/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>16863755
>1 post by this ID
>FUD confirmed

>>16863755
Does this mean Barclays will be buying my linkies for $1000 a pop?

Yes.

that faggot needs to die, every single one of his TA calls were wrong lmfao

>>16863755
>>16863799
>>16863800
Barclays x Chainlink confirmed

>>16863755
Kek guess who was incorporated by Barclays Rise? Partnered with Crowdz and backed by Techstars?
Pro tip, you can find the company here:
https://www.wearepay.uk/who-we-are/guarantors/

Very interesting anon, more evidence Link is undervalued atm

>>16863923
You have to go back

>>16863857
It means a quant fellow/data scientist for the FED worked on SmartPiggies, an Oracle chainlink startup project designed for decentralized derivatives(the 1.2 quadrillion elephant in the DeFi room). Barclays risk manager of 10+ years worked on Smartpiggies as well.

Idk anon. We knew in 2016 from the mouth of Sergey himself at innotribe that senior banking execs were very interested in the tech. You've had a VERY long time.

>>16863907
>Do the opposite of whatever Timo says

>>16863914
>https://www.wearepay.uk/who-we-are/guarantors/
>https://www.wearepay.uk/collaboration-between-pay-uk-and-the-bank-of-england-on-iso-20022-payment-messages/

ISO20022 is not optional for banks, remember this anons. ChainLink has vast first mover advantage on compliance.

>>16863755
you know what?
I think Barclays is working with chainlink too.

>>16863967
it's also trival to acquire for any startup
t. work at a legal-tech startup

>>16863983
>we need an oracle
>well everyone is using chainlink network
>chain who? spin one up for me
Sure thing!

>>16864003
I'm talking specifically about ISO20022

I don't think you should read into compliance as too much of a positive.

>>16864003
also check these dubs

>>16864003
no way dude, establishing a network first and claiming dominance over the entire industry never happens, especially not in this internet age.

>>16863800
Is that a real picture?

>>16864017
Why wouldn't I look at ChainLink actively building on global bank compliant projects as positive? There is literally no competitor to chainlink today, in terms of industry interest and active relationships.

fuck timo

>>16863914
>https://www.wearepay.uk/who-we-are/guarantors/
...Chainlink isn't listed though?

>>16863755
>why i think you should buy my bags

>>16863857
Fucking based

>>16863910
WTF I AM GOING TO COOM TO THICC PEPE WHY DID YOU POST THIS AAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHH

He might just make up for his misdeeds...

>>16863755


"A report, co-authored by Santander Bank says that DLT could reduce banks’ infrastructure costs by up to $US20 billion a year."

So the question is.....

How much will they spend on LINK using Chainlinks oracle network? 100Million... 200Million? Id venture to say its possible they will spend up to 1 Billion on Chainlink if they are to save 20 Billion annually.

>>16863755
Kek. I work with Barclays. With people reporting directly to the CEO (Jes).

No one is working on crypto at Barclays. The bank is way too traditional and focused on cost savings for this.

>>16865671
how much do u make there?

>>16865671

Its called working with digital contracts or smart contracts. not crypto you fool

>>16863910
that fucking pic
10/10

>>16865738
>>16865756
god you guys are retarded, in hindsight you will realize how naive you really were

>>16865671
If you want to keep your phone in a bag of potato chips, then keep your phone in a bag of potato chips.

Really excited for you guys

>>16865783
Ugh terrible movie. laughed my way through it yesterday

>>16865671
>bank is focused on cost saving
>smart contracts, digital ledgers, and automation wont reduce 50% of their staff/data-management needs
make sure to tell jes not to turn it into another blockbuster there buddy

>>16864080
I was talking about Quant Network.

>>16865776
So naive that all you have to do is read what Barclays and Santandar is putting out in the press.

Yeah, so naive. Stay poor anon

>>16865671
>focused on cost savings
What could you possibly be focusing on that would save you more in costs than automating the back-end of your systems without sacrificing security and accuracy using Link?

>>16865898
He meant you're naive if you think that person works for/with Barclays whatsoever

Kinda like how my dad works for Nintendo, etc

>>16863755
So.... Barclays is not working with Chainlink. Timo is always fucking wrong with anything he predicts. Fuck that fat motherfucker.

>>16865671
Why would you buy one of Timo's scented candles that smell like his vagina? Just buy a can of tuna and set it on your shelf. Many such cans. Much cheaper.

>>16865885
Quant IS Chainlink, anon.

>>16863967
When is ISO20022 required?

>>16866823
qnt is a chainlink start up. infact qnt is very limit in use if there is no chainlink. nice try tho!

Chainlink holders are so fucking deluded lmao

'we need an oracle'
I work for Brewin Dolphin and I used to work for Santander, NO ONE SAYS THIS SHIT IN THE REAL WORLD YOU DELUDED IDIOT

>>16863755
kys Timo, you are rightfully the most hated member of the community

>>16866998
Sounds like you need an oracle

>>16866998
>NOBODY IN THE REAL WORLD NEEDS RELIABLE DATA FEEDS
>NOBODY TALKS ABOUT IT EXCEPT FOR ALL THE PRESS RELEASES AND AT MAJOR FINANCIAL SUMMITS
Okay guy

>>16864071
This

>>16863755
Basing this claim on
>2016 poc
>crowdz (shitty Fernando scam startup funded 5 million which is literally nothing for Barclay's)
>smart piggies hackathon dev works at Barclay's
I even defended him and clc when the shit storm happened but this is retarded lok

>>16863939
This, although I do enjoy watching nulinkers find the breadcrumbs on their own

>>16867041
Based this is the realist thing I've read here lately

>>16863967
d-delet

Timo is Chainlink's version of the Coca Cola Kid

In December Whalekiller said the link whales are russian/chinese government connected.
yesterday we learned of the conflux partnership.
he was right.

>>16865149
They probably spend billions on the infrastructure and will save billions.

If they spend 100 billion a year this means using DLTs will only cost 80 billion. Worth looking into because that will all be added to the market cap.

>>16866998


>>16866998
Lel I work there in the Newcastle office

>>16867254
>conflux partnership
Isn't conflux just another chinese scam?

>>16867371
it is THE chinese blockchain project that is officially supported and funded by the government.
call it a scam or not, it has the backing of the CCP.

Imagine believing that if they ever adopt any of this they'll let you plebs get in on it. Not saying don't buy and sell LINK.

>>16867408
when will trump sanction us

>>16865793
And then there's this faggot
Kys

>>16867414
That’s literally what link is