/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>16160981
To those of you that hold both, what's your plan? Wait for another pump in link then go all in bsv or just hold both long term? ratio?

CRAIG WRIGHT opened the floodgates for immutable
CHILD PORNOGRAPHY to be stored on the Bitcoin fork called
BSV

>>16160981
Thanks for the video buddy. Watching now. I think Chainlink is done but thats just my opinion.

>>16160981
Wasn’t he claiming he was going to sue Sergey for copyright infringement? A follow is not an endorsement.

>>16161104
He was obviously deflecting because he doesn't want his following to buy it instead.
He goes into detail in that video on how BSV will require oracle networks for many tasks.

>>16160981
>>16161022
>>16161104
>>16161246
he followed him for sec and fca submissions
bsv doesn't fucking need link, data onchain -> already decentralized and stinky meme not needed AT ALL

>>16161286
>he followed him for sec and fca submissions
He is only following a total of 119 people, and none of the rest of them he dislikes. Why would he single out Sergey in this way?
>data onchain -> already decentralized
He discusses scenarios where using a oracle network is preferable in that video, go watch it.

Link will be on BSV

BSV has no smart contracts capabilities, it's technologically inferior. It wants to emulate them with primitive boomer techniques like having a separate company to process and validate them.

>>16161022
Never selling.
>>16161503
>BSV has no smart contracts capabilities,
Bitcoin can do smart contracts, and it's turing complete.
>it's technologically inferior.
mETH heads will never have a scalable blockchain.
>It wants to emulate them with primitive boomer techniques like having a separate company to process and validate them.
No
Shoo shoo pesky Blockstream Jew.

>>16161751
You have literally zero technical understanding of the words you're shitting out.

>>16161799
Nice projection dumb kike, you're clueless if you think Bitcoin can't do smart contracts, even BTC can. This is common knowledge.
Turing completeness proof:
https://medium.com/@craig_10243/a-proof-of-turing-completeness-in-bitcoin-script-3cf5aa7aeb83
ETH was brought to it's knees by CryptoKitties, ETH2.0 launch will be a complete failure as well.
How much does Blockstream pay you to shill?

link doesn't associate with projects faciliating with free distribution of child pornography (bsv)

>>16161333
these lads and a few others are gonna make bsv the king
>https://tokenized.com/docs/intro/preface

>>16161858
>the shill of a kike-friendly coin calls someone a kike

You are literally retarded and have no idea what Turing completeness means (you can't explain it in your own words). CSW is not even an authority on the subject because he plagiarizes his papers: https://medium.com/@samwill102244/anatomy-of-a-fraud-a-deep-dive-into-one-of-craig-wrights-plagiarized-papers-96bc8624fc12

I actually studied the tech behind BSV, it's mostly garbage. The way they want to implement smart contracts is a joke. There will literally be a company server reading and writing data to the blockchain to update the smart contract status. This is a boomer-tier scam.

KYS. Moneybutton will go KYC soon, btw, prepare your anus.

>>16161949
>You are literally retarded and have no idea what Turing completeness means
Why can't you prove that BSV isn't Turing complete? Why do you resort to only non-arguments? Is it because you're a paid Blockstream shill trying to peddle disinfo?
>The way they want to implement smart contracts
So BSV can do smart contracts now?
>is a joke
Despite it being the only scalable developed smart contracts platform in existence?
>There will literally be a company server reading and writing data to the blockchain to update the smart contract status.
That's a complete lie. BSV will only use oracles if the smart contract requires real world data, just like every single other smart contracts platform, including Ethereum.
It's past your bedtime, Greg.

>>16161949
>links to samwill medium
>samwill
>maxwell
cohincidence?
HI GREG
>greg didn't get a personal key signing with satoshi
BWAHAHA

BSV has the Metanet, nothing else compares to that

>>16162032
>the BSV schlomo conveniently ignores any arguments and goes on to pouring chutzpah

BSV is not a smart contracts platform. The Tulip trust doesn't exit. CSW is a dishonest scammer. You're not tricking anyone.

Cope.

>>16161924
Tokenized is a scam. Imagine using blockchain technology only to rely on a third-party company server to validate your transactions. Just imagine. It works literally like this: you leave a shitpost on the blockchain, "I want to move this token". The settlement node must leave another shitpost, "I allow you to move this token". What happens when Craig and Calvin get arrested for connections to money laundering, and the server goes down? Your tokens get stuck in a limbo. This is not blockchain tech.

Eth ico scam platform will be closed first. Eth has 0 patents nchain will destroy them in 2020.

>>16162093
>BSV is not a smart contracts platform.
Wrong, no matter how much you want it to be otherwise in your neurotic kike mind Greg, BSV can do smart contracts, BTC can too since 2009 but it's crippled by Blockstream kikes forcing 1 MB blocks to persist and by disabling op codes.
The Tulip trust doesn't exit. CSW is a dishonest scammer.
You're going to tie a rope around your neck next year when BTC dumps to $0 faggot.
>You're not tricking anyone.
I've provided proof for my arguments, you've provided only deflections and lies.

>>16162108
retard

>>16162093
>BSV is not a smart contracts platform.
Wrong, no matter how much you want it to be otherwise in your neurotic kike mind Greg, BSV can do smart contracts, BTC can too since 2009 but it's crippled by Blockstream kikes forcing 1 MB blocks to persist and by disabling op codes.
>The Tulip trust doesn't exit. CSW is a dishonest scammer.
You're going to tie a rope around your neck next year when BTC dumps to $0 faggot.
>You're not tricking anyone.
I've provided proof for my arguments, you've provided only deflections and lies.

>>16162174
>BSV can do smart contracts
It can do them in the same way as pastebin.com can do smart contracts. This is NOT BLOCKCHAIN TECH. >>16162108

Fuck off with your lame script, trannie.

>>16162204
>It can do them in the same way as pastebin.com can do smart contracts.
Wrong, DYOR rather than spewing talking points. Bitcoin can do multisig, lottery systems, escrow, payment channels, etc., as it's turing complete. Read the actual paper.
>muh tokenized is centralized
Not required to use BSV, you're low IQ. That's like arguing all crypto is centralized because centralized exchanges exist.
You're getting a bit upset I think Greg, remember to take your meds.

>>16162261
>let me keep on saying "turing complete" without even a minuscule understanding what it means and appeal to the authority of CSW who has been exposed for plagiarism and technobabble and has zero authority on the subject
Have you ever seen the actual prototypes for smart contracts on BSV, brainlet? All of them rely on third-party company servers doing the work, like I described. Pure pajeetery.

>>16162343
I already gave you examples where that wasn't the case.
What you're arguing is that because some companies want to build centralized systems on BSV, that means BSV is centralized, which is retarded.
Everyone is going to be building on BSV in the future, whether you like it or not Greg.
There are centralized projects with tokens on (non-scalable) Ethereum too, does that make Ethereum centralized?

>>16162387
Holy shit, learn what turing completeness actually means and stop embarrassing yourself

>>16160981
>Centralised JSON parser with no indication of actually being able to solve decentralised oracles.
>Centralised bitcoin shitcoin fork pushed by a known fraud who isn't even technical enough to remove metadata from word docs
Imagine being so deluded as to thinking that this is some kind of winning combination. It's almost as if they enjoy losing money!

>>16162442
Read the actual paper, Craig Wright gives some pretty reasonable and rational arguments as to why it is in fact Turing complete, you're only stating otherwise because you're probably a paid shill who hasn't read it.
Once you've read it, maybe you could make a real argument as to why he's wrong, but I doubt you will because you'll realise how much of a brainlet you are for originally attempting to argue otherwise.
By the way, aside from his nuanced and factual arguments, CSW is definitely an authority on the subject too, since he is in fact Satoshi, and all you can do is cry about it.

>>16160981
Fuck man cute anime girls can make me buy anything

>>16162486
>I have no idea what all these terms I'm saying mean and can't present a single technical argument, but let me refer to this alcoholic and habitual liar who has definitely NOT been exposed for plagiarism and pseudoscience

>>16161949
>>16162093
>>16162108
>>16162204
>>16162343
>>16162442
lmao this is just sad. You guys need to get a better script.
If the paid shills are this desperate we have to be close to the end of this pathetic suppression. Unironically 2500 eoy, and even that's conservative. 20x is nothing

>>16162549
>>I have no idea what all these terms I'm saying mean
You didn't even know what a smart contract was you mongoloid, everyone actively involved with crypto knows that Bitcoin can do smart contracts, and I gave some well known proven examples.
>>and can't present a single technical argument,
The paper is filled with nothing but technical arguments, that's why I linked it. If you actually read it and can soundly argue against any of his points, go ahead. Though Nick Szabo already tried and got BTFO'ed.
>alcoholic and habitual liar
Everyone in the upper echelons of crypto already knows that CSW is Satoshi, that's why they dedicate so much effort towards spreading disinfo and hiring paid shills like you to keep their kike grasp over his project.
He's given proof on numerous occasions that he's Satoshi, you just can't admit it's true for the sake of your mental health, Greg.
Tulip Trust 2020
Black swan event.
BTC straight to $0
Then you'll understand.

>>16162731
>I completely don't understand what "turing complete smart contracts" mean due to my own dumbness and incompetence but I still expect others to debate me! Oh, I also believe in the Tulip trust and Craig is Satoshi, look at my high IQ!

>>16162822
>NOOOOOOOO
>HE CAN'T BE SATOSHI.
>MR. HODLONAUT SAID ON THE HODL CONFERENCE THAT HE IS A FRAUD
>
>AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
>STOP SAYING CREG IS SATOSHI
>THEY HAVE PROVED ON TWITTER THAT HE IS NOT
>
>AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
>OOOOOOOOOOOOHHHHHHHHh
>BSV CAN'T DO SMART CONTRACTS NO WAIT IT CAN BUT
>READING IS TOO HARD
>NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
>STOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOPPPPP

>>16160981
Awesome doujin, OP.

>>16162343
>>16162442
>>16162549
>>16162822
I remember when Blockstream shills would at least attempt to make a coherent argument. Now they are just 70 IQ ad hom cope posting.

Many such cases. Sad!

Are you telling me you seriously consider bsv to be at the same line with link? Holy shit you must be fucking retarded.

>>16163480
I know right. Link is an obvious vaporware scam, while BitcoinSV is the future global financial system and the catalyst for the 4th industrial revolution. Not even comparable!

>>16160981
did you just wake up from a coma?
craig was banned from twitter

>>16161858
>Turing completeness proof:
>https://medium.com/@craig_10243/a-proof-of-turing-completeness-in-bitcoin-script-3cf5aa7aeb83
the 'proof' would be actually doing computation on it, not writing a blog post about it

>>16162261
Filthy corecuck how much did they pay you?

>>16163952
We will never forgive Jack for this act of treachery. Bring back Satoshi to twitter, he was an absolute gem.

>>16164552
Here's my favorite

>Seething stinky: I patented your mother Craig
>Creg: Sorry, the patent is expired

>>16163596
t. Craig Wright
Fuck off and take your poo to the loo

>>16164591
How can you not love this guy!? He had like 200 tweets per day lol

hahaha

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cKbPNFUHLYM

>>16165138
I just don't get people who still don't believe Craig is Satoshi. Maybe their pride is holding them back but in reality, nothing can change the fact that Craig is really Satoshi.

>>16165237
They are paid to deny and spread disinfo. They all know and admit to it in private.

>>16162565
Do BSV pajeets enjoy only 'pretending' to be retarded?

>>16161858
>>16162032
>>16162201
>>16162387
>>16162486
>>16162731

Some people cant be educated. Let them FOMO in at $10,000 a coin

>>16160981
yep link 1000 eoy