/biz/ - Business & Finance

Anon theres no point
Quant thread posters fall under 4 categories:
The holders who spam "SCAM"
The shitty telegram fudders who are clearly not from /biz/ who are still trying to accumulate
The tards who believe the first two groups or just come in to shill link
Sincere Quant holders who don't bother trying to have good threads anymore
We'll never have a good thread about Quant until we have a MC of more than a billion

The fact you have to try to explain this coin and it still makes no sense, has no usability or use. Stay far away. Gilbert shelled out cash to get these people at the conference and it’ll be a nothing burger.

remainder that quant requires link to no be a pointless server application

>>16227229
This is the kind of bullshit i'm talking about.

>>16227268
Even is this was true (it's not), so what?
Quant is the better Investment.

>>16227209
>The holders who spam "SCAM"

hehe

/guilty/

>>16227718
Faggot. I fucking hate you.

>>16227996
>Faggot. I fucking hate you.

But I'll become the richest cunt you know.

>>16227301
quant will be big, but it’s better to own link.

>>16227301
it does. deal with it

shillbert must need a new holiday home on the med to pay for these speakers

he will be dumping hard on idex again after this event

Quanties are so funny

>try to start shit with Link
>turns out Quant is using Link (just like linkies always said)
>wonder why /biz/ is still a Link board

>>16228294
>try to start shit with Link
the exact opposite happened, link started it
>turns out Quant is using Link
they're both using each other, it's mutually beneficial, they've both spoken about this

>>16228305
See what I mean?

>>16228305
>they're both using each other
similar to how both an escort and me use my dick to fuck

>>16228352
lel

>>16228310
they have dozens of active threads and yet they insist on shitting up everyone else's
this board is shit now

>>16227100
Is 1k qnt enough

>>16228390
>4chan accurately predicts the next big thing after BTC and ETH
>"this board is shit"

Every time you point your finger at someone, three fingers are pointing back at you.

>>16228273
Explain how, then.

>>16228408
I have link as well, the difference is I don't go into the threads of coins I think are shit and post about Link
>>16228391
Yes

>>16228529
Doesn't change what I said here: >>16228408

The only thing ever shit about this whole situation is the Link fud; including from Quantlets.

>>16228529
>I dont want discussion about my pet project because it fails scrutiny and I dont like it

It would be good have an explanation of the token use case.

>>16228588
NOONE IS FUCKING FUDDING LINK
LINK IS GOOD
LINK AND QUANT ARE FRIENDS
QUANT IS CURRENTLY THE BETTER INVESTMENT

FUCK OFFFFF RETARDED TRIBALIST LINKIE CUNTSSSSSSSS

>>16228677
it's used to access Overledger, the operating system
this is from the post Chainlink made about it:
"Finally, the project Quant has proposed what they refer to as a Blockchain Operating System, which is a patented protocol that runs over the top of blockchains to enable cross-chain messaging and atomic swaps. It acts as a sandbox environment where users can write smart contracts in one language that can then be deployed across many blockchains at the same time (called MAPPs). This limits vendor lock-in, as contracts can be quickly adjusted to work on different platforms without needing to rewrite the entire contract (Treaty Contracts)."
>>16228688
this desu

>>16228688
>NOONE IS FUCKING FUDDING LINK
aw man, remember those constant threads about Quant being "at Sibos" (really at Oracle's booth) but not Link?

>>16228677
its a licence

for gilbert to print money from telegram members

it doesnt really need a token but its for licencing or some shit. Taking permissioned chains like corda with no token and adding one on for interoperability

>>16228710
So a few threads made by the same autist are enough for you to get angry enough about Quant that you shitpost in a quant thread?

>>16228711
Who gives a fuck if it "didn't really need a token".
It has a token, and it's going to make me rich as fuck. Now fuck off with your brainlet tier fud.

>>16228729
Who's angry?
Just know your place.

>>16228770
>Who's angry?
you make up 1/4th of the replies in a thread about a coin that you don't even care about

>>16228785
I think you're projecting that anger, son.

>>16228762
20 cents to $14

it should have already anon

>>16228808
Implying everyone can buy the bottom and sell the top
Even IF I bought at 20c I still wouldn't have sold.
I started buying at 60c and haven't sold a single one. If you think Quant is done you're retarded.