/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>16171618
Bro I'm just hoping we see triple digits in 2 years. Do you guys think thats possible?

>>16171635
Man it totally depends on whether the network becomes usable! That’s the awesome thing about Chainlink.

It’s not like BTC, where value is up for interpretation. It’s either the network works, which means it’s done, the derivatives market WILL be captured, or the network grows too slowly, and derivatives is still an option but not within two years.

Again, comes down to whether we have enough node operators. That’s the network effect.

Seems comfy to me though. Either works or doesn’t, no in between. Just waiting for more operators... we need thousands minimum.

>>16171618
>short term sanity
if you are same you will end up selling early. the only way to make it is to become insane up until link breaks 1000$. then everyone will call you a genius. for now however, pee pee poo poo

> mandatory penis inspection
" Gotta know your customer"

>>16171618
>but we won’t get past that unless we have 10k+ node operators.

No need for that many, 500+ nodes are enough for most of the transaction types and their traffic at this point, and that can (and will) be achieved just with Chainlink enthusiasts, even those wouldn't be profitable at the beginning.

If traffic grows and nodes are profitable, more nodes will be created, it's organic growth which will come automatically.

Remember, Sergey has a lot of supply to compensate network participants, growth can be created really fast in case needed.

>>16171718
500 nodes seems awfully little for managing trillions in settlements, let alone billions. I wouldn’t trust that and I’m a Sergey cock guzzler, no homo of course

>sergey is KYCing them

I'm not a chainlink holder and haven't read enough about this altcoin, but what do you mean by this?

Is this coin centralized? The developer can approve and disapprove nodes? If so, isn't it a problem in a long term?

>>16171618
Shouldn't they focus on streamlining and simplifying how to set up a node then?

>>16171618
>And unfortunately, Sergey is KYCing them daily, which means slow slow slow growth.
for now he needs to KYC the first set of node operators
he outlines why in this post

>>16171618
>>16171718
>>16171751
>12 months test net
>4 months main net
>nobody can name a single dapp with users using Chainlink oracles in production
>(with proof link to dapp.com/dappradar/etherscan)
>Linkers: this is bullish!
>>16171819
Correct, it's a centralized vaporware coin
>>16171866
Sergey's blogpost is a lie. Their design is not sybil resistant, it will literally always need KYC until they actually write the code that makes it sybil resistant, which will never happen because they are scammers and haven't released the specs for it 3 years and $50mil in funding later.

>>16172040
kinda nice knowing that the only chainlink fudder these days is just one guy spamming the same pasta in every thread. highly bullish

>>16172077
ikr lmao boards so ded even the trannies dont wanna spam fud

>>16172077
>>16172094
the most bearish thing is that not a single linker can refute any argument successfully, proving that every single one of my points are accurate. There's literally 50 of you retards getting BTFOed daily sperging insults cause you're unable to disprove no one is using Chainlink in production.

>>16171618
Thanks for the update thomas, did you worked out your chest to stop having man titties?

>>16172189
You aren't arguing retard you are posting blatant misinformation.

>>16171618
So are you gonna link directions to run our own nodes or what are you actually doing here...

>>16172247
:)

>>16172189
>not a single linker can refute any argument successfully
>>16172040
>which will never happen because they are scammers
>>16172040
>centralized vaporware coin
(((arguments)))

>>16171618
There's a blog post from a year ago where Chainlink said they had 19k people want to become node operators. now the demand is even higher so 1k eoy was actually fud

>>16173159
Exactly. The problem is vetting each one for the network inception.

>>16172040
>>16172189
same talking points as Joey Krug
stfu Joey
>pic related

https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1150089167151386624.html

https://twitter.com/joeykrug/status/1150089167151386624?lang=en

imagine if Sergey was as desperate as liddle Joey here and resorted to having to FUD his competition

>>16171618
I like OP's pic
>the numbers Mason!
>what do they mean!?

>>16174123
bruh...

>>16171657
How do I operate innalinks?

>>16172040
>Sergey's blogpost is a lie
liddle Joey Krug is upset>>16173890