/biz/ - Business & Finance

>buying a token which is in a legal battle with its own token reserve holders for control

biggest brainlet move in history

>>16381319
OOOOHH LLLINKKIIEESSS!

>>16381325
anything PoS is the same as investing the masternode scams. you deserve to lose your money, just buy btc if you can afford some if you can't buy ltc band sell it for btc later. god fucking dammit you retards get my blood boiling.

>>16381319
more than ever
>CFO from PWC
>1st protocol adopted by a government branch

>>16381325
>>16381339
you're thinking of this as if we were in the early days of crypto
we're in the adoption phase, specs aren't the whole story (as for the lawsuits, come on, name on firm that doesn't have a legal department, lawsuits are the bread and butter of corporate moves, in or out of crypto)

Windows isn't the OS
Starbucks doesn't have the best coffee
Bitcoin isn't the most technologically advanced crypto

Once a market reaches a certain maturity, arrives a new class of decider that don't understand the product. They rely on name recognition, network, etc.. basically big scale brainlet strategy.
The CFO brought this with his PwC pedigree
The first adoption by C3N is the name recognition future public deciders will rely on

Tesos is on the ramp, not because it's technologically superior, but because it's better connected to incompetent high-profile deciders.
>pic related

>>16381532

two months after this hire is officialized
>pic related
do you think these two events are unrelated.
how long does a government branch test something before making it official? they were testing different block chain protocols, with a strong bias toward projects that could be broadcasted as "french tech", and once they had narrowed down their choice, they needed a name with brand recognition (PwC) to push it forward with the final deciders, which couldn't explain blockhain if their life depended on it

tl;dr: crypto is too mature of a for technical specs to be the only decision factor

>>16381559
* too mature of a market

forgot pic

>>16381532
>>16381559
>>16381563
enjoy the wipeout once the lawsuit is settled

>>16381568
the last big move was the compromise ruling at the start of summer
the two events I'm talking about happened since. Do you think a government branch ignored an ongoing litigation?
as of now, the only scenario is the SEC getting directly involved, with potential diplomatic repercussions, as Tezos is now provider for a branch of the french government
Possible but unlikely, I'm calling a dead-end on the law suit, the disclosure request was the last chance, and it's gone

>>16381631
>the French government will save us!!!

>On one hand it's already an 800m Mcap
>On the other hand, it's just about 2.5x the ICO price and has minimal, but potentially expanding, govt adoption from a major EU nation
Never really started hearing about this until recently, how high could it really go though?