is still using it. It's been constant "integrations" to google, microsoft, amazon yet nobody is still using it. I repeat it. Nobody uses your shitstink and nobody will ever use it.

>>17308893
>nobody
copety cope

>>17308906

Yes nobody. Is google using shitstink despite "integration"? No. Is Microsoft using it? No. Will Oracle use it? No.

>>17308916
Are you saying these companies are lying?

>>17307708
18 decimal places retard

>>17308926
Lmao what is the likelihood of this toilet poo poo token hitting $1k? Probably close to 0

>>17308924

I'm saying that nobody is using your shitstink. I don't care what any companies say, I care about the actual usage which is zero, zilch, nada.

>>17308944
>"nobody" is using it currently (wrong but whatevs)
>but Google Cloud, Oracle, ... will

God DAMN anon stop being so bullish, my penis can only get so erect!

Guys, I have 3 link, am I going to make it?

>>17307163
>il invest when everything is priced in

>>17308426
Priced out?

>>17308944
Very weak anon, you must do better to fool plebbit fags.

>>17306403
My calculation actually put it to about $350 if that happens, which is optimistic but measured in relation to its market cap but also doesn't account for how high momentum can take things in a mania phase on price

>>17308981

As I said, nobody is using it and nobody ever will. Not google, not Oracle, not anybody else.

Oh yeah, somebody is using your shitstink to fetch the price of Ethereum. That's the extent of usage of your shitcoin.

>>17309025
So Google, Oracle, ETH, ... are all lying?

>>17309007
>>17309006

Typical stinklet argumentation. Whenever you point out that nobody uses it they start sperging.

>>17309027
They never said they'd use it for anything so technically not. They just don't use it.

>>17309039
>They never said they'd use it for anything
Anon, I...

>>17307106
>Following this, staking parameters seem to be up I the air and also tied DIRECTLY TO THE CURRENT PRICE OF LINK (LOL) - what happens when a million smart contracts for derivatives need to last several days/weeks/months/years and the price of LINK changes?
Yeah because currency value isn't already fluid, fucking hell % value of stable coins can be a stipulation for starters. LINK doesn't have to be the output of even input of the contract.
It's a digital contract not a piece of paper sitting in a draw where the value is set in dry ink.

>>17309045

Where exactly does that say that they'll use it for anything at all? Integration /= usage.

>>17306236
>if we do 1.2 quadrillion / 350 million, we get 3,428,571.42.

So that’s only 2,2x from here.

>>17309059
>Integration /= usage

>>17309068

>Doesn't answer the question

Anon, I...

>>17309073
Oracle is integrating Chainlink, cope anon.

>>17308944
Lol dude theyre still finishing it.
>I-I-IS ANYONE USING IS I DONT WANNA RISK MY SHEKELS
By the time theres evidence for what you are asking, you will be priced out if you arent already. Stay poor Ranjesh, good luck with the village famine.

>>17309076

And now you need to prove to me that they inted to actually use it for anything at all. Google "integrated" your shitstink since a long while ago and they don't use it for anything.

Looks like you're unable to do that, tough luck.

>>17309083
>Lol dude theyre still finishing it.

T:2030

That is if Sergay hasn't abandoned his second scam coin for yet another Chainbonk that you retards pump for him just to get 700k dumped on you.

>>17309085
>And now you need to prove to me that they inted to actually use it
Why do I need to prove anything?
I didn't claim Oracle was integrating Chainlink, Oracle itself made that claim.

>>17308369
With diamonds in it.

>>17306236
Chainlink doesn't actually do anything you can't do for free. also there isn't a single company using chainlink for anything useful right now.
some faggot at google saying they could use it doesn't mean shit.

>>17308512
Kek, if this shit was already functional we wouldn't be at $4. Same how we were at $0.2 because "they don't even have a mainnet running". The whole purpose of this shit is to get in early before it is built. Now whether or not you think they will succeed depends on your own rationales. I'd say there is a pretty good chance.

>>17309111
>some faggot at google
It's actually Google Cloud itself, not just some faggot.
Pic related.

Also, what about Oracle?

>>17306267
No they don't

>>17309054
Using stablecoins or anything besides link for collateralization severely lowers it's potential locked amount and demand (therefore price). Once steaking is released and the network can be fully utilized, not just basic price feeds, the price of link literally can't go down. Any attempt at dumping a large amount will be instantly eaten up for stake/node operators, and you'd have to be retarded to sell anything over nessesarry operating costs at the rate it will rise.

>>17309092
Cant tell if troll, stupid, swinger, or jeet. Exit scam is oldest fud in the book, it was literally addressed earlier.
>Sir Gay exit scams to get himself blacklisted
Great critical thinking, but youre worse than a troll or a retard or a redditor. Youre a degenerate gambling swingie. Relax we might kiss 3.XX again.

>>17309126
Google cloud isn't actually using it you fucking dimwit, did you not see my image? i looked into this.

it's actually some furry faggot that talks to developers and engineering team and supports them.

All his job is to provide ideas.

>>17309126
Do not spoonfeed the nolinkers or help the swingies fud please and thanks

>>17309152
>Google cloud isn't actually using it
So Google Cloud is lying?

>>17309160
Google never stated they are using it, they said its a way to implement oracles.

>>17306236
you retarded niggers cannot see that Sergey can and probably is dumping on your asses at any given time... I just don't get it. The team takes years to do what others do in months? Like, what's the draw with this shitcoin? I don't get it...

>>17309169
So they're actively promoting Chainlink?

God damn this is bigger than I thought.

>>17309169
https://cloud.google.com/blog/products/data-analytics/building-hybrid-blockchain-cloud-applications-with-ethereum-and-google-cloud

Developer advocate was the fag who wrote the article and it was blown out of proportion.

when they post these articles on Google cloud it gets posted on twitter as well.

What you thought was a partnership is actually a dud.

>>17309183
>it was blown out of proportion
See pic in >>17309126

>>17309181
This fucking level of delusion. Have fun being poor. there are actually better alternatives to chainlink and they actually work. and not a giant glorified json parser

>>17309188
>there are actually better alternatives to chainlink
Google Cloud is promoting Chainlink though.

>>17309186
Fucking retard chaindicks, Even if you spoonfeed them a link they won't do a single shred of research.

Google cloud has a blog from their team, when some faggot writes an article it automatically gets posted to twitter.
Just because it's there doesn't mean they are actually going to use it.

https://cloud.google.com/blog/products/data-analytics/building-hybrid-blockchain-cloud-applications-with-ethereum-and-google-cloud

>>17309205
Google Cloud:
>use Chainlink
>use Chainlink
>use Chainlink
etc.

Anon:
>IT DOESN'T MEAN ANYTHIIIIIIIING RRRRRRRRREEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

>>17309198
they are promoting smart contracts and oracles.
Ethereum is the most Widely known smart contract platform and Chainlink is an Ethereum ERC20 token.

>>17309222
>they are promoting smart contracts and oracles.
They are LITERALLY promoting Chainlink though.

See pic in >>17309126
The Chainlink logo is the only one you can see in those tweets.

>>17309226
google cloud isn't promoting chainlink. Only a developer advocate at Google cloud is promoting chainlink. it doesn't mean google Cloud is actually going to use chainlink or implement it. it's an idea that could happen if they decided to focus their attention to it. companies do this all the time doesn't mean it goes anywhere.
its basically a thinktank.

>>17309143

Like he did with NXT? Yep, he'll just move on to another project. there is absolutely nothing that requires him to partake in that shitcoin. It's hilarious how you stinkies believe he should associate himself with stincoin for the rest of his life just because of what? Because stinkies bought his useless shitcoin.

>>17309226
>>17309222
>>17309213
>>17309205
>>17309198
>>17309188
>>17309186
>>17309183
>>17309181
Can someone please just explain why this shit is supposed to work in plain English? I'll buy 10,000 links at market now and bump the fuck out of the price, if only someone will explain some basic real shit about it

>>17309260
>google cloud isn't promoting chainlink

Anon, I...

>>17309276
this >>17309281
bottom line, its the only crypto that matters now and you are very early (check google search trends for chainlink and compare with bitcoin)
klaus schwab - founder of the world economic forum, endorses smart contracts in his book, stating it is essential for the next step in the industrial revolution

>>17309320

>>17309094
>Why do I need to prove anything?

Because you're claiming that Oracle will use it. Of course you're free to retract your statement, stinky.

>I didn't claim Oracle was integrating Chainlink, Oracle itself made that claim.

You claimed Oracle is going to use it, so why don't you prove it.

>>17309281
You keep posting that image as if it actually means anything. why are you people so fucking braindead? i literally told you Exactly what's going on.

Some "developer advocate" faggot at google cloud wrote an article claiming you could use oracles with chainlink and ethereum basically throwing out an idea after he posted it automatically gets posted to social media.

Listen here you litteral low iq faggot. If i actually thought this project would be used by google and was going someplace i would be all invested. but from what i see its a fucking shitcoin created by a scam artist. they literally spent 2 years creating a json parser.

>>17309276
Blockchain is "deterministic".
This means calculations MUST lead to a predetermined result, or something went wrong (this is what mining is).

This is great, but it means that "external data" cannot be used directly within the blockchain.
Why?
Because external data is NOT deterministic. For instance: there's no way to know what the price of gasoline will be two weeks from now.

To enter external data onto the blockchain, you need a system that is just as "trustless" as the blockchain itself.
These are "oracles".
Oracles are several independent nodes who reach an off-chain consensus on what to write onto the blockchain.

Here's a basic explanation from 2014 by Vitalik: https://blog.ethereum.org/2014/07/22/ethereum-and-oracles/

>>17309352
automation and self-executing contracts is the next step. the fourth industrial revolution is a world where everything is automated, overlooked by an entity, the god protocol.

>>17309373

Just imagine that protocol being Ethereum and what a shitfest that would induce. Not to even mention if StainStink had any part in it.

>>17309276
>>17309369
Now here's the kicker:

Look up the "EEA", the "Enterprise Ethereum Alliance".

They're a bunch of major companies who joined the ETH project to make use of smart contracts. It's probably the single biggest trigger for the ETH moon (and general crypto moon).
They all joined this project because they expected ETH to have oracles.
Oracles did already exist at the time, but they were centralized; i.e. not like Vitalik explained here: >>17309369

Chainlink is the first real oracle protocol that will finally unlock the mainstream potential of smart contracts.
Which is why ETH is calling Chainlink its "resident oracle authority", see pic in >>17308637

>>17309356
>Because you're claiming that Oracle will use it.
I'm not claiming that, Oracle is.

>>17309364
>You keep posting that image as if it actually means anything.
That image means Google Cloud is actively promoting Chainlink.

>>17309373
as mentioned in the op, there are numerous breadcrumbs stating swift, isda etc will use chainlink as a standard for the derivatives market. when will it happen? we dont know. there is still work to be done, scalability issues.

>>17309402
>when will it happen?
2040

>>17309369
Vitalik just stole from ripple labs after he was crashing on one of the lead devs couch trying to get a visa to work for ripples codius project.

>>17309356
It's in Oracle's Blockchain roadmap for 2020.

>>17309401
ONE FUCKING GUY, ONE FUCKING GUY WHO ISN'T A DEVELOPER, HE ISN'T A LEAD ENGINEER, HE ISN'T A FUCKING CEO JUST ONE GUY WHO IS A DEVELOPER ADVOCATE WROTE AN ARTICLE CLAIMING YOU "COULD" DO THIS.

!DOES NOT MEAN IT WILL HAPPEN!

FUCKING RETARD STINKIES ARE THE LOWEST OF IQ!

>>17309391
Haha EEA dead on arrival

Here is a summary pic of this thread for those who dont have the time.

>>17309432
>one guy
You mean "Google Cloud".

>>17309407
>>17309402
$1000 is closer. klaus schwab's estimate is 10% of the global gdp will be stored in the blockchain by 2025 (10% x 80 trillion)

>>17309453
Arjun you can't keep this pump going forever on lies, eventually you need results.

>>17309460
$1000 by 2025 is a conservative estimate

>>17309401
>I'm not claiming that, Oracle is.

Oracle is not claiming that. You're the only one that is claiming that Oracle will use StainStink.

>>17309468
>lies

But the evidence is there for all to see: >>17309281

Another thing everyone is overlooking is that link will be an absolute gamechanger in off chain compute. Most smart contracts will run om chainlink andnonly be anchored to ethereum for fallback security. Chainlink will capture computation and data on ome full swoop. Arbitrum was just a taste and they don't have a native token, they just stake LINK.

>>17309416

And nowhere does it say it'll actually be used for anything at all.

>>17309402
still work to be done... by whom? Chainlink has been shilled and talked up for years, but where's the beef? It's still vapourware as far as I can see

>>17309276
Wow. 10k LINK guys. Better do what he says so he can ‘bump the price’ for us.

Fuck off newfag. Buy FTM.

>>17309473
>Oracle is not claiming that.
They literally are.

>>17309476
chaincucks denying reality

when the massive dump comes after your pump don't say no one warned you.

>>17309493

They literally aren't.

>>17309486
Ethereum can't handle secrets, No self respecting company will use chainlink you retard.

>>17306399
https://blog.chain.link/solving-deep-seeded-trust-problems-in-derivatives-using-chainlink-enabled-smart-contracts/

>>17309488
>but where's the beef?
Ask ETH, Google, Oracle, ...

>>17309496
>denying reality
But those tweets are there for all to see.

>>17309500
Oracle:
>we are integrating Chainlink

anon:
>nuh-uh!!!!!

>>17309506
You didn't get anything I just wrote. Back to plebbit

>>17309488
its only been talked up for 2 years
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8f0KJc4Lj3Y

>>17309506
ETH is a blockchain.
If you want secrets you could make it a private blockchain (like Quorum) and/or use off-chain solutions like TEE, mixicles, etc.

>>17309508
>>17309432
>>17309364
>>17309260
>>17309205
The tweets are blogposts you fucking retard, they automatically get posted, Look up what a "Developer Advocate" Job is

the post is a thinktank, an idea but not one that will be implamented.

>>17309531
>The tweets are promoting Chainlink
very true

>>17309515

>we are integrating Chainlink

Which is not

>We are using Chainlink

Try again.

>>17309535

>Tweets made by a bot
>A bot is promoting Chainlink

This is what a stinkie looks like.

>>17309549
Integration means they'll be using it.

>>17309558
Tweets by Google Cloud actively promoting Chainlink.

>>17309535
https://blog.jeremylikness.com/blog/2017-10-01_what-is-a-cloud-developer-advocate/

This is the blogposting furry faggot that literally does nothing and is making his job seem more important is actually is, is what you took as google using chainlink.

All I know is that the longer I hold onto Link and the longer I ignore the shitskin fudders the more money I make.

>>17309571
No need for personal attacks on the Google employee, anon.

I could call Bill Gates a fake philanthropist cutthroat, but it won't change what Microsoft is.

>>17309591
All google employees need to be shamed for being liberal traitors

>>17309364
Either you are completely lobotomized or you're just coping that you didn't buy link when it was 15 cents

>>17309620
Oh I agree, although I'm sure there are a lot of them that are hiding their power level.

But again, that has nothing to do with the tech. (just like the degenerate politics imposed from the top shouldn't)

>>17306236
>The derivatives market has a greater notional value than all assets in the world combined.
>Therefore the derivatives market is not backed by all the assets in the world.
>OP believes that Chainlink will back the derivatives market, even though all the assets in the world do not.
I'm all-in on LINK, but can people please stop posting this derivatives bullshit. At best, LINK will be able to consume the market cap of all fiat currencies, which is about $90 Trillion worldwide. However, that would require a worldwide transition to using LINK instead of fiat.

>>17309507
>that url
>deep seeded
Lol, you think at the very least they'd learn common english terms.

Honestly, all this fud just makes me more bullish. Why waste your time fudding something you don't believe in. No one is asking you to invest link if you don't want to, move on. Yet, here you still are

>>17306236
Well, there is one thing wrong with what you wrote, link is just speculation right now, and its at speculation prices, still, if it gets used(actually) besides just being traded on exchanges it will have real value

>>17309549
This is the dumbest thing I've ever read

>>17307106
He still doesn't know
How?

>>17309800
Its almost as if its a swingie NEET trying to influence the price somewhat

>>17309560

No, it just means somebody can use it. Just like how Microsoft flow integrated Ethereum. It's there, but nobody is using it.

>>17309568

Tweets by a bot actively promote Chainlink.

Cope harder stinklet.

>>17309800

>Why waste your time fudding something you don't believe in.

Because you're constantly, relentlessly shitting up the board for 2 years straight. You faggots are a cancer.

>>17309941
>No, it just means somebody can use it.
Oracle said they're integrating Chainlink, that means they'll be using it.

>Tweets by a bot
Tweets by Google Cloud's main twitter handle.

>>17309858

>This is the dumbest thing I've ever read

Thats because you've IQ of under 90.

>>17306444
oh man

>>17309953
>Oracle said they're integrating Chainlink, that means they'll be using it.

This sounds like a child trying to convince himself that his druggie mother will buy him sweets the next Saturday. It's hilarious.

>Tweets by Google Cloud's main twitter handle.

Tweets by a literal bot.

>>17309951
>/biz/ warns anon about Chainlink at .15, .20, .25, ...
>anon HATES being warned, doesn't buy

>today: Chainlink at 4USD+
>anon seething

checks out

>1k eoy is fud

>>17309960

Imagine losing your whole Stink stack kept as collateral because a power goes out in some datacenter.

>>17309961
Oracle:
>we are integrating Chainlink

anon:
>NNNNNNNNNNOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

>>17309969
fellow wojakbrain! upvoted

>>17309967

There have been dozens of better performing projects that were mentioned in /biz/. Some were even spammed, but that only wen't on for a month or two, but this relentless shitflinging with muh breadcrumbs and forced Sirgay memes has been ongoing for years. You're a cancer.

>>17309977

>we are integrating Chainlink

As did Microsoft with Ethereum. Doesn't mean anybody is using Ethereum in Microsoft ecosystem.

Sorry, but nobody will use your stinkshit

>>17309276
just read this
https://www.docdroid.net/pYclqmb/chainlink-summary.pdf

>>17309994
>better performing projects that were mentioned in /biz/
not with volume. some dumb occasional shitcoin moonshots, sure, but nothing sustained

>>17309994
>There have been dozens of better performing projects that were mentioned in /biz/
Not since the 2018 bear market.

Cope with not buying when we told you.
Cope with not buying when we're telling you right now.

>>17309674
So at best $90000 per LINK?

This thing has 30X'd, at this point link haters are just sore losers.

>>17310004
>Microsoft isn't using Ethereum

Because Ethereum doesn't have Chainlink yet.
See >>17309391

>>17308450
EYYYYYY! ITS BASED BRAPHOG POSTER! FUCK ME LADS WE HAVE A THREAD NOW! GOOD TO SEE YOU MY MAN! HIT US WITH SOME HOPIUM AND LARDTHOT PICS!

>>17309972
All the link on a node isn't used as collateral for one job. That's also why the fluctuation in LINKs market price don't matter.

If your node goes offline in one location, it can be connected from another one realistically a company would run many nodes all spread out.

>>17310010
>>17310009

>not with volume. some dumb occasional shitcoin moonshots, sure, but nothing sustained

What is Ripple? What is basically anything in top 10?

Butthurt Stinklets getting mad their pet project is not special.

You're a cancer eroding this board for two years straight.

>>17310015

Because we haven't seen any 30x before, yep yep.

>>17310020

Nobody will use your stinkcoin.

>>17307163

>I invest after it moons.

The absolute state of nolinkers

>>17310011
$90,000 is the best I can do.

>>17306403
Man oh man
Imagine being this guy
People will be looking in warosu and going fuckkkk

This retard

>>17309958
*you have an IQ*
Nice English you subhuman piece of shit

>>17306346
>who is Dan Larimer

>>17309972
blockchains you fucking retards

What will returns on staking be? Im expecting only like 5%

>>17310157
>What is Ripple?
Ripple is down 91% compared to its ATH from the early January 2018 bullrun.
Link is up 214% since then.

You're retarded and seething blood out your ass.

>>17310181

>Can't come up with anything better than muh English

>>17310157
>Nobody will use your stinkcoin.
... he says, 4 days after Oracle said they're integrating Chainlink.

>>17309276
>buy 10,000 links
>bump the fuck out of the price
HAHAHAHAHA!

>>17306403
lowtier fud 1/10

>>17310219

Nobody was talking about ATH, stinklet. I claimed there are multiple better performing projects which is an absolute fact. Only stinklet brain could deny reality at this extent.

>>17310226
>34 posts by this ID
fud phase is over retard

>>17310233

Yes, exactly. Nobody will use your stinkcoin. there is zero usage now, there is zero usage at 2030.

>>17310253

>Hurr durrr the 50th daily stinklet thread muh fud phase durrr.

>>17310248
>Nobody was talking about ATH
Well I am.
Because trends matter, and the bear market has been going on for over 2 years now, making it the determining timeframe today.

Chainlink is the absolute best-performing crypto of this past bear market.

>>17310262
>Yes, exactly. Nobody will use your stinkcoin.
... cried the stable boy, 4 days after Oracle announced that they're integrating Chainlink.

>>17310262
your cope is delicious, and it will only increase as the months go on

>>17310226
you question a person's IQ when you can't even use a language correctly.
I don't give a shit if is not your first language either as I wouldn't make such a simple mistake in any language that I am willing to argue in.
t. 162 min.

>>17310272
>Well I am.

Nobode gives a fuck

>Because trends matter, and the bear market has been going on for over 2 years now, making it the determining timeframe today.

Muh trends, muh bearmarket, muh determining timeframe.

you're just shit talking and trying to reason how your shitstink is actually number 1 best performing crypto project ever when in reality it's an average shitcoin with a ravenous shill squad shitting up /biz/ every day with hundreds of threads.

Nobody will use your shitcoin, not now, not ever.

>>17310262
You make a lot more sense when reading in a Rajasthani accent.

>>17310334
>Nobode gives a fuck
The entire crypto market for the past 2 years gives 100% fucks.

>Nobody will use your shitcoin, not now, not ever.
... he whimpered, 4 days after Oracle announced that they're integrating Chainlink.

>>17310286

>muh cope

>>17310299

I'll say it a second time, can't come up with anything better than muh english. I don't give a shit about you, so keep it in your pants, dawg.

>>17310355

>The entire crypto market for the past 2 years gives 100% fucks

About what? About you? Why would anybody give a fuck about what you are saying?

Nobody will use your shitcoin, not now, not ever.

>>17307163
>I feel this project will slowly crumble under the destructive weight of its ambitions.

absolute arglebargle gibberish statement

>>17310362
You spent your entire morning seething. When you go to bed tonight just know I have 56k link and you have nothing.

>>17310385
>About what?
About the financial performance of cryptos.

>Nobody will use your shitcoin, not now, not ever.
... he burbled, 4 days after Oracle announced that they're integrating Chainlink.

>>17310405
>About the financial performance of cryptos.

Which you're trying to reason out to favor your shitcoin, when nobody actually gives a fuck about how much a coin has corrected from ATH.

Nobody will use your shitcoin, not now, not ever.

>>17310395
I have 200k link. Two kilos of cocaine and a kilo of heroin. I have infinite everything forever.

>>17310449
Since the last bubble popped in early 2018, Chainlink has been one of the top performers in all of crypto.
THE top performer when you consider things like volume and sustainability.

And it seems that Chainlink is only getting started since even now when its rolled-out functionality is still in absolute babby mode, parties like Google, ETH, and (since last Friday) Oracle are all on board.

It's time to start coping.

>>17310362
I'm just matching your low effort bullshit kiddo.
200k+ LINK
666 BTC:BCH:BSV
3200 ETH
With a fuck ton of shitcoins which you probably believe are better options than above.
Seething indeed

Would I be insane to place a buy order for 1000 LINK at $3.90?

I can't stop thinking about Chainlink, and I only have 135. I guess this is a FOMO, but if I miss a 10x from here I'm gonna be suicidal

>>17310484

>Since the last bubble popped in early 2018, Chainlink has been one of the top performers in all of crypto.

The only thing that matters in performance is where the project has come from it's inception. Stinkcoin is nowhere near the top in any metrics that actually matter, other than your "muh 2018 bearmarket"

>its rolled-out functionality is still in absolute babby mode

Meaning it doesn't work. It's still centralized KYC shit with the fat russian as the gatekeeper.

>arties like Google, ETH, and (since last Friday) Oracle are all on board.

With none of them using your stainstink for anything. The hopium is on absurd levels.

The hopium is always nice while the pump lasts. Just enjoy the ride back to sub 1$

>>17306236
Fucking hell there are over 28 link threads, can you stop spamming your shitcoin?

>>17310524

>kiddo

Who uses this anymore? You think thats an insult?

>>17306961
>if there is no demonstration of a good/great/profitable reason to do so?
oh sweetie

>>17310544
>The only thing that matters in performance is where the project has come from it's inception.
No, that's not the only thing that matters.
Investment opportunities come and go daily, and for the past 2 years, Chainlink has been one of the absolute very best ones in all of crypto.

>Meaning it doesn't work.
... yet.
And yet, parties like ETH, Google, and Oracle are on board.
Talk about bullish.

>>17310552
This is a LINK board now faggot, if it tanked and made us neck ourselves then you wouldn't have to deal with us.
It pumped 2,654.33% and thus....we made it (or just grew our wealth), so we now own /biz/.
Seething nolinkers make me even happier than then my stacks

>>17306255
so what you're saying is, i can hold on for millions, or potentially lose 80% of my existing profit?

>>17310558
30 y/o boomer coming at ya.
Obviously not an insult, just how I perceive you to be.....a child like nolinker

>>17310573
>No, that's not the only thing that matters.

Yes it is. In your mind it's not though. In your mind the only thing that matters is what timeframe you can take in order to make your shitcoin look the best.

>... yet.

Keep up the hopium.

>And yet, parties like ETH, Google, and Oracle are on board.

Stinkies seriously believe this.

>>17310590
*tarted out with a then

>>17306255
So $1000 at least OR back to $1
That's the way I like it baby, all or nothing

>>17310610
>Yes it is.
No, it isn't.
During the past 2 years, Chainlink has been the absolute best possible crypto investment.

>Stinkies seriously believe this.
That's what ETH, Google, and Oracle are telling us.

>>17310604

Have fun shitting up the board then, stinklet.

>>17310617

What were you just talking about your muh perfect English and you never letting yourself make a mistake while arguing? You're a joke, stinklet.

>>17310634
>talking about the most profitable crypto of the bear market
>"shitting up the board"

The cope is real.

>>17310004
Didn't ethereum hit 1k?

>>17310625
>No, it isn't.

Yes it isn't. Anybody holding basically any coin before 2017 has made a better ROI than your stinkshit.

>That's what ETH, Google, and Oracle are telling us.

Nah, they aren't. Thats just what you believe.

>>17310157
why are you raging about top 10 coins but getting mad at link thats number 12?

>>17310634
I'm shitting up the board with my PNKies now.
LINK is god tier and you should be grateful for it's presence.

>>17310657
>Anybody holding basically any coin before 2017 has made a better ROI than your stinkshit.
Chainlink didn't exist until the end of 2017 lmao.
And since the Chainlink ICO in September of 2017, crypto as a whole is actually down while Chainlink is up 40x.

Fucking c o p e.

>Nah, they aren't.
Yeah, I just made up pic related lmao.

>>17306236
Industry will never use a public blockchain. Only privately hosted on their own nodes on a permissioned blockchain.

>>17310657
>Anybody holding basically any coin before 2017 has made a better ROI than your stinkshit.
Chainlink didn't exist until the end of 2017 lmao.
And since the Chainlink ICO in September of 2017, crypto as a whole is actually down while Chainlink is up 40x.

Fucking c o p e.

>Nah, they aren't.
Yeah nah, I just made up pic related lmao.

>>17310701
It will do shit in a bull market then

>>17310708
Doesn't matter for Chainlink.

>>17310657
Just give up dude, nobody is falling for your weak fud. You seriously have time to post 100 times about this?

>>17310643
My 3rd language faggot and I still corrected my mistake.
¡Viva México, hijo de puta madre!

>>17306236

Nulinker week?

We had this exact thread 100s of tomes in 2017/2018

Im surprised anyone even cares to make them anymore. Water is wet guys

>>17309308
>>17310515
cope redditors, we had 2 years to stack up

>>17310770
honestly a bull flag when there are so many newfriends

For some reason I abandonned just two weeks ago from cooming after years of porn collection. Anyway, getting grounded is what saved me.

When I put things in perspective it's just all so fucking surreal. Like we're out there, in an insanely complex world where amazing shits are happenning all the time, where everythings possible, where others are making it and yet we're all so little, so small, a mere animal when given the occasion, indulging in the most basic of details in the experience that is Living, winding up cultivating pleasure from self through a bottomless pit that was carefully crafted for other souls to fall into. Cause it is a bottomless pit. People be thinking nu uh its your fault if you watch it but the reality is that it's a tease, it's set up for you. It wants you here. There's that to take into consideration

I'm gettin awfully Blakeian here but tell you what, today we're so much caring for stupid bs and whatever, diddling with ur lil tail is lame anyway. The virtual life is lame too. So its just up to you to crawl outta that wet hole you dug with your bare hands. Theres so much to do. Theres romance to be had, there's doubts to cultivate, there's tension to undergo, all them shits that make life hard but worth it they're out there and we just can't experience all that if we're inside, cooming. Living in fantasyland. Pretending. You get it. Sorry for blogpost I'm zonked on kratom and for once I feel things turning around for me.

>>17310718
>Chainlink didn't exist until the end of 2017 lmao.

Which doesn't matter. You're retarded if you try to just compare coins from the date you want to. You have to do it from the start.

>why are you raging about top 10 coins but getting mad at link thats number 12?

Can you guess why? I'll give a hint, only one of those coins has seen tens of thousands of shilling threads during the last two years.

>>17310692

Good. Keep doing it for 2 years with hundreds of threads a day and I might care.

>>17310781
Lmao
They hate us man.

Are you all so fucking retarded you don’t think I have 5,000 dollars to drop on an investment?

Not everyone is a reddit peasant normie working at Starbucks

>>17310541
do it

>>17310738
>Just give up dude, nobody is falling for your weak fud.

muh weak fud.

>Yeah nah, I just made up pic related lmao.

Stinkcoin has tens of threads going on at the same time so what are you surprised of? Hell, you're propably postin ten times that amount in the other shill threads.

>>17310764

Look at you coping. You just outed yourself an idiot and are now desperately trying to deflect.

>>17310806
>Which doesn't matter.
lol but it does.
You can't compare Chainlink to returns from before 2017, simply because Chainlink did not exist yet.

Since the day Chainlink became a reality, it has gone up 40x, while ETH, BTC, Ripple, ... did at most like 2x or 3x since then.

How the fuck is this thread at over 300 replies

>>17310858
Seething nolinkers.

>>17310858
nolinker cope

>>17310858
Nulinker scumbags going through the same conversations we had years ago. Get ready to see more of this garbage.

>>17310541
Market buy 334 now and hedge it with a buy order for 666. The cube will bring you luck.

>>17310854
>lol but it does.

Nope, it doesn't.

>You can't compare Chainlink to returns from before 2017, simply because Chainlink did not exist yet.

Of course you can when comparing any project from the start to present, which is the only way to do the comparison. Your shitstink is not unique, it's nothing special and it will dump.

>Since the day Chainlink became a reality, it has gone up 40x, while ETH, BTC, Ripple, ... did at most like 2x or 3x since then.

From the inception ETH did over a 1000x, XRP close to same and your shitstink managed mere 40x. Your shitstink is garbage.

>>17310896
From Link's inception in September 2017 it did a 40x, while ETH is back at the exact same price during that timeframe.

c o p e
o
p
e

>>17310814
based. redditors can't accept the fact they got in 3 years after we discovered it and try to cope they're on the same level as everyone.
'reddit is retards pretending to be smart while 4chin is smart autists pretending to be retarded'

>>17310922
>From Link's inception in September 2017 it did a 40x, while ETH is back at the exact same price during that timeframe.

And if you bought just a little before 2017 you made a fortune with ETH? Your point?

Stay salty, stinklet.

>>17310848
I simply didn't back space out a word that is one of the more difficult parts of the retarded English language, whilst you've Pajeeted on nearly every post you have made.
My linkies are so stinky and you continue to feed us with your cope.

>>17310939

You spesifically said that you don't allow yourself to pajeet up your language yet you did it just a few posts later. You're a joke, Huan.

>>17310935
>before 2017
You mean a year before Chainlink even existed?
lmao

In my wildest hopes I could not have dreamed of this level of cope two years ago, and look at me now getting drenched in delicious tears.

>>17310961
I corrected my mistake but didn't delete said mistake. Big difference from you fucking up on every other sentence you type.
The word you were thinking of is JUAN.
Wrong again
bajajaja

>>17310961
>spesifically

>>17310963
>You mean a year before Chainlink even existed?

Exactly.

>In my wildest hopes I could not have dreamed of this level of cope two years ago, and look at me now getting drenched in delicious tears.

This looks like an extreme butthurt from a seething stinklet

>>17311032
>I corrected my mistake but didn't delete said mistake.

It doesn't matter, dipshit. You said you don't make mistakes, that you don't allow yourself to do them. You're a joke Huan.

>>17311062
>Exactly
Imagine seething so hard you have to compare Link to returns from before Link even existed.

Since Chainlink's inception, it has beaten the everliving shit out of the entire crypto market.
This is what you're left to cope with.

1k eoy is fud

>>17311062
Oh no he called me a stinklet

>>17311081
>Imagine seething so hard you have to compare Link to returns from before Link even existed.

As I said, you always compare from the inception of the project to the current moment, not some cherry picked dates some retarded stinklet comes up with.

>Since Chainlink's inception, it has beaten the everliving shit out of the entire crypto market.

It's already been proven there were other shitcoins that made greater returns than your shitstink even after the start of the bearmarket. Your shitcoin is nothing special, get over it.

>>17306236
>2017 'what if' bullshit
>derivatives shit
>running on your bedroom project 21 KYC nodes

>>17311136

Oh no he posted a funny gif.

Get out Huan. You made yourself a clown already.

>>17311075
There is not a single red pen in the world with enough ink to mark anything you have written.
*make mistakes.....do them. In the same fucking sentence you got it correct and then fucked it up. Also the use of ; would have been a better choice.
>still can't spell Juan

>>17311169
>cherry picked dates
Link's inception date is hard to ignore lmao.
You can't blame Chainlink for not existing sooner, this is top-tier cope.

>It's already been proven there were other shitcoins that made greater returns than your shitstink even after the start of the bearmarket.
Proven where?

>>17311185
Yes this is an image board and the birthplace of many a funny gif. Use your peasant tissues nolinker.

>>17311202

Trying to regain face after making ridicilous claims and then immediately fucking it all up? It's not working, so you should seriously consider just fucking off and trying again in one of the other 28 stainstink threads. Have fun keeping your private keys from the Cartel, Huan.

>>17311220
>Link's inception date is hard to ignore lmao.

As I said, Cherry picking dates. You can only compare the gains from the inception to the present. Nothing else matters, stinklet.

>Proven where?

Coinmarketcap. The stinklet I served the last time this was brought up got really quiet after. Sorry, but your stinky is nothing special. It's just an average shitcoin.

>>17311265
>Mexican with millions of dollars in funny money
>Not chin deep in the Cartel
Fucking retards these days hey

>>17311294
>Chainlink's inception date
>cherrypicked
These tears are just amazing anon.

>Coinmarketcap
lmao, ok big guy

>>17311295
>>17311255

>Trying to ignore his fuckup

Not working, Huan. You're a joke now. It's better to try again in another thread.

>chin deep in the Cartel

Nice. that means we don't have to suffer your shit for long before you get beheaded by Paco.

>>17311307
>These tears are just amazing anon

Imagine the butthurt.

>lmao, ok big guy

seething.

>>17311384
Yes anon, I'm seething very hard at holding the best-performing crypto of the entire bear market.
You're totally not projecting your butthurt over missing out.

And you're also totally not 60 posts and 5 hours deep into a non-stop discussion about a crypto you don't even like lmao.
Imagine having this sad of a life.

>>17310732
Doesn't matter? Industry won't use crypto, but will use the tech. The coin won't be used for any private sector business.

The no-linker syndrome, my friends. This is it, in perfect display. Observe it. Expect more to come as time goes by. Treat them with respect. Be gentle. With great power comes great responsibility.

>>17311449
>private blockchain
>not crypto
lol anon

>The coin won't be used for any private sector business.
Imagine not even knowing what "private sector" means.
You just implied "the coin" will be used by the government.

>>17311421
>Yes anon, I'm seething very hard at holding the best-performing crypto of the entire bear market.

No no no, you're seething because your arse has been absolutely devastated with each and every single one of your points being completely refuted. the fact that your stinkcoin is nothing else but an average shitcoin hurts your butt especially hard.

This is why you are seething.

I'll exit this thread seeing you absolutely rekt while you'll continue your seething in the other 28 stinkshit threads. Bye, and remember to rope yourself when it dumps.

Chainlink FUDderrs are more insufferable than people who believe that the holocaust happened

>>17311478
More butthurt ramblings.

Imagine seething so hard at missing out on Chainlink that you spend over 5 hours and 60 posts in a single thread trying to say bad things about the crypto that beat the entire market during the past 2 years and just got tapped by Oracle.

>>17309960
Holy shit this explains why Blythe Masters aka the inventor of the credit default swap is an advisor for link AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAASfgfgsJDHDJFDSJFH ITS ALL TRUE ISNT IT WE'RE ALL GONNA BE MILLIONAIRES AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

>>17306403
And ETH should be $10

>>17309961
If you were serious I'd think you had a mental handicap.