/biz/ - Business & Finance

hhm if it really is the only one who solved interoperability this is huge.

the other proposed solutions all require another blockchain on top. this is not viable as it has to be really fast with a consensus everyone wants. that wont happen imo. best case for those projects is that it will connect a few blockchains.

but Overledger sounds promising. So you have an interface that works for all blockchains. thats amazing really.

I also noticed that QuantX is coming up. Would be really interesting to see how enterprises are thinking about it.
if they all love it, it may very well shoot for top 3 position.

Quant is potentially useful as a sandbox, especially in the early days on blockchains, but other than that you either want the security of blockchain interop or would use chainlink to pass messages between systems.

>>16353572

SCAM SCAM SCAM

>>16353645
Chainlink can act as a front-end data loader for Quant’s operating system, which allows it to easily connect with data inputs to trigger cross-chain smart contracts. Quant also has the option of using Chainlink on the backend to connect with off-chain payments and systems for contract settlement.

>>16353658
Yeah it can if the user uses Quant, but Quant is competing in a market with many potential solutions.

>>16353650
https://www.sia.eu/en/media-events/news-press-releases/sia-partners-with-quant-network-to-explore-innovative-solutions-in-blockchain-interoperability-for-banks-and-financial

570 banks, can't you read?

>>16353671
That's true but pretty much all don't scale well.
Overledger requires no consensus on top.

>>16353650
Pajeet-tier graphic, probably made by a ripple cuck

Ripple's ILP is limited to Atomic Swaps, works fine in the Ripple use case, as they are about providing global bridge asset etc.
Overledger provides global interoperability, extending to smart contracts and legacy networks through the likes of oracles etc. The scope of Overledger is much greater than ILP.
More over, you can't develop on ILP, it is just used for bridging digital assets. With Overledger, the Mapps run across any DLT the developers wish, being able to plug and play into them all at once, or which ever one suits their needs at that point in time. This provides an unfathomable advantage, removing any risks of on-boarding to DLT and eliminates the potential for a single vendor lock in of new DLT. This provides future proofing.

Quant is THE interoperability solution.

This is a low point for the despicable Sats Gang. I can't believe you would ruin these anons like this.

Are Quant and Chainlink working together with a CoinMetro related sandbox or something as well as their partnership? Keep hearing about them and on another note the exchange looks good. I tried the demo version so far

>>16353572
Quant will be big in the future, I guarantee it. Legit just look at the CEO's past work experiences and connections. The tech is needed to be able to communicate easily between Blockchains and Legacy systems. Anyone with an IQ over 110 who researches Quant will understand how huge it will be. They will also FUD the board and call it a SCAM - because they want no attention to it yet to buy it cheap for months

>>16353973
Based and truthpilled

MuH ScAm

>>16353572
Interesting.

>>16353696
Blockchain protocols don't scale too well but they do bring higher security which is important. There are also many ways of using off-chain protocols to offset on-chain problems and then just settle on-chain.

Great pump

It's over now though

I have tickets to QuantX, Will be updating you boys as we go along.

>>16354051
hashing

overledger is patented right? can someone link me ?

>>16354136
yep patented, and very much white labeled.
every enterprise talking about having interop is whitelabeling overledger

>>16354155
true. the universal utillity token approach is flawless imo. no third blockchain to connect two other blockchains. finally someone got it right

All in, the next link.

I am in quant but what the fuck are all these pajeet low iq posts?

>>16355323
care to explain?

on a side note, notice how "scam" is no longer spammed and qnt is pumping good right now.

>>16355440
Stop with the shilling. I didn't buy yet. Can only buy 800 at this point. Will that be enough?

>>16353572
fuck off OP dont shill this scam faggot

>>16355536
Holy shit stop, you've had months to accumulate, it's time to actually start discussing the project

>>16355496

800 isn't terrible, you will make it to 6 figs very comfortably with that. In a bull run, sky's the limit for this sort of thing.

If you can get more, do so. Take out loans.

>>16355643
Can a college student with no job get a loan?

>>16353572
qnt is a chainlink start up.