[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance


View post   

File: 242 KB, 1242x1210, 2F89EDD0-7495-4F2D-8B61-6719EF0F56FA.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16892372 No.16892372 [Reply] [Original]

Link might hit $50 if we’re lucky. Do you faggots not understand that staking is a meme?

>> No.16892392

>>16892372
BTC is going to hit 100k at least once before 2025. Up to you to decide where LINK will be in that same timeframe.

>> No.16892409

>>16892392
Where was Link when Btc hit $20k ?
90 cents.

>> No.16892413

the bearmarket is only beginning

>> No.16892612

>>16892372
I predict LINK will hit $90 sometime in Q3 2020. Screen cap this

>> No.16893422

>>16892612
>I predict LINK will hit $90 sometime in Q3 2020. Screen cap this

DELETE THIS

>> No.16893429

>>16892612
fud

>> No.16893446

>>16892372
>Link might hit $50 if we’re lucky. Do you faggots not understand that staking is a meme?
I'm fine with that. Anyone here since 2018 should be a millionaire at that price point.

>> No.16893476

>>16892372
>staking is a meme
Imagine being this behind on consensus mechanisms.

>> No.16893480

>>16892612
what will drive this price rise?
apple, tesla, white house, facebook blogpost?

>> No.16893497

based retard

>> No.16893550

>>16892409
It had just started you shit for brains.

>> No.16893582

>>16892372
The absolute top is 25 USD, and that's assuming bitcoin hit 100k and beyond lmao

Realistic top? 10 USD max

>> No.16893617

>>16893582
Nah if bitcoin reaches 100k that would pull link to around 300 usd

>> No.16893670

>>16893617
You don't actually believe this right? Do you even know how to do math? Similar marketcaps shitcoin hit 20 usd when BTC did 20k, and that was the only case, because a lot of other shitcoins with even more room to grow just failed miserably barely hitting the 1-3 USD range, which is what will happen with link.

20 USD is a pipedream, an absolute fantasy

Sell at 10 USD IF it goes there and IF you have a brain.

>> No.16893674

Half a million for a meme is good enough for me

>> No.16893699
File: 10 KB, 250x221, miserywojak.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16893699

>>16893582
realistic top was already reached anon...

>> No.16893723

>>16893699
Realistic top assuming BTC hits 100k but that will never happen. I agree with you, the top is in already.

>> No.16893752
File: 7 KB, 712x84, Delicious.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16893752

>>16893723

>> No.16893771

Any updates on staking? Haven't been in the loop the past few months

>> No.16893815
File: 87 KB, 1200x600, 5a6a12c9178425320f8b4635.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16893815

>>16893752
I can only assume you missed the bubble top faggot

>> No.16893841

>>16893670
Look at eth and and tell me that again. We already did the math on this months ago. It would put link in the 300 range

>> No.16893858

>>16892372
That would still be the best investment I've ever made in my life

>> No.16893911

>>16893815
I can only assume you missed buying at 20c.
Bsv subhuman shitskin threads ------>

>> No.16893922

>>16893841
>Eth
Not even the same supply so I'm positive you suck at math lmao

>> No.16893931

>>16893911
So what? If you didn't sell at 4 USD you already fucked up, that's my whole point nigger

>> No.16894004

>>16893815
> Because a lot of people know about names and symbols, and virtually no normie understands blockchain it will fail and I'm no longer special because they know!!!!!!
t. hipster stuck in 1929 on wallstreet

>> No.16894159

im 50/50 on btc and bnb atm anons. Should i dump all into eth/link?

>> No.16894185

Imagine selling your link
The horror

>> No.16894188

I believe the don’t computer has us at 271 or 321 somewhere around there at the end of this year

>> No.16894609

>>16893931
Fud

>> No.16895400
File: 352 KB, 1242x1210, Untitled-2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16895400

>>16892372
cool chart ahmed

>> No.16895465

>>16893480
Do you know what chainlink is? None of that shit would even matter