[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance

View post   
File: 94 KB, 980x484, Xrouter.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16348582 No.16348582 [Reply] [Original]

When comparing Blocknet's Xrouter to Chainlinks Oracles an interesting thing caught my attention:

>The XRouter can serve billions of requests per day like Infura (who is doing over 20 billion/day). If each call averages out to about 0.001 BLOCK/call, then that's about $1,000,000 going to the active service nodes. If 100 is running it equals to $10,000/day per service node that the XRouter pulls in based off a tiny 0.001 BLOCK call at $0.70.

LINK charges 0.1 LINK/call which is 0.23 cents, which is quite expensive compared to Blocknet's Xrouter


I'm not saying LINK is a trash project, but it sure seems hyped up when you've got a project doing the exact same thing in a far more decentralized fashion with a 1/200 of the marketcap, while having the first working DEX running at the same time.

For the brainlets who doesn't understand the bigger picture, read this: https://blocknet.co/xrouter-missing-link-between-all-blockchains/

>TLDR: Blocknet's Xrouter is WAY cheaper to use for Oracle based services, and is a far more decentralized setup.

>> No.16348661

>>16348582
18 decimals

>> No.16348691

>>16348582

I thought link was primarily used as collateral in order to establish trusworthyness of oracle machines as a staking mechanism? Plus, isn't LINK already ahead of the curve in terms of establishing itself as a member of Intel's trusted computational framework / SGX?

>> No.16348726

>>16348582
As Sergey has said a bunch of times, the market will set the price

>> No.16348966

How is it decentralized? It seems centralized to me. Given that chainlink is also currently centralized, the goal is for it to become decentralized.

>> No.16349506

>>16348582
>LINK charges 0.1 LINK/call which is 0.23 cents
This is false information, LINK doesn't charge anything. Idiot

>> No.16350853

>>16348582
>a project doing the exact same thing
>xrouter-missing-link-between-all-blockchains

But Link doesn't link blockchains to eachother, it links them to the real world.

>> No.16350887
File: 117 KB, 823x1024, 1574317082110m.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16350887

>>16350853
Why did you bump this dumb nigger shill thread trying to steal interest from link? CL works between chains (interoperability), so much so that garbage projects like quant are literally rebranding a "who cares" functionality of link and making it their entire usecase.

An on chain SC is programmed to send an output/state change, link (with its blockchain agnosticism) feeds that into a different chain's SC. Some dude already made a working concept for the last hackathon.

Threshold signatures and off chain computation/communication makes everyone trying to connect sidechains and scaling solutions obsolete. Link does it coincidentally and with less clutter/hoops.