[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance


View post   

File: 371 KB, 1280x720, 19B3FABB-12C3-4599-8C5B-FA9BB800700B.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16226034 No.16226034 [Reply] [Original]

FIVE months after Craig Steven Wright, an Australian computer scientist and businessman, was outed against his will as Satoshi Nakamoto, he says he is indeed the creator of bitcoin. On May 2nd he published a blog post offering cryptographic proof, backed up by other information, to make his case. Along with two other media organisations, The Economist had access to Mr Wright before the publication of his post. Our conclusion is that he could well be Mr Nakamoto, but that nagging questions remain. In fact, it may never be possible to prove beyond reasonable doubt who really created bitcoin. Whether people, particularly bitcoin cognoscenti, actually believe Mr Wright will depend greatly on what he does next, after going public.

http://www.economist.com/news/business-and-finance/21698060-craig-wright

>> No.16226059

>>16226034
O’hagan said in his books that all those early proofs were faked

>> No.16226069
File: 186 KB, 900x705, sorry_creg.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16226069

>>16226034
there is no-one believes this fat fraud

>> No.16226071

>>16226059
>O’hagan said in his books that all those early proofs were faked
Nope he did not. If you are going to claim that you need to back it up with sources. Protip: You can't

>> No.16226077

>>16226034
>outed against his will
AAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAH LOL

>> No.16226081

>>16226071
No the fat fraud needs to STFU and prove his bullshit. that, or STFU and fuck off. As he can't prove jack, I suggest the latter, finally.
enjoy jail cunt
that is all

>> No.16226082

The Tulip Trust is fake. Hence the rest is fake.

>> No.16226086
File: 432 KB, 1368x398, tale-of-two-satoshis.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16226086

>>16226034
there is only one way we recognize satoshi
and here is step 0:

-----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32)
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=3FTe
-----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----

>> No.16226218

>>16226069
Craig the queer BTFO

>> No.16226225

>>16226071
Yeah he said Craig faked them because of the “tulip trust” and that his financial backer was pissed

>> No.16226267

>>16226225
Still no source? I'm starting to think you are just making things up

>> No.16226277

>>16226034
Rajesh pls refute

https://bitcoinmagazine.com/articles/op-ed-how-many-wrongs-make-wright

>> No.16226285

>>16226277
>Rajesh pls refute
dyor

>> No.16226386

>>16226285
Years later, according to “The Satoshi Affair,” Wright said of his time in the military:

“‘They locked me in a bunker … and I worked on a bombing system. Smart bombs. We needed fast code, and I did that.’”

I found Wright’s claims about his military service intriguing, mainly because military service creates a lot of public records. So I strolled on over to the National Archives of Australia to see what information it would release to me. It took several months of painful bureaucratic back and forth, but I managed to retrieve 82 out of the 177 pages of documents on file for Wright. They are available here.

https://recordsearch.naa.gov.au/scripts/AutoSearch.asp?Number=14078466&O=I

What do Wright’s public military records show?

He was in the Australian Air Force Cadets at age 15 in 1986.
He applied to the Australian Defence Force Academy to train as a pilot in 1987 but was rejected. Oddly enough, the psychologist’s report filed with this application is blank. It is possible that the completed one was withheld.
He was a student at the University of Queensland from 1988 to 1989.
He applied to the Royal Australian Air Force in 1989 and was accepted to a nine-year officer program with a sponsorship to the RAAF undergraduate program to study electrical engineering. The sponsorship offer noted that “should you fail to progress academically for whatever reason … you may be required to apply to repeat the year at your own expense.”

>> No.16226396

>>16226386
He started his first semester in 1990 as an Officer Cadet.
He passed one class, “Law of War,” in the first semester.
Oddly enough, there is no mention of any engineering or math classes, but perhaps these records were withheld.
A (hard to read) handwritten letter released by the archives appears to state that “Officer Cadets Bone and Wright were asked to show cause why they should be provided with continued RAAF sponsorship as they had failed semester 1/90.”
Wright did send a letter regarding his undergraduate sponsorship standing later that year, but it was withheld by the archives.
He went on SLWOP (special leave without pay) on March 15, 1990.
He was discharged October 19, 1990, for “Reason 4.” (I’ve not been able to verify what “Reason 4” means.)

It’s interesting, to say the least, that this man who claims to be a lifelong academic with more than a dozen degrees appears to have failed out of his first semester in the RAAF, according to these public records.

Is it likely that he was given the responsibility to write code for bomb guidance systems as a first-semester cadet? Did he leave the military due to a “conflict of interest”?

>> No.16226461
File: 53 KB, 1024x683, 1573514171453.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16226461

>>16226086

>> No.16226488

>>16226396
lol

>> No.16226495

>>16226461
if that's all you got then sv cucks are eternally btfo

>> No.16226629

>>16226267
Go ahead read O’hagan’s book retard. You can find it through a simple google search

>> No.16226634

>>16226386
>It took several months of painful bureaucratic back and forth,
Greg sir, it’s time. Your medicine awaits

>> No.16226657

>>16226034
Craig Wright is a fraud and a well known pedophile

>> No.16226664

>>16226657
>Craig Wright is a fraud and a well known pedophile
Unironically reported to csw

>> No.16227371

>>16226386
>>16226396
Imagine spamming all this and thinking anyone will read it. I you want to convince people that Craig is not Satoshi you need to do much much better

>> No.16227386

>>16227371
t. low IQ

>> No.16227397

>>16226034
>Guys look, chainlink pumped hard and it was shilled on /biz/, let's do the same thing
Except we know that CSW is a fraud & BSV along with him - even CZ knows it.