/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>16761674
Thank you for fueling this pump with your hardearned money.

>>16761674
did you listen to the stupid acronis shill? everyone saw that he was just spreading lies to keep the price low.

>>16761674

TOKEN NOT NEED

TOKEN WORTH ONE PENNY

pump and dump

>>16761797

I was gonna buy back now. it keeps pumping

IM STILL DOWN 60% GODDAMN IT THIS “MOON” ISNT EVEN CLOSE TO MAKING ME MY MONEY BACK REEEEEEE

>>16761674
It's not a scam. It's one of the most fundamentally sound projects in crypto. It's a true micro-cap gem and will 100x. Always do the opposite of what biz says.

>>16761807
You impatient fucks don't deserve to ride this rocket to Nibiru. Sell the bottom, faggot. Acronis ooga booga. Pussy.

>>16761807
>he isn't swing trading this shitcoin

>>16761816
I bought in back in August, way before I realized how low this thing would dump

too much hype around this project, will probably follow the path of chx. but good luck to all the hodlers. just keep shilling and price will easily get back to ATH

>>16761918
you realize that it doesn't need shills to pump, the project does buyback and burns.

>>16761674
its still a scam u fuck

>>16761816
based and verfied pilled

>>16761725

VIDT is a scam. Token not needed. They created VIDT for the sole purpose of raising money. Service idea came first and then VIDT got shoehorned into it. They needed a utility coin for an ICO, as otherwise it would have been a useless security token and have no chance of being listed on exchanges or being legal. They knew no one would want to invest in a "1 VIDT = 1 Validation" scheme because that would make it a stable coin and have no speculative value. Which also means that VIDT price doesn't matter to V-ID at this point, they already got their million dollars. Unless they want to dump. All buybacks are scams to raise the price, so you give them your lunch money and create liquidity to dump into when the time comes.

Validating 50,000 documents a month, like AmSpec is doing, means it costs nearly one million dollars a year with V-ID to validate hashes on the blockchain versus $99 a year with Acronis (or less than $1000 if you use a server). And you only need one copy of Acronis per office: https://notary.acronis.com/

Acronis Notary costs $99 for the whole year and comes with a cloud backup solution, HDD image creation, and all the validations are free. That's right. Free. Because 99% of people who buy the cloud backup solution are not using notary services in the first place and they're subsidizing the transactions of those who do need the service.

Why would any company choose V-ID over Acronis is beyond me. Not only is it cheaper, but Acronis also works with over a hundred Fortune 500 companies.

Release date of Acronis Notary: 2016
ICO for V-ID: 2018 Q4 (and still work-in-progress as of 2020 with no consumer app - supposedly "coming soon")

Makes you think.

>>16763137
based

>>16763137
thanks based Acronis shill just bought another 10k VIDT.

this shit bled from 54 cents to 6 cents over the last few months and now pajeets want you to get excited about a 3 cent pump. kek. dead shitcoin is still dead. look at any microcap on any shit exchange, this is no different. they bleed forever then pump occasionally. don't for a second believe that it means anything though.
>muh $10 EOY we made it guys!!!

>>16761674
Only 20 more cents to go before we get vaguely near the price where people bought in at last year

>>16763940
>claiming VIDT is dead

https://about.v-id.org/vidt-usage-dashboard/

this kills the stupid fud this anon is puking.

>>16763950
>everyone bought the top

no

The douchebags on this board just shilled whatever was on idex.
First they shilled vidt, then they shilled lit, then they shilled eve.
I remember the whole burning of tokens thing.
They have like 30 million in circulation and they burn 200k a month.

>>16764051
so only 12 years at that pace for them to burn 30 million tokens.

I wonder what a suicide stack of 10k VIDT will be worth then.

LAMBOOOO

>>16764088
Nothing because by then V-ID will be completely obsolete. Both as a company and tech-wise.

>>16764051
>>16764121
they were burning a fraction of that 6 months ago. What will they be burning in another 6 months?

30m circulating supply but the price is dictated by less than 3m on exchanges. Do the math dumbfuck

>>16764121
thanks just bought another 10k VIDT

>>16763983
I understand that this board is full of literal retards, but you gotta be a special kind of stupid to believe in something like VIDT. you probably hold REQ too dont you...

>>16761807
>tfw break even now

I hope all you fuckers sold the bottom. I'm gonna make so many fuck you threads when I get my mil

>>16763950
I'm already above my average buy in fag

>>16766716
But you are unable to sell them. Unless you bought $100 worth lol

>>16764936
wrong.

>>16766796
He is right, you know.

ATTENTION ANONS: Note how none of the bagholders have any compelling reason for the project other than "lambo soon", "buybacks", and supposed revenue (pulled out of their ass - no crypto project mooned based on revenue). That is because it's a security token ponzi SCAM. Avoid!

>>16766911
I have a compelling reason:

you're a faggot

>>16766911
I’d suggest reading up on the SEC case with Siacoin if you genuinely think VIDT is a security token. I figure you’re just regurgitating information you’ve read on here because you’re incapable of formulating any opinion yourself, but nonetheless, read up on it faggot.

How much VIDT to make it? I currently have 2.3k

>>16766941
Yes. Do the opposite of what I'm suggesting. You don't want to be a faggot.

>>16766981
VIDT is a security token. We've went over this way before IDEX banned US users from trading it, newfag.

>>16767012
at least 10k