/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>16642458
btc was shitting the bed before link pumped this time fagget

>>16642458
> NOOOOOOOOOOOOO WE CAN'T LET A BUNCH OF FROG POSTING RACISTS GET RICH ON OUR WATCH!!! DUMP IT!! WAHAHAAAHAAAAAA NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!

>>16642458
>link surely isn't in a daily bear flag
Fucking deluded special snowflakes

>>16642472
basically this, yes

>>16642468
gj being a massive retard

>>16642483
The longer your people prolong this, the more worse your people's 2nd holocaust will be. The one who will appear soon is a holder and is not any happier having to wait. Keep digging your own graves even deeper.

>>16642472
>the Rothschild banking dynasty is stopping my ERC token from making me a billionaire

Enough coonery.

>>16642488
faggot i was watching the charts, btc pumped, and people switched to btc, so link dumped in sats, then the btc rally was killed

>>16642515
They are really fucking up. They are going to lose everything.

>>16642506
i am on your side u fucking faggot, your greentext was pretty ironic

>>16642519
>Link pumping
>BTC dumps

It's that easy.

>>16642531
Everyone and everything will be destroyed, no one is safe and you can thank them for it. No one is on my side as far as I am concerned.

>>16642534
you are pretty stupid, yes link is great and i only hold link in cold storage, but btc is still the king and LINK FOLLOWS BTC LIKE ANY OTHER SHITCOIN fucking dealwith it nulinker

>>16642545
>LINK FOLLOWS BTC
... that's what I'm saying you tard.

Someone keeps dumping BTC whenever Link goes on a pump.

>>16642551
only that link wasnt pumping but bitcoin was, i am out youre too stupid bye

>>16642563
>Link wasn't pumping

>>16642545
>LINK FOLLOWS BTC

Is that why it did x10 on a bear market? fucking faggot

>>16642573
>usdt pair
ok retard

>>16642545
also, see >>16642580

Link absolutely dunked on BTC (and the rest of crypto) during the past 1.5 years.

>>16642603
Do tell me what you think is wrong with that.

>>16642605
thats why I only hold link longterm, still very near time frame before the dump btc broke through the resistance at 6.5k and was dumped then,

btw, i still think that btc will reach 8200 and then be dumped back and link will build from 25500 sats maybe dump one more time below it if btc pumps hard but not for long

>>16642650
>sats
No wonder you're so incoherent and confused.

>>16642681
guess we will see, why doesnt /biz/ even have a fucking betting pool for crypto charts so I could bet against you fucking plebs

>>16642693
Bookies wouldn't understand your ramblings enough to take your bet.

Sats are themselves valued in USD.
Anything you value in sats is always and automatically valued in USD.

it looks like the 700k transfers weren't to be sold on the secondary market

https://etherscan.io/tx/0x205f6ddfa3df6e38add723d3af2f8558a53b60905b388be0a6da84bac326d1a8

>700k movement between binance wallets

Clearly they were a significant number relating to node creation or something similar.

>>16642707
Ok pleb

>>16642728
Yes banks will need significant amounts to deal with the trillions in contracts that will have to be moved every day during the next crisis.

>>16642551
>says link follows btc
>>16642707
>link cant be valued in sats

>>16642728
>>16642728
id make a thread but im traveling and for some reason I'm rangebanned but can post in other threads. why would binance move link around in that particular quantity if it's not for nodes or some other purpose?

>>16642458
>this faggot doesn't know how to read the link/btc chart only link/usd and btc/usd

>>16642530
btc has been gaining ground on link. what the fuck are you guys talking about?

>>16642758
Holy shit you're retarded.

You can value Link in Amazon stock for all I care, what matters is USD value and nothing else.

>>16642769
Only USD matters.
That's why sats themselves are valued in USD.

>>16642775
>btc has been gaining ground on link
Fucking lmao.

Look at pic related.
This is from when Link was 1USD and Bitcoin was 8k USD.

>>16642780
you are fucking stupid.

>>16642788
that was when link was at $4 you fuckin pleb post what that chart looks like now lmfao

>>16642796
What are sats valued in?
When BTC "moons", what is it mooning in?

>>16642780
You are the retard, sats is all that counts atm faggot

>>16642788
I'm talking about over the last month you dumb discord tranny

>>16642797
>that was when link was at $4
No, THIS pic is from when Link was $4

LMAOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

Ah, you see it too

>>16642807
What are sats valued in?
When BTC "moons", what is it mooning in?

>>16642488
>1hr charts
Let's see the 5m

>>16642807
Youre embarrassing yourself faggot

>>16642812
See >>16642788

>>16642761
Good find and no idea

>>16642761
Who doesn't love a bit of meemming? Even souless insect chinks.

>>16642824
You are embarrassing yourself

>>16642846
Answer the question, my huckleberry.

>>16642851
You will see that when the bullmarket starts and EVERYONE runs to btc because it will pump that sats are all that count atm, after the bullmarket is on for some time this will change ofcourse but why am i even spoonfeeding you fucking pleb, you will get rekt anyway

>>16642803
you can't trick question yourself out of being a dipshit who doesn't understand triangular currency flow or currency pairs. LINK/USD isn't in an uptrend because LINK/BTC isn't in an uptrend even if BTC/USD is. OP's post is based around the current market motion, as in what's happening right now. No one gives a fuck about your long term bullish-shit or how LINK grew from 3k to 30k sats, that ALREADY HAPPENED FAGGOT. It's PRICED IN. This is a SPECULATORS GAME. We care about NOW and THE FUTURE.

Stop trying to get people to buy your bags you absolute plebian you won't be able to get rid of your shitty ERC-10 token for more than 2 dollars for the forseeable month. That's right, sub $2 end of decade. Eat shit.

>>16642458
so this is why you're so fucking dumb in a sentence: your post is about THE NOW and THE FUTURE and you're still trying to talk about SOME SHIT THAT ALREADY HAPPENED A LONG TIME AGO THAT ISN'T RELEVANT BASED ON THE CURRENT MOTION

pull some fucking 1month candle TA out of your ass and pretend it's going to do you any good when your shit has been traded for under 100 candles.

>>16642865
Crypto acts to some extent as communicating vessels, but that doesn't change a thing about what I'm saying.

Answer the question: When BTC "moons", what is it mooning in?

>>16642870
>>16642885

Look at all this shit you just typed when all of this is settled with simple question: when BTC "moons", what is it mooning in?

>>16643051
>>16643059
He still doesnt get it, pls nobody spoonfeed him sage

> NO U!
The thread.

>>16643091
I'll answer it for you: when BTC "moons" that means it's going up in USD value.
How much you can buy with BTC (sats) depends on how much BTC (sats) is worth in USD.

Therefore, if you value something like Link in BTC (sats), you are AUTOMATICALLY AND ALWAYS valuing Link in USD, only in a retardedly roundabout way.

>>16643123
>in a retardedly roundabout way
Welcome to crypto nufag, have fun getting rekt

>>16643148
Absolutely NOTHING is valued in sats.

It all comes down to how much it's worth in USD.

>>16642814
What books do I need to read in order to understand what the fuck is going on on that chart?

>>16643364
Just a basic secondary education.

valuing link in sats is retarded

i don't give a fuck about the btc value of my link stack. i don't expect link to ultimately depend on btc. for now it looks like it does, but not when the network is up and running with clients

>>16643419
Link never depended on BTC.
BTC's moves usually reverberate throughout the market, but that has absolutely nothing to do with the fact that USD value is all that matters.

>>16642788
that chart is so fucking old now

>>16643941
Yes it is.

Today, Link is nearly double the value it was at the time that chart was made, while Bitcoin is about 500USD down since then.

are linkies even dumber than digimarines