/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>16743385
You are correct
That's why Sir we need smaller blocks.

>>16743385

Would bang it, otherwise your post is complete shit.

This.. fucking retarded to let globally distributed corporations compete to produce blocks. Much better to have trusted nodes centralized in china with 1MB blocks they can handle
And why lock the protocol, so dumb. Devs need to make a living too and make names for themselves by changing things up every few months. Devs have more skin in the game than chink miners and devs need to eat too.

>>16743385
Yes yes, let the salt flow go short it if it’s such a scam faggot

>>16743385
not neccesarily depends on how much you increase it by. sv went full retard indeed.

>>16743405
luke is an imbecile don't listen to him!
the size of blocks don't matter as much as the size.of the blockchain. we can decimate the blockchain while increasing block size.

Number of nodes does not matter. Look at Dash for instance, they have the high number of nodes the free fall.

When you have like thousands of nodes does not matter to have ten thousands

>>16743385
I remember being a 10 year old cumming in my pants to the london bridge video

>>16743385
>Don’t they know it leads to decentralization?
Unfortunate freudian slip anon

>>16745974
Who puts fruit on a cake plate under glass?
This guy is such a poseur

>>16746009
>poseur

I implore you to retract that statement immediately, sir.