/biz/ - Business & Finance

VERIFY WITH YOUR EYES

>>16832122
Inb4:
>Acronis copypasta
>Chuck E. Cheese token
>FUD lies about the tokenomics/clients/pricing structure
>Slander about developers and their office building
>Schizophrenic delusions about "satsgang"
>Ignoring the fact that that 99% of cryptos have been bleeding

>>16832168
>FUD lies about the tokenomics/clients/pricing structure

>>16832168
>Acronis copypasta
Validating 50,000 documents a month, like AmSpec is doing, means it costs nearly one million dollars a year with V-ID to validate hashes on the blockchain versus $99 a year with Acronis (or less than $1000 if you use a server). And you only need one copy of Acronis per office: https://notary.acronis.com/

Acronis Notary costs $99 for the whole year and comes with a cloud backup solution, HDD image creation, and all the validations are free. That's right. Free. Because 99% of people who buy the cloud backup solution are not using notary services in the first place and they're subsidizing the transactions of those who do need the service.

Why would any company choose V-ID over Acronis is beyond me. Not only is it cheaper, but Acronis also works with every Fortune 1000 company.
Source: https://www.acronis.com/en-in/pr/2019/09/18-12-09.html

>>16832168
>Chuck E. Cheese token
VIDT is a scam. Token not needed. They created VIDT for the sole purpose of raising money. Service idea came first and then VIDT got shoehorned into it. They needed a utility coin for an ICO, as otherwise it would have been a useless security token and have no chance of being listed on exchanges or being legal. They knew no one would want to invest in a "1 VIDT = 1 Validation" scheme because that would make it a stable coin and have no speculative value. Which also means that VIDT price doesn't matter to V-ID at this point, they already got their million dollars. Unless they want to dump. All buybacks are scams to raise the price, so you give them your lunch money and create liquidity to dump into when the time comes.

Token not needed. There is no staking and there is no reason to hold VIDT for an investor. What is the UTILITY of this token for you, anon? Why would hold 10,000 VIDT? Just holding it in case V-ID comes on IDEX and buys it off of you? Is that the utility right now?

>>16832168
>Ignoring the fact that that 99% of cryptos have been bleeding
There are other cryptocurrencies available other than the ones in your own wallet.

The liquidity of this shitcoin is roughly $20,000 right now, across three exchanges.

>>16832195
>>16832204
>>16832215
>>16832222
>>16832239
bullish

>>16832239
I said that the first time I saw one of these shitty vidt threads. It's fucking stupid how they will show you charts yet there's no volume.

>>16832303
>I said that the first time I saw one of these shitty vidt threads. It's fucking stupid how they will show you charts yet there's no volume.
The chart in the OP also doesn't show that it was 9.5 cents when these shills came out of the woodwork last week. Nearly -20%.

$10 EOY

>>16832106
This is a Satsgang thread. OP defending Satsgang at the same time Satsgang is spamming twitter and biz with shills and misinformation.

Look at the etherscan you people are being robbed.

>>16832106
satsgang pnd. i'll stick with kleros.

>>16832948
This. Fucking Satsgang, they are relentless. Exhibit #20399203 is this post: >>16832195

There are such many cases. In fact, all of the counter FUD is like that. I'd suggest avoiding this coin.

>>16833090
>7 posts by this ID

Does schizo-Pajeet ever sleep? I am honestly impressed. This dude has been hounding VIDT threads religiously for months. He never misses a single one. Jesus fucking Christ, he's good. They must be paying him top rupee.