/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>17225978

Another literal who

>>17225978
Fake

>>17225978
>technical explanation of cryptocurrency
>image is of CSS stylesheet
Lmao just lmao

>Using Chainlink is fun

this is NOT how chainllink works
you need to pick your nodes
which makes it centralized

>>17225978
I don’t feel so good...

>>17226862
Wtffffffff the shadow fork is real

>>17226862
some explain why this isn't terrible news

assuming chainlink can connect with anything on kaleido, that means hyperleder besu, quorum, and private geth, they actually can connect decentrally with other chains wtf, i kinda just assumed that was lipservice to be fulfilled up until now

>>17226862
LOL we literally funded Sergey's company and then got shadowforked

>>17226862
>>17226875
>>17226934
>>17226943
>dev environment vs prod environment

You fags are lucky I’m phone posting or I’d shit on you for being retards even more

>>17226934
It's been like this since 2018. Kaleido blockchains are private with a poa consensus

>>17226965
Yeah, it's the environment where they're developing the shadowfork retard

>>17226934
private chains are essentially testnets for public chains

>>17226862
That's it, put all the rest to bsv, all in now.

>>17226998
>>17226965
>>17226967

Thanks but it say's environment not like test environment.

https://docs.kaleido.io/using-kaleido/environments/

Isnt the whole idea of chainlink to link private blockchains to data etc. Why wouldn't they charge?

>>17226862
>>17226934
It's incorrect, that is the default, but most operators will set a minimum payment. Probably every one that has a brain, otherwise you'd be paying to work.

>>17227075
>>17226965
yeah this guy is correct. I skimmed past the first sentence.

$0.00 EOY TOKEN NOT NEEDED BITCHES

>>17227072
no, the whole idea of chainlink is to connect smart contracts with off chain data that they need close to trustlessly, public chains are more secure and less expensive for enterprises to participate in but they are slow and lacking in privacy, mixicles, deco, etc. tackling the privacy argument and dents are being made in the scalability argument (t sigs for cost reduction of posting large amounts of oracle responses on chain, zkrollups and the like for condensing large amounts of transactions into a single on chain response, PoS, sharding, etc.), once all these features are mature public chains will be irresistible, all of this aside, it's conceivable that transactions could be made on private eth forks, but payment still happens on public ETH, interestingly enough, enabled by chainlink itself lmao

>>17227196
TLDR $0.1 shitcoin until later in the future

>>17227225
yea lets buy high sell low instead

https://www.swift.com/about-us/legal/ipr-policies/trademark-guidelines
SWIFT does not authorise any use of its logos by third parties unless with prior SWIFT approval.

>>17227305
So that's why they took off the logo from the site?

>>17226965
Basted anon

>>17227196
yeah but if chainlink are providing all of their service to private chain clients for free why the fuck would they switch to a public chain and pay?

+ wont they have the problem of lack of collaterisation for node operators?

>>17227314
>>17227305
https://www.smartcontract.com/

>>17227305
Yes, that's why it's no longer on CL website

so what does this actually mean for chainlink

>>17227355
Smartcontract.com is the parent company. Meaning chainlink the product and the token is not involved

>>17227359
Right but it’s on smartcontractdotcom’s website so what’s your point
>>17227355
Checked. Fudders and swinglinkers BTFO

>>17225978

>Weimerica 2020
>Stocks

Useless

>>17227027
be careful anon. The chainlinkers hate anons who have brains.

>>17227400
Point is, sm the company can provide smartcibtract services to swift, without involving chainlink and the fcking token that biz bought.

>>17227369
It means $10 eoy

>>17227400
How are swingers BTFO? They all sold at 40k and are re-buying on much cheaper. Don't make sense

>>17227452
chainlink is literally on the smartcontract website, fk off man

>>17227264
That's the /biz/ motto

>>17227330
private chains are only functional in-house, all of these services want to actually sell a product, which requires. a public network

ANOTHER STUPID TRANNY FUD THREAD

>>17227929
Nice one thanks for explaining.

t. 5k linklet

>>17226862
>>17227305
Okay now this is good fud, good i, too, went all in bsv earlier. Have fun bagholding faggots

>>17227305

>>17225978
priced in stupid faggot

>>17226862
This isn't fud, 35% of the supply is network *incentives*(free tokens)

>>17228918

This picture is illegal in my country. Please delete.

>>17227394
Holy shit get a load of this low IQ loser and his cope.
> t-they aren't working with chainlink on blockchain tech, they're just working with the parent company whose main blockchain product is chainlink
No one would notice if you killed yourself.
Do it.

>>17226862
Nice inspect element

>>17226862
Lmao good shit