/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>16615090
>no dubs
pathetic

>>16615099
checked

>>16615100
checked

>>16615099
aye

>>16615099

triple digit BSV soon confirmed

>>16615145
checked ;)

>>16615099
>checked

Eh, but I'm buying, another 10 today, just like the day before, and day before that.

82 now, going to 92! Will probably just hit 100 before xmas and sit happy there.

>>16615824
How much to make it?

>>16615145
more like single digit

>>16615090
>he doesn’t have running water

>>16615829
I don't know... I originally had 50 but wanted to bump up to 100 to give myself more flexibility when I am DCA my way out over the years.

I want to be able to take profit at a 'safe' point while still having enough left over to shoot for the moon. I feel like 100 gives me enough stack to take profit at key points and still have a ton of potential.

>>16615865
I have 230 aiming for 250. But I was to cash out 100k $ by Hopefully only need to sell 50

>>16615898

The way I look at it there are 3 levels

couple hundred K - can retire a few years earlier
1-3 million - could technically retire now but wouldn't because of risk
5 million+ can easily retire with 0 risk

I want to have a stack big enough that I lock in positions when I hit each point, so I don't kick myself if price collapsed, while still enabling myself to realistically be able to hit those if it were ever in the cards to do so.

I have 10 for a suicide stack, that's all I'm buying

>>16615898
But obviously, it's risky. It could go to 0. And it's about finding that sweet spot of exposing the least amount of capital to the risk while still being able to achieve those goals.

>>16615944
I think it's only risky if you think Blockchain as a whole could fail.

I mean, it's the only chain that scales and that has unlimited possibilities, no competition

>>16615980
There is nothing in the world saying the best technology must win, or the good guys must win. It can easily fail for a variety of reasons.

I'm 100% behind the tech and vision, but there are a lot of variables out there that will determine it's success.

>>16616005
It's the only tech working lol.
Others don't scale

>>16615939
I respect that.

>>16616005
Hello, fellow high IQ friend.

>>16615099
This. Delete the thread op

>>16616161
That might be the case, but it doesn't guarantee anything. Don't be naive, that sort of thinking will lose you a lot of money.

>>16616005
No, in the end the best always wins if they hold NECESSARY patents. Wanting the best is a universal market force, the same market force that replaced Blockbuster with Netflix

>>16616237
And yet Coke continues to dominate Pepsi for decades despite it always winning blind taste tests. Shitty example but it was first that popped in my head, we actually talked about coke vs pepsi recently at work lol.

There are lots of variables, just look around you in general. Most popular car brands, not exactly top notch quality or engineering. Look at modern housing, against cheap and shitty corners are cut.

Yes Netflix beat out Blockbuster because the market chose it, but you don't know for a fact what the market is going to value more when it comes to BTC vs BSV, or if the market will even ever *HEAR* about BSV. It could continue to be suppressed into obscurity.

>>16616274
>Coke continues to dominate Pepsi for decades despite it always winning blind taste tests
What do you think people will like best of

Bitcoin - cheap and instant transactions
BTC - expensive and slow transactions

>>16616274
>you don't know for a fact what the market is going to value more when it comes to BTC vs BSV
True, I guess I'm more optimistic that the general population is smart enough to make the right choice. What will help is the price difference between BTC and BSV. Buying 0.01 BTC doesn't feel as desirable when you can get 1.0 BSV

>>16616293
I'm done arguing with you. I'm 10k into BSV, but it's only 3% of my portfolio. I am only telling you and others to also exercise smart investing strategies. If you want to go all-in and risk ruining your future, it's your money and your right. Have at it.

I think most people investing in BSV hold the same opinion as me, and are approaching it smartly and rationally. There are always going to be some people out there who want to risk it all to chase a get rich quick dream.

>>16616336
>I think most people investing in BSV hold the same opinion as me, and are approaching it smartly and rationally.
lol why are you even trying to make it look like I am not? BSV has the best tech hands down. And they are most effective in pursuing real businesses for real adoption. That's why I'm invested in it. Your concern trolling is just stupid

>>16615145
>0.00

where do you even buy bsv? if it's not on coinbase no one cares

>>16615090
Fucking not gonna make it

>>16616450
I've used buybsv but their fee really sucks. I've also used coinbase for ETH and then converted it with changehero.io Not idea, but I'm not interested in joining any exchanges so those were my only paths.

Burgers desperately need fiat onramps to BSV.

>>16615090
When BSV goes to zero, and it will go to zero, these threads will be the last pathetic remnants of one of the largest cons in history.