/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>17045777
>based
>red pilled
>checked

Lucky 7’s never lie. RLC top 10 EoY. Cap it

>>17045777
So rlc finally figured out their oracles are shit and useless. Good to know. I'm glad we could provide you with the industry standard like all the other shitcoins out there

>>17045786
People like you are insufferable. I hope you hold neither.

>>17045803
I hold chadlink. I remember not that long ago all the rlc shills being smug about being able to compete with link. Oh how the tables have turned

>>17045831
Oh fuck off with your garbage.

>>17045803
>>17045846
Lol I’ve never seen this much ass burning coping before. What happened to all your smug “rLc wiLl oVertAke LiNk” threads? Digital oil my fucking ass lol

>>17045831
this, kek
reminds me when the same thing happened with enigma

>>17045896
Lol omg I've never seen so much fud from people that bought into the 1000$ eoy meme and have zero understanding of crypto as a whole so they spend all day fudding legitimate things instead of constructively talking about them.

Typical retard on biz is typical.

>>17045928
>>17045896
>>17045831
Are you guys laughing at Links price ?

>>17045995
No I’m laughing at rlc chart
>>17045934
Making fun of you rlc retards is constructive for me

>>17045934
Seethe you contrarian fuck. You just had to go all in a shitcoin to prove how smart you are eh?

Hahahhaha cope more chainlink went up 512 % in 2019 and rlc is still hovering ico.

Do me a favor and never buy chainlink you would never make it anyways

>>17045777
>An iExec worker uses the following datasets: Chainlink’s dataset, and a lot of unnecessary meme shit that doesn't work.

>>17045777
You got trips so I'm intrigued

>>17046556
Have you noticed how implementing LINK has recently become an exit strategy for dead shitcoins? They always pump a little after "partnership" announcement.

>>17045777
Holy shit based lube poster

>>17047091

>up more than LINK on the month
>Dead

Pick one faggot.

>>17047142
Are you pretending to be retarded, or do you genuinely believe rlc is better than link?

They bent the fucking knee

Iexecucks BTFO
now stop talking shit

>>17045846
I'm glad iexec came to its senses and we can all move forward now, but you gotta understand there's going to be some gloating over this.

>>17047328
Over what exactly? 2 great crypto projects collabing on interesting use cases that utilize both ecosystems equally?

You anti-RLC linkers don't get it. You should definitely hold LINK but if you are unironically fudding RLC without having a bag I feel sorry for you.

>>17045831
oh how the turntables...

This is huge RLC LINK and ETH are the holy trinity

>>17045777
It's over Gilles, we won't finance your tranny undercover operations anymore

>>17045803
I agree, he sounds obnoxious. I hold both, about 95% link, the rest rlc. I figure market cap wise, what I hold in rlc is about the same level of investment I bought link at (a bit more to be honest, but you get the idea).

Honestly, I’m also thinking about buying ubt now. I have a feeling these are going to be the 2020 holy trinity.

>>17047380
You have to be new here for weeks RLC shills did nothing but talk shit about link in every link thread

>>17047931
Also, to anyone who has held link since ‘17: you should be figuring out what the next link is. I’m not talking about selling any substantial amount of link. But you should be diversifying about 5-10%. Chainlink won’t end up being the only valuable crypto project (it’s impossible for link to truly succeed without other legit projects utilizing it).

>>17047981
That’s true. They were obnoxious. But the few projects that aren’t run by scammers should stop attacking each other. Frankly the only “project” we should shit on is bsv. They’re truly the only people I’ve ever wished lose their money.

>>17047981
Literally never happened. Maybe for a short time period but since the dawn of time every RLC thread has had multiple LINK holders fudding.

>>17048096
Fuck right off you dense cunt. RLC clogged up the catalog for weeks with unoriginal memes and promising the fucking world to anons. Muh digital oil! RLC collabing? RLC paying Chainlink for a fucking service in order to perform what they want to do, more like. Cope harder you prick. Your bags will pump, and that will be possible ONLY because Chainlink made it possible. This is my thread now. Get the fuck outta here.

>>17048428
>WAHHHH YOU CLOGGED MY BASKET WEAVING FORUM WITH MEMES
>HOW DARE YOU!!11
>t. you

>>17045777
no offense but to everybody who didnt see this integration coming is a fucking retard. these two companies + intel were all working together and confirmed working together months ago.

same shit shit for Google cloud. the breadcrumbs are true, they're obviously all true at this point. now it's just a matter of time before the microsoft x link comes to fruition on paper - but im not going to be surprised when it does because it was in front of our eyes this entire time

>>17048096
jesus christ the cope HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

>>17045995
Yep, I sure am. I’m up 800% right now

>>17047931
Why UBT?

>>17047994
What are your picks for some good projects?

>>17048938
I'm the guy you were replying to. On my computer now:

>Link
>RLC
>UBT
>EDGE
>REN

Maybe RSR (this is a huge fail or pass... no in between)
Maybe BAT (this has legs, but for some reason just can't get running).

>>17048938
>>17049148
Some ETH and BTC to be smart also.

But those are my moonshoots.

Note: I am 95% link about 4% RLC and the rest split between the others I mentioned (minus UBT, EDGE, and REN (plan on buying some of these if link moons sometime soon and they don't).

>>17048938
ETH/RLC/LINK is the holy trinity.

>>17045831
this this this

>>17047994
>>17048938
>>17049148

Posting from phone to show id is same and not just taking advantage of your question

>>17049206
Had WiFi on... one more time

>>17049148
>>17049164
>>17049221
Okay thanks lol. Right now I’m 95% link 5% split between btc/eth, but always listening for promising projects

screencap this
RLC will also drop their TEE tech in favor of TC
better tech and industry standard always win

>>17049270
tc is not working and it never will

>>17049270
RLC has dropped anything, but it’s funny watching linktards pretend they even remotely understand the tech they are invested it. Stick to shit posting, poor fag.

>>17049270
Holy shit you have zero understanding.

>>17049402
I am actually a frenchfag and saw gilles at the assemblée nationale last year, and he did not convince me with his intellect
that is the only reason I have never bought in

that is my personal opinion I don't want to hurt anyone's feelings

>>17049489
>and he did not convince me with his intellect
You expected him to use his intellect to convince you to buy rlc? LARP fag.

This really should moon, seems it takes a few days to a week for news to filter through to price increases lately

>>17045777
I thought RLC was going to make ChainLink obsolete? What happened, Pierré?

>>17049244
Yeah same. It sucks that this board is so “zero-sum” when it comes to people’s general attitude. Would be nice if we could go back to simply discussing projects we like and how they work instead of just shouting
>YOU BUY YOU BUY, BEST PRICE NOW, YOU MAKE MIRRION DORRAR AND HAVE BUG PENIS FOR FUCK GWAILO WOMANS

OR

>GET FUKT GREEDY SHILL SCAM SCAM SCAM REEEEEEEEEEE ETC

>>17045777
>>17045784
>>17045786
>>17045803
>>17045831
>>17045846
>>17045896
>>17045928
>>17045934
>>17045995
>>17046556
>>17046560
>>17046577
>>17047073
>>17047091
>>17047139
>>17047142
>>17047238
>>17047255
>>17047328
>>17047380
>>17047394
>>17047754
>>17047904
>>17047931
>>17047981
>>17047994
>>17048026
>>17048096
>>17048428
>>17048441
>>17048492
>>17048841
>>17048890
>>17048913
>>17048938
>>17049148
>>17049164
>>17049189
>>17049198
>>17049206
>>17049221
>>17049244
>>17049270
>>17049287
>>17049402
>>17049430
>>17049489
>>17049510
>>17049708
>>17049794
>>17050228

Of course the shit-eating rlc pajeets have come crawling back after spamming the board for months about the big v4 release which dumped like every other time.
It's nice to see they had some news - bending the knee to chainlink. This is where you really need to just stop posting your pajeet tier rlc sales pitches and horribly made memes. You lost - even Gilles knows his shitcoin team is only fit for smartcontract codemonkey work and will NEVER be the industry standard for decentralized oracles.
S AND H

kek
guys guys, can i please get a knee status?
bent [ ]
not bent [ ]

also anyone got the iexec comparison table? just wanna be sure they know what they are collaborating with

>>17051062
Thanks for the bump

Theres nothing knee bent about it, LINK and RLC have basically formed a 50/50 partnership to power smart contracts, and I daresay there's probably more money to be earned in the computation side of things that there is in the api calls!

>>17047139
why not just hold the bags in your hand

>>17051062
>S AND H
>Dr. Sage & Mr. Hide
The simple fact that you put this in almost all of your replies, while also coincidentally happening to find these threads to post in speaks absolute volumes.

>>17045777
All you said is will.

Rlc is a concept.

Pumping until the insiders dump. $0.30 end of February.

SATSGANG SATSGNAG

>>17051163
>actually thinking this

>>17052819

>>17045831
This, used to shill RLC and point out the team dynamics and clear roadmap as a reason why it was 100x better than LINK and got BTFO when LINK went to 1.80 while RLC was like 40 cents or some shit. LINK is truly blessed by KEK

Based thread for all the wrong reasons. Good post.

>>17045777
when the outputs from iexec workers needs to go back on chain doesn't it need redundant (decentralized) oracles again?, the workflow graphic looks too generous for iexec and too stingy for chainlink, not saying isn't doing some interesting things but they really do appear to be riding on LINK's coattails here (and this point is intentionally being underplayed), particularly because in the summer iexec tried to argue they had superior decentralized oracles when this was obviously not the case

>>17047380
>Over what exactly?
Over the fact that iexec launched their own oracles because they felt Chainlink was too shitty, and now they're actively integrating Chainlink.

>You anti-RLC linkers
There was no such thing until RLC started directly attacking Chainlink.

>>17051062
it has barely dumped. less than link after mainnet and google blogpost

>>17054461
you are either newfag or retard. every rlc thread was spammed with low iq shitstinkers before the chart came out

>>17054461
also they are not integreting link, fuckin slavs should learn to tweet. read thr blogpost faggot, they are showing a usecase - that iexec can be used with any oracles

>>17054615

THIS.

THIS.

THIS.

>
>
>

...

> HOW THE ACTUAL FUCK DOES NO ONE UNDERSTAND THIS?!?!

> HAS NO ONE ACTUALLY READ THE MOTHER-FUCKING BLOG POST?!?!

I wouldn't be surprised if this does a 10x over the next couple of weeks, takes time for the news to filter through latley

>>17054654
Because so many link holders are fucking mad that RLC could gain any traction they just relentlessly shit post instead of doing any actual reading.

RLC will make you rich. Link should have already. Imagine not buying both when they were around 0.20$

> Gilles Fedak answering to himself using different ip
so lame

>>17055178

Now that I think about it, it's not too surprising when considering the fact that this board has been home to the primary hoard of LINK 1K EOY HODLERS for several years now.

>RLC will make you rich
>Link should have already
That's kind of profound if things pan out.

>Imagine not buying both when they were around 0.20$
Pure regret.

>>17055378
Yep. Essentially why every RLC thread is filled with shit

>>17054615
>>17054654
>>17055178
>>17055378
>>17055457
>they are not integrating link

C O P E
O
P
E

>>17056149
Same way how link integrates rlc stuff you blind animal

>>17056164
So you agree that they ARE integrating Chainlink.

>>17056177
so you agree link is integrating iexec?

>>17056187
I'm replying to people who said iexec is not integrating Chainlink.
Try to keep up, buttercup.

I KEEP HEARING THIS WORD AND I'D REALLY LIKE TO KNOW WHAT IT ACTUALLY MEANS.

>INTEGRATE

>>17056164
>>17056177
>>17056187
>>17056196
>>17056149
Link is integrating RLC and RLC is integrating LINK.

RLC is controlling the dApp and worker side and LINK is controlling the "bitch work" aka grab the data and send it to RLC.

LEARN YOU NIGGERS

>>17056214
>RLC is integrating LINK.
Glad you came around.

>>17056196
i am replying to slav who cant read. is link integrating iexec?it is a simple question

>>17056228
You said iexec is not integrating Chainlink.
But they literally are.

Start coping any time.

>>17056177
I see 3 way integration eth link rlc and looks like all 3 is needed to make money

>>17056214
>linking blockchain to the real world is now "bitch work" because my butt hurts.
Imagine being this pissblistered lmaoooo

>>17056224
Yes, as an oracle for a single dApp. But LINK is integrating RLC to do the heavy work. The most valuable work.

The thing is RLC could probably do this themselves but LINK is very known so it's easier to just partner and get the spotlight from it.

>>17056235
answer my question: is link integrating iexec?

>>17056248
In comparison to what RLC is doing? Yes, being a fucking data medium is bitchwork compared to iExec.

>>17056250
>>17056252
you:
>iexec isn't integrating Chainlink!

iexec:
>we are integrating Chainlink

you:
>B-B-B-B-B-BUT BUT BUT BUT BUT RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRREEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

>>17056235
And your camp started with bs knee pads meme I know its hard to undertsnad such concepts as equal contribution

>>17056262
please answer the question: is link integrating iexec?
if you cant answer that you are a coping low iq slav

Iexecucks still coping after their team bends the knee

I love the denial

>>17056269
I don't have to answer shit.
You said iexec isn't integrating Chainlink, yet iexec themselves literally say they are.

>>17056266
The kneepads meme is from way before Chainlink newfag.

>>17056262
Let me spell it out for you retards.
BOTH PROJECTS NEED EACHOTHER RIGHT NOW.
iExec needs LINK for "mainstream oracles"
LINK needs iExec for computing powerhouse.

BUT

in the future RLC may not need LINK. RLC already has a crazy system built out for computing BUT ALSO ORACLES.

LINK only has oracles, and barely anything to show for it.

This is why I am more in RLC than LINK but still hold both. DON'T BE A FUCKING IDIOT. BOTH PROJECTS ARE GOOD BUT RLC HAS MORE ROOM TO GO UPWARDS.

>>17056286
okay coping cuck

>>17056250
>LINK is integrating RLC to do the heavy work.
This doesn't make any sense.
RLC needs external data for its use case, and they are using Chainlink.
Because providing external data is what Chainlink does.

>>17056289
>ok so iexec bent the knee now, BUT IN THE FUTURE !!!!
lel

>>17051094
Damn it feels good to be a linkster

iExec has an oracle but not an oracle network. The team is focused on developing the computing product which is now extending to 5G and IoT capabilities. Today's partnership allows iExec to build a PoC with Chainlink to reach real world utility. The next steps are to build a demo and test with insurance companies. The market size for computing and oracles are big enough for both teams to co-exist. Besides Chainlink oracles more oracle teams can launch their oracle logic on iExec to provide off-chain trusted compute. This is great for iExec and whomever wishes to take advantage of the iExec technical stack.

>>17056300
It doesn't make sense to a RETARD.
But to someone with a brain it does.
It's showing us that LINK can work with RLC.
That's a big deal.
It's also showing us that RLC can work with LINK.
That's not as big of a deal because RLC already has their own oracles.

>>17056300
rlc can do oracles and tee. link can do only oracles. rlc used tou retards to gain some spotlight

>>17056324
Based. It shows that RLC can work with MULTIPLE ORACLE SOLUTIONS, and possibly other technologies as well.

It's truly magnificent.

>>17056326
>>17056334
>>17056338
>iexec publicly integrates Chainlink instead of their own oracles
>"Y-YES BUT IEXEC HAS THEIR OWN ORACLES"

>>17056345
>iExec partners with the most mainstream oracle solution for a single dApp, gaining momentum with nothing to lose
>T-THIS IS BAD FOR iEXEC! BEND THE KNEE!

>>17056345
Do you even read? IEXEC has oracles but oracle network.

>>17056345
read >>17056354
fuck i hate low iq link subhumans

>>17056354
>>17056366
I never said it's bad for iexec; in fact it's fantastic for iexec.
It's just funny to me how you seem to be so buttflustered that you have to put down Chainlink by saying they do the "bitchwork".

>>17056356
Guess what the D in Doracles stood for, brainlet.

>>17056369
never said that. it is linkies who were buttblasted from the second it got tweeted

>>17056376
Bend the knee

>>17056376
>never said that
No, you just said "iexec isn't integrating Chainlink", even though they literally said they are, >>17056149

>>17056295
Yeah, I'm the one coping here, Mr. "iexec is not integrating chainlink".

>>17056369
I'm sorry but it's literally bitchwork. It's going to retrieve something so the machines can produce a real product with it. It takes more on RLC's behalf and in reality that bitchwork could eventually be done without LINK because RLC does have oracle capability.

That's all im sayin

>>17056399
>>17056384
link is integrating rlc

>>17056404
>iexec is not integrating chainlink!!

>>17056401
You know what is actual bitchwork? Bending the knee.

>>17056414
Technical integration for one dApp.
There's a difference.
Also it shows that RLC can integrate multiple oracles.

LINK is finished.

>>17056414
yeah technical integration of iexec into chainlink

>>17056401
By this logic, Amazon does “bitchwork” since they just get someone else’s products to customers.
Fucking cope.

>>17056426
That's iexec's article you retard.

>>17056422
>iexec integrates Chainlink
>"Chainlink is finished!"
LMAOOOOO

>>17056435
Nope, Amazon is more like iExec actually. The people doing the bitchwork are the vendors and amazon workers, getting packages for amazon to process and make money on.

Just like iExec is the marketplace for cloud computing.

You really fucked up.

>>17056441
>iExec can integrate multiple oracles including its own
>this is good for LINK
KEK

>>17056441
this. >>17056443
how does it feel to be a slav bitch? i bet your ancestors enjoyed getting fucked by mongols

>>17056443
Amazon doesn’t produce those products. They just ship them.
So by your logic they’re doing the “bitchwork”.

>vendors and amazon workers
Those would be the nodes.

>>17056447
>iexec integrates Chainlink
>this is bad for Chainlink

>>17056452
You're missing the point.
Amazon is the MARKETPLACE that allows people to buy things.
iExec is the MARKETPLACE that allows people to buy compute and data.

Workers do the BITCHWORK for amazon's marketplace.
Oracles do the BITCHWORK for iExec's marketplace(or in this case, a single dApp)

YOU LOSE.

>>17056469
So iexec workers are doing the bitchwork. Got it.

>>17056481
No. LINK's oracles are grabbing the data (which is the least profitable work and therefore the bitchwork) while iExec workers are doing the big boy work (AI/ML) and getting paid 10x what the oracles are.

>>17056469
>iexec integrates Chainlink, a project they tried to directly compete with
>"h-haha Chainlink is bitch"

peak cope

>>17056493
Amazon does the distribution, which is also the least profitable part of the transaction.

>>17056493
Grabbing data is Chainlink's use case.
They're set to grab the data for pretty much all of crypto, including ETH for instance.

>>17056499
>implying RLC isn't a competitor still
Kek, they could use and oracle but chose LINK because it's the most known. EZ MARKETING.
Peak link cope.
>>17056506
>Strawman argument
>Still cannot see the point
>typical sub90 iq mongrel
Kek. Stay poor retard!

>>17056524
>iexec integrates Chainlink
>"th-they're still competitors!!"
I am extremely entertained.

>>17056519
Not necessarily true. There are multiple oracle solutions, it's just that LINK is the most known.

RLC will be the powerhouse for all of crypto, and with the capability to use any oracle, it makes LINK look less attractive.

>>17056532
>Competitors cannot collaborate
0 IQ retard.

>>17056534
>iexec integrating Chainlink makes Chainlink look less attractive

L M A O

>>17056534
All of crypto has the "capability to use any oracle". And they all end up using Chainlink.
Including iexec.
Including ETH.

>>17056546
Yes because it shows they can use multiple oracles and that LINK's oracle is currently the top dog but in the future may not be due to the implications.

>the implications.

>>17056549
See above.

>>17056562
>iexec integrated Chainlink, that means Chainlink is finished!!!

>>17056562
>it shows they can use multiple oracles
EVERYONE can use "multiple oracles".

And they all end up using Chainlink.
Including iexec.
Including ETH.

>>17056575
>>17056576
>The fact that there are multiple oracles that can be used over LINK is a good thing for the future of LINK
KEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEK

>>17056597
The fact that everyone is turning to Chainlink despite there being other oracles is extremely good for Chainlink, yes.
ESPECIALLY when it's those "other oracles" themselves who are turning to Chainlink.

>>17056640
>The fact that everyone is turning to Chainlink despite there being other oracles is extremely good for Chainlink
For now.
What happens when people realize you can just use RLC's all-in-one solution?
Who knows.
What if a better oracle solution comes along?
RLC can integrate that.
Really doesn't look good for LINK outside of 3 years. You'll probably see some gains though, so have fun, but I will see much more with RLC. I guarantee it.

Hilarious watching rlc pajeets seeth

>>17056289
Oh what an insufferable cunt you are! You can’t “muh super compute” any fucking data if you can’t onboard it to the blockchain via an oracle can you? Link doesn’t look to solve what RLC does but RLC NEEDS the capabilities of the Chainlink network to perform its function in a useful way. Don’t give me that bullshit “oh we’ll use a better oracle solution when it comes along” That race is fucking over. Your beloved project is already securing that fact by joining the network. Many have tried and failed to solve the oracle problem. They all bent the knee. There is only one standard. There will only be one. Now fuck off and thank your lucky stars that such a solution exists, so that you can make a chunk of change on your RLC investment. But do me a favour anon, when you’re at the bar whispering in that thots ear about how fucking smart you are for investing early in some computational powerhouse crypto that made you rich... Remember it was all thanks to Chainlink and pure luck, nothing to do with your retarded brain at all. After reading your discourse on this thread I can state that with 100% confidence. This whole ship sails or sinks on the back of a successful oracle network. Always has and always will. GFY

>>17056832
COPE

>>17056837
>COPE
>... Cried Riktesh

Jesus crist are you guys aint stopping shit train of thread?

>>17056879
>>17056888
KYS pranjeets

>>17045777
UND > RLC

>>17045777
Post your hand.

>>17056909
Eat curry Mandeep

>>17056832
This