/biz/ - Business & Finance

Just like it mooned every other month for the past six months, eh? Fuck off.

>>16757444
just wait for that one anon to post the stale acronis fud. I think he does it for free, or acronis is paying him.

>>16757763
The project is overpriced and worthless. Customers cannot validate files in bulk, there is no software, and the team has to come to your place of business to validate or you have to upload all your sensitive files to the server of a small Dutch startup ran out of a shared office, next to a Subway sandwich shop. Pic related. To be a reseller of V-ID, you need to pay for tokens upfront, bought on exchanges, and hope to move it by roping in customers. Meaning the more tokens you need, the more you have to pay. Does that sound reasonable? Having to pay a company to sell their product? The tokens are worthless on their own. MLM pyramid scheme scam.

>>16757444
>How much to run a fud campaign on V-ID?
I dunno, Anon. How much were you paid for this shill post?
Nice trips, btw

Validating 50,000 documents a month, like AmSpec is doing, means it costs nearly one million dollars a year with V-ID to validate hashes on the blockchain versus $99 a year with Acronis (or less than $1000 if you use a server). And you only need one copy of Acronis per office: https://notary.acronis.com/

Acronis Notary costs $99 for the whole year and comes with a cloud backup solution, HDD image creation, and all the validations are free. That's right. Free. Because 99% of people who buy the cloud backup solution are not using notary services in the first place and they're subsidizing the transactions of those who do need the service.

Why would any company choose V-ID over Acronis is beyond me. Not only is it cheaper, but Acronis also works with every Fortune 1000 company.

>>16757777
>Pic related
Forget something?
When you copy paste this you're supposed to use the Subway pic.

>>16757777
quad 7 fud. get fucked op, you dont have to pay anyone to FUD vidt you coping bagholder people will glady do it for free

>>16757789
true VIDT are thieves

Here's one of the Acronis wallets: https://etherscan.io/address/0x00472c1e4275230354dbe5007a5976053f12610a

Refresh that page and you will see a different client notarizing at least once every minute. It costs less than 2 pennies for Acronis to validate a hard drive. You can validate 20 times a day or 600 times a month. Costs less than $12 a month for Acronis if you do nothing but validate 24/7. V-ID charges a minimum of $54 for a subscription alone, not counting a $2.22 charge per file.

>>16757793
>Forget something?
Now that you mention it, yes. VIDT is a scam. Token not needed. They created VIDT for the sole purpose of raising money. Service idea came first and then VIDT got shoehorned into it. They needed a utility coin for an ICO, as otherwise it would have been a useless security token and have no chance of being listed on exchanges or being legal. They knew no one would want to invest in a "1 VIDT = 1 Validation" scheme because that would make it a stable coin and have no speculative value. Which also means that VIDT price doesn't matter to V-ID at this point, they already got their million dollars. Unless they want to dump. All buybacks are scams to raise the price, so you give them your lunch money and create liquidity to dump into when the time comes.

Acronis Notary: 2016
V-ID (ICO): 2018 Q4 (Still work-in-progress as of 2020 with no consumer app)

Makes you think.

>>16757829
this is literally true thought haha the tokeneconomics are SHIT

token literally LITERALLY NOT needed

>>16757444
Checked. Ask the pajeet schizo acronis poster

>>16757444
>How much to run a fud campaign on V-ID?
22 rupees sir payable in bsv only thank

>>16757946
>>16757971
Fudding is free, but I will promote V-ID with the same fervor for 10ETH a week.

>>16757854
Bagholders never countered that FUD. Everything you need to know.

Not only has V-ID stole the idea from Acronis (infringing on the patent of a billion dollar company), not only were they two years late, but they still haven't released their app. But it's supposedly "coming soon" according to bagholders.

>>16757444
checked.. just accept your losses and move on. this was the most obvious scam ever.

>>16757808
1) Can you read the input data on those tx brainlet? Acronis is validating one file per tx. If VIDT were to do this, you'd see multiple tx per second, all day long. But they aren't as retarded as you, they decided to batch the files. Take this into account and VIDT has validated 10-20x more files in the last 300 days than Acronis (approximate math). Acronis is getting blown the fuck out by a dutch stoner startup.

2) Acronis charges nearly $1000 per machine eg computer. Confirm it with their sales rep. Clearly you don't understand the implications of this and why companies choose to use VIDT.

3) 99% of tokens do not need to exist. Same for publicly traded corporations. This is not a problem if the token does not introduce additional friction or costs. VIDT doesn't. That's the function of an IPO in the real world.

that's about all I can be fucked to type while I eat dinner. You're a fucking faggot, btw

>>16757444
chekt and doityourselfpilled

>>16758490
>You're a fucking faggot, btw
Right back at you.

1. Acronis batches every 70 minutes. Pic related is from 2018, since then they have grown their customer base by +30%. They have multiple patents for the tech and a finished, SHIPPED product. V-ID has 32 customers, an unfinished product, and somehow they are validating more than Acronis? Cope.

2. Acronis charges less than $1000 a year for a SERVER. You only need one computer with True Image 2020, which costs $99 a year, if all you need are validations (which is what V-ID does). If you need cloud storage backup, ransomware protection, etc. for every computer then you obviously need multiple copies for multiple installations. Retard.

3. Cope away and take your meds, paranoid boy.

>>16758490
>Clearly you don't understand the implications of this and why companies choose to use VIDT.
Which companies have signed up with V-ID since June of 2019? We're waiting for the answer. In every thread. All we see is crickets and you retards making another thread the next day.

Warning to anons: Avoid bagholder lies. I'm looking out for you all.

>>16758781
thanks for looking out for me anon. i can feel jesus working through you

>>16758732
Do you understand what a batch is? Multiple file hashes within a single transaction. The acronis contract does not do this.

>>16758691
network traffic has increased by nearly 300% since June. Over 30% of that is from a handful of new validators. Which companies have signed up with Acronis? You don't have a fucking clue

I've never made a VIDT thread in my fucking life. You make more shill threads than all the bagholders combined, cause this is your only source of enjoyment

>>16758914
I'm in direct contact with Jesus. He also told me months ago that ETH will go down to $120 and that will be the bottom and to buy as much as you possibly can. Hope you all listened.

>>16758979
>Over 30% of that is from a handful of new validators.
Nice dodge and not answering the question. Here's another question for you: Why cannot V-ID patent their technology? Hint: Because majority of the "tech" is essentially relying on a fucking blockchain tutorial/course which can be validated by looking through the source code.

>Which companies have signed up with Acronis? You don't have a fucking clue
I do: https://www.acronis.com/en-us/resource-center/category/case-studies-274/

And https://www.acronis.com/en-in/pr/2019/09/18-12-09.html
>With 500,000 business customers, and a powerful worldwide community of Acronis API-enabled service providers, resellers and ISV partners, Acronis is trusted by 100% of Fortune 1000 companies and has over 5 million customers.

Latest publicly revealed Acronis client being Liverpool: http://www.sportspromedia.com/news/liverpool-acronis-cloud

>>16759034
>ctrl f "notary" not found
>ctrl f "notarization" not found
>ctrl f "blockchain" not found
>ctrl f "ethereum" not found

you are the most dishonest piece of shit on this entire board

Acronis Cloud includes Acronis Notary for free. Liverpool has access to Notary at no charge. V-ID will not be getting them as a client. Nor will they any Fortune 1000 company. Or any company with a competent IT department.

Baholders BTFO.

>>16759057
Eat shit, scammer. I already knew what you were going to say before I even saw your post: >>16759058

>>16759058
and yet VIDT is still validating more files as a first year start up. Acronis offers a basic package with no API implementation or on site training.

you can screech all you want but the proof is in the pudding

>>16759121
>Acronis offers a basic package with no API implementation or on site training.
Proof is in the pudding that you are a fucking piece of shit scammer, but a retarded one at that. Pic related. Everything else you have to say can be invalidated (no VIDT required).

Acronis also has a customer support line (phone or chat) and there is no need for site training when most companies have an IT department for that very purpose. What is the appeal of VIDT again?

Oh yeah, retards holding it and hoping it will be their get rich quick scheme to not have to wagecuck.

>>16759155
>managing api keys
thanks for confirming what I just said

facts:

1) etherscan reveals that VIDT is validating more files per day when batches are decomposed. Billion dollar company, "500k customers", offering the service 2016 (your words), vs 1 year old dutch stoner startup.

2) batching frequency of the acronis contract is virtually the same as a year ago. Zero growth. Compare to VIDT's metrics

3) competition only validates the usecase

4) rebutting dishonest bullshit about a project generating actual revenue (whether you agree with it or not) does not make me a scammer dipshit. Go through CMC top 100 coins. Lies, pump n dump hype cycles, founders dumping their premines. Those are fucking scams. VIDT is just a decent project doing their best, which may or may not work out, that you happen to have an unhealthy obsession with.

>>16759249
>1) etherscan reveals that VIDT is validating more files per day when batches are decomposed. Billion dollar company, "500k customers", offering the service 2016 (your words), vs 1 year old dutch stoner startup.
You have no proof of this claim. Acronis does have that many customers. It's the #1 solution for backups. The fact that no bagholder has heard of Acronis before I even mentioned it says it all. Notary is included with every $99/year license. How is it possible that a "1 year old dutch stoner startup" with roughly 32 clients (some of which aren't validating shit) is validating more files than Acronis, which is used by every Fortune 1000 company?

>3) competition only validates the usecase
V-ID stole the idea from Acronis. V-ID would be the competition, except it isn't (because they have no clients, connections, or capital to compete)

>4) rebutting dishonest bullshit about a project generating actual revenue (whether you agree with it or not)
Poo poo. V-ID hasn't released any financial documents. Which is stranger since VIDS will represent shares in the company. Show proof that V-ID clients have paid a penny and they are not running off of ICO funds. As V-ID partnered with FTM, do you think they will be charging FTM per file or will they do the validations at cost for the opportunity to be able to say that V-ID tech is being used by various "governments"?