/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>17070959
they are indeed retarded OP

but if they hold out they will make money. Do you honestly expect FOMO retards to buy solid projects that serve a real puprose? Or do you think they'll buy 'bitcoin but fast and free XD"...

nano is not a bad hold as long as you don't actually believe in it and let the stupid ass community burn coins for you

>>17070959
>Some of them have even been sending 10 nano daily to a burn address in hopes of reducing the supply thinking it will increase the price

wouldn't you have to be a mega whale for this to work, unless there's tons of people willing to take one for the team?

team nano buying ads on 4chan now from plebbit

nano team is the best team just look how much fun chief operating officer of nano george is having with her date

>>17070959
>>17071017


>>17070983


>>17071057


>>17071066

>>17071083
at what price are these people going to sell at? Do they seriously think this will 1000x again?

>>17071083
Who cares? Some people bought eth at 1300 $ and btc for 19000 $ +.

First they ignore you
Then they fight you
Get ready to cry when NANO moons.

>>17071290
I fucking hate nano faggots so much. Fuck you guys are so fucking retarded.

I have 30k of these bad boys. Don't give a FUCK, I know for a fact they'll go back to at least 3 dollars in the next bull.

I feel like I havent even heard the word nano since 2018 lmao

>>17070959

Lmao my friend was watching this go from $5-$20, told him not to buy were in a bubble “you’re just too late”
> goes to $25
Bro you don’t know anything, he proclaimed, I’m going all in!
>lmfao.gif
He buys $15k work at the dip back to $20, tells me he got in so good.
> final moon to $30
Bro you’d better get in on this train, I just got my parents to dip into their retirement, we’re in at $65k total and I’m already making gains!

I tell this fucking idiot to exit ASAP, he keeps buying.

He never sold, still holding those bags, he tells his parents it’s a long hold “but he can cash them out any time”.

To this day the dude has the audacity to blame me for getting him into crypto.

Fucking rekt.

>>17071310
Give me your viber.I'll send you photos of my new house in a year.

>>17070959
SEETHING

>>17071374
this is what I mean, these people are thick headed as fuck. Kinda makes me want to buy in because its clearly bottomed and I am thinking they aren't ever going to sell cuz I doubt this will hit $30 again. Meaning it might shoot up to the $5 range if they are dedicated enough...

>>17071347
I can tell the same about people who bought btc in 2017 when it was ~200$ and did not sell when it hit 20k.
It's not NANO fault that some prople are dumb.
Oh by the way...it seems that nano ads is now on 4chan :D .Hate it as much as you want.We are here to take over

>>17071374
>>17071406
God damn these faggots truly are the bottom shit tier shit of crypto they don't even know it. They talk all about how normies aren't in yet, these fucking retards dont realize THEY are the normies. They will never make it nano is absolute trash.

nano chief operating officer george paid 650000 eurs for a yacht 4 months ago from developer fund rofl

>>17071620
How much of the total supply did the devs keep?

>>17071620
>>17071631
Reddit was a mistake. Kek look at all these plebbitors.

>>17071620
I hope they at least bought their parents houses with all the reddit money.

george coo of nano is paid 250.000 british pounds (say their company accounts) a year she was hired with no previously management experience stonks

>>17070959
Don't be so grumpy. Name one reason why NANO would not be better for mankind then BTC.

>>17071290
>some people bought BTC at 19000+
Hey that’ll be a pretty good deal in a couple months

>>17071620
Do you have a source to back that claim up, or do you have some other dumb bullshit you'd like to conjure up?

>>17071731
>she

>>17071620

Thats a serious claim.Any proof? Go f@#k your@#$f

>>17071731
Thats a man

There's always these types of threads before something moons like crazy. A 10x from here would still put it less than 1/3 its ATH.

>>17073413
This thread is literally a buy signal. Unironically just put 75% in

>>17071057
Ya look at this pathetic bullshit. I thought there was no begging allowed.

>>17071771
because it has no abuse prevention and can't do anything but count.

https://www.reddit.com/r/nanotrade/comments/exuydm/nano_ads_on_4chan_nearly_every_ad_on_the_biggest/
Look at this thread faggots, none of the accounts on that thread has high karma. We're not redditors, it's just a useful platform for niche communities

>>17073830
Not buying your bags faggot

>>17073830
HOLY SHIT THESE DICK SUCKING NIGGER FAGGOTS ACTUALLY THINKS THAT THIS WILL WORK

The holocaust was not real you plebbit fags. Gas chambers cannot have wooden doors. I will literally never, ever ever buy your fucking nano bags and went all in on Chainlink in 2018 while your money was bleeding away.

Hiel Sergey, Heil Hitler. Fuck plebbit

bought xrp at 0.50 sold at 30$, meanwhile u bought btc and xrp at ath
MAD BOYS SUCK MY DICK KEK. for real tho ill buy this shit again when its at 0.50 i'm not paying more than that for this trash

>>17074030
i mean xrb faggots

>>17074040
kek

>>17071406
>>17073758
Click on those ads so nano fags lose even more money

>>17074057
no don't encourage them they will think it is working and double up

>>17074063
That's the point dummy.

>>17070959


They missed out on ETH
they Missed out on LINK
they are gonna miss on UBT.

Ethereum
Chainlink
Unibright

The three most important projects tasked to bridge legacy business to the blockchain.

>>17074079
im just tired of hearing about it every day, it gets shilled here constantly. If they think the ads are working, they are going to continue the campaign, and lets be honest if people see that shit during the next bull run when all the fresh meat comes in, they are going to make threads about it.

>>17070959
>Some of them have even been sending 10 nano daily to a burn address in hopes of reducing the supply thinking it will increase the price.
Impressive levels of retardation on display.

>>17074156
they literally made a thread called 4chan burn and burned another 10 because of us
https://www.reddit.com/r/nanotrade/comments/exz3kb/4chan_burn/

>>17073382
You can swear here you fucking reddit pajeet

>>17074192
Hahahaha that's what I like to see!

>>17074144
yeah but if it's pay per click we can bankrupt them lol
just turned adblock off for the first time in a decade

>>17074235
may as well try to spam the network then while we are at it. If it really has free transactions you could just clog it up by sending enough transactions fast enough.

>>17070959
Not only are lead dev and management incompetent sociopaths, but Nano is also fundamentally flawed and will never work, as seen here: http://archive.is/dHzRA

Zero relevant education, zero relevant work experience and three years solo traveler Nano Chief Operating Officer George Coxon showing off her *ahem*..."qualifications"..

>>17074282
ya I honestly don't see how they think having free transactions will work in the long run. The only benefit I can see are microtransactions. One dude was talking about monetizing everything from memes to mouseclicks with it, but I just don't see how that is possible. Plus, the network seems vulnerable to a DDoS type attack.

Have you fucking dipshits actually read anything about the actual tech or do you just circle jerk yourselves to sleep at night bouncing back and forth amongst yourselves this bullshit "kek" "weeb" mother fucking 13 year old dumbass lingo? What the holy fuck is this hell hole of a no knowledge valid thread, you bunch of shit eating degenerates. Do some fucking research.

Vapid. The word is vapid.
You are terrible people.

>>17074192
are these people autistic

>>17074429
Yeah there is no metadata and the core concept of ledger pruned nodes.
What good is a digital transaction without the ability to attach metadata to it?

>>17074448

Marketing comes in many forms and you're now thinking about it.

>>17074456
Metadata shouldn't belong in the core transaction if you're building the absolute leanest form of transfer. Metadata is built on the next layer which is already being developed.

>>17074456
Pruned nodes would be a different part of the infrastructure separate from full historical nodes. Pruned nodes don't even exist yet as it's still not final. Why is that a con if it's not even actually part of the protocol yet? It's under development.

>>17074466
Dude you literally do not understand anything about the real world.
Look at any digital (non crypto) payment platform , or EDI systems , or core B2B automated purchasing systems.
You need to scale smart contract platforms not be able to instantly settle a number in a ledger somewhere , that technology is near worthless even if it was pure trustless ( which in Nano it is not there is governance through representative votes for token holders )

But go ahead and buy more Nano, it is like making the best fax machine possible in 2020 , I am sure it has a bright future.

>>17074429
Read the thread, Nanoid ignoramus and then come back and explain to us how Nano will ever work in the real world:
http://archive.is/dHzRA

>>17074429
Even former core dev Zack Shapiro doesn't believe in NANO, pic.

>>17074553
(((Zack Shapiro))) to the left.

>>17074498
Right because ledgers don't do anything now. Accounting is dead.

I understand your point but just because I believe in the necessity of the absolute leanest fastest cheapest confirmed transaction doesn't mean that I don't believe smart contracts aren't important. It's not a single solution to every situation. You don't need metadata in the minimalist sense of confirming a transaction. There's value in transaction speed and minimalism, but it sounds like you don't believe that to be the case.

>>17074429
Piss off reddit

>>17074578
Yeah, that's the quality I expected from this place.

>>17074568
How many months before Nano Foundation runs out off money and goes bankrupt? Two, three? Then what? Why do you use Nano Foundation to fund Colin's private lawsuits and to buy dysfunctional companies from Nano COO George Coxon?

>>17074604

I guess we'll see but holy shit, how does it feel to be so far up George's asshole? How long did it take you to dig through her IG and put all these puzzle pieces together? Are you this angry in real life or is this just your 4chan personality?

>>17074595
And that's why you should stay on reddit :). Get the discourse you so desire there.

>>17074604

My bad, thought you were the one pulling her IG photos.

>>17074604

Just a friendly reminder. Nano already has working product.I can send you 100$ in less then a second if I wanted to.

>>17074604
My bad. Thought you were digging up her IG photos. Wrong person.

>>17074639
So if you can form coherent arguments. Why not do that here? Why does this place have to be filled with garbage? Is there anything uplifting on 4chan or is it always everyone just shitting on everything?

>>17074629
>How long did it take you to dig through her IG
It took me less than 15 minutes.
>to be so far up George's asshole?
You low IQ plebbitor whine and bitch about quality >>17074595
and then stars to talk about your favorite topic, your COO's asshole?
>Are you this angry in real life or is this just your 4chan personality?
I have asked you several times to explain how Nano will function in real life and how you can overcome fundamental flaws with Nano, all I ever got from you psycho plebbitor is some rambling about me being angry. There is a reason why you idiots have to delete comments and block users on Plebbit. On 4chan there is free speech and all relevant data can be posted. On plebbit the most relevant data will be deleted and user blocked. You are delusional

>>17074669
>is it always everyone just shitting on everything
Yes, now fuck off.

>>17074429
buttblasted faggot

>>17074646
>Just a friendly reminder. Nano already has working product.
Nano has no load on the network. I can also use your Nano business model and claim that people can travel the world for free using my travel agency, using volunteers to put in all the work and fund it, with zero passengers. It's still an insane business model that will never work in real life.

A global currency with micropayments must at least be able to handle 100K TPS. Nano can barely handly 0,2K before a total crash. Visa can handle 65K.
https://usa.visa.com/dam/VCOM/download/corporate/media/visanet-technology/aboutvisafactsheet.pdf

The costs of running Nano with 100 000 TPS is insane. Neither you Nanoid idiots or your scammy Nano Foundation have done ever any kind of cost analysis. Do you have any idea how much CPU, IO and bandwith will cost to run a 100 000 TPS Nano network? If you and the Nano devs/management team have not even done basic cost analysis, then why not and who on earth would ever trust you scammers?

>>17074738

I don't think that global currency will ever exist. As I remember PayPal had 200-300 tps when they had 100 million clients.At the moment nano works perfectly and is improving every day. Your last paragraph indicates real problem which I hope gets solved.Every crypto has its problems. Look at btc. Look at eth. ( I have nothing against eth besides delays which indicates technical problems)

>>17074820
>PayPal had 200-300 tps
That's average and not peaks. You must calibrate for peaks. If you want to buy presents one time Christmas time, or something vital during holidays abroad, and you can't due to Nano network crash, you will never use or trust Nano again.
>I don't think that global currency will ever exist
You can't stop it. Nano users will push Nano towards global until a total network crash. That Nano is not dimensioned for it, is a disaster. It's just a matter of time before we have a perfect crypto currency, and that currency is not Nano.

>>17074629
>>17074640
You are confusing IG with Flickr.

>>17074898

Just for the sake of interest. What's your perfect crypto?

Also global currency adoption wouldn't happen over a night. Maybe 10-20 years.By that time nano would improve as well as computers ( I'm talking about quantum comluters but I am not very educated on this subject)

>>17074948
>What's your perfect crypto?
Constellation (DAG) if they had followed their original plan. They claim to have solved the scalability problem
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nPJLCKB8i1k

and they had a very elegant solution regarding the cost problem. When they aimed for DAG as currency they would charge large volume users (typically Amazon, ebay etc) while small users would get their transactions for free. However, they redirected focus towards big data and now will charge for speed, not volume. Hopefully they will use their Constellation technology to make a crypto currency spin off.

Other than that, MTV regarding as a high risk high reward investment. ETH is having additional problems due to transitioning from ETH to ETH 2.0, so there is a high probability that 1MM market cap MTV will be able to pull off sharding before ETH.

Other than that, ETH has the largest and best dev community plus big business support:
https://entethalliance.org/

and they are aiming for 1 million tps and banking the unbanked.

>>17074669
yeah turns out shitting on everything is a really great system to help us avoid losing our savings

colin hired george for exclusive access to her "skills"

>>17075352
smol tits would smash

small tits and a bulge is she MtF

>>17071771
no use besides fast transactions (which I could just use Paypal or my credit card for)

For chargeback prevention I want something that's widely used and is easy for my customer to get (on Coinbase) like BTC/ETH
ETH also brings something to the table beyond faster/cheaper transactions

Turns out he was stealing from himself

This is good. Glad redditfags got the rope by being scammed by their own project

God never fails

>>17074568
You are once again showing that either you are young or you have no knowledge of finance as a whole.
Accounting is not a single column of numbers in a ledger, accounting is asset classes , tax laws, depreciation, and literally millions of other man made rules tying metadata to numbers in a meaningful fashion.
Again let me emphasize and regress to my easy to understand analogy. Nano is building the best fax machine in a world of computers and the Internet. It can server a niche purpose, but it has no great value.

>>17070959
Never touch this. FRM will be a new version of XRB, third worlder wise.

nano bagholders on /biz/ LMAO
I blame the linkmarines for bringing plebbit fags here

>>17074595
>>17074629
>>17074669
DUH!!!! CRINGE!!!! DUH, BRINGE!!???!!1 CRINGE!!!!! IS THAT ALL YOU SHITPOSTING FUCKS CAN SAY!!??? DUUUUH BASED BASED BASED CRINGE CRINGE BASED BASED CRINGE CRINGE CRINGE BASED CRINGE I FEEL LIKE I'M IN A FUCKING ASYLUM FULL OF DEMENTIA-RIDDEN OLD PEOPLE THAT CAN DO NOTHING BUT REPEAT THE SAME FUCKING WORDS ON LOOP LIKE A FUCKING BROKEN RECORD!!!!! CRINGE CRINGE CRINGE CRINGE! CRINGE BASED BASED! ONIONS ONIONS SNOY! ONIONS EL-OH-EL ONIONS!! CRINGE!!! BOOMER!! LE ZOOMER!!!! I AM BOOHMER!!!! NO ZOOM-ZOOM ZOOMIES!! ZOOMER GOING ZOOMIES MYYEEEAAA I FUCKING HATE THE INTERNET SO GODDAMN MUCH FUCK YOU SHITPOSTING I HONEST TO GOD FUCKING HOPE YOUR MOTHER CHOKES ON YOUR OWN FECES IN HELL, YOU COCKSUCKERS BUT OOOOOOOH I KNOW MY POST IS "CRINGE", ISN'T IT?? CRINGE CRINGE CRINGY CRINGE-BASED CRINGE BASED REDDIT CRINGE! BASED CRINGE ZOOM CRINGE ONIONS REDDIT BASED BASED

>>17070959
>>17071017
>Some of them have even been sending 10 nano daily to a burn address in hopes of reducing the supply thinking it will increase the price
I sent .04 Linkpool to the ETH burn address for this same reason, it's a legit play.

>>17074646
>Just a friendly reminder. Nano already has working product.I can send you 100$ in less then a second if I wanted to.

nobody cares about transaction speed you fucking sperg. bitcoin is slow as shit and is still ontop proving that technology and decentralization dont count for shit when it comes to price action. you literally have been fooled into thinking that anybody outside of reddit care about some stupid crypto currency with a logo that looks like anal beads

>>17074948
the issue is not 'who has the best technology' its people actually using it, and NOBODY use crypto as currency. all we do is use it for speculation and trading it to eachother hoping we dump on the previous person. the tech is interesting but putting your faith into it hoping that if you beat all the other coins in how advanced your coin is then you will win the top of cmc. It. will. Never. Happen

>>17074456
IMAGINE THE SMELL

>>17077478
>Reddit jerking themselves off for being intelligent and classy
somethings never change, hang yourself niggers.
also the holocaust was a lie

>>17070959

BSV is BitCoin

I think I lost a couple IQ points reading this fucking thread. I guarantee that most of you idiots commenting here have no hands-on experience with DLT or even distributed systems for that matter.

Nano is one of the few currencies that does the value transfer use-case perfectly as it is at its core asynchronous by nature. The fact that I can send any amount of money pretty much instantly to any account anywhere on Earth is revolutionary and is what normies think about when they consider "digital currency", and BTC and other currencies simply do not have that functionality today, not to mention tx fees.

The tech is constantly improving and while the team may be questionable at times I believe that the technical community is among the best out there as they are not fucking sperging out about price, partnerships, and other hypebeast BS like you absolute fucking retards.

The code and architecture is solid and extremely lightweight and is as close as you can get to a perfect internet value transfer protocol, and I still haven't heard any of you brainlets even mention any counterargument to this than lmao reddit shitcoin.

t. dev who has been involved with bitcoin since 2011, graduated to DAG-coins due to their superior architecture

>>17077885

Jesus fuck I rarely sperg out like this but the absolute retardation in this thread is exhilarating. Sometimes I wonder why I still come back to this godforsaken place when most people are fucking brainlets.

>>17077885
wow that's great

too bad nobody gives a fuck about internet currencies. you can be hyper focused on the 'tech' and miss the philosophical big picture. you faggots are the worst because you're constantly trying to convince yourselves and others that you don't care about the price "i'm in it for the tech... nano is more green, etc'. which is total fucking cope because you lost a ton of money. The gulf of adoption for Nano is insurmountable. If you don't convince everyone to agree to use it it is worthless.

You got dumped on. It's over. You guys are not nearly as smart as you thought.

>>17077885
>>17077900
What's your TPS?
What is the cost of running a Nano node with 100 000 tps? CPU, IO and bandwith? Do you know? If not, why don't you or anyone in Nano know? Who is bearing the costs and why?

>I think I lost a couple IQ points reading this fucking thread.
You are too stupid for biz, back to plebbit, moron.

>>17077900

You're right, but desu we all just want to make money. While it has no adoption, and no signs of adoption, its a fucking nothingburger. It hasn't had any interest since the crash, its a dead project.
At this point anyone in the game can make an instant, free crypto..its not special

>>17077944
>too bad nobody gives a fuck about internet currencies. you can be hyper focused on the 'tech' and miss the philosophical big picture.

Again, not a fucking argument. The only reason Nano hasn't reached widespread adoption is because no one is aware of it and that the consumer tech isn't there yet. All that is required is a killer app/service that demonstrates superiority to King Shitcoin.

Besides, I don't think Bitcoin will ever go away, but you're delusional if you think that something like Nano won't be used in P2P value transfer or microtransactions.

>>17077968

I'm running a node right now, and it is costing my barely above 20 bucks a month. I'm running it because I need to interface to the network with the service that I am building, which most other people are also doing apart from fringe hobbyists.

100k tps is a far way out, and even if the mempool ever reaches that amount, sharding and other performance enhancements will render this problem non-existant.

>>17077991

This is true, but we are in a general bear market for crypto and I believe that the next bull run is going to be the bullrun that ends all bullruns as most of the components required for widespread adoption are already built and ready to go. It's only a matter of time desu.

>>17077995
LMFAO

literally everyone on this board is well aware of what Nano is and does. Are you fucking kidding me?

We hate nano and we hate you stupid faggots. You're all completely retarded from spending all day on your faggot circle jerk website and have become deluded to the point where everything you believe is not congruent with reality.

Nano would have been great in 2013. The space blew right past you and you're still hyper focused on the currency aspect of crypto.

I will literally never buy Nano and there is nothing you can do about it.

Nano is the holy grail. Please miss out on it 4chan nazi faggots. Then hang yourselves after

>>17078047
>I will literally never buy Nano and there is nothing you can do about it.

I really don't give a shit, all I want is that you stop shitting up this board with blatant FUD and retarded arguments. Just because there have innovations in other sectors of the crypto space doesn't mean that P2P currencies are completely eliminated from the playing field - this isn't a winner takes it all market.

Besides, the entire fucking point of crypto has always been to decouple oneself from central banks and the banking system in general, and if you don't think value transfer has a space in that then I suggest you leave the space entirely because you obviously have no fucking idea of what you're talking about.

>>17078016
Typical low IQ comment. You did not answer my questions. You ramble on about numbers when there is close to zero load on the network. That's delusional. Answer my questions.

>>17077885

i saw posts like this back in 2017 with omisego and even earlier with ethereum. you guys all think YOUR shitcoin is something special but its not

>The only reason Nano hasn't reached widespread adoption is because no one is aware of it and that the consumer tech isn't there yet. All that is required is a killer app/service

the great dilemma of crypto is no so much that the technology isnt improving constantly but the bridging of the technology to the masses. if nano has a way to bring crypto to the chads and staceys of the world, then i would support it, but what you are talking about is how sophisticated and modern javascript is in 1995 when you want people to be using an iphone touch

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FF-tKLISfPE

you are like the fucking nerd guy in the audience asking questions in this video. Nobody gives a shit about what nerds have to say, all that matters is when the consumer can see the result of the product clearly with their own hand is when nano will matter, regardless of how sophisticated it is

>>17078016
>100k tps is a far way out
Stupid comment. For a global currency with micro payments, 100K is the very minimum. Visa, not calibrated for micro payments and not aimed to serve the unbanked, have 65 000 TPS.
https://usa.visa.com/dam/VCOM/download/corporate/media/visanet-technology/aboutvisafactsheet.pdf

For you to say that 100K is "a far way out" only further display how deluded and low IQ you Nano bagholders are. Back to plebbit, boomer.

>>17078016
Nano devs were spamming their 7000 TPS lie, pic.

>>17074111
>Ethereum
Based
>Chainlink
Based
>Unibright
Token not needed

>>17078016
>>17078235
Reality was 75 TPS. That's less than 2% of promised TPS. Only reason why Nano mooned was the 7000 TPS lie when BTC struggled with very high fees and the volume of transactions. Pretty scammy of devs to lie that blatantly about key emperical data, right?

this pathetic reddit pleb tier thread proves that computation is not the bottleneck, its the adoption.

just buy ripple. its already adopted. fuck you with your nano tier literally-who coins.

>>17078263

Listen here you little shit:

The 7000 tps claim isn't a hard limit, the limitations are hardware and network bound rather than protocol bound. Theoretically, the protocol is infinitely scalable in its current form, only that decentralisation may suffer as larger and more powerful nodes outprocess smaller hobbyist nodes. This can be fixed with protocol upgrades such as sharding etc.

Here, let me lay it out with some back of the evelope mathematics so your brainlet fucking brain can understand.

A nano block is roughly 200 bytes at the moment. Thus, 100,000 NANO transactions would require a network pipe throughput of 20 Mb/s per node. which is ENTIRELY within the realm of 99% of server hosts out there. Even if you add misc. network traffic and multiply the fucking throughput by 10 you still wouldn't be able to saturate a standard VPS network pipe. CPU processing time is a non-issue with adequate optimisations on the node software.

You keep bringing up the 7000 TPS claim but you obviously have no understand how the fucking network works. Stay salty that you lost your money in Bitgrail faggot.

>>17078423
>Listen here you little shit:
Fuck off low IQ Nano boomer.
>Theoretically, the protocol is infinitely scalable in its current form
That's just as stupid as saying you plan to jump to the moon and only the strength of your legs is a limitation and that you are getting stronger for each day. There is no way in hell Nano with your butchered technology will reach the very minimum for a global network with micro-payments.
>Thus, 100,000 NANO transactions would require a network pipe throughput of 20 Mb/s per node. which is ENTIRELY within the realm of 99% of server hosts out there
Insane statement. Again show me your cost analysis for 100 000 tps officially from Nano. If you don't have it, then something is seriously wrong with you scammers if you don't even do basic cost analysis. I really hope they use your retarded numbers and analysis.
>This can be fixed with protocol upgrades such as sharding etc
Are you retarded? Do you have any idea how difficult it would be to combine dag and sharding? And who would pay for it? Your fund is nearly totally depleted after your scammer devs burned through all the money with private law suits, buying dysfunctional businesses from team members etc, i.e. corruption. More scam from Nano dev team.
>You keep bringing up the 7000 TPS claim but you obviously have no understand how the fucking network works. Stay salty that you lost your money in Bitgrail faggot.
I saw that your scammy Nano devs were lying through their teeth about their 7000 TPS lie. So I was not on Bitgrail when the Italian scammers crashed Bitgrail, after Nano scammer devs guaranteed for Bitgrail even up to a few days before the crash. Pic.

>>17078423
Why did Nano scammer devs move 1.5 million Nano, around 30 million USD out off Bitgrail, AFTER the "hack" was publicly known and Bitgrail closed for retail investors? Pic.

>>17078423
Your calculations regarding bandwith, CPU and IO is clown world. Same with your insane easy sharding fix. Here is reality for your Nano idiots. Far, far away from 100 000 tps, or BPS as you call it:
https://forum.nano.org/t/nano-stress-tests-measuring-bps-cps-tps-in-the-real-world/436

>>17078423
Even Zack Shapiro says Nano is shit and can't compete with BTC. >>17074553
How pathetic is that and how do you explain it?

>>17078423
Weird that you are emotionally defending something when the devs have acknowledged it won't get adopted.

Kek at plebbit still actually trying to shill nano, absolute shit coin. Take your advertising to some third world shit hole and convince them to use it. BTW 4chan one, the retarded, teenage nazis destroyed you in this market and will continue to. Soye cucks

>>17073413
>>17073736
GOD DAMNIT SO SICK OF YOU LOW IQ SHILLS FUCK THE FUCK OFF

>>17074669
Thats how you get to the truth. Circle jerking doesnt help anyone

Nano is the new raiblocks

>>17070959
WTF I sold this coin at $30 in Bitgrail after a 5x.

I miss these good times

>>17078081

You definitely decoupled yourself from your dollar investment lmao. How is your portfolio looking?

>>17077885
just bought 100k

>>17071347

lol damn. Thats why I dont even try and get ppl into crypto anymore. I told one dude to buy vechain at 40 cents and he didnt sell when it went up to like $10. Ended up basically selling it for nothing. They always look at you funny like somehow its your fault