/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>16639610
The universe took them.

Sell it and buy Reserve. Thank me in 2021

>>16639610
Your core dev said Nano is shit and will never beat Bitcoin. Your lead dev has given millions to his findom, had a messy divorce, multiple lawsuits, insane spending, so he has been dumping on investors daily plus all Nano Foundation funds are fully depleted in a few months time. An open satanist, with the handler Rock Me Suck Me Jesus, is Nano's official senior community manager. Price has crashed as usual. Other than that, GREAT!

>>16639610
Oh, and Nano's Chief Operating Officer has no qualifications, no experience, but she DO enjoy sitting topless with a pizza saying "FUCK ME" on it.
>>16596049

>>16639610
Plus Nano devs finally are able to push Nano to around 6% of the promised TPS in Dec 2017.

>>16639610
Plus Nano devs finally are able to push Nano to around 6% of the promised TPS in Dec 2017.
>>16616779

>>16639610
If guys like these (could they even be more Jewish?) or a very horny guy with a thing for redheads and a spending problem, try to sell you their internet money - then RUN!

>>16639610
If guys like these (could they even be more Jewish?) or a very horny guy with a thing for redheads and a spending problem, try to sell you their internet toy money - then RUN!

>>16640388
It's so obvious you're the faggot from the previous thread with an I'd that had over 100 posts in a thread with 300 posts.

>>16639610
So even though your investments have crashed and you lost 96% of your investments, just think about how much joy and fun you gave the Nano team, pic related.

>>16639610
Do you think a random bikini blogger and solo traveler for three years could afford this without your Nano money?

>>16639610
Life is gooOooOoOood!

>>16639610
Could a guy like this bank redheads on a daily basis without your Nano money? I think not.

>>16639610
Why did you invest so much? Imo you should never invest that much in a single crypto. I do have faith nano will rise in the future, it was predicted it would drop at the current price. It wont ever be as high as btc or the main cryptos but I'm sure it will be at 2$-3$ by mid january

>>16639610
Luckily Nano devs and their friends managed to get tens of millions of dollars out off crashed Bitgrail, AFTER the "hack" was officially known and exchange closed. Pic
https://www.reddit.com/r/nanocurrency/comments/7xqxqu/500_thousand_nano_was_moved_today_out_of_one_of/duaj73z/

>>16640401
>>16640456
Thanks for for sharing your story about Stockholm syndrome in such an obvious way, Nano investors.

George owned 100% of Appia, and then Nano Foundation bought shares from Appia and the holding changed. thus, Nano Foundation (Colin) bought shares from George for £100k. From the time of Formation to like 2 weeks ago, Appia was owned 100% by George according to their filings.
https://www.reddit.com/r/nanocurrency/comments/e10hkd/nano_foundation_and_appia/

Pic for you feet guys, here you go, in luxery hotel suite, courtesy of Nano "investors" worldwide. At least third world Nano investors know where their money went. They can look at the pictures. That brings some comfort, right?

Pic is from Hotel Alfonso XIII, a Luxury Collection Hotel, with the title: Champagne Breakfast

>>16639610
>>16640401
>>16640456
Nano Foundation only has funding left for a few months:
https://www.reddit.com/r/nanocurrency/comments/dxptka/nano_foundation_overspending/

But who cars about that? FreeedoooOooOom!!

>>16639610
Okay, you are down 96% on your investments, but think about all the JOY you have given team Nano from Nano foundation!

>>16639610
Aahem, yeah, some more of your Nano Chief Operating Officer's "qualifications".

>>16640501
I never bought Nano but fuck I feel bad for the cucks enabling this roastie

nano is my favorite second only to xrp im glad i am to help the team be happy and buy new houses and cars

>>16639610
You don't have to be a Satanist Nano senior community manager, like Rock Me Suck Me Jesus, to enjoy life and all the tens of millions of Nannis you dumped on the market, while having a casual breakfast overlooking abramovich's yacht and posting it on instagram.

>>16639610
You don't have to be a Satanist Nano senior community manager, like Rock Me Suck Me Jesus, to enjoy life and all the tens of millions of Nannis you dumped on the market, while having a casual breakfast overlooking abramovich's yacht and posting it on instagram.

>>16639610
Okay, Nano has a totally broken business model and crashed tech that will never work in real life
>>16616779

but there is SOooOOOoo much more to life than that! Instagram pic related, from Como - Italy.

>>16639610
So you lost 96% of your investments, but at least you can get warm and fuzzy inside just thinking about your money supporting ultra liberal Colin and his hard left feminist ideology, lying through his teeth to defend George Coxon, pic related, plus Zack Shapiro tweeting daily his hatred for Donald Trump and calling for open borders! Your hard earned money well spent, ryte?

>>16640334
Nano Foundation is now working hard to say that the FUCK ME pizza pic is not her, that she did not post the photo on her instagram account. That is kind of strange, as all of her 6000 followers saw it, that the link to her instagram account, was dumped together with the photos days ago and many took copies of her Instagram account, freshgingerr, now weirdly and suddenly private. But HEY, they have nothing to hide, ryte?

>>16639610
OF COURSE it is super duper easy to burn through all the Nano Foundation money and now only have left enough for a few month. Only the small people, the Nano investors, think that is strange.

>>16639610
Hello there, I am Nano dev Zack Shapiro. Hope you Nano fans enjoyed me dumping my million heavy bags on your heads, while Nano was crashing, the very bags I got out from Bitgrail while you were stuck and tried to get your "KYC" from Bomber (lol). Take that as a lesson schmucks, don't listen to guys on the internet, like me, when doing financial decisions. Pic is me before you gave me my millions of $$. Aaaah, life is gooOOooOod. L'chaim!

>>16639610
>>16640661
You can trust us Nano devs. lol. This is me 4 days before BitGrail exploded. Enough time for us Devs and our buddies to get all our own stuff out. We managed to move millions of our sexy Nannis out when BitGrail was down for "maintenance" and closed for you "normal" people, Bombers KYC bullshit, etc, i.e. idiots who are not insiders. Sucks to be you. lol. In addition I had to tweet like crazy to the small people, the ungrateful Nano "investors" that were pestering us all the time with their, *whiny voice* "I have 8.3 Nano and I am so worried Zack, please help me". Worst part living in America is dealing with white people. They will never be winners. And they lost. lol. Peace out to all fellow Naniites!

>>16639610
Okay, so you got Bitgrailed and your Nano investment has a loss of over 98%, an investment from hell you say.... Well, don't tell us you weren't warned, we kind of told you so when we hired satanists in our core team, like senior community manager with the handler, Rock Me Suck Me Jesus (rockmsockmjesus). We literally couldn't make it more clear, ryte?

>>16639610
You might want to look up the word findom in the dictionary, buddy. You were gone for a year, but the rest of the rabid Nano investors, not so much.

findom, noun (uncountable):

Financial domination: a form of erotic humiliation in which one person gives money and control of their finances to another

Nanoids are so tragic. Either they organize and flood biz, bombarding stupid and nasty comments, pic related, or they just run the hell away, unable to defend their scam and shitcoin. Tragic.

That's not true.

>>16640628
wtf I didn't know any of this until now

>>16641917
Spread the information, fren! But I wouldn't try Plebbit if I were you. The slightest hint of this and the Nano mods will ban you + the crazy and abusive Nano mob will go into hysterical overdrive. Unless, of course, you enjoy seeing them go nuts.

>>16640322

>I trusted an italian scammer with my coins so now I blame others for my losses

>>16642820
Again, retarded Nanoid, I did not lose any money personally, as I looked into Nano scam and found out that they lied about their tps i January, before Bitgrail. Pic related is the insane lie from the sociopathic Nano dev team

>>16642820
>>16643580
Meme gif is pure scam, pushed by lying sociopathic devs and Italian scammers.

>>16642820
>>16643580
Only reason why anyone heard about Nano is that the devs/Italian scammers pushed their 7000 TPS lie, right when BTC was clogged and had huge problems with transactions. Nano scammers claim that their 7 000 TPS lie is OK because they said test environment. That is absurd, as test environment is meant to simulate reality with +/- 15% MAX. Sociopath Colin's claim, however, that he took directly out off his ass and presented as facts, is close to - 99% underperformance. 75 TPS instead of the promised 7000 TPS, pic. That's pure and utter scam in full Bitconnect fake trade robots style.

>>16643645

it literally said 7000 tps in a test environment, which is correct. that gif was stupid but it isn't made by the dev team

75 TPS is huge for a decentralized p2p coin, bitcoin can barely sustain 10% of those TPS. that's the worst fud attempt I've ever seen

>>16643841
>Nano has 756 TPS [1][2]. VISA can handle over 56,000 TPS [3]. Competitors work on 1 million TPS solutions [4]. Nano’s aim to be global currency is either delusional or a fraud.
>7,000 TPS was falsely boosted and promoted, causing the Nano price to skyrocket 97.7x in December 2016 alone. Real transactions per second (TPS) for Nano, however, was a meagre and pathetic 100-200 TPS [5].
>Nano falsely claim theoretical unlimited scalability, only constrained by hardware and bandwidth limitation [6]. This is as absurd as claiming that a car has unlimited speed theoretically, and the goal is to drive so fast that the car escapes earth’s gravitational field and park on the moon. Nano’s technical updates don’t bring it closer to the goal. It’s like saying the improvements on the engine of the car has brought us closer to driving to the moon.
>Nano advocates like to use average demand as benchmark for needed TPS. This is false. Who will use a currency that will crash at every emergency, at Christmas and other holidays?
>Nano (Raiblocks) was a dead amateur coin, worth less than 10 cents less than a year ago, until it was discovered and pumped hard by Italian scammers. Only after the pump did Nano full time dev. This amateur project has had a full-time dev for less than a year, with a horrific team and management picked among incompetent friends and supporters.
>Lead devs are leaving Nano. Insiders obviously know Nano is riddled with terminal flaws and structural problems. Insiders obviously know Nano is riddled with terminal flaws and structural problems.
>Devs are dumping Nano on the market [7]. Insiders obviously know Nano is riddled with terminal flaws and structural problems.

>>16644167
(Cont.)
>Constant node issues. Withdrawals/deposits suspended on several exchanges due to security and stability issues, multiple times, every single month. All exchanges down less than 6 weeks ago [8]. Kucoin less than 3 weeks ago [9]. Another failed update and node crash this week [10][11]. This despite being miles behind having any sort of global currency traffic. Nano could be years away from even having the potential to be a well-functioning global currency.
>Coinbase will only use coins stable for multiple months. Nano is far away from that, see above and [8] [9] [10] [11]. Coinbase will also stay away from a coin riddled with legal problems [7] [12]. Best case scenario is having Nano on Coinbase late 2019, if at all, leaving Nano hopelessly behind other cryptocurrencies.
>One single miner can destroy the network via DDoS with 500 GPUs at no cost [13] [14]. A critical attack vector never seriously addressed by the Nano dev team. Having the problem highlighted to them, admitting to it, their response has been the usual -to promise and deflect -without providing any real technical solution. Nano is wide open for a massive spam attack crippling the network for a long time. This also scares the Coinbase experts; a total crash in Nano, via spam vulnerability and insane node issues, will reflect badly on Coinbase.
>Nano team seem like tech amateurs. Don’t understand the difference between Random (not cryptographically secure) and SecureRandom. Don’t even understand basic cryptography. A disaster in waiting.

>>16644170
(Cont.)
>Former head of engineering at Facebook, Bryan Veloso: Nano "just a hype...no real use case" [16]. Currently NANO is only processing 0.15 transactions per second. Transactions have gone down in the last months. Extreme low usage combined with a very speculative 90x pump in just one month, causing a flash crash, are all indicators of a coin with pure hype and speculation, without any real value. Bryan Veloso’s claim that Nano is just hype with no real use cases is validated by empirical data.
>Charlie Lee, creator of Litecoin: “Nano will have a hard time being decentralized... It won't be as uncensorable as Bitcoin or Litecoin” [17]. “Nano is not without faults...it has a LONG way to go” [18].
>Millions of USD sold from the Nano Developer Wallet lately, at extremely low prices. Not a good sign that devs are dumping Nano in a fire sale [15].
>Nano team marketing strategy is to have no marketing strategy.
>Nano team adoption strategy is to have no adoption strategy.
>Nano’s essentially following same strategy as Betamax vs VHS and HD vs BluRay.
>First coin on Amazon, eBay, etc. will be the global currency. Nano’s avoiding partnership. Nano’s publicly stated “strategy” is to not seek strategic partnership, basis being that USD has no partnership as a currency, so why should Nano have one. Ridiculous.
>Dev fund is dangerously low, they may burn through it in a matter of 1-3 years [15]. Also, multiple pending and coming lawsuits against the Nano foundation.
>100 addresses hold 65% of all 133 million Nano. Initial distribution to friends of developers, nontransparent distribution method. Who solved the captchas? Where is the audit? Extreme centralization that only got worse with BitGrail, where large holders of Nano (including devs/friends of devs) managed illegally and unethically to get out of the insolvent exchange, leaving normal investors behind to take an 80% loss.

>>16644179
(Cont.)
> 51.27% voting weight, held in 6 addresses, opens vulnerability to devastating 51% attacks.
>Flawed structure, currently insane 92% of the voting power in the top 1% of the nodes only [19].
>No smart contracts. Masternode coins utilizing high capacity data contracts on their second layer are the future. Nano can't do any of this, it cannot compete with other coins.
>Must run expensive nodes for free. A borderline insane and untested business model that will most likely crash the network. Even if it worked, no matter how unlikely, with full adaption the cost of running a node would be astronomical, leading to extreme centralization. Having again the elites controlling our money must be avoided. No financial incentives for DPOS representatives to keep securing the network.
>Same whales that pumped and dumped Nano first time (-98% from ATH), pumped again. Failing to pump further, will result in a dump again, very soon. The delusional Nano hodlers will be stripped of their money again.
>70% centralization of all Nano, due to Nano original developers setting default node to their own.
>The code hasn't even been audited by an established software security company.
>Nano is permissioned and non-trustless [20]
>Going from UDP to TCP too late and too slowly [21]
>90% of github commits by only one person (Colin) in the whole “team”.
>Hired pretty girl, G. Coxton, who’s done nothing. Why’s she not on YouTube pushing Nano?
>Nano team are business amateurs. Pushed BitGrail when clearly a dangerous exchange. Guaranteed bomber as a good guy. Rebranded to Nano right before BitGrail exploded. Retarded decision. Marketing disaster.

>>16644191
>Nano has no ‘human face’ for people to connect with, it’s just an empty logo. Unlike other top 10 coins – e.g. Ethereum has Vitalik, Tron has Justin Sun, Litecoin had Charlie Lee. NEO has Da Hong Fei. EOS has Dan L. etc.
>Nano has post Bitgrail probably the worst community in crypto [22][23], much of it due to the Nano teams catastrophic handling of the Bitgrail crash.
>There are many other coins that are far better than Nano, with instant transactions, zero fees, near infinite scalability, near infinite decentralization, permissionlessness and trustlessness, 1 millionth the energy usage of Bitcoin [24][25][26]. Nano is an extremely risky investment [27]
>Posted some of the above questions on Nano subreddit. Got banned.
>Multiple pending and coming lawsuits against Nano devs personally and Nano foundation. Ugly truths about the Nano team, Nano devs and Bitgrail will come out [12][7]. It could lead to bankruptcy and a total shut down of the project.
>Anyone investing in this documented shitcoin deserves to lose their money. Nano is Bitconnect 2.0

FOOTNOTES:
[1] https://www.reddit.com/r/nanocurrency/comments/982bq9/stress_test_beta_network_v15_results_in_here/
[2] https://www.reddit.com/r/nanocurrency/comments/98alqy/why_isnt_stress_test_result_published_as_5700_tps/
[3] https://www.accenture.com/no-en/success-visa-connected-commerce-car
[4] https://www.ccn.com/vitalik-buterin-ethereum-will-eventually-achieve-1-million-transactions-per-second/
[5] http://archive.is/iq9fP
[6] https://nano.org/en/whitepaper
[7] http://archive.is/lDoCW
[8] http://archive.fo/v2noA
[9] https://news.kucoin.com/en/nano-deposits-and-withdrawals-are-now-enabled/
[10] https://medium.com/nanocurrency/weekly-nano-update-9-17-18-834f3a493994
[11] https://www.reddit.com/r/BinanceExchange/comments/9flnx5/is_nano_deposit_broken_someone_also_having/
[12] http://archive.is/dOMVA
[13] https://www.reddit.com/r/nanotrade/comments/7vwl86/what_are_the_faults_of_nano/dtvpymd/

Insane nano guy always comes out at milestones.
This milestone is nano just beat BTC and ETH in transaction count.
https://blocktivity.info

>>16644204
[14] https://www.reddit.com/r/nanocurrency/comments/90wu2v/what_are_the_negative_things_with_nano/e2tskr8/
[15] https://www.nanode.co/account/xrb_1ipx847tk8o46pwxt5qjdbncjqcbwcc1rrmqnkztrfjy5k7z4imsrata9est
[16] https://www.quora.com/Is-the-NANO-crypto-coin-a-working-product-If-so-what-advantage-does-it-have-over-on-other-crypto-coins
[17] http://archive.is/e7oVV
[18] http://archive.is/GvyPd
[19] https://www.nanode.co/representatives
[20] https://www.reddit.com/r/nanocurrency/comments/92b1at/how_does_nanos_dpos_compare_to_other_dpos_such_as/
[21] https://www.reddit.com/r/nanocurrency/comments/8kt2ed/universal_block_canary_has_been_released/dzakb0a/
[22] >>11104923
[23] http://archive.is/DlNyk
[24] https://www.quora.com/What-are-crypto-currencies-you-are-bullish-on-for-the-next-bull-run/answer/Marius-Kramer
[25] https://www.quora.com/Which-is-the-best-crypto-currency-to-buy-in-September-2018/answer/Marius-Kramer
[26] https://www.quora.com/What-makes-a-bad-crypto-currency/answer/Marius-Kramer
[27] https://youtu.be/JS9tJgbFTUA?t=27m27s

>>16644205
All of Nanos activity is fake and non-commercial, made by Nano amateur scammers. Virtually all of BTC's and ETH's transactions are either commercial and due to wealth transfer.

>>16644205
Nano is a crashed coin with a broken system. The very basis for Nano network is that people will run the whole system for free, for all eternity, all the time, with no downtime, or the Nano network will crash. Can any of you nano "investors guarantee that? The integrity of your network is solely based upon people that will work for maybe thousands of hours for free and pay tens of millions in costs for nodes, bandwith for free, for all eternity? How insane, delusional and away from real life is that?

1. For a global currency with micro-payments, 100 000 TPS is the very bare minimum. What's Nano's current TPS? You claimed 7 000 TPS in DEC 2017. Pic. Is it not a little over 200 TPS?
2. What is the total costs of Nano network with 100 000 TPS (CPU, IO and bandwith) , that you believe people will do for free for no reason. How many tens of millions? You have no clue do you? Same with Nano Foundation. Zero cost analysis. How amateurish and pathetic is that?

>>16642820
Nano’s relationship with BitGrail, their main trading platform, was incestuous and dirty from the very beginning. However, after “Bomber”, CEO of BitGrail found out that his exchange had been hacked for 80% of their Nano assets in October 2017, close to 10% of total supply of Nano, the relationship between Nano devs and BitGrail became criminal.

BITGRAIL PROBLEMS KNOWN BY NANO DEV TEAM PRIOR TO BITGRAIL CRASH
>Insolvency of BitGrail and missing 10 million nano, discovered and made public by the Nano community [1][2]
>Missing transactions on BitGrail, discovered and made public by the Nano community [2][3]
>Single transactions replicated multiple times on BitGrail, discovered and made public by the Nano community [4][3][5][6].
>Millions of Nanos moving out from BitGrail, when the exchange was closed for withdrawals, discovered and made public by the Nano community [7].
>Withdrawals on BitGrail blocked for weeks due to alleged ‘maintenance’.
>Withdrawals on BitGrail blocked for weeks due to ‘KYC’ excuse [8] [9]. Hundreds of thousands remained unverified [10].
>Withdrawals on BitGrail blocked for weeks, due to alleged ‘pending withdrawals’, which were never processed [11].
>Nano withdrawals on BitGrail blocked for weeks due to node problems.
>Customer support ignores tickets - not just for days but for weeks [12]
>Bomber increasingly unhinged and psychotic. Insults his customers on social media for asking legitimate questions [12]. Nano community expressed concern to the Nano devs.

>>16644271

NANO DEVS ILLEGAL & UNETHICAL ACTIVITIES PRE-BITGRAIL CRASH (1 of 2)

>Accounts connected to Nano devs moving around millions of Nano, do arbitrage between exchanges. [13][7][14].
>Accounts connected to Nano devs moving around millions of Nano move assets to safety. Just one of these accounts handled 50million USD [13][7][14][15].
>Insider trading on BitGrail done via accounts connected to Nano Devs. Traded tens of millions of dollars [15].
>Nano dev team used incestuous relationship with Bomber to get instant KYC verification [16], impossible for standard Nano investors.
>Ordinary Nano investors accounts blocked from doing arbitrage, moving assets to safety or doing insider trading, unlike Nano dev team. Stuck with coming 80% loss [17].
>Zack Shapiro (Nano dev): Everything under control. Just too much work with KYC. Not insolvent. (statement made 4 days before BitGrail insolvent) [18].
>Zack Shapiro: No reason to worry, BitGrail doing normal KYC, “scams don’t do that” [19]
>Zack Shapiro: “Yes, you can [trust BitGrail]. I talk to Bomber every day and he’s a good guy. We’ll get it all sorted next week. Just hang in there” [20] [21]
>Zack Shapiro: Confirms BitGrail is a serious business. “Opposite of an exit scam actually” [22]
>Zack Shapiro: BitGrail is “Legitimate. Complying with the laws of their contry” [23]
>Zack Shapiro: “Funds are safe on Bitgrail…Again, funds are safe” [24][25]
>Mica Busch (Nano dev): ‘‘funds are safe, [BitGrails] representative account does not show any suspicious activity’’ [26]
>Nano: “Be assured that your funds are safe” [27][28]

>>16644281

NANO DEVS ILLEGAL & UNETHICAL ACTIVITIES PRE-BITGRAIL CRASH (2 of 2)

>Person who discovered and exposed 50million USD account being connected to Nano Dev team, got later banned from Nano subreddit [13].
>Nano community member who discovered/reported that nearly all nano on BitGrail was missing, was forced to delete initial post titled; ‘10 Million XRB Possibly Missing XRB From BitGrail’ [2] and repost under different headline ‘I need some help with tracing funds’ [1].
>Nano team systematically deleted threads of investors’ concerns and the sharing of new information regarding BitGrail [4].
>Nano dev team confirmed knowing about all BitGrail problems, told investors to relax, and promised a thorough investigation [29][30][28]. ‘Developers are taking care of that’ [31].

>>16644293

NANO DEVS ILLEGAL & UNETHICAL ACTIVITIES POST-BIGRAIL CRASH

>Nano Dev team claimed to do all they could to investigate and find missing Nano. No update since. Nothing done. [32]
>Nano community did all the work, themselves researching/investigating. [33][34][35] [32][41].
>BitGrail victim group representative, Espen Enger met with Nano lawyer Josh Kleiman in Italy [36]. Details of the deal made with the Nano team is not made known to the BitGrail victims.
>After meeting between Enger and Kleiman all criticism of Nano Dev team became banned on BitGrail victim discord [37].
>Change in BitGrail victim group management. Protection of Nano Dev team and suddenly non BitGrail victims used as hostile mods on BitGrail victim group discord [38].
>Don’t be surprised if Enger gets millions, and/or cushy job at Nano when all this is over. As a big thank you from the shady Nano team.
>Multiple pending and coming lawsuits against Nano foundation and Nano team members. Outside the original BitGrail victim group, now Discord BitGrail/WebCoin Lawsuit [39][40].

>>16644300

Footnotes to the above Nano -BitGrail Crash (and Nano dev team involvement) –1 of 2

[1] https://archive.is/8mMEU
[2] https://archive.is/LUN33
[3] https://archive.is/V30nG
[4] https://archive.is/pk03o
[5] https://prnt.sc/ilv1gl
[6] https://prnt.sc/ilv0p6
[7] https://archive.is/Wkgvn
[8] https://bitsonline.com/raiblocks-nano-bitgrail-epic-fail/
[9] https://archive.is/CKs1V
[10] https://imgur.com/a/rOn3Seb
[11] https://archive.is/RW944
[12] https://archive.is/DM6Nl
[13] https://archive.is/acLnr
[14] https://imgur.com/a/Owlui
[15] https://archive.is/pC3vC
[16] https://imgur.com/a/mJMhlx3
[17] http://archive.is/86eDr
[18] https://imgur.com/a/aFYpDyk
[19] https://imgur.com/a/KNg2src
[20] https://imgur.com/a/o8lIwDz

Oh shit I think insane nano guy is really threatened by nano succeeding.
Warning: none of these points are worth responding to, he will not change his opinion because it is not a real opinion.

>>16644309

Footnotes – part 2 of 2

[21] https://imgur.com/a/urpgzwv
[22] https://imgur.com/a/G7fgqWV
[23] https://imgur.com/a/4YcVEji
[24] https://imgur.com/a/IWP2thd
[25] https://imgur.com/a/rFV6BJy
[26] https://archive.is/bfd0Y
[27] https://imgur.com/a/ql0cjLP
[28] https://archive.is/dykfh
[29] https://i.imgur.com/ddzQlVw.jpg
[30] https://i.imgur.com/7xwM1Lx.jpg
[31] https://i.imgur.com/e8n7fWo.jpg
[32] https://archive.is/lTCkP
[33] https://archive.is/o1BmU
[34] https://archive.is/8Md3N
[35] https://archive.is/f4Q8E
[36] https://youtu.be/40aufi9oJno?t=10m16s [Embed] [Embed]
[37] https://imgur.com/a/gQmoQv0
[38] https://imgur.com/a/d8xG4QL
[39] https://archive.is/MbWv1
[40] Google: silvermillerlaw com 2018/04/2018-4-6-DE-1-CLASS-ACTION-COMPLAINT-1
[41] https://archive.is/0R8Qe

>>16644313
>t. rambling scammer and Nano idiot. Can't answer a single point. Also, pic related.

>>16644313
Colin and the rest of the sociopathic Nano core, kicked Bitgrail victims off their Nano reddit, and Nano community post Bitgrail is mostly people from Bitconnect community. Pic.

>>16642820
Nano Foundation admitted guilt. You will not see this on plebbit or hear it from the fraudulent Nano Foundation:

Brola’s lawsuit, filed in New York, was withdrawn last October after reaching a CONFIDENTIAL SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
with Nano, says Silver.
https://decrypt.co/6396/nano-cryptocurrency-seeks-dismissal-170-million-rescue-fork-lawsuit

Plus ongoing lawsuit where judged overruled Nano:
https://casetext.com/case/fabian-v-lemahieu

It's not worth discussing anything with this insane man.
NANO is bitcoin's mission, realized. It works reliably, now. P2P cash that is inflationless, permissionless and near instant.

The nano fudder is absolutely based. He provides references and proof, but nano retards continue to run away or make already debunked claims kek. And no, comparing it to bitcoin or litecoin will not benefit nano, it only makes you guys look more desperate. Nobody wants this centralized reddit DAG coin with no incentives to run a node and no brand awareness.

>>16644494
Oh look he got a new ip to complement himself.
Fucking weird man, go drink some eggnog and sign off for a while.

>>16644435
You Nano idiots are so predictable, comparing yourself to BTC. Bitcoin has earned its reputation due to enormous hashpower and proven track record for a long time resisting all kinds of attack. Nano has nothing of this. No one is buying BTC due to the great and cutting edge tech.

Worse, Nano was pushed by sociopathic devs, lying about 7000 TPS Dec 2017, pic, and Italian scammers at Bitgrail. Due to the incestuous relationship, devs and their friends got 15 million USD out of Bitgrail, as admitted on Nano discord, while normal retail investors were stuck and lost 170 million USD.

VISA is calibrated for 60 000 TPS due to peaks like emergency catastrophe, holidays like Christmas etc. What is Nano's real TPS now? 130 according to last spam test. Or 250 from last summers test? No way in hell can Nano have the tech to be a global micro-payment system. Even if you did, let's say you managed to have the minimum TPS for a global micro-payments system, 100 000 TPS, what would the enormous costs for bandwith, CPU and IO be? Have you crazy Nano fanatics or your scammer devs ever done the cost analysis? Remember that your whole crazy and dysfunctional business model is that all that costs and work must be done by volunteers fro free for all eternity with no downtime ever. Nano is a dead project with sociopathic and borderline criminal devs and a crazy cult-like fanbase. Worst in crypto.

Pic, Nano hodler getting ass-raped by sociopathic devs, Italian scammers and the market since Jan 2018, while screaming: "2 da MoOooOOOooOoooooOn!"

>>16644544
>Oh look he got a new ip to complement himself.
Nope. Pathetic nanoid. Pic related.

>>16644544
I'm not autistic enough, to post that many times in every nano thread. He looks like he is genuinely trying to save you and your money but you guys keep trying to deny his proof and references.

>>16644570
>comparing it to bitcoin
>>16644564
>comparing yourself to BTC.
Hahaha well thats telling.
He is doubly offended at comparing nano to btc.
It's a maxi scared of actual p2p cash.

>>16644589

>>16642820
Nano and Bitgrail leaders scammed over $100 million from Bitgrail

While both Nano and Bitgrail leaders told nano investors that Bitgrail was safe and not compromised, http://archive.is/dOMVA, they themselves took all their assets, over $100 million, and moved it as fast as hell away from Bitgrail, hiding their assets, while telling everyone that Bitgrail was OK and perfectly safe. This is why neither Nano dev team, nor Bitgrail, have done any kind of investigation who stole the money, where are stolen Nanos now, where are the thief. Firstly they just don't care, they are now rich, secondly there is too much criminal activity from both sides that none of them want to be investigated and exposed. They prefer darkness, secrecy and that all their crimes will just fade away. This will not happen. Multiple lawsuits are pending and coming. Nano tech is flawed and does not function under pressure, http://archive.is/Vva8Z, Nano is Bitconnect 2.0

>>16644606
Colin dumped millions of xrb in May from private wallets when there was Nano Binance Competition (100kk+ USD VOL.)
He chose a good moment for send to Binance. Who gives a dam about Nano and Bitgrail's victims who suffered a stolen.
Guess they had some special developer donation account before actual one which exists now.
I'll explain you so maybe you'll figure out.

Old developer donation account:
https://www.nanode.co/account/xrb_3wm37qz19zhei7nzscjcopbrbnnachs4p1gnwo5oroi3qonw6inwgoeuufdp

The first address that recieved a nano from Old Developer Donation was this:
https://www.nanode.co/account/xrb_3pg6xswkroybxydyzaxybb1h531sx34omiu7an9t9jy19f9mca7a36s7by5e
(Colin's account)

https://www.nanode.co/account/xrb_3pg6xswkroybxydyzaxybb1h531sx34omiu7an9t9jy19f9mca7a36s7by5e
(Colin's account connected to the old developer donation account)

2. https://www.nanode.co/account/xrb_11iaqa1oppdxzawrbuzh4m5y78i9zngnhwp8urpup97fsf7k8e84gf61ei75
(Colin's private wallet)

3. https://www.nanode.co/account/xrb_31kxdcjafw5k5w4u3h9uo7yctkawcjkegnwaqjr1jqq3tanu8bp6m4obru7a
(Colin's private wallet)

2. and 3. are connected to the 1.

https://www.nanode.co/block/BE548A457F28A42119FB22373303690DAB5F40811E4E87643A15267827D6C138
This is the first transaction when old developer donation account sent to this account back in 2016.

Picture is from 02.12.2017
https://i.imgur.com/KEwsZsY.jpg

>>16640322
imagine how much NANO whales are paying this pajeet to FUD
fucker hasn't slept in days spamming this board
probably trying to squeeze some volume for longs

>>16644589
He is trying to hide this.
>>16644603
>>16644343
More duplicate post types. It is the same guy.
I wonder if it's a miner or a paid state actor scared of inflationless money?

>>16642820
While retail investors were stuck for months to get verification before Bitgrail collapsed, friends of the devs had no such problem.

>>16644636
>I wonder if it's a miner or a paid state actor scared of inflationless money?
Yeah, you crazy Nanoids are not insane and delusional at all....

>>16644629
Why is it that you stupid Nano idiots never ever have anything of substance in your comments? Pic related

NANO is instant feeless and laser focused on p2p cash. It is relevant now.
Join us in spending and replacing. Once you use nano, you just don't go back to the 'fee market' whatever the fuck that was supposed to do.

>>16644684
why u so mad kid?
shorted the bottom?

>>16644687
>feeless
Only because amateur enthusiasts pay for it for now with zero load on the network. If you ever got any attraction and usage, the costs would be astronomical and amateur enthusiasts could no way in hell afford to run the network for free. Why not make Visa free then. Volunteers are paying for the network and doing all the work, and they will have no problem running whole Visa network for free, because they all have self interest in a free network, so even though no one forced them to pay for the network and do all the work, they would all do it due to their self interest. Right? How has that EVER worked in real life? How delusional and detached from reality are you crazy nano bois and findom pervert Colin? Did you learn nothing from the crash of communism? It does not work.

>>16644636
>>16644687
I'm not a bitcoin maxi, did you miss me saying litecoin to? Just admit you work for the foundation and scared shitless someone was autustic enough to dig that deep kek.

>>16644711
I have enough money to do whatever I want. I care about crypto space. Nano is a scam project.

>>16644719
>>16644716
Hi nice job simultaneously from both accounts.
You even almost changed the writing style.
Very convincing.
Also I will not respond to your ramblings.
Have a nice holiday.
Remember, anyone else reading, there are only 133 million nano and there will be no more created, ever. Cold store some, just in case the double posting copy paster is wrong.
You don't need a lot if nano succeeds.

>>16644711
hahaha what a joke
keep hustling pajeet
you look desperate

WEISS: NANO RATED AS UTTER SHITCOIN
D+
Pic related
>"When Developers Get In Over Their Heads"
>"But in actual practice, it has fallen short of expectations. And now Nano has effectively admitted defeat, retreating back to an approach that's same old, same old.
>What a far cry from the promise it once had!"

Desperate and hysterical Nano fanbois went crazy found a blog article that was identical with pic related, bombarded Weiss with so many nasty tweets that they had to make their Twitter account private, too stupid to understand that was the blogger that had plagiarized Weiss from an email sent to all paying Weiss customers approx one month before being published on their internet site. Not Weiss plagiarizing the blogger.

>>16644753
Kek can smell the fear from here you nano foundation fucks.

>>16644786
So why exactly are you fudding nano everyday?

>>16644799
It's very easy to sell Nano to normies with their feeless selling point, not telling normies that it is only "free" now due to Nanoids taking all the costs for the time being. Both business and tech is broken and will crash Nano, it could easily be very damaging for crypto space if a large numbers of normies got burned in the Nano scam. PLUS; I was appalled when I saw how Nano devs operated pre and post Bitgrail. I sincerely believe they are sociopaths. I read multiple genuine suicide posts. Community was there, willing to donate, but devs and Nano core did nothing. Couldn't care less. I get a bad taste in my mouth just thinking about it.

>>16644799
Plus Nano core community manager Mr. "Rock Me, Suck Me, Jesus" pisses me off.

How about "Rock Me, Suck Me, Muhammad" Colin and rockmsockmjesus, cowards?

>>16644786
since when has weiss any credibility in crypto?
their intern wrote a fud article about nano that got debunked long ago
but since you like weiss ratings, I'm assuming you hold EOS XRP and TRON, some of their favorite coins

>>16644799
>>16644907
Hahahhahaaha
> breathes
Hahahahahahah
Use nano and you will never go back.
Spend and replace, cold store and build.
We will win and I'd like for everyone reading to be there with successful businesses.

>>16644911
What are you talking about? Tron has rating C. EOS C- and XRP B-
https://weisscrypto.com/

>>16644935
I have and immediately recognized how eaasy it was for someone malicious to spam the network. Bought like 1 when it listed on binance to fuck around with the wallet to wallet. Sold it right after seeing how flawed it actually was and doubted it would catch up with the branding compared to pure currency coins like BTC, LTC, XMR and the others.

>>16644962
I didn't ask and don't care.
nano is p2p cash realized. You send 1 nano, your receiver gets 1 nano not 0.999999.
BTC is fundamentally broken.
Bitcoin POW is unnecessary
Build on nano and build the future.

>>16644992
You don't care because I just debunked nano's usefulness for the millionth time just like all the other anons before me on this centralized shitcoin.

>>16644935
Nano's claim in their whitepaper is absolutely rubbish. It's just as crazy as me stating that I will go the moon using my bicycle, proudly claiming that my speed is unlimited, only restricted by my muscle strength and I am getting stronger and stronger for each day and very soon I will be strong enough to get such a high speed that I will jump to the moon. Ridiculous. Do they have any written plan for 100 000 TPS? Any cost analysis? ETH and other competitors will roll out 100K to 1 million TPS in a matter of months/year.

Nano has done zero cost analysis for 100 000 TPS bandwith, CPU and IO. Random volunteers are supposed to take costs involving millions of USD each year, working on the network 24/ with no downtime, holidays, Christmas etc. Nano has done nothing to provide how it is feasible for Nano to reach 100 000 TPS within the next years. However, imagining it's possible, Nanoids admit that Amazon and large operators like them will take all the costs and burdens of operating the system. That's a clear and open single point of failure (SPOF) and is the very reason why people choose crypto currencies over banks and centralized payment systems. That Nano is not able to identify a clear and basic SPOF in their system is worrisome on multiple levels.

>>16644992
And I thought you weren't responding to ramblings and were leaving? Kek. >>16644753

Nano foundation cucks please.

>>16645009
>>16645012
It's ok, things like average time until punctuation, word choice and internal tempo are near impossible to change.
Keep practicing and you will get better at it.
Or maybe do something useful with your life instead.

>>16645047
>Or maybe do something useful with your life instead.
Like trying to shill a scam with flawed tech and being delusional about people posting on a filipino newspaper comics forum? HOLY KEK.

>>16644935
>Hahahhahaaha
> breathes
>Hahahahahahah
Name one successful global brand that is so stupid that they give the finger to 1-2 billion people. Not only Christians, but also Muslims will find Nano core community manager "Rock Me, Suck Me, Jesus" very offensive. But if you are sociopath, Colin, or stupid, you, then you do it. That's just another of the other hundreds of reasons why you amateur idiots never will succeed. Outside scamming naive and gullible Nano investors, for course. Nano is Bitconnect 2.0

Oh how the larper's larp. Yeah fucking right you bought or solved enough captchas to get 6 million of these. Just as bad as Link chinks who say they have a stack of 20,000.
>>16644992
Wether you like it or not, PoW is proof that something like electricity was used to generate computational power to solve problems and create new coins. Using energy is a natural process in the universe. Bitcoin is more green than traditional international bank transfers and uses less energy than all the cars commuting in the world on a daily basis.

Humans are here to fuck shit up. The Earth will still be around if all humans died. It moves on.

Here's a low risk plan for anyone looking for one: get a reasonable, small, amount of nano for each person you want protected from the possible future of a nano centric economy.
Don't spend a lot if you don't have a lot, but cold store and have the public address(es) at hand.
If nano begins to take off you can always get more.
Don't worry about price fluctuations and just go about your life.
We will work on your behalf to increase our own valuations (and yours).

>>16645100
Nano with its shit tech will never do 100K TPS, the necessary minimum for a global currency. But let's say you Nano scammers could pull it off. Your insane business model is based on volunteers taking all the costs and man-hours for all time. How much does it cost to run your Nano network with 100K tps? You have NO clude, do you? Same with scammers and amateur business team Nano. No one has done any kind of cost analysis ever. You are still living in delusional fantasy world. What does that tell you? Also, explain pic. Nano is a complete and utter clusterfuck. Only thing they succeeded in, is scamming you idiots for over 100 mill, at the bare minimum - could be much more.

>>16645100
>Don't worry about price fluctuations and just go about your life.
>We will work on your behalf to increase our own valuations (and yours).
Bitconnect 2.0

>>16640416
>>16640501
>>16640587

>>16645152
Oh this is a reminder that Chainlink is supposed to do one thing really well and that's take your money to fund Hamburger Boy's belly.

>>16644786
Oops, shitcoin Nano now crashed to rating E

Even this guy, Nano core dev, pic, thinks Nano is a shit coin and can never compete with BTC >>16640322

Are there any news about Bitgrail Hack and Colin divorce lawsuit?

DIDN'T READ
NEVER SELLING

Can't believe people are still talking about Nano even after Ferrum became a thing. I swear this space just survives on drama. Buncha truecels trying to get off on other people's suffering. Time to make it guys. Hope you caught yesterday's pump.

If you like child sacrifice, death and decay, having urine, semen and blood sprayed over you during sermons, then NANO is the coin for you. Just contact our senior community manager and satanist, Rock Me Suck Me Jesus, - not kidding.
http://archive.is/D72hB

>>16646737
Will becoming a satan worshiper get me a big tiddie goth gf?

>>16646844
She will be big, alright. Just to take deep breaths of air, every time you have the chance to and your head sticks out, when she is over you. Or you get a huge hairy Arab tranny that has a thing for assrape. Thing is you never really get what you want from Satan, always some twist. Just like buying Nano.

>>16646933
Ahhh fuck I knew it was too good to be true :(

>>16644570
Nano is shite but you better not make fun of the height of fashion anymore!