[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance


View post   

File: 171 KB, 326x281, zoomertidepod.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16283697 No.16283697 [Reply] [Original]

Can millenials and gen z force boomers into crypto? I refuse to buy stocks because they are essentially boomer bags. Everyone is always trying to shill the bags they hold, there is no reason why something like LINK isn't as legitimate of an investment as buying index funds. Boomers only tell you crypto is "high risk" because they aren't invested in it and don't want their USD/boomer bags (stocks) to get JUST'd.

Millenials and Gen Z hate boomers and they should know that when they purchase bitcoin, its essentially saying "fuck you" to boomers. When the younger generations take over the work force and they are all pro crypto, the boomers will be forced to buy our bags or see their "boomer bags" go to 0.

Basically Gen Y/Z will inherit all their parents money anyways. I just want people to speed it up with crypto. Whenever people talk about crypto being the greatest transfer of wealth in history, it's not from the 1% to the poor, its from boomer to zoomer.

>> No.16283705

How does this blogpost help us make money anon? Shut the fuck up.

>> No.16283708

when the younger generations takes over job force boomers wont give a fuck because theyre all be dead

>> No.16283724

When stocks were relatively new, were boomers claiming that stocks were high risk?

>> No.16283728

>>16283705
Use the rise in boomer hate to shill your bags, fucking retard. Boomer hate is going on a bullrun. I don't think any generation has ever been so hated before in recent times. It will be quite easy to push the narrative that buying crypto is a fuck you to boomers.

>>16283708
No, they will be in nursing homes being waited on by minorities who hate them and treat them like dog shit.

>> No.16283731

>>16283724
>relatively new

I suggest you start reading something other than manga comics

>what is the GFC of 1929?

>> No.16283746

>>16283724
>when stocks were relatively new
>Dutch East India Company
>stock began trading 1611
wat

>> No.16283763

>>16283724
Boomers weren't but older/more cautious types of people in the 1920s were.

>> No.16283783

>>16283697
The enemy is central banking and debt based money.
Unless we're talking about bank stocks then stocks are absolutely not in conflict with cryptos, if anything they complete

>>16283724
Stocks exist since 1600 when dutch invented them.

>>16283708
Boomers will live up to 100, we will be old they still won't be dead. That's why we will have to fleece them with them with retirement homes and robotics.

>> No.16283809

>>16283728
“Hey anon! New to crypto? Feeling disenfranchised by the generation that sold away your prosperity before it was ever realised, only to subsidise their pensions until they die and rot? Buy Chainlink! The ONLY decentralised oracle network that is anti-boomer.” Read what you’re fucking typing you thick cunt :)

>> No.16283828
File: 31 KB, 400x400, py8UM0-5_400x400.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16283828

>>16283783
>The enemy is central banking and debt based money.
>Unless we're talking about bank stocks then stocks are absolutely not in conflict with cryptos,

They are in conflict because buying stocks is money that could have been invested in crypto.

>> No.16283844

>>16283809
This would sound pretty good to the average millennial desu. I want them to pump my bags. Why is this a bad thing?

>> No.16283913

>>16283844
You clearly don’t understand what you’re holding of you think it needs millennials to be buying in on an anti-boomer sentiment... Link won’t moon on retail speculation, it will be on mass institutional adoption. The lucky low IQ sheep and the turbo autists who’ve found this project will become very rich without mass retail investment.

>> No.16284005

>>16283913
It doesn't need it but there is a chance that if crypto doesn't moon soon enough the entire economy could crash and we might have to wait another 5 years for a true bullrun.

Would rather take and secure some additional profits now than wait for adoption. I mean for fucks sake even LINK themselves are advocating for a shill army. Would they actually need that if they thought getting normies involved and institutional adoption was a 100% sure thing?

https://blog.chain.link/announcing-the-official-chainlink-community-advocate-program/

They have fucking "advocate swag". So should I sell? Seems the link team thinks their price might rely on normies pumping their bags...

>> No.16284134

>>16284005
“Why Become a Chainlink Community Advocate?
With the industry’s top technology providers working with Chainlink to realize the next generation of externally-connected smart contracts, we need to build out a comprehensive network of talented coders, engineers, and enthusiasts to support the rapid influx of interest and business opportunities.”

Network of talented CODERS, ENGINEERS and enthusiasts... This is a call out to devs and those who build to start learning how to integrate Chainlink into what they do. This is unironically the start of mass adoption. Chainlink needs no mass shilling. Look at how it has dominated biz and now its shilled constantly on twitter too. Links online sentiment is usually top 5 normally and #1 when news breaks on twitter. Selling now to realise profits when the team are clearly rolling out a worldwide dev tutorial program is insanity. Hold those linkies fucking tight and buckle up fren.