/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>16790346
Supposedly this thing could reach 100k and possibly higher but I don’t see that happening for another 15-20 years. We are so far from that

>>16790399
Supposedly this screenshot from the future leaked to biz shows link achieving 80k by 2027.

>>16790346
6 6 6

>>16790432
the related cryptocurrencies really says it all

>>16790346
According to estimations 1 Link could generate 200-1000$ of annual profit after 5-20 years.
With a 4% yield this would put it at 5000-25000$ per Link...

Wow, no need to change anything.
Luckyy!

>>16790432
If I went to the future I'd post a bunch of lottery numbers from this year, but not say on which specific dates those numbers occur

Frens I dont want to wage I just want to hang out and enjoy gains. Maybe travel to eastern Europe and have the sex with petite cuties

Moon days are over. You will be rich when you're 40. No sooner.

>>16790399
so if you hold 10000 stinkies and it is worth that much in 20 years you essentially are appreciating 50mm each year just buy holding them lol

All link marines will make it

You guys will be hunted down by the Rothschild

>>16790346
>Did the package arrive
>Community consensus model for verifying external data
So, I can see how you could have a global network of computers providing the price of oil, but how can you have "community consensus" for UPS delivering a package?

>>16790432
>time travel

>>16790723
No worries.

>>16790399
>Supposedly this thing could reach 100k and possibly higher
HAHAHAHAHA

>>16790346
LOL max it will hit is $10-$15

>>16790346
What strikes me about old ETH posts is how the most optimistic holders did not come close to guessing the top. They guessed much lower. It does make you wonder if we might be doing the same thing. Really anything is possible.

>>16791407
>What strikes me about old ETH posts is how the most optimistic holders did not come close to guessing the top
This is what I’m getting too. I missed the eth moon train but I see the exact same hype cycle for link. It’s quite unsettling

>>16790399
cope
Look at what ETH did in 5 years, driven only by hype and no use cases. Link will be $1000 by 2024, minimum

>>16790432
>still the same windows 10 interface

Honestly to me chainlink is about controlling the chinese and other third worlders to guarantee things came from where they said they would. You can't trust a chink but you can trust your local white node operator

>>16791593
whitenode.eth

BTC ONLY COIN WITH HOPE CONFIRMED

>>16791543
Win10 was designed to be an evergreen OS, tho.

>>16790346
There is a reason Vitalik never mentions shitcoin chainlink. You think someone as smart as him hasn't sized up this project already and realized it's a fucking mess?

>>16790346
reminder that LINK is NOTHING like ETH.

1. ETH had a testnet with thousands of users and finished mainnet 1 year after ICO, and only raised 16mil. Chainlink had a testnet and mainnet with ZERO users after 2 years and 32mil. It has gained ZERO adoption (the partnerships aren't using it). The level of developer adoption and excitement for ETH vs LINK is absolutely incomparable, LINK has none.

2. The Ethereum tech was actually innovative. It was the first successful attempt at a smart contract platform. It was decentralized and working one year after ICO. Chainlink only has centralized oracles (Sergey is lying about decentralization) which are not new or innovative. Their "innovative" solution to sybil resistant consensus is KYC.

3. The Ethereum foundation only had 1% of the Ethereum supply after ICO. The Chainlink team has 65%. Also when Ethereum was $1, it had a market cap of less than $100,000,000. It was actually a low market cap gem. Chainlink's real marketcap (if you count the 650,000,000 tokens in Sergey's wallet, ready to sell) is currently $2,000,000,000, which makes it an incredibly overpriced top 10 coin, not a low market cap gem like Ethereum was at the time.

4. Chainlink has already had mainstream exposure. It's made the front page of crypto subreddits countless times, was covered in forbes and every news outlet imaginable. Yet, even after all this attention, it has failed to get any developer adoption. It is fair to say that every single dev in the space knows about Chainlink, and decides not to use it. There are many projects running oracles in production, none of them choose to use Chainlink.

>>16791593

Truth. Chainlink is the trust of white people in code form

stop being fucking delusional even Apple, amazon or microsofy couldnt break 1 trillion and maintain it

these companies provide services used by pretty much every company out there. If they cant maintain 1 trillion neither will chainlink be able to

1000eoy is a meme

>>16791482
kek ETH had users a few months after ICO on test net.

It's been 3 years and 6 months MAINNET and Chainlink still has literally ZERO users.

>>16791905
this man speaks the truth also i'd like to point out LINKs code/scripting is sloppy using longer characters than we already use in programming. LINK team is special

>>16791898
>>16791905
>>16791917
>>16791918
>>16791965
Nice samefagging Rajeev. But your shit stench betrays you

>>16791917
1000 eoy is over. It never got that and it never will.

>>16791543
You think there wont be windows 10 in 7 years? Are you stupid?

>>16791918
>>16791965
fuck up Vijaykumar

>>16790346
holy shit u guys didnt dump at $5? i thought we memed this so we can sell to reddit. Who the fuck believe in 1k eoy?

>>16792042
ETH and LINK are both dogshit vaporware piece of shit PoS coins poofex out of thin air and sold by devs so they could acquire fiat to buy actual things
Pic related, sergeys dads new lambo aventador, curtesy of ponzimarines

>>16792541
>((((((((((((((Schiff)))))))))))))

>>16792541
>t.