/biz/ - Business & Finance

who?

>>16956148
lmao "ICONists" more like bagholding.

>>16956148
Just another literal who

>>16956170
>>16956182
Someone's fudbot settings are off lmao

>>16956148
ICON is literally a failed project

>>16956191
... cried the copelet.

>>16956198
I actually hold Link, seriously nobody gives a fuck about this "Korean Ethereum".

It was hyped in 2017 reaching $11 and now it's trading at fucking 12 cents lol

>>16956198

>>16956205
... cried the copelet again, self-harming.

>>16956148
None of these matter for adoption. Only one of those smart contract platforms will win and its called Ethereum.

People are missing the point of this, icon is a separate blockchain, it's not on ethereum. Chainlink is slowly moving into further realms.

>>16956207
wow great point

>>16956213
It doesn't matter who "wins". What matters is everyone needs trustless external data.

>>16956220
Ethereum has a 18 BILLION dollar marketcap, it's not undervalued in any way. On the contrary...

>>16956218
based and observationpilled

It's interesting being reminded of these failed 2017 projects and having a quick look through their Reddit "communities". Pretty brutal.

Crypto ecosystems are coming up with interoperatibility which will lead to adoption in industrial market. DeFi is going to revolutionize and thus oracles will play an important role. Wanchain ecosystem is coming up with DeFi oriented project FinNexus which can use Chainlink for oracles.

>>16956226

>>16956226
this

>>16956220
>cope

>>16956243
>>>>>cope

>>16956242
>$1000 to $300 is the same as $11 to $0.15

>>16956222
Checked and truthpilled

>>16956242
>comparing Bitcoin to Ethereum
Do you realize Ethereum solely pumped because of the ICO scam craze of 2017?

Or are you one of those deluded bagholders who thinks Ethereum will reach 10k with a 1 Trillion dollar marketcap?

>>16956259
I'm comparing Bitcoin to Icon. Keep up.
The point being that the shape of a chart doesn't mean shit.

>>16956256
See >>16956255
and cope.

>>16956256
Bitcoin dumped far worse throughout its history.

>>16956269
>comparing bitcoin to icon

>>16956279
>cope

>>16956148
S O . W H A T ?

>>16956291
>>comparing bitcoin to icon

Yes.

>>16956315

>>16956148
Mfw realized chainlink did not gave an icon

We're crashing because of this news, thankyou Sergey

Dumping like shit from this news.

>>16956326
>b-b-b-b-but muh chart shape!!

>>16956366
>>16956356
grampa bitcoin having a senior moment again

>>16956218
That's not what this is

>>16956383
Bitcoin sneezes and alts catch the coronavirus

Nothing new in crypto

>>16956396
Sometimes it be like that.
Other times alts go their own way, especially Chainlink.

lmao linkspergs. what the FUCK is Icon. it is trading at 11 cents lmfao. muh revolutionary tech. spergs! all of you lmao. Also great news link down -7.5% LOL cope more you brainlets

>>16956433
there there lil fella

>>16956148
GOOOOOOOOOOKEEEEEEEEED

People in biz are so stupid ,oh it's dumping it's a shot coin ah is pumping it's a great coin , Brian dead fags , only buy at the top and complain when it's dumping.
Icx for me great opportunity since it's so cheap and has some decent team behind it , but fags Wil buy it at 1 dollar

>>16956477
Many people can't think ahead more than 5 minutes.
We call those people niggers.

>>16956315
now do this again with chainlink’s chart

>>16956692
Why?

>>16956697
because it looks the same dummy

>>16956701
How does it look the same?
Chainlink is the absolute best performer in all of crypto during the bear market.

Also, my point was that chart shape means very little in terms of future performance.
Bitcoin looked like that for two years after the 2013 bullrun.

>>16956222
It acually fucking does if libra wins noone will need your fucking trustless external data KEK

>>16956984
>Libra
>not needing trustless external data
Oh boy.

Libra is backed by a "basket" or "reserve" of external assets like fiat, securities, ...
Its entire system is built on the need for trustless external data.

>>16957072
No it is not lmfao it is permission nodes "pay to operate" system imagine thinking it is built "on the need for trustless external data"

A inside in mind of ICON bagholder KEK

holy shit does this mean chainlink is partnered with samsung????

>>16957092
>No it is not
"This ecosystem will offer a new global currency — the Libra coin — which will be fully backed with a basket of bank deposits and treasuries from high-quality central
banks"
https://developers.libra.org/docs/assets/papers/the-libra-blockchain.pdf

"A basket of bank deposits and short-term government securities will be held in the Libra Reserve for every Libra that is created, building trust in its intrinsic value."
https://libra.org/en-US/wp-content/uploads/sites/23/2019/06/LibraWhitePaper_en_US.pdf

KEK

>>16957155
Hahahaha Ranjesh Manoor absolutely fucking killed there by based anon.

>LINK about to gets ICX AIDS
Time to sell.

>>16956148
Scamcoins are partnering with scamcoins to PnD each other. The crypto world is really pathethic af.

>>16957155
>>16957208
He literally proved nothing are you retarded lol, nodes ARE permissioned and there is nowhere in anything he linked fact libra needs decentralised oracles

You anons are morons

>>16957393
>nodes ARE permissioned
That has nothing to do with anything.

>there is nowhere in anything he linked fact libra needs decentralised oracles
This discussion wasn't about oracles per se, it was about trustless external data.

"For the network to be fully permissionless, the association will have to explore ways to further distribute and decentralize the reserve, including automating the verification of the assets in the basket"
https://libra.org/en-US/permissionless-blockchain/#open_technical_and_economic_challenges

There's something I don't understand, maybe it's because I've stopped following icon news. But wasn't Icon's selling point that it would be the first blockchain allowing for interoperability between different blockchains? Using link, that solves this very issue, seems to mean theyhave totally given up on this? Whats Icon's addvalue now if this is the case?

>>16957563
>wasn't Icon's selling point that it would be the first blockchain allowing for interoperability between different blockchains?
Same with Quant, and they're using Chainlink too now.

Pretty much any use worthwhile use case needs external data, and Chainlink offers the perfect backend.

I hold link and this is nothing. Newfags dont know about icon bagholding. Anons stopped making icon butt blasting threads because everyone's sold or sudoku. The binance news means more

>>16956205
Jesus.. I hadn't looked at it since 2017.

>>16957756
cope

>>16956148
> tfw still holding icon bags since 2017
is there hope?

>>16957786
Chainlink is the key to making a ton of crypto projects finally come true.

This includes ETH by the way. The EEA only exists because everyone thought ETH already had external connectivity.

>>16957563
They just published interoperability inhouse code a few weeks ago. Should have the official version soon. They worked on that shit for years. Lame

>>16957563
To add on to this, them having "solved" the interoperability still takes a lot of man hours to put it in practice, link is basically what they will let their shitty dapps use while big governmental projects (my id) are being fully worked on

3rd, icon is obnoxiously slow piece of trash but their team still hasnt touched their tokens so for those who still have its quite a comfy hold with 20% staking gains and not too big inflation

>>16957769
Buy some icon if you think this cope. Any price above 0 is too expensive for my taste

>>16957959
Even if Icon is a complete and utter scam, the exposure from this alone adds value to Link.
For starters, Icon has nearly 3 times the Twitter follower count of Chainlink. Icon was one of THE posterboys for the 2017 crypto boom, and THE blockchain mainstay in worst Korea.

The fact that Icon is also still being actively developed is just a bonus.

>>16957967
Chainlink doesn't need exposure to twitter fanboys. Its needs competent dev's working on it and competent projects using it. ICON is certainly not the later. My statement still stands. The binance news means far more because cz is at least not incompetent. Also by your twitter exposure argument my statement is still true since binance has more followers than a 2017 shitcoin

>>16958013
>Chainlink doesn't need exposure to twitter fanboys
>Its needs competent dev's working on it and competent projects using it.
It needs both, obviously.

All the brilliant work in the world means shit if nobody knows about it.

>binance has more followers than a 2017 shitcoin
And that "2017 shitcoin" has nearly three times more followers than Chainlink.
You think like a child.

>>16958022
You are a fucking retard. Read my og post and refute it. You haven't. I claimed binance announcement means more and I claimed icon is a failure. None of your verbal diarrhea has made any argument to indicate I'm wrong. Fucking nulinkers are cancer

>>16958055
>Chainlink gets advertised to a huge audience
>"this is nothing"

cope

>>16958063
Yeah the price action from that tweet is really uncontrollable. Reminds me of the google tweet. All those followers are moon boys from 2017 or 2018 who probably lost money on crypto and dont pay any kind of attention to their twitter feed. Some dev meeting Sergey did without announcing is probably more important to chainlinks future than a shitcoin tweet. Price action draws idiots and speculators. Development leads to price action. If this was 2017 or early 2018 you would be right. But you dont remember 2017.

>>16958302
Bitcoin's shitting the bed, markets are weird like that.

>Some dev meeting Sergey did without announcing is probably more important to chainlinks future than a shitcoin tweet.
So that cancels out getting shilled to 11k twitter followers?

You seriously have a very child-like thought process.

>>16958319
>cope
I this news mattered buttcoin shitting the bed wouldn't really effect it. At the very least it wouldn't be dumping like every other shitcoin (that's also filling twitter daily with useless partnerships and announcements). I have a realistic view you gutless faggot.

>>16958397
>the Binance news is bigger, that means this Icon news doesn't matter!
That's like saying "there's a new tallest building, that means the previous one isn't a tall building!".
This is how children think.

>>16958493
No retard dead shitcoins tweets dont matter. Being exposed to random twitter moonboys doesn't matter. Your rosey idea of "oh boy exposure!" Just shows you are a naive retard. Binance announcement is possibly important because cz is important in this space and if he chooses to develop defi through his platform using link that's huge. The only icon is gonna do is dump. Since you are a retard I'll spell it out. There is a time and a place for shitcoin tweets to mean something and so far it was only 2017.

>>16957829
>icon is obnoxiously slow
wut the transaction time is near instant because it's close to DPOS, they can go up to something like ~9000 transactions a second. That's not slow at all.

>>16956315
Comparing charts like this is absolutely brainlet-tier
You can do this with just about ANY coin that pumped in 2017

>>16956148
what a disaster

>>16956198
>>16956208
Newfag. We hold more link than you. ICX died long ago.

>>16956148
>The entire planet decides to partner with Chainlink
>Linktards go apeshit over the great news
>Price of Link does absolutely nothing as usual
Vaporware memecoin anons. Nothing more, nothing less.

>>16959162
This, nothing will pump your bags linktards

>>16959162
these "partnerships" with literal who coins are pure cringe. linktards are retarded

>>16958631
>No retard dead shitcoins tweets dont matter.
The exposure matters.
Cope.

>>16959053
>You can do this with just about ANY coin that pumped in 2017
That's the point you tard.
The shape of the chart means nothing.
Tons of projects that are still largely seen as legit have that shape, and Bitcoin had that shape several times in its history.

>>16959159
cope

>>16959252
All of crypto needs Chainlink, what's happening is as predicted back in 2017.
If you can't deal with that, then boo hoo.

>>16959306
1000 eoy!!!

>>16959162
Chainlink has been raking in the partnerships for a while now, it's very normal for there not to be any immediate pump.
But the effect does accumulate, make no mistake.

This is emabrassing

>>16959356
this must be one of the last retards still holding that this useless erc shitcoin

>>16959356
Based OP

>>16957816
So zre you saying the use of chainlink is only temporary, they'll use tveir own solution once released?