/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>16579459
have you been keeping up with your investment?
you do realize they sold funds at ATH prices right? please tell me you know this

>>16579459
We’re just stupid. But it’s okay cause Kek loves us.

>>16579459
Can you tell me what link has done or achieved to even be legitimately worth 2 USD per link?

>>16579459
I do, I believe in the product but I'm also worried they are selling way too much of their stacks. I'm not saying exit scamming, but being very irresponsible.

I know im being delusional but maybe they are going to take all the cash they got and do market buys on christmas to moonshot this....

>>16579459
I thought we would see $10 by now, now I realize we will be lucky to see $3 again.

It’s over

>>16579492
Fuck it

Chainlink Connections:

Swift + Chainlink (Page 11, SmartContract + Rise Technologies, SmartContract is who makes Chainlink):https://www.swift.com/sites/default/files/resources/swift_swiftatsibos_innovation_pioneering_inno_for_community_brochure.pdf

ISDA’s general interest in smart contracts: https://www.isda.org/2019/01/30/legal-guidelines-for-smart-derivatives-contracts-introduction/

ISDA + Openlaw (Attending an ISDA event on Nov 6th): https://www.isda.org/event/london/isda-technology-forum-2019-11-06/#anchor-agenda

Chainlink + Openlaw: https://twitter.com/openlawofficial/status/1177300013946417154?s=21

Chainlink + Google: https://cloud.google.com/blog/products/data-analytics/building-hybrid-blockchain-cloud-applications-with-ethereum-and-google-cloud

Chainlink + Intel: https://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/new-confidential-computing-solutions-emerge-on-the-hyperledger-avalon-trusted-compute

Chainlink + Oracle(Software company): https://blogs.oracle.com/startup/every-startup-in-the-blockchain-with-oracle-cloud-and-chainlink

Chainlink + Amazon (Skip to 1:01:30): https://pages.kaleido.io/webinar-ondemand-kaleido-on-aws-thankyou?submissionGuid=68a3dd47-631c-4ad9-acf0-d54c52e1dc7c

Notable content from Chainlink
Smart contracts: https://blog.chain.link/the-power-of-smart-contracts-what-they-are-and-how-they-can-revolutionize-the-future/

Oracles: https://blog.chain.link/oracles-the-key-to-unlocking-smart-contracts/

Derivatives: https://blog.chain.link/solving-deep-seeded-trust-problems-in-derivatives-using-chainlink-enabled-smart-contracts/

Bonus:

General Crypto + Business: https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/se/Documents/risk/DI_2019-global-blockchain-survey.pdf

>>16579505
>now I realize we will be lucky to see $3 again.
Man even that feels like a moonshot at this point . Seems the market has deemed link is barely worth $2

>>16579459
I did, and it cost me in the end. I still made way more than the fudders in these posts though.

>>16579519
those links are nothing but talk, do you have anything more substantial that actually shows value?

>>16579566
Lol

>>16579519
All those breadcrumb diggers were just anons trying to connect dots that never existed. That much is certain. None of them came true

>>16579566

You will just get autistic Fud replies. The fact of the matter is, literally NONE of the breadcrumbs have come true. Remember Assblaster and his open banking platform predictions? The reddit linktrader mod with the PSD2 pasta? I want to punch myself in the head now for believing that shit.

>>16579519
All of that is cool and all, but is anyone actually using chainlink right now? Are their any actual solid plans to even?

>>16579459
D E L U D E D
I
N
K
I
E

>>16579490
It's literally crashing

>>16579612
same here fren. ive been here since delta link days. i cant fucking believe that all these years and so far they produced a price checker. im not even fudding i am looking at what my own investment has accomplished. i wish i was wrong so much.

>>16579714

It’s a dilemma. Cash out now with an insane ROI anyway. Or hope Link is building some crazy shit behind the scenes and we are all proved wrong. Which is highly unlikely. They are only working with crypto projects right now which I don’t consider actual partners. So corporate interest has been ZERO so far.

I definitely thought $4-5 would be able to hold and we would be around $7 by now.

>>16579612
Early, not wrong.

>>16579673
literally staying at 2$

>>16579459
Might as well just sell it all now and start over :(

>>16579795
I think you should cash out now dear fren

>>16579813
Early is the same as wrong

>>16579459
I didn’t
Lurk moar

>>16579903
>Early is the same as wrong
how? whether it goes to $1k 2 years from now or 3 years from now, it doesn't matter.

>>16579903
Literally the opposite of this is true
>The sun will rise on 12/17/2019
>WRONG! Retard LMAO
This is how you sound

>>16579903
Being early is actually correct.

>>16579903
If you're pushing 80, maybe. To which I say: You had 60 years.

>>16579459

Can't wait to buy LINK for 30 cents again.

>>16579967
>>16579964
>>16579977
>>16580232
Soros predicted the dot com bubble and shorted. He was too early and lost money.

>>16579903
Only if you are unable to maintain your position.

Premined shittoken

>>16580442
I don’t think I could survive a dump below 1

I AM NEVER SELLING

>>16579620
Ampleforth is using it right now: https://twitter.com/chainlink/status/1204164045932257281
So is Synthetix: https://twitter.com/synthetix_io/status/1201646889021652992

Keep in mind, if you were paying attention this would have been easily predicted. And when I say “paying attention”, I mean vaguely.

This whole experience with link has really taught me how investing is so hard. You people are traumatized little minnows. At this stage, it’s obvious chainlink is going to be massive. You think that if link is down 30% that you’ll sell for that loss. You fear this because you know you’re weak. You know won’t make it. I’ve even shared a plethora of massive interests focused on smart contracts and chainlink and yet you still fret. Fuck.

>>16579459
i did fren. realistically $30 by next December is likely

>>16580825
He meant is anyone actually using Chainlink to do real business or commerce...not whether or not some school projects could pass useless information through it...

>>16581169
we say this every year lol

>>16579519
You take investment advice from blog posts by the company in which you're investing?

>>16580825
thats just another crypto company fag

>>16579459
>Who else honestly thought back in the beginning of the year LINK would be at least 20-30USD?


i did not, and im a very optimistic linkie with a decent stack that im never fucking selling.

however, i didn't expect it to go to 20-30. i was surprised when we hit 3 and $4 and didn't know if it was sustainable. i had been telling my brother to buy link for a year, then mainnet came out and he was wondering if he should get some on the pump to ~80 cents. and i told him "i don't know. i don't know if we're going to pump or dump after this." its so hard to predict crypto, my advice to him was to wait and see. then the google news and the coinbase listing came up and we mega fucking pumped and we shattered links previous ATH. so buying after mainnet was still technically "smart" even if it was at a price that was close to links all time high.

but this is crypto and this shit is hard to predict.

that being said, this is crypto and this shit is hard to predict. so link could announce something in the next few months that could make your dick explode.

i haven't even seen the price today but i do know the market has dumped a bit, i don't look at the price of link every day sometimes im literally waiting for a wider mega-dump in the market to buy a shit load more if possible. if you've been paying even a little bit of attention link is sort of de-coupled from bitcoin and eth. if they dump hard, link dumps hard too, then it pumps a bit for whatever reason. its trying its best to go up despite the market taking a shit on it.

this shit was never going to be a straight line up, you didn't think this would be easy did you Linkmarine? man up and enjoy the ride, its going to be fucking wild.

>>16579519
https://blog.chain.link/the-power-of-smart-contracts-what-they-are-and-how-they-can-revolutionize-the-future/

Even this is such a trash blog entry "Smart contracts will definitely help insurance....uh...because of IoT devices! These will definitely make Insurance work way more efficiently!"

This blog entry was written by a college moron that knows nothing about the insurance industry. I'd bet money on it.

>>16581231
>if they dump hard, link dumps hard too, then it pumps a bit for whatever reason. its trying its best to go up despite the market taking a shit on it.
yup. it's a very interesting pattern

>>16581273
>everything around him slowly gets more and more connected to the internet as the years go on

"fuckin' internet of things lol whats that all about."

IoT is the backbone of the fourth industrial revolution. literally everything will be online someday. theoretically the paint on your wall will be connected to the internet someday. it's going to be complete insanity. bringing everything online will probably give everyone brain tumors so we better cure cancer at the same rate that we're bringing on this technological revolution but if you're laughing at IoT devices triggering insurance payouts then you're not researching the future enough. that's totally reasonable tech that more than likely will happen at this rate.

>>16581329
Yea, you can shill this nonsense all you want...but people connecting their lights and coffee maker to Alexa has nothing to do with Smart Contracts dumbass. Smart Contracts aren’t nearly as useful or revolutionary as people try to make them out to be.

>>16581231
based. we ride together brother

>>16581231
>man up and enjoy the ride, its going to be fucking wild.
I’m so excited for you all

>>16581329
If Smart Contracts WERE useful...you’d be seeing development of interesting and important projects. But what do you see? Gravel Coin and LinkPal. WOW! How revolutionary!

>>16581376
was literally bout to post the same kek

>>16581202
It's literally up 1000% from last december

>>16579459
LINK will become $20-$30 but because BTC will be $200,000 at the time. Basically the entire alts market will be worth a lot just because it's using BTC as the base currency to value all the shitcoins with

>>16579522
Ya either that or BTC dropped 50% since LINK hit ATH and it went down with it like every other alt. It has remained in the 15-17 range on CMC the entire time.

how many hours

>>16581344
>completely misses the point of the post
>calls others dumbass
If you don’t understand the value of smart contracts why are you on a crypto board? Go buy stock in Beyond Meat with the rest of the sóyboys.

>>16581390

You realize if gravel is able to be profitably tokenized and the industry is disrupted by gravelcoin, literally every commodity from aluminum to uranium will be disrupted by Chainlink, meaning more link tokens taken out of circulation right?

NEW LOW NEW LOW NEW LOW NEW LOW NEW LOW NEW LOW NEW LOW NEW LOW NEW LOW NEW LOW NEW LOW NEW LOW NEW LOW NEW LOW NEW LOW NEW LOW NEW LOW NEW LOW NEW LOW NEW LOW NEW LOW NEW LOW NEW LOW NEW LOW NEW LOW NEW LOW NEW LOW NEW LOW NEW LOW NEW LOW NEW LOW NEW LOW NEW LOW NEW LOW NEW LOW NEW LOW NEW LOW NEW LOW NEW LOW NEW LOW NEW LOW NEW LOW NEW LOW NEW LOW NEW LOW NEW LOW NEW LOW NEW LOW NEW LOW NEW LOW NEW LOW NEW LOW NEW LOW NEW LOW NEW LOW NEW LOW NEW LOW NEW LOW NEW LOW NEW LOW NEW LOW NEW LOW NEW LOW NEW LOW NEW LOW NEW LOW NEW LOW NEW LOW NEW LOW NEW LOW NEW LOW NEW LOW NEW LOW NEW LOW NEW LOW NEW LOW NEW LOW NEW LOW NEW LOW NEW LOW NEW LOW NEW LOW NEW LOW NEW LOW NEW LOW NEW LOW NEW LOW NEW LOW NEW LOW NEW LOW NEW LOW NEW LOW NEW LOW NEW LOW NEW LOW NEW LOW NEW LOW NEW LOW NEW LOW NEW LOW NEW LOW NEW LOW NEW LOW NEW LOW NEW LOW NEW LOW NEW LOW NEW LOW NEW LOW NEW LOW NEW LOW NEW LOW NEW LOW NEW LOW NEW LOW NEW LOW NEW LOW NEW LOW NEW LOW NEW LOW NEW LOW NEW LOW NEW LOW NEW LOW NEW LOW NEW LOW NEW LOW NEW LOW NEW LOW NEW LOW NEW LOW NEW LOW NEW LOW NEW LOW NEW LOW NEW LOW NEW LOW NEW LOW NEW LOW NEW LOW NEW LOW NEW LOW NEW LOW NEW LOW NEW LOW NEW LOW NEW LOW NEW LOW NEW LOW NEW LOW NEW LOW NEW LOW NEW LOW NEW LOW NEW LOW NEW LOW NEW LOW NEW LOW NEW LOW NEW LOW NEW LOW NEW LOW NEW LOW NEW LOW NEW LOW NEW LOW NEW LOW NEW LOW NEW LOW NEW LOW NEW LOW NEW LOW NEW LOW NEW LOW NEW LOW NEW LOW NEW LOW NEW LOW NEW LOW NEW LOW NEW LOW NEW LOW