/biz/ - Business & Finance

delete this, nano already won

redit-the coin

>>16229511
how do i delet?

>>16229229
Nano is a disaster in the making. Devs lied about 7000 tps DEC 2017, right when BTC was clogged. Real TPS, or blocks per second as they call it, is a little bit over 300 and around 500 Nano crashes totally. No way in hell can that be a global currency for micro-payments. ETH is working on one million TPS.

>>16229229
Nano only functions now because no one is using the network. With a global currency, you will have at least 100 000 TPS, something Nano can't do and never will. But let's say they will change their tech dramatically and have 100 000 TPS. Nano is "free" because volunteers take all the costs. Works fine with no activity on the network, but with 100 000 TPS the costs for CPU, IO and bandwidth would be astronomical. To believe people will take all the costs, working 24/7 for nothing, for all eternity, is crazy. Just like having free toilets where volunteers will clean the toilets for nothing will never function. They tried that approach in USSR and every single communist country. It never worked, always crashed.

>>16229807
Nano doesn't crash if overloaded. It simply takes a while to vote, and transactions take longer than a few seconds.

ETH may be working on it, but it's not here today. Paypal only did 50ish TPS when they started, and they had millions of users. With 300TPS Nano will be fine for the next cycle.

>>16229841
See above. It wont happen overnight. First a few million here and there will start using it, and it will necessitate more robust nodes to validate transactions, and the cycle will repeat.

Also, bandwidth is the bottleneck resource. It's a simple voting protocol to validate transactions.

>>16229807
was going to actually respond b4 i realized you used that weiss article. hilarious. "two nodes can double spend" kek

>>16229965
Yeah that Weiss article is about as uneducated as it gets, lol

>>16229964
>Nano doesn't crash if overloaded. It simply takes a while to vote, and transactions take longer than a few seconds.
No, it is a total crash with nodes falling out etc. Here:
https://www.reddit.com/r/nanocurrency/comments/dob4zr/500_cps_beta_stress_test_happening_in_25_hours_7/
Some other report highlighted it more, but guess you reddit boomers know it better than me.
>Paypal only did 50ish TPS when they started, and they had millions of users. With 300TPS Nano will be fine for the next cycle.

Paypal was not global, not micropayment, not for the unbanked. VISA is calibrated for 60 000 TPS. Nano crashes at 500. A total joke
>See above. It wont happen overnight.
What has this to do with costs?

>>16229965
>>16229987
What about the rest of the article and the criticism of Nano? Why did the nano community go crazy and started to spam Weiss, rambling on about them copying a blog post, then it was the blogger that copied them, instead of answering the criticism from Weiss? Nano community presented themselves as very childish, delusional and cult like. Not a very great sign for potential investors.

>>16229841
nano isnt trying to be a global currency so that's a really dumb argument. it's just trying to be the best possible crypto payment coin. and it's won that war. nothing else is close. there's not even another technology that could achieve 25% of what nano has. xrp is the only other distinct technology from bitcoin that could compete, but it belongs to banks, and it's still not feeless or instant.

if you believe in crypto as a payment, just get in on it and stop crying. if you think crypto is retarded as a payment, invest in eth and stop crying.

>>16230146
no body cares about the weiss article. one of charlie lee's largest reddit posts is in the nano sub and he's an investor (dm him and literally ask him yourself). that's all you need to know brainlet.

>>16230182
>nano isnt trying to be a global currency so that's a really dumb argument.
Are you retarded? Does Nano have some kind of geographical limitation? Does Nano have a physical limit on users? When Nano crashes first Christmas shopping, first holiday, emergency situation etc, users will stay the hell away from Nano. The tech and cost structure is retarded and will not function in real life. Deal with it. You clearly think crypto is retarded and can never compete with VISA of fiat.

>>16230199
>charlie lee's largest reddit posts is in the nano sub and he's an investor
He sold nearly all his Nano some months ago, what the hell are you talking about? Pic related.

>>16230242
you think crypto will ever replace visa? hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha

>>16230254
yes he had his doubts back then. it's proven to be decentralized as much as--if not more than--bitcoin this year. you can dm him. he responds.

>>16230199
>no body cares about the weiss article.
Right. Nano crashed 98% from ATH and you idiots in the Nano community thinks that potential investors don't care about Nano not being able to answer the criticism in article, outside spamming the hell out off their twitter account with false accusations of plagiarism. Tragic.

>>16230261
>you think crypto will ever replace visa?
I think crypto will replace the fiat monetary system we have now in many areas. Especially cross border payments, but also micro payments within fiat regimes with substantial monetary expansion.

>>16230272
Costs of nodes will lead to centralization. Charlie Lee is NO spokesperson of Nano. Are you on drugs? He has hardly said anything about Nano the last months, outside mentioning that he sold nearly all his Nano. How delusional are you nano nuts?

>>16230182
Again, Nano only functions because nobody is using the network. If they did, the network would crash and the costs of operating it would be astronomical for the people that are supposed to do it for free for all eternity with NO downtime ever. Delusional hippie coin. You have to be on hard drugs to believe that is a viable solution.

>>16230319
Look everybody its lyin' loser dag fag!

>>16230495
When was this and I said he sold NEARLY all his Nano some months ago. Learn to read nano nuts.

For those who don't know, this dude is paid by the post to come here and shill DAG and fud NANO. He has been employed for over a year now, tending to the dark corners of /biz/ like a drug dealer long past his prime. He reeks of jew and kike. I wouldn't bother engaging. Nano doesn't need to be shilled here either, it can stand on its own two legs.

>The more I argued with them, the better I came to know their dialectic. First they counted on the stupidity of their adversary, and then, when there was no other way out, they themselves simply played stupid. If all this didn't help, they pretended not to understand, or, if challenged, they changed the subject in a hurry, quoted platitudes which, if you accepted them, they immediately related to entirely different matters, and then, if again attacked, gave ground and pretended not to know exactly what you were talking about. Whenever you tried to attack one of these apostles, your hand closed on a jelly-like slime which divided up and poured through your fingers, but in the next moment collected again. But if you really struck one of these fellows so telling a blow that, observed by the audience, he couldn't help but agree, and if you believed that this had taken you at least one step forward, your amazement was great the next day. The Jew had not the slightest recollection of the day before, he rattled off his same old nonsense as though nothing at all had happened, and, if indignantly challenged, affected amazement; he couldn't remember a thing, except that he had proved the correctness of his assertions the previous day.
Sometimes I stood there thunderstruck. I didn't know what to be more amazed at: the agility of their tongues or their virtuosity at lying. >Gradually I began to hate them.

>>16230242
So what's your alternative, global cryptocurrency? Bitcoin? Lightning Network?

>>16230526
>For those who don't know, this dude is paid by the post to come here and shill DAG and fud NANO.
That's an insane accusation. Are you also on drugs, nanoid moron? Where can I apply to get money from DAG to fud Nano? You are that satanist Nano psycho, right? Too bad you Nano idiots can't defend your crashed satan coin that will never work in real life. All you idiots have is dreams and delusions. Do you still have that other satanist, rockmsockmjesus as a community organizer? That should tell potential investors anything they need to know about Nano and Nano foundation. Plus their crashed tech, openly lies about TPS, shitcoin pushed by Italians scammers and devs. What a shitshow.

>>16230528
>Lightning Network?
Is a joke.
Multiple projects will roll out their solutions soon, we will see which project is best. Nano will never function, crashed tech and real fundamental flaws in both the business side as well as the tech side. Nano will never work.

>>16230526
Give me ONE example where I have lied. I just demonstrated that Nano devs lied about 7000 TPS. Here, pic, info they gave DEC 2017 right when BTC was clogged. Only reason why Nano mooned. Based on a lie and Italian scammers.

>>16230594
NANO already works, today. I just bought some clothes with it.
Checkout was instant
And there were no cunts hanging around an inflation funnel jerking off into the value.

>>16230526
>>16230623
THIS is however the reality, pic, how is that for a lie, satanist? Go cry to your abusive lord satan, moron.

>>16230570
Yup, knew it. I am the satanist mega nano whale shill from beyond. Fear deez.

>>16230526
>>16230623
>>16230634
Nano devs are proven scammers.

>>16230629
>NANO already works, today
Nano only works as a kitchen table amateur project where volunteers take all the costs for free and there is no load on the system. As soon as anybody actually will use Nano, it will all come crashing down. Nano is a joke.

>>16230634

>>16230644
NANO means game over for BTC moonboys.
No inflation, sound monetary system, no fees paid out to greedy fat miners for burning coal in 3rd world nations.
It's just better, in every way conceivable.

>>16230526
>For those who don't know, this dude is paid by the post to come here and shill DAG and fud NANO
Is this true? Is DAG actually a better version of NANO?

>>16230639
>>16230668
Why should I fear some retarded and delusional nano satanist, worshiping loser Satan? That would, however, explain why you crazy nanoids enjoy being assraped by the devs, market and italian scammers all the time. Pic related.

>>16230675
>NANO means game over for BTC moonboys
BTC is only priced due to proven security and brand recognition. That you nanoids compare yourself to BTC all the time and not the new tech being rolled out the next months, says everything a potential investor needs to know.

>>16230594
Fud more so you can buy.

Good strategy anon

>>16230684
>>16230745
DAG is much better than Nano in every way. Those that listened to me in the summer got around 5x on their investments. Compare that to tragic Nano. DAG has a very low market cap, only 15M and that is less than 50% of the capital they got from pre-sale. Thanks to crypto winter, Constellation is now at a bargain price. Plus:

>The next stage of crypto is data focused. 'Data is the new oil.' This is Constellation's specialty and focus: direct on-chain data processing. No other blockchain infrastructure is able to do that
>DAG founders recently burned ALL their tokens, 7.2% of total supply
>Deflationary token model
>Staking
>Horizontally scaleable. Faster and more capacity with every node. No theoretical limit to TPS.
>Light-nodes on phone
>CEO actually ran a business with 45 million in annual revenue
>Advisor: Rehito (Ray) Hatoyama former Managing Director of Hello Kitty (Sanrio)
>Commercial contract with USAF
>Partnership with Link
>US, San Francisco based so close proximity to Fortune 500s
>Part of a large ecosystem, with real use cases that will provide security for the network and world-wide market. Same as IOTA and Nano but better
>This large ecosystem and not solely a currency will provide protection from Central Bank regulators, like ETH & IOTA, but unlike Nano.
>All zero-fee systems are open to spam attacks. Constellation has a much more advanced and elegant solution than Nano with their reputation system.
>Mainnet is ongoing/current/rolling out in Batches - Batch 0 is live now and Batch 1 will be onboarding soon
>Early 2020, a full function mainnet, data on the network, node operators running,

Constellation (DAG) will go to top 10 on coinmarketcap. Just watch this 30 min interview with the man behind Hello Kitty, one of the most successful brands and marketing operations in history, who is now cooperating with and supporting Constellation.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KGVpdNSLp54

Ray Hatoyama has a proven record of:
1. Sniffing out superb projects with global potential
2. Bringing projects to global dominance

DAG will 1000x. Currently it is still cheap with a market cap of only 50% of the startup capital they raised pre-sale.

There is no other blockchain outside DAG that is designed to handle big data. If the USAF contract goes well, they will provide to the whole US military. For a tech startup company to get such a deal, so quickly, is unheard of. It's a very strong signal to the market of both the projects and the teams quality. That alone will give DAG a MCAP of 100M USD.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/darrynpollock/2019/09/20/usafs-blockchain-interest-shows-technologys-power-to-secure-data/#3b922b537cef

DAG will be the main or sole provider of big data to Link

>>16230855
Constellation Network engages with Chainlink to become a node operator on the Chainlink network, to provide smart contracts with access to real-world streaming data from Constellation’s enterprise clients, and to provide validation for streaming data. The integration, explained in the recently released paper, “Oracalizing Big Data on Distributed Ledger Technology” outlines how Constellation will become an oracle node on the Chainlink Platform.

https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/constellation-network-integrates-with-chainlink-to-bring-big-data-solutions-to-distributed-ledger-technology-300939390.html

DAG team member Benjamin Jorgen is working with Portland State University on the worlds first accredited Blockchain certificate program.

This is a business focused program on accelerating learnings around business adoption of distributed ledger technology. https://www.pdx.edu/sba/blockchain

Due to our market impact and technology focus, Constellation is in the preliminary talks of becoming part of the PSU board of advisors.

The reason this is important is because for us to have a connection to a governing board at a leading university in the Blockchain space, it will only increase Constellation’s ability to have a seat at the table to influence Enterprise business adoption. This is yet another deposit in the validity of our team and overall company focus to be a trusted partner that’s in this for the long haul.

https://youtu.be/6BNk9wdcuGY

DAG is less than 1/2 of pre-sale and still insanely cheap. More about Constellation (DAG) technology pic and here:

Tech Gem Solves DAG Centralization: Bye IOTA Bye Hedera. Enter Constellation
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OyXu-CX33-c

Finally we have a CEO in crypto space that actually knows how to do business.

The problem is that Nano has a really short, catchy name. Such a name is a blessing for adoption. "Hey, have you heard of Nano, this new electronic money?"

"Constellation", on the other hand?

>>16230908
You asked for it, nano satanist. Without you starting to ramble on with your false accusations about me being paid to inform about DAG and criticize scammer coin Nano, nothing would have happened. You also talked about me getting money from this, ryte? Who can I contact to get my money? :)

Constellation (DAG) founders burned ALL their tokens, pic. How is that for supporting the community and compare that to the scammy Nano devs lying about 7000 TPS and pushing Italian scam trading platform Bitgrail?

>>16230954
When boomers google dag, they will get to Constellation (DAG).

Nano is used everywhere and very hard to differentiate, the graphic looks like something a dog would leave on the floor.

>>16230954
>Smart contracts
Constellation will provide data to the Chainlink network for a myriad of smart contract use cases that benefit from connecting to validated, external, and streaming ...
https://constellationnetwork.io/pdf/Chainlink_Constellation_Network_Technical_Integration_Overview.pdf

V20 Lydia is live

I repeat: Lydia is live

https://medium.com/nanocurrency/v20-lydia-is-live-4f50d14799b1

>>16231019
Constellation is a scam. Stop shilling this shit here. This is a NANO thread

This is how incestuous the relationship between Nano foundation and Bitgrail was, when retail investors were stuck, could net get verification, and lost all their money. Pic. When retail investors could max move one BTC out off Bitgrail per day, friends of Nano devs moved tens of millions of USD out off Bitgrail right before the collaps with more than 100 million dollars lost for Nano retail investors. Compare that to DAG founders that burned ALL their tokens to show support to community.

>>16231052
This is how incestuous the relationship between Nano foundation and Bitgrail was, when retail investors were stuck, could net get verification, and lost all their money. Pic. When retail investors could max move one BTC out off Bitgrail per day, friends of Nano devs moved tens of millions of USD out off Bitgrail right before the collaps with more than 100 million dollars lost for Nano retail investors. Compare that to DAG founders that burned ALL their tokens to show support to community.

>>16231052
>This is a NANO thread
This is now a Constellation (DAG) thread :)

>>16230798
Ah here we go. derails Nano threads with DAG spam


Good thing Nano is spam resistant

>>16231034
NICE

This team keeps going stronk

>>16231099
Your last spam test was not great. I guess v20 will also crash in a modest spam test.

Compare that to DAG:
>Constellation's (DAG) lead dev is a genius, pic.

Nano on the move. Guy who thinks we are all satanists has been reported for spam/low quality posts. Don't feed the trolls. And Hail Satan.

>>16231152
>Spends his time at some christian album cover photoshoot and not programming.

Okay. go back to your hole tard

>>16231159
When you Nano dev came and could not answer a single question, proved himself to be clueless about tech and micro economics and had to run away, you also responded with reporting and flagging my posts. Why are you nanoids so delusional and ignorant, totally unable to defend your shitcoin?

>>16231152
My dev can kick your dev's ass

>>16230261
>then they laugh at you

What's this...? Colin is evolving...!

>>16231177
>Okay. go back to your hole tard
Tragic how low quality the nano posts are.

Colin-Chu has evolved into... Colin-Chad!

>>16231159
yes hail Satan. And Colin

>>16231194
Nano will crash and guy is a scammer, have a look:

Dangerous flaws and major problems with Nano
http://archive.is/diUnZ


Nano Heading for Disaster – Dirty Deals with BitGrail
http://archive.is/GGWIG

Nano and Bitgrail leaders scammed over $100 million from Bitgrail
http://archive.is/zAtyl

>>16231209
>says we are only on shit exchanges
DAG is only on shit exchanges

>Says our glorious devs are terrible
His dev has some shitpic from a christian album cover photographer

>Says we aren't ready for world-shattering TPS
Strawman, also lol

come up with better shit pajeet. how much do they pay you to derail actual progress?

>>16229511
checked

>>16229807
>>16229841
>>16230116
>>16230146
>he's back
pump incoming

>>16231272
DAG will go on larger exchanges once they have finished rolling out mainnet. Operation going on right now.

>Says we aren't ready for world-shattering TPS
VISA is calibrated for 60 000 TPS due to peaks like emergency catastrophe, holidays like Christmas etc. What is Nano's real TPS now? 300 according to last spam test. Crashed every time near 500 blocks per second and network was totally saturated. No way in hell can Nano have the tech to be a global micro-payment system. Even if you did, let's say you managed to have the minimum TPS for a global micro-payments system, 100 000 TPS, what would the enormous costs for bandwith, CPU and IO be? Have you crazy Nano fanatics or your scammer devs ever done the cost analysis? Remember that your whole crazy and dysfunctional business model is that all that costs and work must be done by volunteers fro free for all eternity with no downtime ever. Nano is a dead project with sociopathic and borderline criminal devs and a crazy cult-like fanbase. Worst in crypto. Sorry.

>>16231320
AAAHHAHAHA not even mainnet? Common pajeet try harder

>>16231034
best devs in crypto
imagine not investing in NANO

>>16231333
blessed digits btfo nanofudder

>>16231356
Imagine shilling some +100 rank shitcoin over Nano....

>>16231319
>pump incoming
Just like summer 2018, right. Crashed from USD 3,5 to sub 1. Market didn't like the news/facts and how you nanoid fanboiz reacted. Remember?

>>16231333
>AAAHHAHAHA not even mainnet? Common pajeet try harder
That's one of the many reasons why DAG will 1000x. So much news and heavy price drivers are in the waiting. Pic.

>>16231375
>forgetting august 18 when you came back after 3 months off and the price doubled shortly thereafter
>and just recently you come back right before kraken announcement pump
thanks anon, good times ahead

>>16231370
he used to just fud nano, i guess he recovered from bitgrail and is shilling this shit. his timing is interesting though. usually a good sign when these threads come up

>>16231370
>Imagine shilling some +100 rank shitcoin over Nano....
You nanoids are too stupid to understand concepts like potential and upside. DAG will easily 1000x and moon to top ten CoinMarketCap. Nano not so much. You are lucky if you manage to stay within top 50 the next months. When ETH or others presents one million TPS, of FTH with 100 000+ TPS, then Nano is toast. Sorry.

>>16231400
>forgetting august 18 when you came back after 3 months off and the price doubled shortly thereafter
What are you talking about? 2019? I have virtually done nothing this year. If you are talking 2018 then there was no doubling whatsoever and I was not three months away. I started late summer 2018.

>>16231399
So your'e saying they are behind on the roadmap? KEK

Nano just rolled out a new node version like an hour ago. Get on our level Paj

>>16231367
top kek

>>16231432
>i guess he recovered from bitgrail
I sold Nano before Bitgrail, when I looked into the lies from the devs regarding TPS. It was disgusting to see how the devs and community treated Bitgrail victims, a fate I just narrowly escaped. Worse when I realized how scammy the devs operated both post and pre Bigrail. Like pic.

>usually a good sign when these threads come up
Nano never recovered after the market got informed about your tech and scammy devs. From 3,5 USD to mainly sub 1 USD

>>16231481
>So your'e saying they are behind on the roadmap? KEK
They are not. Rolling out mainnet with corresponding nodes will be done in batches.

>>16231481
>Nano just rolled out a new node version like an hour ago.
Still light-years away from their stated 7000 TPS DEC 2017. Yet you nanoids are ecstatic? How much must your devs lie to you and underperform before you wake up?

>>16231573
It says Mainnet was expected in October.

They are late Paj, get over it.

>>16231756
Nano 4evah

>>16231756
They started on-boarding in October. That's when they started rolling out mainnet in batches.

>>16231772
>Nano 4evah
Yep. Nano = crazy death cult.

>>16231201
i'm a nano investor. i probably have 10x more than anyone in here. it's never going to replace visa. that's not what makes it special anon.

>>16231862
150k?

>>16231890
guess not. 120

>>16231934
nice

>>16231934
DAG has 10x since this summer and is still less than 50% of ICO (35M), why didn't you buy?

>>16231862
>it's never going to replace visa.
I agree that replacing VISA should not be their goal, but what is then the use case for Nano?

>>16231970
because it's trash

>>16231994
>because it's trash
How do you know and why would you say no to a clear 10x "genius"?

.>>16231991
Micropayments, everywhere.

>>16232012
why do you think i answer questions from poor people?

>>16232015
Right, with 300 TPS and full network crash at 500 TPS, or block per second as you call it.

Micropayments you say, so what will the costs for CPU, IO and bandwith be for 100 000 TPS? Do you or the Nano devs have any clue? Remember that these costs and all the work must be done for free, for nothing, by volunteers all the time 24/7 with no holiday or downtown. They must bear all the costs. But you have NO clue, do you?

>>16232019
>why do you think i answer questions from poor people?
I sold Nano before Bitgrail, what do you think? And I am not an idiot like you.

>>16232053
right now many of the reps are $5 digitalocean vps. as time goes on, those get replaced with more powerful nodes. the 7000 tps limit was taken from testing between a few powerful nodes for example. there are very powerful servers as reps right now, they're just not the majority. but in the case of nano actually fulfilling a niche, you'd only have powerful nodes as a necessity.

>>16232100
>the 7000 tps limit was taken from testing between a few powerful nodes for example
False. It was all "theoretical", they never had a full node operating at 7000 tps. Pic.

So what are the costs, Nano moron, for 100 000 TPS? How many tens of thousands of dollars must a node operator fork out every year for working for free on that crazy hippie network? Do you have any clue?

>>16230254
I think that's gonna be better for short term adoption. No government or company wants to use a decentralised system yet.

Either way, my bags are full at low prices, just gonna ride this one

>>16232163
> Kraken
> Binance
> Working for free

>>16232163
nope it was a test on one or two of their servers. you can find it in one of the amas. it's obvious to everyone that the network is only as fast as the slowest node so i dunno why ure arguing. run 1,000 $5k/m servers and of course you'll be able to do thousands of TPS. but that will be the reality if NANO was adopted.

>>16232100
>but in the case of nano actually fulfilling a niche, you'd only have powerful nodes as a necessity.
You are delusional. So with MORE costs you believe the guys running it for free will pay for even MORE expensive nodes, just like that? That's inverse price elasticity. Nice job Nano foundation.

>>16232197
Centralized as hell.

Remember to report dag shills. Clearly a pajeet.

>>16232214
NANO nodes are a sunk cost for a perfect p2p currency. Value is extracted from usecases, like trading.
But you already know that, you are just trying to spread misinformation

nano thanks

>>16232210
Testing a supposed global network on one server. That's dishonest as hell. Their numbers were the most misleading in whole crypto. From promised 7000 TPS to crash at 250 TPS in the real world. Then pushing Italian scam exchange as well. That's Bitconnect level of dishonesty.

I asked for total costs and individual node operator costs at 100 000 TPS. Aggregated costs of CPU, IO and bandwidth. You have absolutely NO clue, do you? And the same goes for the ultra incompetent Nano foundation. Zero cost analysis, right?

>>16232240
>Remember to report dag shills. Clearly a pajeet.
Back to favourite shitting street, Nanoid.

>>16232249
How is that sunk costs? Do you first have to buy a node and THEN buy Nano? Are IO, CPU and bandwidth costs not both fix and variable, but sunk? Are you on drugs?

>>16232267
just buy it and stop crying pajeet

There's only one nanofudder here.

>>16232315
>just buy it and stop crying pajeet
Great investor strategy there. That's why I sold Nano before Bitgrail and you still hodl.

>>16232322
>There's only one nanofudder here.
Correct, and yet the nanoids got hysterical, can't answer my questions and must retort to mass flagging. Pathetic.

>>16232322
do you think he'll fud when he finds out colin is satoshi and it's been a somewhat known fact since early 2016?

>>16232353
>do you think he'll fud when he finds out colin is satoshi and it's been a somewhat known fact since early 2016?
Good grief, I truly hope you are on hard drugs, nanoid....

>>16229229
> suddenly shilled on biz
> added to fiat gateway (i.e. gonna be dumped on retards for cash)
> plebbit
very bullish sirs

omg these threads make me lol

Is everyone else thinking the same thing I am reading these posts? I feel bad to laugh, but this retard is malicious, so I kind of wonder if there is an element of karma to it all.

>>16232348
someone did a linguistic inquiry and word count analysis of satoshi and colins whitepaper along with their posts on bitcointalk and it came up as a 98% match or something liek that. harvard or stanford has an engine for it you can go look at and literally do the same thing.

additionally, nano is the only technology that's made specifically for p2p and a completely distinct technology. eth and xrp being the only other ones. and the architecture of nano was described by satoshi at some point on bitcointalk.

you already own nano so i'm preaching to the choir tho

>>16232508
I was not aware of this, however I did run Colin's name + Nano in a Gematria calculator and came up with results along the lines of "Walt Disney Company", "Jesus Christ in the Flesh", and "Mark of the Beast", among other odd results.

>>16232508
>someone
Crazy nano fanboi, supposedly
>98% match
You need much more text for such a high percentage.

Nanoids are so deluded. No wonder, as whole Bitconnect community swarmed Nano after Bitgrail. Pic related.

>>16232496
Time for you to get assraped by your dark master satan again. Was he the one telling you to buy Nano?

>>16232496
With so many satanist running around in your community and leadership, how do you square the circle with satanists being ultimate selfish, narcissistic and hedonists, and then the nano network is supposed to be paid for and run for free by a bunch of hippies (like trying to get volunteers to wash public toilets for all eternity and paying for it)? It makes no logical sense for a satan coin like nano. Or is the satanist trying to abuse the hippies to make all the work for them for free? Or are you just a bunch of delusional, low IQ satanists and hippies with no clue what you are doing, plus some dishonest scammers?

>>16232787
>63 posts by this ID

>>16233234
>63 posts by this ID
And still no answer from the nano nuts. All you do is flag comments and run away from questions. Most pathetic group in crypto. Pic related.

>>16233310
Look they made a thread for you over here >>16226905

>>16233323
Shouldn't you nanoids post your usual fake rumours and scam some newbies? Pic related.

>>16233323
Maybe try your good old PayPal routine. Pic.

>>16233323
Or maybe the always so popular "thanks, just bought 500K nannis" routine, pic.

>>16233234
Desperate

>>16232508

>>16232508
lol biggest bullshit i ever heard.

This shit is going back under a dollar retards.