/biz/ - Business & Finance

buy rupee bro

>>16713806
Shit the fuck up

>>16713818
fuck u son basterd bitch

>>16713824

>>16713803
Yes you should. However you need to know that it might not happen overnight. Link is a long term buy not a scalp.

>>16713803
Redpill me on Link. Why are you guys so hyped about it? Why is it a meme here? Why do we care about it in the long term? What makes it different from every other damn shitcoin?

https://www.computerworld.com/article/3510457/10-top-distributed-apps-dapps-for-blockchain

>>16713836
peepee poopoo

Link is so 2019. time to find and buy new gems

>>16713803
Why LINK? Of all crypto out there with projects so active, I would stay away from LINK and do some more research. Start your DYOR with CENNZ. I can highly recommend!

>>16713836
scoopdidipoopdiloop

>>16713803
poop
scam

>>16713888
>>16713901
FUCK YOU

>>16713803
My linkies stay super stinky, $1000 EOY!

>>16713803
>Should I buy link for 2020?
2020 sats? Of course, yes.

>>16713836
diddlywoop

>>16713836
I'll let you in on a little secret that biz refuses to tell newfags, but first you need to understand two fundamental concepts about trust, and their uncaptured value within the financial sector. Let me explain...

>>16715015
>Link is the /biz/ fingerbox

Blog again Sergey your writings are inspirational and great for price movements. We love your speculative flair for thinking about future stuff all the while avoiding any concrete pieces of information that might imply usage.

>>16713803

tulips are better investment lmao

>>16713803
honestly, absolutely not
crypto will die this year
it is over

>>16713803
Yes but only if you can afford a 10k suicide stack

>>16715724
Any Link is better than Link.

>>16713836
Good shit. You seem very informed. I’m glad you’ve done the necessary research by costing 4chan and asking us to hold your hand and tell you if it’s a meme or not. Keep up the good work anon. Thumbs up emoji

>>16713803
Serious answer: NO

>>16713836
Pfffffff pffffffff

>>16713818
Shitting up asap, do you want me to point my butt at India? To help your superpower cause?

>>16713836
Hnnnnnggfff!

*Plop*
Is this what you seek?

>>16713914
Oooo this Indian is jealous of your poop flaunting. He wants what you have, he never has enough. Pooop.

Google these terms, do some research and take notes retard
"Smart contracts" "the oracle problem" "blockchain" "chainlink"

>>16713836
Bunch of 4channers tried to force it as /ourcoin/, during the presale ico phase of chainlink there was a minimum requirement of 300eth to enter the presale. Bunch of anons pooled up together and shared presale links to fill them with their eth.

Coin continued to get shilled and pumped up and hyped for the sibios event that link attended, whole event turned out to be a flop chainlink had a presentation in a room of like 18 people next to the public toilets, literally no news or partnerships came from the event and the coin dumped back to below ico prices and created 1000's of bagholder anons.

Now during the alt bear market lots of anons and took advantage of this and fudded this coin to all the late money and newfags that bought in July and don't know this story.

The coin is HEAVILY manipulated and the supply is dried up from huge whales who accumulated below ICO price to create a artificially lower supply (a lot like REQ) and these people have so much room to dump on all of you faggots to still be in profit when the time comes.

In regards to actual project that chainlink aiming to achieve it's nothing more than a basic json parser for smart contracts, would take like a day to add to ethereum by itself.. literally making links whole concept pointless and definitely no need for a token. Would take a lot longer to get it working with bitcoin but the bitcoin core devs would be able to work out the solution a lot quicker than chainlink will, think that's something worth noting that literally nothing is completed and you're literally just buying a whitepaper, they have only 2 developers and they don't communicate at all with no proven background on either, in fact sergey was involved in a project before chainlink called NxT that he since been abandoned until it was took over by a new developer team.

>>16713836

2020 is when we see link follow the shit coin pattern.