/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>16575972
Twinky men are hawt

go back to /pol/
we deal with shitcoins here, not some gender pay gap bs

>>16575972
I like this

>>16575992
this. Cool incel theory tho

>>16575992
It is about business&finance and i do not expect real arguments from pol. You are also not contributing. I am honestly curious about things that i might have overlooked. I am still waiting.

>>16576031
Your argument is sexist, op.
B/c it does not favour women.

>>16575972
The better solution is force feeding women an additional 500 calories per day

>>16576031
The answer, incel, is related to all the feminine products that they take and use (and are necessary, not just cosmetic), which add up to way more than the cost of 500 calories. Now please return to /pol/.

>>16575972
i guess women spend 2,5% more on makeup so it evens out. not that makeup should matter but this fucked society is what it is

>>16576102
>incel
Whatever makes you feel good. Could you name these products? I am unable to think of anything besides tampons, while men also have certain "must have" products, such as razors(at least to trim) in the majority of working related situations.
Its really funny since you name those female products as a "common sense" fact but simultaneously try to banish me to pol as soon as i try to use the same argument the other way around.

Yeah I hear you op but the calorie intake is recommended
Even though in practice men would just naturally eat more than women anyway but I guess they would argue that its recommended calorie intake

>>16576133
Adding to that: make up is choice, while caloric intake is not.

>>16576147
>he thinks women don't buy a shit ton of razors too
Incel confirmed

>>16575972
>2000 calories
Where I work woman are constantly snacking claiming they haven't eaten all day then ordering a huge meal.

>>16576168
My gf is just not a monkey, that's all. Moreover as i said those things are a choice while caloric intake is not.

>>16575972
I like the premise if this argument
>>16576168
Make an actual argument you white knight

>>16576102
>mascara
>lipstick
>shampoo
>toothpaste
>sunscreen
>hair dye
>eye liner
>fake nails
>piercing
>tattoo
>earrings
>rings
>bracelet
>wristwatch
>necklace
>...

Sustainable shit.

Not to mention
>Prozac
>Aspirin

and the little fact that the smaller the clothes, the more costly.

We should get the rope for being so stupid and let women be our enemies weapon of choice to destroy us all.

>>16576133
Quite recently the tax on "women's hygienic articles" like tampons was reduced because "all women need them" and they shouldn't have to be punished financially for bleeding out of their cunts.

>>16576213
Oh I forgot, that was in Germany

>>16575972
Interesting argument. But where do you draw the line?

>Men are more likely to die at the workplace
>Men are more likely to get depression due to work..
>Suicide rate
....
....
You get the point

Either OP pic man is a les or a manlet or - more likely - the woman is a tranny or fatfuck or both.
Subliminal.

>>16576168
>cant buy razors on amazon and be done with it
>defending make up purchases as mandatory
You're the biggest retard here. Post a picture of your slimy fat balding face and kill yourself.

>>16576242
Yes i get that but my argument is based on the hardest (in my opinion) fact, namely caloric intake. You just can't eat less than your body is burning in the long run without cannibalizing yourself. And telling men to fill up the 25% with cheap stuff like sugar would be discriminating(i mean that non ironic)since it would be a hazard for the health while women do not have to constrain their intake. I have to repeat myself now: I am clearly focusing on calories because it is undeniable that it costs more for men as they have no choice.
Pregnant women should also get some extra money for their nutrition in my opinion.

what a racist thread

>>16576276
Men and women are neither a race lmao

>>16576245
>implying women can get a job without makeup
You would criticize any woman without makeup as ugly, weird, and unprofessional, guaranteed

>>16576088
based and checked

>>16576302
>You would criticize any woman without makeup as ugly, weird, and unprofessional, guaranteed
No, i wouldn't.
Would the average man be healthy while eating 2000kcal for the rest of his life?

>>16576298
>he doesn't know

>>16576302
>You would criticize any woman without makeup as ugly, weird, and unprofessional, guaranteed

I wouldn't, but other women would.

>>16576385
you would avoid her with some shitty rationalization attached

>>16576345
No

>>16575972
You are mistaken because a calorie doesn't have a fixed price., it depends on the type and brand of food you're buying. In fact, many high-calorie foods are cheap, and many low-calorie foods are expensive.

There's no causality between needing to eat more and spending more.

>>16576423
Meant for
>>16576406

>>16575972
LOL SO FUNNY! YA! Fuck bitches and the libs!

>>16576427
I covered that in this post
>>16576273
You are suggesting that men should fill their lives with cheaper food or less eating out and so on. So they have to sacrifice a part of their food life quality because they were born male

>>16576453
just because food is cheaper doesn't mean it's bad or less nutritious. in fact, some of the most nutritious foods are extremely cheap because they're easy to produce.

>>16576478
Doesn't matter if cheap, expensive or in between. For the sake of his argument, men have to pay more. MORE is the relevant one.

>>16576539
You can't bitch at nature. Men complaining about having to buy more food is like black people complaining about failing as a society.

>>16576539
>For the sake of his argument, men have to pay more.
But they don't have to.

>>16576594
They either have to pax more for 25% increase in quantity or conpromise their choice of food items (choose items that they would not choose if they had no need to compromise) in any case their choice would differ from the female choice if they would want to spwnd the same amount of money.

>>16575972
Thanks anon, my wife is going to hate me spouting this. You're contributing to the destruction of my marriage.

>>16575972
I once read some feminist cuck seriously argue that women only grow up smaller and weaker than men because they're systematically fed less.

>>16576787
nice. what was his pseudo-intellectual rationalisation for the fat ones?

>>16575972
-500 calories per day to both groups, unless they're exercising regularly. I hate fat fucking faggots, and if you are one, stop fucking eating non-stop or please die already. Nobody likes you, you smell like shit, you are a waste of resources, and you are an eyesore. It is in your control to change it, you just have to stop being a hopeless homo.

>>16576859
You are absolutely right. Manlets like you should earn less, since you consume less food. Manlet Tax.

>>16576102
femanon detected

>>16575972
Is this real? I thought most women in the US are overweight, like 66%+. Wouldnt they be consuming more than recommended to maintain their overweight status?

>>16577136
Yes, which means they are an intentional drag on our system and a moral hazard.

>>16575992
SEETHE
>>16576000
SEETHE
>>16576102
SEETHE
>>16576168
SEETHE
>>16576449
SEETHE