[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance

View post   
File: 89 KB, 1024x768, uk skanks.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1618299 No.1618299 [Reply] [Original]

Have to write a dissertation for school and of course they expect me to write only bad things about Brexit (and there mostly are bad things, economically, it seems) the kike school it is.

However, what are some positive things. Did it actually CREATE any jobs? Not only for UK but any EU country. Did it help certain companies or branch?

Help.

>> No.1618302
File: 68 KB, 1024x759, schwestechen-952-whrr.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1618302

Oh, and source would be nice.

>> No.1618325

>>1618299

It's been 5 months and Article 50 hasn't been involved yet. No knows yet, still. Unemployment is at its lowest in 11 years though.

>> No.1618513

>>1618325
What's Article 50?

I just wonder if there is any branche that already actually benefitted from Brexit.

>> No.1618562

https :// www.ft.com /content/cb0e61fc-8a0f-11e6-8aa5-f79f5696c731

>> No.1618563
File: 1.89 MB, 236x224, 1415333795481.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1618563

>>1618513
Article 50 is Brexit. It hasn't happened yet, the UK is still in the EU.

Article 50 is an action the UK government can take to begin the process to leave the EU, it takes 1-2 years to fully enact once they start. You won't actually see the first day of Brexit until 2018 at the earliest.

>> No.1618572

>>1618325
but job growth is tremendously down too

>> No.1619182

>>1618299
UK is paying more money than thay get from eu

deregulations are good to some point

>> No.1619283

The pound's been devalued so you'll make more from sales abroad.

>> No.1619326

>>1618299
businesses that provide products and services to low income people will boom

>> No.1619342

>>1619326
Why haven't they already bloomed? It's been a while since brexit.

>> No.1619348

brexit was the worst fucking idea ever

>> No.1619353

>>1619342
because it hasn't happened yet

>> No.1619379

>>1619342
They only voted on it

>> No.1619686

>>1619283
only flaw in this logic is that england barely has the resources to "make" things; and needs to import stuff to produce, to sell abroad.

Examples. I read unilever is having a row with UK based comps on delivery of marmite, since its costing the uk more. Another example is tobolorone or however you spell it; the swiss chocolate, has been reduced in weight to be able to sell for the same price in UK, since the materials got more expensive.

If you can find me any goods; fish and chips? topkek, that brits can sell "cheap now" go ahead and start that bizzz. But imo brits cucked themselves with brexit harder than any politician is daring to admit atm, out of fear of "political suicide". I might be wrong, but haven't really seen much evidence yet.

>> No.1619711

It stemmed the flow of welfare sucking leeches and terrorists

>> No.1619720
File: 491 KB, 2560x1600, 1465754474001.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1619720

>>1618299
>positive things
Real estate gets cheaper and more affordable for normal people.
Local manufacturing becomes more competitive. Fewer immigrants that alienate the indigenous population.
Once again a true sovereign nation.

>> No.1619722

>>1618299
ACTUAL ANSWER
I am too lazy to find some sources but go check the fishing industries of UK, i.e. the net export rates, the history and the current and past policies. This should be sufficient for your essay

>> No.1619732

>>1618299
It helped to preserve the British Ethnicity from shit immigration. This is good economically because immigrants are shit unless they are white Euros.
>inb4 muh paki doctah
nah fuck you

>> No.1619750
File: 60 KB, 498x668, 1418861046060.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1619750

>>1619732
but Indians and Pakis don't come from the EU