/biz/ - Business & Finance

Topkek

This is what scammers do anon, they only care about dumping on rekt plebs aka Quantards

>>16829860
Gilbert Alaverdian <gilbert.a@neo.net.au> is as a Senior Security Consultant at Neo Corporation Pty Limited

if he has a connection with Neo Corp blabla yes.

Why don’t you email and ask him directly you stupid faggot

social@quant.network

Big chance you can ask him tomorrow. Everytime the price dumps he drops by in the chat, claiming that Central Banks are using QNT.
I can’t imagine anyone actually believing that shit.
Central banks using any crypto right now is just ridiculous. Maybe Ethereum ..but that’s it.

>>16830017
>I can’t imagine
And you know everything anon

So why the fuck has there been endless amounts of news regarding central banks creating Central Banks Digital Currencies

Here’s just one article you raging faggot

>Many central banks have been researching this technology since 2013 and a recent Bank for International Settlement (BIS) study shows that seventy percent of central banks surveyed are engaged in some type of CBDC exploration . In fact, the IMF published a paper in November 2017 encouraging central banks to experiment with CBDCs

https://www.pwc.com/gx/en/financial-services/pdf/the-rise-of-central-bank-digital-currencies.pdf

Inb4: but it doesn’t mention Overledger
> KYS faggot

>>16829968
>Neo Corporation Pty Limited

PARTNERSHIP WITH NEO CONFIRM SIRS!! TIME TO POST MANY GIF IN QUAMFY TELOGRAM !!!

>>16830061
Not the brightest fella in the room. Central Banks will use their own digital currency. Not some crypto project in the lower parts of the top 100 that hasn’t even proven itself technically.
The fact that SIA once released an article saying that they aim to work together with Quant in the future does NOT mean that 570 banks use Overledger. That is just Bullshit.
The digital currencies used by the banks will be their own stable coin, dumbass.
Not an ERC20 Token that is created out of thin air.
They create it themselves.

>>16830157
The whole point of Overledger is that it doesn’t tie you down to one blockchain you raging faggot. It gives clients options to pick and choose different DLTs wherthers it’s EThereum or Bitcoin or Hyperledger or whatever shit, it allows uses freedom and flexibility to utilise cockchain technology quickly and cheaply and without major upheaval. Who says central banks are creating their own tech? They creating their own stable coins, but you have no proof that they are not using public blockchain chains you raging faggot

>>16830206
>. Not some crypto project in the lower parts of the top 100
He thinks central banks pick and choose cockchain technology based on coinmarketcap rankings.

Central bank dude: “so I’ve had a look at crypto rankings and I like Tron. It’s rank 11 on Coinmarketcap so I guess it must be good.”

>>16830206
I have no proof they are NOT using it?
Do you have proof that they are using it, that’s the question.
Central banks using Overledger to switch between their blockchains?
Gilbert hasn’t even send out any blog or tweet regarding that. He only wrote it in TG because he knew stupid quantards like yourself believe his lies and start pumping that worthless QNT token.

>>16830249
>I have no proof they are NOT using it?
Yes that was the question, how about you answer it instead of trying to flip the onus o me . A simple google search will tel you many banks are exploring blockchains like Ethereum Quorum Hyperledger ETh. Whether they use Overledger time will tell. Either Gilbert is a big scammer or I’m gonna be rich. I’m taking the bet it’s the latter. Kys

>>16830222
I’m saying they don’t pick any crypto. Maybe Ethereum but that’s it.
They are not using XRP too.
Some have partnered with Ripple tech. But nothing to do with XRP.
No, they don’t look at ranking because they don’t look at any crypto project that is unproven. That’s my point.
I’m not saying they will NEVER use quant. But to think central banks will use a tech that is 1,5 years old and has a token created by a hacker out of thin air...wake up dude!

>>16830280
Yes. Now we get real. At least you consider the possibility and you know you are gambling and see a possibility he is a scammer. I’m not saying he is, but at least we know he lies about his name.

>>16830288
>But to think central banks will use a tech that is 1,5 years old and has a token created by a hacker out of thin air
Don't forget the Demo didn't work, and all Team members that worked on it left.

>Central banks using Overledger to switch between their blockchains

kek essentially thats all it is, but i heard it doesnt work anyway and they publically proved it doesnt work at their own event?

>>16830288
>But to think central banks will use a tech that is 1,5 years old

We early. ETh is how old 4/5years? So what if Overledger is “new” if it works and does what it says then it’s all good. Yes cockchain are new tech and that’s what Overledger is good at - allowing organisations to experiment with multiple cockchains without commitment. Takes money time to use one cockchain. Imagine the money spent on getting wagecucks to learn solidi but then deciding ETh is too fucking slow. Using Overledger means orgs can switch between multiple cockchains quickly.

>Yes. Now we get real. At least you consider the possibility and you know you are gambling and see a possibility he is a scammer

Welcome to crypto. This is a game of speculation not boomer stock investing. The only thing certain in life are taxes and death. Now excuse me but you are boring me to death so see ya faggot

CEO uses false name.
Technology doesn’t work yet.
Overledger was off line for more than two weeks last year.
Demo didn’t work.
All other team member left.
Sure dude. That really sounds like a next partner for a central bank.
Oh wait. Let’s just say 5. That sounds better.
Oh wait. Let’s say we are working with one of the big 4 accounting firms. Sure they will believe that too.
And let’s throw in a national health service too.

>>16830368
I think the problem that he addresses is that Gilbert is claiming that central banks are using QNT NOW!
Not saying they won’t use it in five years.
But if he claims Central Banks are using Overledger now, you bet your ass he is lying.
Because if they did use it, they would have to sign an NDA and he would never claim it on TG.

QNT was top volume on idex for a year, then topped out just before Idex started asking for KYC

Clearly a PnD and the pumpers have now left the building

>>16830379
>>16830157
>>16830398

LMAO at this fud
This is a big buying signal for me. I've seen this several times
Have sex incels.

>>16830396
Overledger is already being used by Australian governments...central banks usage is not that difficult to believe. Thrown in Sia who ok are said to be exploring Overledger, but that’s good enough for me. Things take time. 2020 is the year of adoption they say and we will find out soon enough. See you at $1000 per QNT

>>16830827
DELUSION

>>16830827
Proof?

So JP and Colin left just as the central banks came in? Seems reasonable

>>16830860
Don't worry he doesn't have any

>>16830860
https://www.australiacloud.com.au/media/aucloud-and-quant-network-partner-to-provide-worlds-first-blockchain-operating-system-for-government-and-critical-national-industries/

>>16830935
Fake

>>16829860
All Arabs are scammers you should know this by now

>>16830860
Proof of what?

>>16831448
Oh someone already linked proof of Aus gov involvement.

Going back to central banks...even if all the central banks in the world decided to use a private forked version of Ethereum....guess what...they still need a way to interact with each other. That’s where Overledger comes. Interoperability faggots. What’s the point of all these shitty cockchains coming out if they can’t talk to each other? Overledger can connect blockchains and legacy systems. $1000 faggots. Buy now or buy at $1000 your choice

Imagine I invented a new burger. Instead of launching my own restaurant and trying to get new customers, what if I went to McDonald’s and made a deal to put my burger on the menu? Sound fucking awesome right? That’s what Quant are doing. Instead of trying to capture customer individually, Gilbert is going to existing service providers who already have fuckloads of customers. Integrating Overledger into the said service providers, they can then capture fuckloads of users in one go. Just like having a burger in McDonald’s menu. That’s why we have Sia - a fucking giant European financial institution who are already working with central banks in Europe. $1000 faggots. Screenshot this

/biz/ literally never had any QNT related threads a month ago
now its all just memefud like
>CEO uses false name
and for some reason all the fud threads want you to buy some other shitcoin
Its like chainlink fud and pajeets shilling their mobius scam throught it.

>>16830935
doesn't say the government is using Quant you dumb faggot

>>16831731
You’re retarded. Stay poor faggot

> Scott Wilkie, Director of AUCloud stated that Australian Government, Department of Defence and major industries are using or testing blockchain to interact with their supply chain, critical infrastructure, national record keeping and financial services. These organisations require the interoperable functionality that can only come with an operating system like Overledger and the security of the leading sovereign Australian cloud platform. Without Overledger, none of these projects or systems will be able to communicate with each other or enable cross party collaboration.

>>16830327
>and all Team members that worked on it left.
How do you know, source on that?

You have been warned:
https://www.ledgerinsights.com/accenture-open-sources-enterprise-blockchain-interoperability-solution-with-hyperledger/
https://www.ledgerinsights.com/accenture-wins-central-bank-deal-for-digital-swedish-kona-trial/

Muh Accenture whitelabel Quant
Muh Quant private GitHub repos

>>16829860
Quant will head back sub $1 where it belongs. Never shud have been $15. ICX vibes.

>>16829860
DAG red flag + Quant = red flag?

>>16832896
will this make quant obsolete fren?

>>16831632
>CEO uses false name
That one is true though. His real name is Gilbert Alaverdian, that can be confirmed just by Googling. So the new US COO must be his relative, would be too big coincidence. I hold decent amount of Quant, but this is a bit concerning.. althought it might be good idea to hire someone he knows, if the guy has what the job takes.

>>16833771
DAG is a confirmed scam. Their telegram channel has 5 different actual Satsgang admins. Its is the most scammed token in all of crypto.
Their trade volume dropped by 80% today which proves it was pump and dump all along. Real projects dont pump and dump. If QNT partnered with a PnD it doesnt look good. Looks even worse when the same pump and dump group is pumping QNT too.

INB4 Satsgang Pajeets dont want to talk about etherscans and all the incoming buy orders being dumped on by wallets in SE Asia

>>16833993
Well Chainlink also partnered with DAG.

>>16833993
fuck..not you again...what did these projects do to hurt you this much personally? You dedicate your life to say these things in every thread where the topic discussed is something you don't like. Did you lose all your money and got hurt? Wtf happened to you man

>>16833862
Kek, somebody will create a new ICO soon:
The new interoperability protocol for interoperability between Accenture and Quant interoperability.

Quant team about to dump tokens on idex lol

>>16834004
No DAG likeely approached them to integrate and anyone can use Chainlink

when code review?

>>16833886
>he fell for satsgang fud
literally google alaverdian, retard, that guy is COO on quant

>>16829860
scammer pose every fucking time

>>16835199
What part you didn't understand brainlet? The point was that COO is Alaverdian, but so is CEO. So they are probably related to each other.

maybe gil was some beast hacker then turned into cyber security expert. now bringing blockchain to the rescue