/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>17016388
dude no shit we have been excavating mountains for breadcrumbs for YEARS.

If I can extrapolate my behavior to other breadcrumb seekers it would go like this:
>2017-mid2018: accumulate +100k link based off of percieved potential and very tenuous details
>late 2018: pray we don't breach $.10 while going through the trash of anyone who works at the local bank hoping for some type of connection
>early 2019: golden age of silly shitposting. We had made it through the storm
>mid 2020: we have been vindicated
>since then: fucking 42

We made it. We know it. The people who have the focus to find breadcrumbs are burnt the fuck out after years. It is known and we no longer have to scrounge for hope.

The only people who need breadcrumbs now are $4 coinbase buyers and they aren't the type to dig.

I am burnt out so I know others are too. It is known

Are you really still hyping link? We bsv now fren.

>>17016388

Can’t have tendies without breadcrumbs

>>17016454
Thanks for reminding me I'm not alone, Anon. I'm so tired. But my 6% on my 100k+ stack keeps me comfy and warm

>>17016388
Wow, this is bullish! ...for Microsoft. This has nothing to do with LINK you fucking worm.

>>17016388
Don't see shit about DLT or smart contracts on that page Anon

>>17016531
>ID: 5oi 84y
>Soi gay
OH NO NO NO

>>17016531
if ONLY you knew. hheheh......

>>17016566
Nothing personnel,?

This has nothing to do with anything. pls kys.

>>17016555
soigay, you just got destroyed what do you have to say in response

>>17016608
>>17016534

Keep looking what does LINK actually do in a general, what is its purpose?

>>17016633
Technically mainnet went live May 30th. You're being vague as fuck bro -- if you actually have a point might as well just get to it before we get the wrong idea about you and start assuming you're a mouthbreathing retard or something OP. Because so far nothing in the screenshot has any more correlation with chainlink than the number 42.

>>17016672
I guess you didn't do any further research with the provided link

>>17016740
why even respond to these retards?

>>17016555
KeK has spoken
>BasedGay

>>17016672

https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/dynamics365/fin-ops-core/dev-itpro/data-entities/entity-store-data-lake

I think Microsoft is going to be launching nodes soon. It makes perfect sense. Everything in the 365 Dynamics is based on data aggregation. Feb 3rd all of these products are available for early access customers, and April 2020 for all customers. FFS read between the lines and see what these services do/offer.

You probably aren't the real 42, he would have went through my links first...

>>17016454
i am exactly like you, but i only have 12k links

and i have been forced to sell just recently.

>>17016809
i once had 2k
then lost my job
now im at 320

>>17016770
If we wake up one day and Microsoft has nodes up on mainnet, thats gonna be a massive green dildo.

>>17016821
ouch, i hope you get another job bro, got to have at least 1k before the end of year.

>>17016837
working on it man!
thanks!

>>17016388
>>17016454
>search for CHAINLINK
>0 results

help me out frens how is this gonna make our linkies moon

>>17016770
I assumed that this was your implied message. And I honestly think you are likely on the right track -- my belief is that Microsoft will give current customers the opportunity to operate their own nodes and remonetize their internal data. I read your link and that's precisely why I left a comment, you're grasping at straws here imo. Nothing in what you've shared has any direct implication of DLT or an oracle layer. Services already exist for secure data remonetization, they're just not trustless -- until this is implicating use of a smart contract executed in a blockchain environment you've got nothing new to share

>>17016740
April seems optimistic but plausible for staking. Hey did anyone else notice that this year it's gonna be 4/20 for a while month? Haha. 420 - 0 = 42 you see. Anyways cheers to steaking bros

>>17016809
I've got almost 4K I unironically hope for $1000 EoY.

>>17016878
Based realist

>>17016770

Cryptlets aka whitelable LINK nodes

It's gonna simmer in testnet for a bit longer, think autumn is realistic for mainnet.

>>17016454
>>17016516
Personally I did not look a lot into the breadcrumbs lately after I went all in 2 years ago.
The most important things for me were Sergey's same shirt autism and his team.
Also I found out that Sergey had a personality similar to most of us in that interview explaining how he chose his shoes to be the most comfortable and never think again on it.
If I imagine what I could do if I decided to do my best and focused on one specific task, I have no doubt that it would be successful.
If Sergey is like that, there is no reason to doubt his ability to deliver.
There are extremely few people like us and I still haven't met another someone like us in real life.

>>17016388
Not going to happen anytime soon anyway, they need first ETH 2, wait a few months/year to make sure of a smooth working network, then implement into chainlink.

>>17016770
Well we'd see it in roptsen in days then. I doubt it.

>>17017924
Eth 2.0 is well over a year away.

>>17017949
Well, we'll see major companies using the network in a couple of years then

>>17017338
>If Sergey is like that, there is no reason to doubt his ability to deliver.
he's already proven he's incapable to deliver. Imagine wasting 3 years and $40mil to create KYC centralized oracles that have already existed since 2015.

>>17016454
The worst is over, now we just need to wait until the timelines fully merge and then you can retire in peace

>>17018126
>centralized
Except Chainlink's mainnet launched with three parallel nodes.