/biz/ - Business & Finance

You know in the 1500s protestants bitched about catholic priests living extravagantly. Turns out, it didn't matter at all.

Stay poor and mad.

>>16507644
t. champagne socialist

The hilarious part is leftists are too stupid and obdurate to admit its a bad thing, are willing to throw all their economic equality arguments under the bus just for muh 16 year old autist. Talk about bad priorities lol

>>16507646
Look, pointing out hypocrisy is good ingroup signaling but it's never won over any converts. You need to put some thought into how the progressive religion would actually be undermined.

>>16507649
they don't care as long as they can get rid of white people and capitalism, everything else is window dressing

>>16507655
Im not trying to convert, Im trying to ridicule and its working. You do know radical rhetoric is transferable right. Oops.

>>16507655
>how the progressive religion would actually be undermined.

Consider this being held to your own standards.

>>16507671
4chan is a board of peace mister special agent :^)

Give me one credible source climate change is false? inb4 "the jews"

>>16507678
Oh yes of course, Tarrant was an emissary of peace.

>>16507684
Now why would I do that when I can blame you for refusing to address the problem. Chinks, beaners, Africans, south Asians. If you dont attack them, youre dishonest and insincerely only going after white people. Canada needs climate change? Youre a shill. Hows that.

>>16507671
Damn the glowniggers really worked themselves to the bone crafting that image

>>16507689
>>16507684
India has rivers of trash, solid trash flowing out to sea. China dumps the industrial waste we put in tailings ponds - into the rivers and lakes. Any climate cunt who doesnt attack China first is a liar and using it as an excuse to undermine capitalism, which Id add I dont support.

>>16507689
wtf are you even talking about brainlet?

>>16507691
Youre the fed. Its called badjacketing what youre doing. Feds were caught in court case records shilling on 8ch and they discouraged copy cats, suggesting it was "not even the Mossad, but Putin" who makes people kill their local drug dealer and post a video online. Feds discourage crime, thats their job, unless its on telegram, which mimics a closed room scenario where a plan is organized. The last thing feds want is uncontrolled people going off and doing random acts of uncontrolled violence. Did I ask you if you wanted to do something illegal? No? Youre the fed.

>>16507699
Are you color blind? 95% of world pollution is by non-white countries, non-white countries you leftist fake environmentalists give a free pass because youre exclusively focused on damaging white countries economies, not stopping environmental damage.

>>16507699
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s2WdPTF1FA0&feature=youtu.be
Climate cunts btfo

>>16507708
Nah in most cases they're just selfish retards. They only care about pollution if it's in their backyard. Dumping their problems on the Chinese and Indians so they don't have to inhale the noxious fumes.

You want to go to china and force them to lower the economic success, be my guest. Saudi Arabia, Guatemala, India, sub-Saharran Africa and Mexico. Go shut their factories down in the name of the environment, 100% okay with me. America and Europe are clean though, no one can justify activism there.

UNLESS its to stop pic related, immigrant pollution, which is a real thing hurting our countries. Borders are the solution. And guns, shoot on sight policies for illegal alien invaders.

Just cement a watermelon to the ceiling if you're black and sell the dilapidated house for a 100M anon.
(((Art))) is quite a thing nowadays. Davinci wouldn't've thought.

We need to generate enormous amounts of energy from Nuclear, then we can stop importing Dinosaur juice from these shitholes. Then we need to get everyone driving electric cars.
With excess energy we can make it affordable to use indoor farming on a large scale and produce enough varied foodstuffs to make imports unnecessary. We reduce the numbers of immigrants and focus more on robotics instead for menial labour.
So by doing that you solve most of the environmental issues, food and problems with immigration. That's how it should be done. Its humane and it fixes these issues globally as the technology is adopted. Gen IV nuclear has the potential to produce huge amounts of electricity with low waste (only lasts 300 years as opposed to 10000), but no, because of these stupid fucking handwringers would moan about muh waste and muh safety and using robots to replace cheap labour would be against some made up human rights. Let's just build solar panels in fucking Finland lmao

>>16507649
Leftists have 0 moral continuity anon, their entire belief system is rooted in jealousy and low self esteem.

>>16507635
What makes you think she's spent that much on a chair?

>>16508005
Labels like left and right cover a very broad range of positions, so it's hardly surprising you don't see moral continuity. But leftists are far more likely t be motivated by altruism than jealousy or low self esteem.

>>16508059
cope

>>16507635
>not investing in a bug eating chair
ngmi

>>16508063
What part of my post are you referring to?

>>16507635
cope

>>16508059
>altruism
>leftists
Leftists want the state to be altruist with ressources of others.

>>16508088
The altruism cope. Leftists jump on chances to the the side of publicly perceived victims due to a desire for virtue signalling as well as a skewed sense of empathy which comes from their low self esteem, having been victims themselves all their lives.

>>16508005
That's why a 16 year old rich girl lobbies against wealth, right? As if this wouldn't be a sign of moral continuity, that even a rich girl would be against her own wealth. Of course there should be no logical continuity to be expected from threads like this one here.

>>16508133
>"lobbies" against wealth while living in luxury herself

I don't understand how the left thinks Greta cannot be criticised.

She chooses to put herself on a stage
She chooses to be an activist
She chooses to speak at the UN and take on political figures
She chooses all of this
If you choose to do all of this, you choose to accept criticism.
>bu-but Nick Sandmann le smirk boi
Nick didn't choose to be confronted by some old guy with a drum while on a field trip, he didn't choose to be filmed for eight seconds with some awkward smirk on his face, he didn't choose to have his face plastered on the news like he was some Hitler Youth.

>>16508133
If you asked her or her parents if they're rich 100% they would tell you "no" despite buying furnitures the price of a small car. That's the level of dissonance we're dealing with here.

Leftists equate thinking and crying with actually doing something, that's why they are much less generous than conservatives:
>https://www.nytimes.com/2008/12/21/opinion/21kristof.html?em

Most of this energy spent trying to look like a "good person" is an attempt to cope with the fact they are garbage people inside.
I've never met more hypocritical scum than leftcucks.

>>16507635
why the FUCK does that image need 2 titles that says the same thing?
privileged greta is annoying but whoever made that image is 10 times worse.

>>16507635
I never got the whole Greta thing.
She's a fucking kid!
I don't understand, how are you caring what she has to say at all?
Was this when leftism jumped the shark.

>>16508501
clearly she has no idea what she is saying and her parents are writing her scripts for her. i mean she even has some mental illness, that's clear just from looking at her. when talking about a "stolen childhood" it's her parents that have stolen her childhood from her.

also when talking about being privileged how much more privileged can you get than being a white girl from a rich country, rich family, traveling across multiple countries and preaching directly to high-up politicians and world leaders? plus they built her a god damn boat to traverse the ocean, the construction of which created way more negative impact on the environment than just buying a plane ticket and flying with 100 other people would have

>>16508133
>>16508143
When did she EVER lobby against wealth?
Or are you too dumb to comprehend that wealth and CO2 emissions are very different things?

>>16508101
As the state is most able to help people, leftists want it to do so. Not with the resources of others, but with the resources of the state (which were formerly the resources of everyone including themselves). Everyone gains and nearly everyone contributes.

>>16508120
It's the rightists who play the virtue signalling card. And if they've been victims all their lives, a sense of empathy is hardly skewed if it wants to prevent a recurrence of that situation. It's the rightists, who are happy to see people being victims all their lives (and in some cases, to make people victims all their lives) whose sense of empathy is skewed. And your ridiculous drivel about low self esteem shows your sense of empathy is very skew indeed.

>>16509009
>having morals
>wanting to *actually* conserve them
>wanting to maintain your genetic identity and heritage
>having high standards for acceptable human behavior
is this virtue signaling? lmfao

>>16509009
>Not with the resources of others, but with the resources of the state (which were formerly the resources of everyone including themselves).
Slimy sophist

>nearly everyone contributes
Kek, yeah white men pay for everyone else you fucking commie

>It's the rightists, who are happy to see people being victims all their lives (and in some cases, to make people victims all their lives) whose sense of empathy is skewed. And your ridiculous drivel about low self esteem shows your sense of empathy is very skew indeed.

But conservatives are more generous again, they are far better people than leftist scum because they actually act instead being holier than thou psychos
>https://www.nytimes.com/2008/12/21/opinion/21kristof.html?em

>Conservatives also appear to be more generous than liberals in nonfinancial ways. People in red states are considerably more likely to volunteer for good causes, and conservatives give blood more often. If liberals and moderates gave blood as often as conservatives, Mr. Brooks said, the American blood supply would increase by 45 percent.

You're an awful human being anon, a predatory sociopath hiding behind morality to fuel your jealousy and compensate for your low self esteem, you're scum in short

>>16509119
People on both the left and right have morals. But having a moral code for show and not really living by it is a form of virtue signalling that's very common on the right.

If you mean what I think you mean about genetic identity and heritage, that's classified in Europe as lunatic fringe rather than right.

>>16508899
Don't be daft. No chair without an ICE costs that much.

>>16507685
he was a fucking glow

>>16509466
>cut your dick n balls off
>cut your tits off
>have no kids but demand influence over posterity
>pornography
>multiple partners
>sexualizing children
>legislating access to hrt for children

Fuck off faggot, you do not speak for all of Europe - the identitarian wave is coming

>>16507684
I don't care if it's true or false. I don't live inland though, so if it's true I won't have to hear as many retarded coastal dwellers bitching about it after they are swallowed by the sea.

>>16509408
>Slimy sophist
What, for summarising an argument you fail to understand?

>| nearly everyone contributes
>Kek, yeah white men pay for everyone else you fucking commie
I was not referring to the current system in the USA, which I know has a lot wrong with it. I was referring to the system in first world countries where nearly everyone contributes and everyone benefits.

The USA does have a great tradition of philanthropy that other countries would do well to emulate. But it rarely provides help in a form that enables many people to improve their quality of life.

>But conservatives are more generous again, they are far better people than leftist scum because they actually act instead being holier than thou psychos
You imply all the "holier than thou" psychos are on the left; that's a pretty strong delusion!

Can I ask you if the figures in that article include the amount given to those organisations that campaign to make the rich richer?

Who do you think I'm jealous of, and why?
What makes you think I've got low self esteem, and why do you think that's important?

>>16509517
I think your post may be misdirected. If not, what did you think I said that was daft? And why didn't you answer my questions?

>>16509605
Here you seemed to be railing against what you wrongly imagine my position to be on an issue irrelevant to this discussion.
But then I realised the reason for that: in the post I was replying to, you didn't mean what I thought you meant about genetic identity and heritage. I thought you meant something to do with race.

>>16507826
Nuclear is a meme unless we can bury the waste in 3rd world shitholes because as it stands now they bury that shit like 100 miles from my house.