/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>17188650
From dOracles
To nOracles

>>17188650
Next coin from iExec announced in 67 days

>we got this nice new secure blockchain technology
>let's do everything off-chain anyway!
oh you newfags

>>17188678
I'm mainly a LINK holder myself but I picked up 10k RLC after this announcement.
I understand that RLC has oracle capability but perhaps they are using LINK's because A) It's the most well known and B) most likely to be used in the future.
From what I also understand, RLC's oracles are still decent and usable in parallel with LINK, as well as any other oracle service that pops up in the future.

The real interest from me comes from the fact that both coins are focused hard on their main priority and figured out that partnering up would speed up development for both teams.

>>17188650
Very. Both have unique selling points and seeing them join forces opens the door to a lot of profitable collaboration.
>>17188719
Only actual brainlets think all computation needs to be on chain. If you can cryptographically prove that some work was done, why should that work be on chain? It adds nothing and costs money.
>>17188730
>The real interest from me comes from the fact that both coins are focused hard on their main priority and figured out that partnering up would speed up development for both teams.
This. Using link oracles to grab data, then process it in a docker container running in an SGX enclave, then provide that data as the answer for another oracle... this shit gets my dick hard.

>>17188815
>this shit gets my dick hard.
It's fucking genius.
We were all here shitting on RLC and vice versa for so long that we couldn't realize the solution was to team up, but they did. They fucking did.
I truly think LINK and RLC are going to experience an exponential rise this year. RLC might have more gains because its lower MC though.

>>17188650

ETH
LINK
UBT

Is all you really need.

>>17189015
>some shitcoin latched onto LINK's name
>changes what the shitcoin is 2 months later
every time.

chainlink makes iexec obsolete
look at the market caps

>>17189041

No you idiot.

Unibright is leading the EEA to aminstream adoption.

The EEA has tapped UBT for Eminent, Use Case Taskforce and MainnetWorking Group.

All three tasks force was created to literally onboard every enterprise in the EEA, which means every industry on the planet, to move towards blockchain.

The success of Unibright means a direct path of success Ethereum which means Chainlink and iExec.

>>17189015
You don't understand RLC if you don't list RLC next to ETH and LINK. Sorry...
>>17189041
Right? UBT is some random shitcoin that youtubers started peddling. Maybe it's good but there's no way it's RLC level good.
>>17189058
RLC makes LINK powerful
LINK makes RLC fluid
You need to update your brain drivers my son.

>>17189148
I don't think that's fully true. iExec is a big player in the EEA too. They wrote the TCF for many big players.
However due to your ability to type multiple legible sentences I will research into UBT on your behalf.

>>17189243
let me find EEAs statement for you.

>>17189274
Please do. I'm interested in UBT but I need to do more research. I just don't agree that the success of UBT will in any way affect LINK or RLC. Both of them are power houses.

>>17189243


https://entethalliance.org/eea-mainnet-working-group-forms-task-force-eminent-ethereum-mainnet-integration-for-enterprises/


RLC and LINK do work together.

UBT is different that it is tapped for integration. It IS the bridge for nocode way for enterprises to create smartcontracts.

Without Unibright Mainstream adoption may not happen or will take too long since the cost of resources to move an everyday business to the blockchain is high. What do people want them to do? spend a 100k a year on developers? UBT is the answer and Vitalik knows this. Thats why they are heading the 3 taskforce whos main objective is integration.

The space is moving towards normy adoption. It needs to happen in a microsoft Apple kind of way, being UI friendly.

>>17189294

No, I don't think RLC and LINK success depends on UBT. However, a successful Unibright facilitates and expedites RLC and LINKs usage.

>>17188730
>larping this badly

>>17189393

UBT is about 10 million market cap.
only 2 exchanges, Idex and Hotbit
tapped by EEA to lead a task force to integrate all of the EEAs enterprises to Ethereum.
Spent the last 2 years developing instead of shilling so know one really knows about them. Just like Chainlink.

This is a no-brainder investment.

>>17189294
Also, if you didn't know every fortune 500 relies on ERP and SAP systems. it literally runs thier business and UBT is tasked to integrate with ERP and SAP specifically.

>>17188650
>Are any of you excited about this partnership?
Linkies couldn't give a fuck about this pity partnership. I don't know what RLC "chads" think. I assume hurriedly rewriting memes about "RLC btfo LINK" kek

>>17189393

Im out. good luck researching.

Don't forget to checkout Unibrights 360 platform. end to end solutions for STOs.

>>17189516
I think that linkies should care, because it empowers LINK probably the most out of any partnership. Massive amounts of computing power + LINK's oracles = holy shit.
>>17189590
Thanks for the info ill read it after samsungs presentation

wtf lmao

>>17188650
RLC is a shit stable coin without the stable or the use of the tech OR EVEN THE FUCKING CODE WRITTEN YET

>>17189734
>OR EVEN THE FUCKING CODE WRITTEN YET
Huh?
It's one of the most developed projects on the market.