/biz/ - Business & Finance

14

alternatively 11.25

alternatively unknown

alternatively 10

alternatively 7

these are probably the best interpretations

14, just like a perfectly ripe pussy.

>>16339911
14

>>16339911
make a dumb facebook page, post dumb mental midget pics like that so every facebook boomer mom has to comment and argue with their pea brains about these things and get a lot of monetizable activity on the page

>>16339911
This calculates number of vertices with even degree.
The first graph has them in corners and in the middle, so it's 5
The second graph has 8 of them.

>>16339959
>trying to outsmart the game
Corners are vertices, fag. You're lucky you're not in Saw or else your head would have got cut off or something.

>>16339976
I know about this. Your point?

>>16339976
most retarded post ever made
congratulations

>>16339911
obviously the answer is 10

There’s n*n squares, with (n+1)*(n+1) vertices. (n+1)^2 - n^2 is the formula I like most. It reduces to 2n+1. Then it’s just all the odd the numbers!

>>16339911
create an entire standardized testing industry based upon the ability to count squares.

>>16339938
8 intersections with 2 lines crossing

>>16339976
ah i see someone else has a functioning brain also

>>16339911
12

t. autistic genius

8

>>16340220
true you could define a rule like that also
8 or 12 both can be correct if there is only two samples.

>>16340235
nah i changed my mind, 12 is bullshit 8 is the only answer that can be correct in a strictly mathematical sense.

>>16339911
11.25 cuz 5/4 =1.25 and 1.25*9 = 11.25.

>>16340262
there are literally infinite answers because a question hasn't been posited

>>16340275
well there is only one rule that fits lines and vertices and areas and whatever basic geometry you try on the first shape without any addition or subtraction bullshit. if you start adding a c constant or involve multiplications the number of possible answers is indeed infinite so that's not a good approach to solving a problem.

>>16340275
25

>>16340304
4x=5
9x=?
is an interpretation more likely to be true than your own. pure' and beautiful questions aren't more likely to be asked than any other questions

>>16340350
yeah who said it's 4x?

>>16340394
who said it wasn't lad
there's 4 small squares
says its 9
then i see 9 small squares

>>16339911
By doing a big poo and aiming it right at the centre

>>16340440
there are 8 lines 9 points 16 of 90 degree angles
also your equation basically applies to units of areas however the size of squares are clearly different.

>>16340552
not to mention 9 points + 16 angles is 25 divisible by 5.
so it could be (a+b)/5=5 in natural numbers.
face it your approach is the last likely to be correct.

>>16339911
10 is literally just as valid an answer as any other. I hate that questions like this have a "right" pattern and a "wrong" pattern. There should be onky 1 pattern whoch works for all cases and that's it.

>>16340584
how in the hell could 10 be correct?

>>16340220
this, high iq here, answer is 12

>>16339911
Number of squares you can possibly make
So 14
Fuck everyone else

>>16340812
How can you base this off of one example? It could be anything, (number of small squares + 1 for example)

>>16340843
>It could be anything, (number of small squares + 1 for example)

>>16339911
15- total number of possible squares

>>16340843
>It could be anything, (number of small squares + 1 for example

>>16340886
i mean 14 fk

>>16339911
who the fuck draw on my floor you cucks

>>16340891
Explain how you know it's 14 and not 10

>>16340895
total squares

>>16339938
Based

I'm guessing
14 is the number of squares that can be formed
11.25 is if each small square is 1.25
10 is the number of the smallest squares +1
7 is the number of straight lines used -1

I also like >>16339959's answer of 8 where he counts vertices with an even degree.

But the best answer of all is
>>16340275

>>16340927
You're just assuming that's what it is though. You need at least two datapoints before you can look for a trend with any amount of confidence

>>16341014
Of course i am. I'm just saying that it is a possible solution.

>>16340275
>i-it's t-too hard

Everyone is right. Personally I go with 10 cause it's the simplest answer.

Israel doesn't have a right to exist

>>16339911
The answer is 888, you idiots.

>>16342139
8881.

10

>>16339938
>alternatively 11.25

>>16339911

9! = 362880

>>16339911
I don't understand, it's just an assertion. The second image equals the ? symbol - Ok, got it.

>>16339911
The answer is 1k EOY

>>16342296

>>16339911

20.

>>16339911
5/4 * 9

>>16339938
You forgot 20 - There are 4 copies of the 1st in the 2nd.

>>16343963
21

>everyone in agreement that you can't know the right answer
>still arguing over what's the right answer
Something truly beautiful here

>>16339911
4 small squares = 5
So 9 small squares = 10

Or number of squares = 5
So 9 + 1 +4 = 14

four squares = 5
9 squares at the bottom so its 10 and 1 square
5/4=1.25

so the correct answer is 11.25

>>16339911
12

>>16344312
>Implying it is 12
Nice try, CIA

number of line segments - 1
answer is 7

>>16339911
A1 = 5
A2 = 14

>>16340274
this one is correct

>>16340812
lol this
anyone else who didn't recognize what this is about is a brainlet, no matter how skilled in math

>>16344230
:^)

from the little context given it seems 14 is the answer if you are looking for an answer regarding the pic without having a clear assignment
how make money from this? wish i knew
>>16340274
don't want to sound like a knowitall but
that's a weird definition of 4
could be a 5, too
could also be 1
why 5/4
why not 4/5?
assuming it's 4 = 5 like you think. 4 = 5 is a wrong statement. 0 = 5/4? 0 = 1.25?
seems incorrect

>>16345259
No. It's 4 = 5 as in 1 * 4 = 5 as in 1 = 5 / 4 as in 1 = 1.25.
1 = 1.25 my man.
The more you know your mathematics...

>>16340274
Patrician! It's all about that ratio sequence! How the thing on the left corresponds to the thing on the right!

>>16342139
>>16342160
883 actually

>>16340274
would be correct but there's an "=" symbol
if there was a "=>" symbol you'd be right
4 is to 5 like (insert "any number" is to (1.25* any number)) because the one on the left is smaller and the one on the right is bigger
i'm still retarded lol

>>16340274
undefined 1 -> 5
undefined 2 -> ?
thanks fren you're cool now i've seen God clearly in my dreams and he told me formality and ISO standards are the tools of the Devil fuck all the other brainlets who don't apply formalities to confuse us and bring us off the right path of truth as if it could ever be 14 or any other bullshit all those brainlets tell us

surname do the needful and count the squares

>>16339976
they caught the jigsaw killer though r-right?!

>>16346455
ABSOLUTELY BASED

>>16339938
all wrong, this is the actual answer

>>16339911
wash da floor
demand monies
after u demanded mony
pee on da floor and paint wit invisible paint dat turns visible after a day for future monies

>>16339911
8