/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>16784584
>a peer-to-ear system
When a bunch of BSV pajeets keep bullshitting you non-stop

>he has the pre-proof read version
Undeniably Satoshi

>>16784584
We are beyond the point of if you believe Craig is Satoshi, you're retarded. At this point if you believe he's Satoshi, you're a vegetable.

Fuck all the street shitting Indians who keep shilling this faggot's face on /biz/ constantly too.

>>16784609
kek

>>16784584
Yes, I know you love to run around going “Craig’s not Satoshi, don't listen to him”. However, all of that is irrelevant. The simple fact of the matter is that I've taken the original protocol that I designed and implemented it and it scales and it works. Not the way that people like James A. Donald desired (and yes, he is a child pornography and paedophile and that is part of why he wanted an anonymous coin, something I didn't realise in 2008). Rather, it is a micropayments system that changes the entire nature of the Internet. It allows companies like Google and Facebook, or rather the ones that will replace them to create systems that earn through micropayments and at the same time allow individuals to earn the money to pay for this. It's not the concept that people in the cryptocurrency space think about, but then the people in the cryptocurrency space are rarely those who will take this forward.

Don't worry, you can still play. I do know how to fix lightning; I have patents on it. Likewise, I have patents that would fix Ethereum but then I don't need to, bitcoin doesn't need Ethereum.

It surprises me how little people bother to learn. The entire cryptocurrency space is premised on ideas that have gone before. The only true innovation that I added to bitcoin was an economic system that linked to a traceable pseudonymous series of transactions. Proof of work-based Cryptocurrencies existed 20 years ago. Distributed Cryptocurrencies existed 20 years ago. The entire technical and corporate space 20 years ago was larger than the entire bitcoin space and in fact cryptocurrency space at the peak a couple years ago. But then, few bother to actually do the research. Few and then fewer even bother to understand that the concept of a blockchain, of hashing a block of information into next block was not new. It was published 25 years ago.

>>16784584
kek BSVtards eternally BTFO how will they ever recover

>>16784584
The pretentious homo on QI once said that the reason why spam emails use spelling errors is to filter out all the people too smart to fall for a scam and get a better success rate.

Do the needful sirs

>>16784969
>Not the way that people like James A. Donald desired
>James A. Donald
the fat fraud actually mentioned the real satoshi's name in a post so casually lmao holy fuck this glownigger is absolutely fucking BRAZEN.

enis :DD

>>16784584
OHNONONONONONONONONONO

AntiBSVers seem to be rustled today.

>>16784584

>>16784633
if you ever believed he is Satoshi you have very low IQ.

>>16786399
Just admit that you're retarded and were wrong about Craig being satoj. That's all we ask

>>16786500
You spergs are going to 5150 when you figure things out

>>16786500
This, I wouldn't mind SV as it's unique enough to exist but CW is a fucking moron and needs to be jettisoned.

BCH figured it out and SV should soon too.